Samuel T. Cogley wrote: » In fairness if 120 people who went through our education system contracted HIV then yes, yes it is.
Wibbs wrote: » To be fair Sam, it's an absolutely tiny percentage of people who have gone through the Irish education system. It can always be improved of course.
Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: » In the 80’s gay Byrne actually demonstrated how to use condoms for this very reason - safe sex. That actually worked, sex education did in fact reduce the spread of the disease. Not sure why it has risen since. Do you have ideas?
dav3 wrote: » Yes.https://www.hivireland.ie/hiv/prevention/There are many ways to reduce the risks: Practice safer sex – use condoms consistently when having vaginal, anal and oral sex. Check out our guide to using condoms. Try to avoid contact with body fluids such as semen during sexual contact, and don’t share fingers, hands or sex toys. Remember that some sexual practices which may be described as ‘safer’ in terms of HIV transmission might still be risky for transmission of other STIs like syphilis or Hepatitis A. Get tested regularly. Keep in mind that it is possible to have an STI and show no signs or symptoms. Testing is available free of charge in many public hospitals. Vaccinations are available for Hepatitis A and B free of charge from your STI/GUM clinic. There is a post-exposure treatment available for HIV and Hepatitis B. Details of this are in the section on PEP. If using drugs, do not share any drug using paraphernalia. Educate yourself, know the risks, and take responsibility for your sexual health.
Wibbs wrote: » "and don’t share fingers, hands" That's some kinky shit right there. *clutches pearls*
Giveaway wrote: » Paradoxically a relative emigrated to a Southern African Country to work as a professional. he had to demonstrate that he had no HIV TB etc with doctors reports, certified lab results etc. The HIV carriage rate is circa 1/3rd in this African country and they would have not issued the visa if he could not demonstrate conclusively he had no infectious disease. He also had to provide evidence of medical insurance such that if he became ill he would not become a burden on their state. And i think the Southern African country is correct in this stance
Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: » Why do you think repeating the same instructions (which I actually replied to) is in any sense an answer to my post?
Giveaway wrote: » i remember a "Freshers Pack" from the 90s containing a latex glove as well as the standard condom, fact sheets and lube. was quite perplexed by it
OldMrBrennan83 wrote: » You never hear much about it now. Can they cure it these days or something?
lbc2019 wrote: » Id imagine few young people now were aware of the death sentence that HIV/AIDS was in 80/90s
Atlantic Dawn wrote: » Anyone not knowing about diseases spread from unprotected sex is an idiot, they should have to 100% finance treatment themselves.
wakka12 wrote: It is a chronic illness that can be successfully managed by taking a variety of daily drugs, there is no cure
lbc2019 wrote: Id imagine few young people now were aware of the death sentence that HIV/AIDS was in 80/90s
Giveaway wrote: » https://www.hivireland.ie/hiv/prevention/prep-2/ a good outline on what Prep is and who for. I disagree with it becoming blanket taxpayer funded. main indication is to protect high risk groups from contracting HIV from unprotected sex. Widespread availability of free prep may paradoxically increase the number of cases of HIV by giving a false sense of security leading to riskier behaviour, and one is less likely to be compliant with the treatment regimen if it is free than if one paid for it oneself
Dontfadeaway wrote: » How will it increase if people are on it? I'm sure many more would be on it if it wasn't 400 euro a month. :pac:
Beanntraigheach wrote: » Yet another example of how mass-immigration enriches our country. Hooray! :rolleyes:
dav3 wrote: » the poor moderating that allows threads like these to exist across the internet
Martina1991 wrote: » I think this is a significant point. As HIV is more manageable, people might not understand the seriousness of HIV and werent even born when the AIDS epidemic was raging. More cases may being diagnosed as more people are actually getting checked for STDs than before.
gmisk wrote: » I think you are spot on. I would highly recommend a doc called how to survive a plague, its about the early years of the aids epidemic in the US heartbreaking stuff.
Giveaway wrote: » quoting the CDC below. its not 100% effective even when taken correctly. Missed pills greatly reduce the efficacy "When taken consistently, PrEP has been shown to reduce the risk of HIV infection in people who are at high risk by up to 92%. PrEP is much less effective if it is not taken consistently."
blanch152 wrote: » https://www.hivireland.ie/hiv/hiv-in-ireland/ Here are some facts from 2017. "Among the diagnoses in 2017, 39% were previously diagnosed with HIV in another country." "Of the diagnoses in 2017, 26% (n=130) were born in Ireland, 63% (n=308) were born abroad and 11% (n=54) did not have information on country of birth." Is it really a problem with our sex education?