Unearthly wrote: » Game Changers will be available on Netflix October 16th
Unearthly wrote: » Interesting actually that I know 2 people who have gone vegan since watching this. They are very bro science/Bro Rogan so haven't got much between the ears but the vanity of vegan lads having muscles has won them over. Looks like it's working to win over men
Tar.Aldarion wrote: » turns out there are plantbased sources of B12 around!https://www.vegansbethechange.com/what-is-vegan/what-to-eat/plant-source-vitamin-b12/
the company’s water lentil crop containing the ingredient Lentein® plant protein
fat bloke wrote: » Could they not have called it something more bloody palatable than "duckweed"???!! :rolleyes: Snozzcumbers anyone?! :pac:
gozunda wrote: » Duckweed aka They've trademarked it already? Nice way to print money tbh. Have you ever seen duck weed? Not something I'd be scooping out of the local pond and getting sued for doing so when there are better non trademarked sources out there tbh ...
Tar.Aldarion wrote: » You can't trademark that haha, they are trademarking a processed product from it.
Ahead of the UK release, Veganuary spokesperson Toni Vernelli played down the significance of the fact that the meatless patty is prepared on the same broiler as meat products, suggesting that the Rebel Whopper is more designed for flexitarians.
rubadub wrote: » I see the BK vegan burger is not vegan as its cooked on the same plates as the regular ones.https://lovindublin.com/food-drink/burger-kings-plant-based-whopper-isnt-suitable-for-vegetarians-or-vegans Not just the UK, same notice on the Irish site.https://www.whopper.ie/
Tar.Aldarion wrote: » I would consider that not plantbased but vegan, since it doesn't harm any animals to have it cooked nearby meat I have no issue with it personally.
65535 wrote: » Thread in another area of boards called 'Vegan death cult'https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2058045320
davidjtaylor wrote: » GE2020. Vote right down the ballot paper, put your least favourite at the bottom (like to start from the bottom and go upwards towards "least worst").
ednwireland wrote: » do not do this (unless you want to) but if there are candidates you dont want your vote ever going to just leave them off, otherwise your vote could count for someone you dont want it to count for. Apologies - mods maybe a ge202 thread might be more appropriate
Individually, it is true, failing to vote right down through the list has only a marginal effect. But if this sin of omission is repeated on a widespread basis by fellow voters it can actually assist a candidate who you would prefer to see defeated by lowering the effective quota, and making it easier for him/her to reach it. As an election proceeds and the number of non-transferable votes accumulates, the number required to be elected – the effective quota – falls. In an election in which there is a strong non-transferable trend, this marginal trend can become very pronounced and results become very unpredictable.
loveisdivine wrote: » We only have 1 candidate here that voted in favour of the hunting ban. The rest all voted against the ban (and various other poor animal welfare views) so what should I do? I definitely don't want my support going to them.