Effects wrote: » The bridge is in a pretty bad state. I crossed over it early last year. Would it simply be easier to replace it rather than try and repair? As for the private land on the northside, is it possible to CPO a section so the path could continue up to Farmleigh?
Mercian Pro wrote: » Originally there was a tunnel linking the end of the bridge to Farmleigh but I presume it is no longer usable.
plodder wrote: » I hope it includes some investigation of the tunnel because the bridge goes over the lower road and straight into the tunnel as far as I can see.
Effects wrote: » You're not seeing it properly. There's a stone entrance at either end that's blocked off with steel plates. There's no tunnel that can be seen when you are at this entrance.Here's one image looking north from the bridge
plodder wrote: » Sorry, I just meant the tunnel must be there, not that you can enter it, or that it isn't blocked. The point being that I hope it could be unblocked without too much work. But, have you seen the other end of it? That would be very interesting. If so, where roughly is it?
cgcsb wrote: » By public transport, walking or cycling
Carawaystick wrote: » Lets say I and the smallies want to go cycling in the park. We get the train to Ashtown and they should just cycle along the ashtown road, around the roundabout at the halfway house and into the park? I presume your four year old is able to do this, but mine would not be able to do this safely. Also if a person wanted to walk a dog, no public transport will take them.
beauf wrote: » The solution is infrastructure that doesn't exist. Also make every journey 2 or 3 times longer. Not much of a sales pitch is it. The cycling infrastructure around D15 is very disjointed. Nothing connects to anything.
Effects wrote: » Sorry. I was talking about the bridge entrances. Looking back at photos now, the stone entry to the bridge is only on the north side. Behind it there's no sign at all of a tunnel.
buffalo wrote: » Surprised this wasn't posted already: http://phoenixpark.ie/visitor-experience-strategic-review/ Deadline for submissions is tomorrow at 6pm: Now's the time to ask about some pedestrian and cyclist crossings, priority for same at junctions, less through-traffic, making the Park available for cycle races more easily, etc. Or whatever you're having yourself.
Cycling is a big issue, as well as public transport and what we do with cars. If I was starting with a blank page, would I allow cars at all? But Chesterfield Avenue has evolved over decades as a commuter route and for many people it is a necessary way to get into and out of work,”
buffalo wrote: » Review now available at http://phoenixpark.ie/visitor-experience-strategic-review/
• Generally against the closure of Chesterfield Avenue and any reduction on car usage which would impact commuters in particular • Support sustainable transport proposals including public transport, electric shuttles, or improved access to train line or extension of Luas line. • Welcome the improvement of pedestrian and cyclist facilities generally (surface, additional paths, crossings, increased management for safety, additional Dublin bike stations and rental locations) • Support the reduction of the Park as vehicular route (slowing down, partial closure of access, increased traffic management, enforcement of speeds) • Against any additional parking (e.g. Bloom permanent car park)
buffalo wrote: » Love this summary:
bazermc wrote: » Some amount of inconsiderate car parking in Phoenix park this morning. Cars parked in the on road cycling lane on Chesterfield avenue. OPW was out dealing with it but not sure what exactly they can do if anything.
From another cycling forum: If anyone is training in the Phoenix Park, just a warning that one of the Lucan Cycling Club fellas had his bike taken off him at knife point near magazine fort in broad daylight. The rangers caught the thief and got the bike back but still worrying.
Changes coming for the Phoenix Park
Looking forward to hearing the usual anti cycling brigade on Pat Kenny in the morning so.
Instead of discussing the merits pro and cons of the plans, it will no doubt turn into a moan fest about cyclists and why oh why are they not all squeaky clean like their fellow car drivers.
30kph limit proposed also. Assume that doesn't apply to bikes!
Of course it does. How could it not?
I'm open to correction here, but my understanding is that speed limits do not apply to bicycles on any other road, so not sure why they would here.
Speed limits apply to mechanically propelled vehicles, bikes not falling under this category. Neither are they obliged to have speedometers, so not sure how cyclists would monitor this speed
1) The Minister may make regulations prescribing a speed limit (“ordinary speed limit”) in respect of all public roads, or all public roads with such exceptions as may be specified in the regulations, for any class of mechanically propelled vehicle
11.—The following section is substituted for section 47 of the Principal Act:
“47.—(1) A person shall not drive a mechanically propelled vehicle at a speed exceeding the speed limit
*Edited to add relevant legislation*
Cause we don’t pay road tax 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣