tara73 wrote: » yes, and why is there only one still image available? there must be footage of what they did at the gate, when they arrived, did they talk to MIB, how they left. It's just: they were work colleagues-alright, no more questions from anybody. why not?
sugarman wrote: » Donal McIntyre / TV3 some how got hold of the full footage before the guards released it and showed in it their documentary.
tara73 wrote: » yes, and why is there only one still image available? there must be footage of what they did at the gate, when they arrived, did they talk to MIB, how they left. It's just: they were work colleagues-alright, no more questions from anybody. why not?? who released the footage anyway? the guards? media? unknown source? I have the feeling there's just one story shown to the public, this MIB, first at the pillar, than at the gate. If they are so sure the work colleagues have nothing to do with it, why showing just one eerie still pic with three people standing outside of the gate instead of just withholding that pic. It started all kind of unnecessary?) speculation (and still does for me).
Fiftyfilthy wrote: » I don’t wish to sound disrespectful but td’s father has said in the last 24hrs that any altercation with a gang is nonsense. They also don’t believe suicide either, so I wonder what they must think ?
sugarman wrote: » Any links or quotes to that?
KWAG2019 wrote: » Because the police ask the questions and determined 19 years ago the others should be eliminated from enquiries. It’s not the place of posters with no access to the full information to set aside police conclusions. These people are irrelevant to the TD disappearance.
Coconut12 wrote: » Street workers hadn’t ceased at that time in that area ! Google it
chicorytip wrote: » In the wake of the Geoghan Quinn 1994 legislation there was a major crackdown by Gardai forcing most girls off the streets. It certainly was a lot more difficult to find sex for sale on the street in it's aftermath. Anybody living in or who was familiar with the Upper Mount St.,Herbert St, Wilton Place, Warrington Place, Upper Pembroke St and Fitzwilliam Square areas during the mid to late nineteen eighties would affirm this, I am sure.
smelly sock wrote: » The more you would think about it the lads going back to the office full of gargle is strange. Not getting in and heading off again and remebering nothing about MIB. People here can argue that it was run of the mill stuff but have you ever gone back to your office at 3 4 or 5 AM full of beer?? Hiwmany here have done it.
smelly sock wrote: » The more you would think about it the lads going back to the office full of gargle is strange. Not getting in and heading off again and remebering nothing about MIB. People here can argue that it was run of the mill stuff but have you ever gone back to your office at 3 4 or 5 AM full of beer?? Hiwmany here have done it. Regardless of that we cant even be sure about the time line. Time stamps on CCTV could be wrong or inaccurate. Its a case full of possible explanations and mystery. AGS seem to believe ot was a chance run in with a criminal gang operating in the area.
Executioner511 wrote: » A chance run in with a crime gang???I doubt that what reason would they attack him and then dispose of his body we have already seen the so called strong credible evidence that he was buried in Lucan lead to nothing,probably some lowlife spinning yarns to get leniency.
smelly sock wrote: » Myself i would consider extremely unprofessional to go to my place of work intoxicated.
odyssey06 wrote: » Attitudes were a bit more relaxed back then plus it was the company party. Tipsy\merry ok... absolutely stocious no.
smelly sock wrote: » Ah i dont know. Again how many posters here hand on heart would have done or would do the same. Obviously nothing to do with TDs vanishing but strange all the same. Thats the thing about this case. All of the little snippets we know are so strange and conflicting. Maybe all missing persons cases are like that.
eviltwin wrote: » Was he intoxicated?
Fiftyfilthy wrote: » Disagree strongly. Plenty of them around up until a couple of years ago I’d say around 20 most nights Still some around to this day
Beechwoodspark wrote: » I also find it strange that the two work colleagues were literally standing beside MIB at the gate but as far as I know they’ve never given an account of the night and their memories of MIB - was anything said etc.
Flippyfloppy wrote: » It's seems cold case detectives on YouTube did an episode on Trevor only a couple of months ago. They seem to put a lot of credence into the bank target theory.
Dwarf.Shortage wrote: » FWIW I'd have walked that route 2-3 times a month for a year while living on Haddington Road in 2017 and I was propositioned once on Wilton Terrace half way between where it meets Leeson and Baggot. Said no but had a bit of a laugh with your one and she wasn't strung out or anything but rough head on her and fairly old to be on the game. So they're still about but are certainly a rarity. Weird that it was so rough years ago, very affluent area nowadays.
sugarman wrote: » You've had several people already say they do or have done it at some stage! Yet you and other posters still insist its strange behavior because you dont! I do it all the time working in an office thats open 24/7... whether I've been out drinking or just doing a bit of shopping and don't want to carry stuff around i'll drop into the office to drop off/pick up stuff all the time. I usually have bags of shopping / rucksacks, changes of clothes, jumpers and jackets, my laptop, umbrella etc.. at my desk in work and I might need or want to pop in to grab something at any time. If I was drinking in a pub 200m away from my office and it was pissing out / no taxi's id certainly pop in for an umbrella and hot drink.
Day Lewin wrote: » I recall hearing at the time that some of the staff who were working that day, changed into their party gear and left their day clothes at the office. Called by there to pick their stuff up on the way home. Regarding the mobile phone tracing - this was the year 2000. Mobile phones were by NO means so common as they are now: and a lot of them were prepay - you'd buy the little docket at a shop and key in the code for twenty quids worth - ah, memory! At 4 a.m. in a non-residential district, there really would not have been that many calls happening. Looking at the CCTV - the "girl" that passed the lamp post - could this have been the same person seen at the ATM earlier, when Trevor got some cash out? Tall and skinny, maybe with a woolly cap on but not much of an overcoat?
BDI wrote: » Wilton terrace is ground zero for prostitution. There to the bridge then back to the garage on the other side supposedly is where they walk up and down. Bad weather no punters desperate times snap judgements.