NIMAN wrote: » How is it that Connors is taken seriously?
DavidLyons_ wrote: » Fat brainless cnut.
Fiftyfilthy wrote: » I despise that fat wobble faced idiot I read his posts on fb as we have a mutual friend The daft **** that comes out of his pea brain is staggering
dan1895 wrote: » Such a f*cking lowlife. Easily the biggest cnut in the country.
punisher5112 wrote: » That fat fcuk Connors is one Grade A tool. He hasn't a clue.
Omackeral wrote: » Sure f*ck personal responsibility.
freshpopcorn wrote: » It's a well known fact that if people in Foxrock got drunk and lit a chip pan and it resulted in a fire the council would take responsibility and they'd be none of this death by misadventure.
freshpopcorn wrote: » The one thing that puzzled me about the Carrickmines fire is they often speak about over crowding at the site and it being dangerous but they decided to invite another family to stay that night.
suicide_circus wrote: » freshpopcorn wrote: » The one thing that puzzled me about the Carrickmines fire is they often speak about over crowding at the site and it being dangerous but they decided to invite another family to stay that night. don't bother looking for common sense or consistency on this subject. It is the fault of the state in so far as these people are little better than wards of the state - whole families in what amounts to state foster care as they are incapable of supporting themselves or apparently thinking for themselves beyond their entitlements.
Amber Icy Machinist wrote: » Would love if DL-R council sued the prick for defamation.
naughtb4 wrote: » The state didn't force them retain there culture The state didn't force them into marrying young The state didn't force them to leave school early The state didn't force them to live in a halting site The state didn't force them to get drunk or stoned The state didn't force them to want chips
Larbre34 wrote: » It was breezed over in the reporting of the inquest that some residents of the Carrickmines site offered testimony that County Council electricians had been on site the day before the fire. No such thing happened and that was a disgusting attempt to abdicate, deflect and implicate.
NIMAN wrote: » Doesn't matter if there were CC electricians on site the day before. Irrelevant. It wasn't an electrical fire, it was a chip pan fire caused by human error/neglect.
Lillyfae wrote: » Why would you have to consult trespassers???
seamus wrote: » - and to be fair the media aren't going into the nitty-gritty
suicide_circus wrote: » this is an interesting observation. why no detailed coverage of the causes as you outlined in your post? this is a widely publicised tragedy with much outpouring of grief and some truly appalling accusations being directed at employees of the state, accusations that would certainly warrant a tribunal and prosecutions.
seamus wrote: » . I wouldn't be surprised if this weekend's Sunday Independent has a large four-page report on it.
The Satanist wrote: » You'd have to wonder why newspapers are so scared of people who can't ****in read.
Lillyfae wrote: » Ya but.... this...https://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/europe-finds-ireland-in-breach-of-traveller-rights-in-cases-of-evictions-899753.html Why would you have to consult trespassers???