nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Liverpool FC Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours 2019/2020

Thanx 4 The Fish

And on we go, this is the thread that will probably see out the season.

Old one here

https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2057962637

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

[Deleted User]

giveitholly wrote: »

And lovern missed a lot of time from January onwards

Do people genuinely not understand that this benefits us ?

Would love to see him leave this summer as it takes away all worries, I have, that he’ll ever be on the pitch for us again.

the whole year inn

yourdeadwright wrote: »

OK how about I say Liverpool where one draw away from winning the league, which is a factually statement ,

Ps how many points do you get for a draw

Why are you going into the realm of make believe, sure you could change the results where City lost all there games while your at it.
The oringal postered stated Liverpool lost the league by one point but infact it was 2. Simple facts lads!

dogbert27

the whole year inn wrote: »

Why are you going into the realm of make believe, sure you could change the results where City lost all there games while your at it.
The oringal postered stated Liverpool lost the league by one point but infact it was 2. Simple facts lads!

Fixed my post for you.

Now to disengage..

200.webp?cid=790b76115cfe3acb53557765553a947f&rid=200.webp

yourdeadwright

the whole year inn wrote: »

Why are you going into the realm of make believe, sure you could change the results where City lost all there games while your at it.
The oringal postered stated Liverpool lost the league by one point but infact it was 2. Simple facts lads!

I'm only taking the p*ss

But it was still factually to say they where one draw from the title

citytillidie

the whole year inn wrote: »

Why are you going into the realm of make believe, sure you could change the results where City lost all there games while your at it.
The oringal postered stated Liverpool lost the league by one point but infact it was 2. Simple facts lads!

I could have swore Man City had 98 points and Liverpool 97 that is a one point difference unless my maths is bad

yourdeadwright

Deleted User wrote: »

Do people genuinely not understand that this benefits us ?

Would love to see him leave this summer as it takes away all worries, I have, that he’ll ever be on the pitch for us again.

Really ?

He's not half as bad as some like to make out ,

We lost one league game with him this season ,
Got to two Champions finals and he got to a world cup final in two season's, Seen as he is CB pretty important spot, he can't be that bad,

Also he is possibly our 4th choice CB now So could you name a better 4th choice CB in world football ?

giveitholly

the whole year inn wrote: »

Why are you going into the realm of make believe, sure you could change the results where City lost all there games while your at it.
The oringal postered stated Liverpool lost the league by one point but infact it was 2. Simple facts lads!

I must be going mad but I thought City finished on 98 points and Liverpool on 97 points. 98-97=1. Simple fact lad

the whole year inn

giveitholly wrote: »

I must be going mad but I thought City finished on 98 points and Liverpool on 97 points. 98-97=1. Simple fact lad

And who would have won the league if Liverpool got that extra point?

dogbert27

citytillidie wrote: »

I could have swore Man City had 98 points and Liverpool 97 that is a one point difference unless my maths is bad

To be a pedant, technically we were 2 points away from being champions but it depends where those 2 points came from.

If we turned a drawn game in to a victory against United or West Ham then we would have won the league by a point.

Or if we turned our draw against City in to a win we would have won the league by 2 points.

If we had beaten city for example we would have finished on 100 points and they on 95.

The point of the original post though didn't seem to get taken in to account and the "facts" had to be corrected.

Bringing the "facts" in to it though, the 08/09 season we suffered too many draws and you could say similar in 18/19. United won the league that season losing more games than us and City did this year.

yourdeadwright

the whole year inn wrote: »

And who would have won the league if Liverpool got that extra point?

Liverpool if they gained the extra point v City

gibgodsman

giveitholly wrote: »

I must be going mad but I thought City finished on 98 points and Liverpool on 97 points. 98-97=1. Simple fact lad

Give Liverpool 1 extra point, we still don't win the league, do you understand Goal Difference

yourdeadwright

gibgodsman wrote: »

Give Liverpool 1 extra point, we still don't win the league, do you understand Goal Difference

Again they do it that point was taking from the away game v City ,

the whole year inn

dogbert27 wrote: »

To be a pedant, technically we were 2 points away from being champions but it depends where those 2 points came from.

If we turned a drawn game in to a victory against United or West Ham then we would have won the league by a point.

Or if we turned our draw against City in to a win we would have won the league by 2 points.

If we had beaten city for example we would have finished on 100 points and they on 95.

The point of the original post though didn't seem to get taken in to account and the "facts" had to be corrected.

Bringing the "facts" in to it though, the 08/09 season we suffered too many draws and you could say similar in 18/19. United won the league that season losing more games than us and City did this year.

I dont think its pedant at all. When you look at the table Liverpool needed 2 points to win the league. To say one is wrong simple as that.

gibgodsman

yourdeadwright wrote: »

Again they do it that point was taking from the away game v City ,

You can't just decide the point comes from the only possible game in which it would have mattered, so Liverpool didn't lose the title by a point, the lost the title by not getting anything against City in the 2nd game, see the difference

giveitholly

gibgodsman wrote: »

Give Liverpool 1 extra point, we still don't win the league, do you understand Goal Difference

Understand it perfectly but if we got that extra point against City then goal difference doesn't come into it

the whole year inn

giveitholly wrote: »

Understand it perfectly but if we got that extra point against City then goal difference doesn't come into it

But as the table stands they lost by two, you could go into different scenarios where Liverpool would get the points from but as the table stands its 2 points.

BullBlackNova

Is this reminding anybody else of that Twitter exchange between two Arsenal fans about Jackson Martinez's age?

Turtyturd

BullBlackNova wrote: »

Is this reminding anybody else of that Twitter exchange between two Arsenal fans about Jackson Martinez's age?

How many minutes Mahrez has played?

BillyHasMates

Liverpool finished 1 point behind City. Liverpool would have needed 2 extra points to win the league. Both statements are true....

yourdeadwright

BillyHasMates wrote: »

Liverpool finished 1 point behind City. Liverpool would have needed 2 extra points to win the league. Both statements are true....

Correct but they could have also won it with one extra point if that was taken form a draw away to City ,

All correct everyone's a winner

yourdeadwright

gibgodsman wrote: »

You can't just decide the point comes from the only possible game in which it would have mattered, so Liverpool didn't lose the title by a point, the lost the title by not getting anything against City in the 2nd game, see the difference

I can , I decided our extra points comes form City away

PaddyWilliams

Oh sweet Jesus, the next season can't come quick enough.

Harry Palmr

Bring back 2 points for teh win, that's what I say!

anyway...some assists for you to drool over.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJIa3AUle_g

dogbert27

the whole year inn wrote: »

I dont think its pedant at all. When you look at the table Liverpool needed 2 points to win the league. To say one is wrong simple as that.

It is pedantic when you focus on this instead of the context of the post.

And you could have at least gone back and thanked the post after I fixed it for you! :pac:

Agent Coulson

BillyHasMates wrote: »

Liverpool finished 1 point behind City. Liverpool would have needed 2 extra points to win the league. Both statements are true....

Keep that logical up and you'll have no mates.

the whole year inn

dogbert27 wrote: »

It is pedantic when you focus on this instead of the context of the post.

And you could have at least gone back and thanked the post after I fixed it for you! :pac:

Thanks Pal!

It was the only issue I had with the post , now the post is spot on.

joe_99

1 point + 6 goals wins the league. We didn't need 2 extra points.

Harry Palmr

Didn't have the goals though.

jones

What do people think about signings this summer? I've seen a lot and listened to mates saying we don't really need new signings as Ox Keita etc will be like new signings for the upcoming season but i think that is BS. We need to kick on now and strengthen the squad. We were very lucky in a number of games this season in the league and we just do not have the squad that city have (maybe an impossible task i know) but we need to strengthen.

I'd love to get De ligt make a real statement but i'm not sure how realistic that is given the money being asked. We need a back up for Mane and also LB/RB understudies.

Peatys

BullBlackNova wrote: »

Is this reminding anybody else of that Twitter exchange between two Arsenal fans about Jackson Martinez's age?

even better, the whole 'one season is two years' craic from a few months ago.