System Upgrade Dear EV Drivers, To enable us to provide you with some enhanced functionality and a new app, we will be performing a system upgrade this coming Wednesday morning, October 2nd,
mickdw wrote: » I don't get what is deemed acceptable and what is not at public charge points. I commented on here before how a leaf always seemed to be charging at a local street charge point. The general response here was that it was ok for him to plug in for the day and feck off. Now it seems if I buy a 530e bmw, I'm the devil if I dare to plug it in to a public charger. There seems to be an odd under current of snobbery in the EV community not based on the badge but based entirely on how fast you can pull in power from the public charger. If people are going to be limited to 45 mins, does it matter how much power someone is taking on board in that time?
Mickeroo wrote: » An EV driver I know was giving out on Twitter saying the charges were to deter people from using the chargers so ESB wouldn't have to install anymore. I'm not making this up.
Deleted User wrote: » My OH is German and German address is no problem Might be worth checking out though I use the DC chargers so infrequently it would hardly be worth the effort.
Black_Knight wrote: » I can see their logic. Charge for charging, demand goes down on the current infrastructure, less pressure to add additional chargers. I'd hope ESB are going to use the post fees usage statistics to determine which sites still have high usage and add additional chargers there.
kanuseeme wrote: » A litre of petrol is €1.45 ATM, what will further increases in carbon tax make it?
unkel wrote: » About €3 in about 10 years time? Diesel about €5?
Nermal wrote: » Closer to a 22c per litre increase in petrol from what I can see. Assuming the €6 per ton increase per year for the next decade.
Mickeroo wrote: » That's fair but surely their goal is for the network to be profitable, I don't see how the current infrastructure would ever be profitable with the tiny fleet of EVs in the country at the moment.
charlieIRL wrote: » From my calculations, my EV will cost me €0.022 per km (night rate charging)
adunis wrote: » Sorry late to this party but C4 cactus 1.6hdi 4.5l/100km so .45*1.35?=6 cent km 1.0 Octavia 5.8l/100km so .58*1.45?=8 cent km Ioniq, 12.6kwh/100 so at home night rate is 12.6*8.8/100=.......One cent per km. Esb public rate costs not that I care one jot cos I only ever use them for long journeys once in the blue moon. 3.odd or 5.odd per km. Point to note above are long term average results for me personally in three super efficient examples of their kinds. I would also consider the 1.0 Octavia style hatchback The closest equivalent I could think of for an Ioniq volume,space,equipment wise all very similar. An Ioniq is 30k,Octavia is 26.5k with manual box 28k? Auto.
unkel wrote: » That sounds very high. eGolf average consumption about 15kWh/100km? Night rate about 8c/kWh incl VAT? That means 15 * 0.08 / 100 = €0.012 per km Saving over 130,000 km times (€0.084 - €0.012) is almost ten grand :eek:
Mupchease wrote: » Just for some more data for people I do a fair bit of Motorway driving but my egolf exec is averaging 16.78kWh/100km for the year to September. 25k on the clock. I’d say that will rise too coming into the winter. Best I got for a month was back in July at 15.5kWh / 100km.
Silent Running wrote: » Maybe another consideration needs to be factored in. I've never driven a 1 litre Octavia, but I can't imagine it beating many cars off the line. Probably the same for the Cactus. If you drove either hard, what would their consumption figures look like? The Ioniq can be driven hard without costing very much more, and it can leave most "premium" cars sitting at the traffic light drag strip. :P
Silent Running wrote: » The Ioniq can be driven hard without costing very much more, and it can leave most "premium" cars sitting at the traffic light drag strip. :P
unkel wrote: » You should have seen that BMW520d that I raced twice without him knowing that I was racing him. I pretended I didn't even know he was there. From the corner of my eye I spotted the horror and confusion on his face
unkel wrote: » Nope. I was way ahead from the lights, but he crept up on me and overtook me at about 80km/h. Twice. But I was holding off at that speed anyway as there are often checks and the road has 80km/h speed limit (N4 outbound a bit past Heuston) I'd say if there were 0-50km/h reference sites, they would back me up. Didn't I read somewhere that the original i3 (ohne REx ) is quicker to 50km/h than the E92 BMW M3?
DrPhilG wrote: » I spent a weekend in a BMW x1 diesel while my i3 was getting serviced. Horrendous. Nearly got killed at a roundabout because I didn't anticipate just how ridiculously slow off the line it was. I could never go back to ICE.
Mike9832 wrote: » An auto one?
unkel wrote: » Yep photos were uploaded a few days ago here. The first ever ESB charging site where more than one car can DC fast charge at a time. Hallelujah! (albeit at 2009 speeds, not 2019 speeds) Commercial companies (Tesla / Ionity) are installing 6 bay 350kW charging stations in Ireland. For free. Yet our government is using our tax payers money in a very inefficient way by installing inferior, outdated, unreliable (Portuguese EFACEC) and slow chargers (1 or 2 bay 50kW). We really should stop this and use our tax money in a more efficient way.
unkel wrote: » For some cars like all the Nissan Leafs, with their CHAdeMO charging, there would be no difference at all, still stuck at 43kW (2009). And they would not be able to charge at all at Tesla Superchargers or Ionity fast chargers as neither support that obsolete Japanese protocol.
jasonb wrote: » it’s still being installed in brand new cars, and therefore in my opinion chargers being installed should support it.