freshpopcorn wrote: I wonder is she doing then year challenge? How many kids has she had since 2009?
Ray Palmer wrote: » Roger Hassenforder wrote: » You are right I made a mistake ment Roger. No worries
Roger Hassenforder wrote: » You are right I made a mistake ment Roger.
Plumbthedepths wrote: » More than she can afford.
freshpopcorn wrote: She never claimed to be poor!
Ray Palmer wrote: » Yes it does, building a house costs so much and additional size is cheaper to build after the initial costs. Seriously you all think I am some liberal idiot commie but you lot are proving yourselves to have very poor comprehension and understanding on basic stuff.
Paddy Cow wrote: » Can you imagine getting so drunk and stoned that you'd end up setting your house on fire and putting your son in that position?
Goldengirl wrote: No but I never said I condoned that , what I said is the council were accountable ALSO.
Goldengirl wrote: » No but I never said I condoned that , what I said is the council were accountable ALSO.
tretorn wrote: » I dont think its a case of us thinking you are an idiot liberal idiot, you have posted enough idiotic nonsense to prove that you are an idiot commie. If people are stupid enough to pay for private schooling then let them off. This means the only part of that schooling the Government pays for is the teaching, the teachers have to be employed and paid for no matter where the private school pupils go so private schools are a benefit to the exchequer. Fine Gael will never allow moves against private schools or private hospitals. The main reason people pay for private schools is so their children can go to school with people like themselves and go their whole lives long without ever having to cross paths with Cashes children. its the same with private hospitals, you have less chance of being stuck in award with drunks and smokingobese addicts so the peace you will get if you are unwell is worth every cent. The Government encourage private health insurance through tax reliefs so private hospitals arent going anywhere either.
Mad_maxx wrote: » Myself and my partner are unlikely to be able to afford to send our son to private school but I would if I could, im dreading sending my boy into a leftists dominated public education system
gormdubhgorm wrote: » How is this thread still going? What has Margaret done now? Or is the thread just going around in the same circles?
StinkyMunkey wrote: » This woman is so much more clever than people give her credit for, she has a gaggle of kids and it's milking the system that pampers to her ilk. While everyone ones moans and give out, she is sitting with her feet up laughing at us eejits working for a living. All she has to do is keep popping out kids and the gravy train gets better and better. Her spawn will milk the system after mammy shows them just how easy it is. Personally I couldn't be a leech like her, but her kind will leech as long as they can get away with it. 7 Don't know who sickens me more, her kind or the kind that defend her.
Filmer Paradise wrote: » Two cheeks of the same arse. The Elites 'earn' so much that they're never going to have to live beside them. 'Shure aren't they great craic with their quaint little customs'. All that guff.:rolleyes: The underclass inhabit the same envionment as the pavees & see them as quite normal. Meanwhile, the working/coping class have to pick up the the tab for all of the wasters mentioned above. Pavees, Elites & the underclass need to be strung up and shot. None of them are worth their weight in rabbit droppings. Edit; At least rabbit droppings can make your grass grow!
gormdubhgorm wrote: » Not true, the 'elites' can hate travellers just as much as anyone else can.https://www.irishtimes.com/news/howth-halting-sites-plan-deferred-at-heated-fingal-council-meeting-1.80570https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/council-approves-controversial-traveller-halting-sites-26123015.html
Filmer Paradise wrote: » They have the power to keep them off their doorsteps. The rest of us haven't got that luxury.
pjohnson wrote: » Then you shouldnt have had a kid. Is that not one of the staple points of this thread? Cash had kids she couldn't afford seems you did to.
Rex Tasteless Gutter wrote: » That poster has one child who will be educated with the support of the state (just like the vast majority of other Irish children)
pjohnson wrote: » But the poster does not want their child in a public "leftist" school. If the poster wants a private education for their child should they not ensure they have the money to guarantee a private education?
Rex Tasteless Gutter wrote: » There's a big difference between having one child you cannot afford to educate privately and having seven children you cannot afford to house, feed, and clothe.
Rex Tasteless Gutter wrote: » The taxpayer provides 100 percent of the costs of raising those seven kids, while Margaret and her estranged husband provide 0 percent.
pjohnson wrote: » Obviously in terms of the actual cost but it seems in both cases the parent isn't able to fully provide for their child. Irresponsibe behaviour.
