Edgware wrote: » Any time S F say that they are a left wing party they are lying. They just say that to get the vote of the great unwashed
hatrickpatrick wrote: » Do you believe that Sinn Fein were lying about pursuing left wing housing policies, so?
JMMCapital wrote: » Good riddance to SF! How could so many young people be so gullible to fall for there propaganda.
FrancieBrady wrote: » I have and always have responded to any question asked of me. If it is such an insignificant thread..like, why are you even bothered to be here? Absolutely unbelievable.
Mortelaro wrote: » Yup These type of threads enhance that flaw
[Deleted User] wrote: » Tbf your kinda pointing out the obvious flaw,with the whole website
Deleted User wrote: » Tbf your kinda pointing out the obvious flaw,with the whole website
Mortelaro wrote: » Pointless to the outside world Nobody else watching
Mortelaro wrote: » You and others Although its you mainly doing the nit picking Others are willing to respond Total 5 or 6 max Pointless to the outside world Nobody else watching
all about the mane wrote: » Jaysus that didn’t take long. The shinners sure are rattled!
FrancieBrady wrote: » What were you 'talking about'?
all about the mane wrote: » You do understand that poll means feck all?
FrancieBrady wrote: » Not sure where you are getting the data to support this. Last poll showed them holding their own and FG gaining 13 points with FF falling. Is this a feeling in your waters type of thing?
Mortelaro wrote: » I think it's an example of the type of thing I was talking about (Says me adding 5 more same person views to the thread)
all about the mane wrote: » The wheels have completely fallen off the SF wagon since their best ever election result. Hard to understand how they made such a monumental mess of things. The shinners in here have been frothing at the mouth since. By the way, how’s Mary Loo? she’s had a good 5 weeks in isolation now. Must be some sort of record!
Yurt! wrote: » Here's the rub: the wheels fell off the blue painted wagon after the election and their foghorn online faction were badly stung. When the covid crisis struck the caretaker gov asked for shoulder to the wheel, which is fair enough in a national emergency. Many on the blue cubscout faction took this as a signal that criticism and any form of dissent is unpatriotic, and asked people not politicise the crisis when all they've done is politicise it and used it as some sort of opportunity to paper over the litany of f*ck-ups that preceded the last few weeks. The Green Jersey might be a useful tool for a wounded incumbent from time to time, but it's not a magic wand.
markodaly wrote: » OK, So they are doing well, but you are still going to criticise them just cause. That comes across as a crank and malcontent.
FrancieBrady wrote: » but there are lapses and failures that I am going to debate and discuss and make no apology for so doing.
FrancieBrady wrote: » May I say, your sensitivity to criticism is way too high. I have stated several times (if you had taken the time before attacking to read the thread) that I think the government are doing well managing the crisis overall and a lot better than our neighbour (including NI) but there are lapses and failures that I am going to debate and discuss and make no apology for so doing.
jh79 wrote: » They shut stormont over RHI and the language act yet ran a mile from a solution that would of given NI transparency on their dealings with their special advisors.
markodaly wrote: » Sorry, I am not reading close to 3000 posts to try and catch up on the inane arguments. As I said, you level of expectations are way too high, you should be careful as we can see in NI, that the administration there are no better than in the South. Many would in fact state, that the Republic are showing them how its done.
FrancieBrady wrote: » All sorted out already on the thread with another poster Mark...try reading it.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Maybe. I think ultimately the responsibility falls to Martin to verify. We can only take politicians at their word until we know different. In truth we can only 'trust' that NPHET and the HSE are giving the correct figures. we can't actually and factually verify them.
FrancieBrady wrote: » I said that 5 parties support that 'code of conduct' and therefore I was happy it had concensus. If the 5 parties decided to support Allister's motion, that was ok with me too. What could be more democratic than that?