Gemma not taking enforced retirement too well

Kimsang wrote: »

People like you that infer I am a racist because ....reasons.

Do you believe Japanese people are racist?
Are you white? Because if so you are calling an asian in the above quotes a racist. Which by woke logic is racist. Everything is racist!!

Can you try to make sense? I know you dont understand racism but fúckin hell you are just vomiting out random buzzwords.

"Woke logic" and "woke" just seems like you trying to clutch at made up straws.....

Are you trying to ask biko questions?

Odhinn wrote: »

It would be nice if you could target and quote anyone posting here that's using or has used "woke logic" in such a manner.

I have been asking a fairly simple question for a few days now, the woke types are purposefully avoiding it.

Batgoat got the furthest by admitting s/he thought Japan was xenophobic(wouldn't go as far as racist though)

The rest of the woke brigade know they're narrative fails when considering a country such as Japan.

pjohnson wrote: »

Can you try to make sense? I know you dont understand racism but fúckin hell you are just vomiting out random buzzwords.

"Woke logic" and "woke" just seems like you trying to clutch at made up straws.....

Are you trying to ask biko questions?

Are you white?
Can a black person be a racist?
What is your definition of racism?

Odhinn

Kimsang wrote: »

,,,,,,,,,,,,,

The rest of the woke brigade know they're narrative fails when considering a country such as Japan.

What is their narrative exactly?

Kimsang wrote: »

I have been asking a fairly simple question for a few days now, the woke types are purposefully avoiding it.

Batgoat got the furthest by admitting s/he thought Japan was xenophobic(wouldn't go as far as racist though)

The rest of the woke brigade know they're narrative fails when considering a country such as Japan.

What woke brigade :pac:

Odhinn wrote: »

What is their narrative exactly?

That only white people can be racist.

Kimsang wrote: »

Are you white?
Can a black person be a racist?
What is your definition of racism?

Not relevant.
Yes.
prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race

pjohnson wrote: »

Not relevant.
Yes.
prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race

So why did you infer I was racist twice?

pjohnson wrote: »

Fair play on the consistency of racism denial. Real shame you cant be proud and admit what you believe but hey ho.

pjohnson wrote: »

So racists continue to insist nothing is ever racist. I dont get their phobia of the word but its amusing anyway. They try to cling onto some part of the modern "PC" world.

I met none of those standards that you just wrote.

Kimsang wrote: »

That only white people can be racist.

Then this "woke brigade" are idiots that dont understand racism.....

Are you Stephen and Recedite part of this "woke brigade"

pjohnson wrote: »

Then this "woke brigade" are idiots that dont understand racism.....

Like you that inferred twice I was racist? Where is your proof?

pjohnson wrote: »

Fair play on the consistency of racism denial. Real shame you cant be proud and admit what you believe but hey ho.

pjohnson wrote: »

So racists continue to insist nothing is ever racist. I dont get their phobia of the word but its amusing anyway. They try to cling onto some part of the modern "PC" world.

Odhinn

Kimsang wrote: »

That only white people can be racist.

If somebody has said same in this thread, or in another thread, please link it, because thus far I haven't seen anyone do so.

The whole 'only white people.....' remark was made with Afro-Americans in mind. Essentially it stated that insufficient black people were in such positions as could be used to discriminate against 'whites'. That is a flawed premise, given the fact there are now black Judges, senior police offers and even a president.

Kimsang wrote: »

Like you that inferred twice I was racist? Where is your proof?

In the thread. Probably around where I made those posts? Although I'm 90% sure the second of those wasnt quoting you you just got triggered by it on behalf of the wokies. But its been established for days you dont understand racism.

You fit right in on that woke brigade.

pjohnson wrote: »

In the thread. Probably around where I made those posts? Although I'm 90% sure the second of those wasnt quoting you you just got triggered by it on behalf of the wokies. But its been established for days you dont understand racism.

You fit right in on that woke brigade.

You have no proof and you're lying you're talking tripe. Where is your integrity? Show me proof and prove me wrong. You bandy around the word racist, and then when called out on it, 'it's in the thread' all the same with you woke types.

You guys also move the goalposts when it suits from the dictionary definition of racism to the sociological definition and vice versa.

Answer the question: Is japan racist or not?

Odhinn wrote: »

If somebody has said same in this thread, or in another thread, please link it, because thus far I haven't seen anyone do so.

The whole 'only white people.....' remark was made with Afro-Americans in mind. Essentially it stated that insufficient black people were in such positions as could be used to discriminate against 'whites'. That is a flawed premise, given the fact there are now black Judges, senior police offers and even a president.

No, the ones that believe it don't have the integrity to say it.(except batgoat) They will avoid the question, introduce strawmen/red herrings and move the goalposts. The same ones that flippantly label others as racists, misogynists and sexists, and when challenged refer back to 'woke' definition of racism, sexism and homophobia. This is done with the intent to shift the focus away from criticism, often onto some minor detail or tangent

The modern day crypto-fascist, famously described by Heinrich Böll

Kimsang wrote: »

No, the ones that believe it don't have the integrity to say it.(except batgoat) They will avoid the question, introduce strawmen/red herrings and move the goalposts. The same ones that flippantly label others as racists, misogynists and sexists, and when challenged refer back to 'woke' definition of racism, sexism and homophobia. This is done with the intent to shift the focus away from criticism, often onto some minor detail or tangent

The modern day crypto-fascist, famously described by Heinrich Böll

That's some mistake there mixing up William F. Buckley Jr. and Henrich Böll

[Deleted User]

Kimsang wrote: »

You have no proof and you're lying you're talking tripe. Where is your integrity? Show me proof and prove me wrong. You bandy around the word racist, and then when called out on it, 'it's in the thread' all the same with you woke types.

You guys also move the goalposts when it suits from the dictionary definition of racism to the sociological definition and vice versa.

Answer the question: Is japan racist or not?

Why can't you answer the question of where your going to emigrate to when Justin gets into power?

Also to answer your question racisim isn't purely something that is exclusive to white people, they just ****e on about their beliefs more.

Kimsang wrote: »

No, the ones that believe it don't have the integrity to say it.(except batgoat) They will avoid the question, introduce strawmen/red herrings and move the goalposts. The same ones that flippantly label others as racists, misogynists and sexists, and when challenged refer back to 'woke' definition of racism, sexism and homophobia. This is done with the intent to shift the focus away from criticism, often onto some minor detail or tangent

The modern day crypto-fascist, famously described by Heinrich Böll

Except when they answer you and you ignore it........amazing.

I answered your stupid "woke survey" yet you werent capable or comprehending it and asked more shíte.

pinkyeye

Kimsang wrote: »

Are you white?
Can a black person be a racist?
What is your definition of racism?

I'm white.

Yes a black person can be racist, what a silly question.

My definition of racism is a hatred or bias against an individual who belongs to a certain group of people purely based on the fact that they belong to that group with no other reason. It's fairly simple.

DubInMeath wrote: »

Why can't you answer the question of where your going to emigrate to when Justin gets into power?

Also to answer your question racisim isn't purely something that is exclusive to white people, they just ****e on about their beliefs more.

Because your question is loaded.
It assumes this guy Justin is going to get into power.
It assumes Justin wants to expel all non ethnic irish.

So I'm not sure if these two are true.
Could you in future ask less loaded questions like the ones I pose please? They are far more efficient at advancing a conversation, as they don't lead in the future to "Gotcha!" moments.

But let's suppose they are true. I would go to the UK or Thailand.

The Japanese people believe that anyone who is not ethnically Japanese cannot be considered Japanese, similar to most countries in the world that are not Western. You could move there and have generations of children, and they would not be considered Japanese.
If this were true, would it be enough for you to call the Japan racist?

Because that's the bar many seem to have set for Stephen.

pinkyeye wrote: »

My definition of racism is a hatred or bias against an individual who belongs to a certain group of people purely based on the fact that they belong to that group with no other reason. It's fairly simple.

Where is your integrity?
You thanked this post on 22-08-2019, 16:48

cookie1977 wrote: »

"Modern variants of racism are often based in social perceptions of biological differences between peoples. These views can take the form of social actions, practices or beliefs, or political systems in which different races are ranked as inherently superior or inferior to each other, based on presumed shared inheritable traits, abilities, or qualities."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism

When we were arguing what the definition of what a racist was.

Wheres this idea non Japanese born people cant become Japanese citizens?

The Japanese had a Brazilian born left back for years so it doesnt appear correct.

Kimsang wrote: »

When we were arguing what the definition of what a racist was.

I dont get it. What's the question/comment? You've thrown out so much "stuff" I'm getting lost.

cookie1977 wrote: »

That's some mistake there mixing up William F. Buckley Jr. and Henrich Böll

This post serves only as proof as to meaning of what crypto-fascism is.

This is done with the intent to shift the focus away from criticism, often onto some minor detail or tangent

Kimsang wrote: »

This post serves only as proof as to meaning of what crypto-fascism is.

Still lost.

cookie1977 wrote: »

Still lost.

I think kim is just arguing with the woke brigade in her mind. Vomiting all the buzzwords.

This is what happens when you OD on GemGem.

I will be clear. Try to keep up.

Odhinn and Pinkeye both liked a post created by cookie1977 posted on 22-08-2019, 16:48.

This post was arguing that a dislike of the ideology if Islam is akin to racism.

Here is the post

Now the mob of bullies are backtracking to the dictionary definition of racism again. It's all documented in this thread how many times the likes of pinkeye switch between definitions to suit their agenda.

pinkyeye wrote: »

So you admit that you hate people based purely on their religion??
The very definition of racist.

pinkyeye

Kimsang wrote: »

Where is your integrity?
You thanked this post on 22-08-2019, 16:48

When we were arguing what the definition of what a racist was.

You asked what MY definition was??

Now because I liked a previous post that has to be MY definition??

Seriously what are you on about?

And who monitors likes?