realdanbreen wrote: » Not in 1 week 2 weeks whatever, NOW! While most people are adhering to the health advice you cannot expect the gobshytes like those clowns packing beaches and parks to obey unless they are forced to. Shutdown NOW. Anyone that agrees stick your name below.
FVP3 wrote: » Source for confinement being part of the plan? Leo just said it wasn't, he was trying the Korean methodology - South Korea didn't even shut the schools.
DeanAustin wrote: » If my understanding is correct - you get this virus by spending 10-15 mins within two metres or so of someone who is infected. I went to the beach yesterday. Everyone on that beach, without fail, stayed at least two metres away from everyone else bar their immediate group (which were mainly their families). Yet, some posters seem to think this is dangerous. On the few occasions I have ventured out, social distancing has been observed pretty much without fail.Am I missing something?
FVP3 wrote: » Source for confinement being part of the plan? Leo just said it wasn't, he was trying the Korean methodology - South Korea didn't even shut the schools. The shut down of non essential services is already happening.
FVP3 wrote: » The emergency powers will allow them to shut pubs and other large gatherings. Full lockdown isn't enforceable so it isn't going to happen. If it does happen a lot of middle class people will be indoors eating their pasta, while their dogs grow fat, while the feral youth kick balls against the door. Parts of Dublin are not policable now.
physioman wrote: » There has been a massive overreaction to the beach/park situation. I went to the beach yesterday with kids and yes it was busy, car park was busy but the thing people aren't getting is that cars were coming and going at different times. On the beach nobody was within 3 metres of each other. It was a joy to see the happiness on people's faces and the quality family time people were having. It's common sense really. Wash your hands properly and frequently. Keep the physical distance.
STB. wrote: » Doom merchants! Get your head out of the sand. You obviously have no idea or refuse to acknowledge whats coming down the tracks. HERES your EXPERT advise - we are struggling right now to even keep up with the testing phase and we don't have a handle on our numbers."We have a simple message for all countries: TEST TEST TESTYou must test and isolateYou cannot fight a fire blindfolded and we cannot stop this pandemic if we do not know who is infected."WHO Director 16 March, 2020 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4i_95rKQa6M
smelly sock wrote: » A question. Do face masks stop you spreading the virus if you have it? I understand that they may not stop you contracting. If they stop the spread then why arent govt supplying them to households or why dont they legislate to enforce the wearing of them during thos crisis.
aido79 wrote: » I understand all of that but how long do you lockdown for? Until a vaccine or cure is found?
STB. wrote: » This is all nonsense. Confinement and shut down of non essential services is the next stage after social distancing. It is part of the flattening of the curve plan.
The government has emergency powers now at its disposal. Limited numbers will not play ball even when the gravity of whats facing us is explained. They can be policed.
CaoinDory wrote: » I think what that person means is there are no experts I'm this specific virus yet as it is so new.
Plumbthedepths wrote: » Well I'll put it this way , I will listen to the advice coming from the WHO and our own public health experts as opposed to doom merchants on Boards . They may not be experts on this particular virus but their expertise is based on studies of pervious pandemics and transmission of infection.
smelly sock wrote: » Oh. Ok. So the face masks are effective? If people where them then even during a "lockdown" they should be exempt?
Guy:Incognito wrote: » You know this isn't the first virus that can be transferred between humans, yes?
STB. wrote: » 1 infects 4 which then rises exponentially. We have 40,000 cases backlogged for the past week or so. Its the only solution. Otherwise it will run rampant and overwhelm our limited health system. And when that happens, the doctors have to decide who gets the ventilators and who does not. That means there will a age/suitability cut off point and people are morphined to death to ease the fact that they cannot breathe, in isolation, with no family members present. I hope that underlines the gravity.
aido79 wrote: » How long is a lockdown really practical for? I don't think it's the magic solution that a lot of people are hoping for. This all begun in Ireland and every other country with one case. If there is still one unknown infected person after the lockdown then the whole thing starts again. More testing and people following proper social distancing protocols would be a more effective strategy longterm in my opinion.
STB. wrote: » There are NO EXPERTS. .
The One Doctor wrote: » Posters think everything is dangerous. Boards is worse than WhatsApp for sowing worry. Shutdown Boards and WhatsApp and many problems would-be solved.
Plumbthedepths wrote: » To answer your question, there are not enough and the frontline staff need them more than some idiot that can't get the concept of social distancing.
CaoinDory wrote: » I agree. But what do we do with the people who are not doing it properly? That is my problem with it. For these people, who seem to think they are above everyone else, I think they would need to be forced into lockdown to make them realise. Alot of people are practising social distancing and if everyone would, the country could continue at a slower, but still functioning pace.
STB. wrote: » It is going to happen. Limited numbers will not play ball when the gravity is explained.
DeanAustin wrote: » If my understanding is correct - you get this virus by spending 10-15 mins within two metres or so of someone who is infected. I went to the beach yesterday. Everyone on that beach, without fail, stayed at least two metres away from everyone else bar their immediate group (which were mainly their families). Yet, some posters seem to think this is dangerous. On the few occasions I have ventured out, social distancing has been observed pretty much without fail. Am I missing something?
FVP3 wrote: » There would be no way of enforcing a lock down even if we wanted one. The police might try and ban or stop major public gatherings instead. Keeping everybody in their rooms wouldn't work long term and has no exit strategy. Politicians in the west are clear about their strategy, it is flattening the curve. Not killing the virus, or stopping it, like in Wuhan. They clearly don't think that is possible in the West. Although possible elsewhere, I don't think we could even police large gatherings here though, although that might be desirable. If a group of 20+ teenagers take over a beach then the police are not going to be able to do much. There are parts of Ireland where there is no If there was an official lockdown then the teen and other gatherings would still take place but a bored compliant population would be stuck in their rooms. Instead the best we can do, which wont work either, is to reduce groups to 2-5. Germany has just tried that.