Southdubin6 wrote: » It was Paul Geraghty Not Deco.
ghostfacekilla wrote: » Nope, not him
PLOPS wrote: » And say if that shop was robbed, would you ring the gardai?
harry Bailey esq wrote: » Shot a bouncer in the face at the red cow
harry Bailey esq wrote: » Probably, I don't venture south of the river often. I do know deco had to jump out a window because he was about to get plugged, supposedly on the orders of rattigan. But, by its very nature the drug trade is very fluid. You'll have lads working together one day and the next day they are out to kill one another. It was just a theory. Ie. Nat would have access to Brian’s cash, and used it to generate more money using Geraghty as the man on the ground, Geraghty on the other hand could've been given a 'pardon' by rattigan for ensuring that his nest egg is significantly bigger than it already was. As I said, just a theory. But stranger things have happened in fairness Paddy.
Pintman Paddy Losty wrote: » You've got that one totally wrong.
harry Bailey esq wrote: » If the rumours are true, bizarre as it sounds Deco shacked up with Nat was probably a factor. No angel herself...
Southdubin6 wrote: » Yeah John and Noel would of been the feet on street when Brian went away. It’s a very strange one though as rumour has it Geraghty is running things for brian with Dempsey (Geraghty is throwing Brian’s ex a bone) and yes Wayne is a headcase of the highest order.
harry Bailey esq wrote: » Twas another poster who said that he turned his life around, not me. I was just giving a hint to his identity as the third person. Same poster was wrong about other things too. Without the Roches there wouldn't be a 'rattigan faction' to begin with as you probably well know. As for our friend Wayne, he'll be in and out until his dying day. That's just the type of him.
Southdubin6 wrote: » Turned his back on crime? You’re joking right. He’s out a wet day and he’s 2 trials this year.
White lighting wrote: » Foleys a little rat. Judge was a wanker with rattigans sentence and will surely be appealed. Regardless off his reputation that should have zero influence in a court of law and hes beem in prison since 2003. While he had other charges like shooting at the cops and the drugs charge he should be out given its only manslaughter hes doing. Juridical system is a joke. A man jimmy devanney copped a prostitutes head off a few years ago in athlone and because half the guards in the towns names were in here tic list he got off on manslaughter and three years. How the **** can you clop someones head off and get manslaughter
Southdubin6 wrote: » Have no idea who you’re referring to as the 3rd.
Southdubin6 wrote: » Nathan more then likely 55 to life W/O Freddie Life W/O Keating 35+ Shambles and it isn’it t the system it’s just the judiciary as far as I can see DPP and prosecution is ensuring right cases with what they have to lock in any sentences. Someone’s making deals with the powers that be that much is a fact.
The pink killer wrote: » The system in this country is a laughing stock ,what would them men be serving in america or even england. ?
Southdubin6 wrote: » Freddie would be roled as the Joint enterprise facilitator. Nathan as a pawn, Aylmer, Keating and now him have all been given same option of facilitation charges. I’d love to know what judges seen different in Keating and Foley. Both involved pre murder and Foley involved Post murder also. Foley to a higher extent. Keating role consisted of fitting a tracker and driving a car into place pre murder. 10 years Foley drove gunman from to and from the scene, pre and post murder. Moved gunman from safe house to city center. Destroyed the 2 main cars. 6 Years. Something stinks.
pablo128 wrote: » Nathan Foley got 6 years for being involved in David Douglas's murder. Is this the new thing now. Once you didn't pull the trigger you can plead guilty to this lesser charge and get a vastly reduced sentence. I'd say Freddy is kicking himself.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » June 2008 + (17 years * 0.75) = March 2021. He must have received further remission though god knows for what.
Southdubin6 wrote: » Your maths is wrong. He is due for release 7th November this year from the drugs charge.https://www.google.ie/amp/s/www.irishmirror.ie/news/irish-news/crime/evil-dublin-gangland-boss-brian-13904440.amp
ohnonotgmail wrote: » Well even if he wins he wont be out next year. He is also serving a 17 year sentence backdated to June 2008. That brings him up to March 2021 if my maths is correct.
benny79 wrote: » Even if he's out next year he would of been locked up for 16 to 18 years thats a very long time especially in this country when you compare to the likes of John Gilligan & Larry Murphy etc.. All his 20's and 30's ..
Southdubin6 wrote: » He is entitled to the remand while serving a sentence as long he had not drawn bail on murder charge which he clearly didnt. He will win an appeal and most likely be out end of next year according to a few who are in the know.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » He has prison sentences for offences other than the murder that cover the entire period of his incarceration.
Southdubin6 wrote: » He was committed for 4 years on the murder charge, I can’t see it going any other way with that.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » He would have been in prison for all of this time if he had never been jailed for the murder charge. The time he spent locked up for murder was concurrent with other sentences he was serving. We will have to wait and see but i dont see any grounds for thinking he will be out next year.
