PressRun wrote: » I'm not attacking anyone. Just stating that a vote for Peter Casey isn't what some people on this thread think it is. You're the one who seems to be getting very het up with everyone. This isn't a thread about FF, so no, I'm not getting into a discussion about them.
MrMusician18 wrote: » You said I'm seeking an alt-right Utopia, so go on, show me where I've sought that. I can wait.
Patser wrote: » When you have 5 wannabes trying to be an alternative to a massive favourite, and 1 strikes gold by standing apart from that herd, I wonder will any of the others break ranks and try something.
Zubeneschamali wrote: » Yes, the other 4 will ignore Higgins and beat Casey into the dirt for his comments.
Patser wrote: » With even Gallagher and ní Riada now looking nervously at their deposits - will the try to undermine Casey and hope to get above 12%
PressRun wrote: » Do you think that's an attack? You seem extremely defensive.
BoneIdol wrote: » I'm sure they will go for the jugular as will the rest of the candidates. There is no evidence anywhere that Casey has a hope in hell of getting elected and he is now the easiest candidate to get rid of possibly in history.
DChancer wrote: » Spreading hate and division! Targeting the most marginalized! Yup, I thought a lot about my post, thought a lot about Pastor Niemuller as well!
Vincent Vega wrote: » What's with these weird little videos about Michael D appearing on Casey's twitter?https://twitter.com/CaseyPeterJ/status/1054271429401890816 And the American lad narrating them. Is he just trying to tap into the American reality tv politics MIGA feel of his supporter base, with their parroting talk of liberals, snowflakes, NPCs and silent majorities? Or could it be possible that he has received support in his campaign from American interests? I'd say Trump would much rather sit down with Casey than Higgins, and you'd have to wonder if the cancellation of his planned trip here might have been done with that possibility in mind.
humberklog wrote: » I thought there would've been weekend polls (redC or imrb...one of the big ones) out today ahead of the thingy tonight, no?
PressRun wrote: » I'd say they'll go for Casey as well. It'll be easier to ground him than Higgins.
Venom wrote: » I think the Limerick Leader poll someone posted earlier in the thread, was from the weekend but the results didn't fit the narrative the media is spinning so no mention of it from the usual places.
humberklog wrote: » I posted this last night over on another thread so excuse the copy and paste... "It'll be interesting to see if the Limerick Leader's poll gets much publicity tomorrow. There's a few studies that show polling influences results. This is a pretty good election for one study: Boomerang and Bandwagon. The Boomerang is basically complacency in supporters of a runaway leader. Some supporters don't bother voting because "ah sure they'll romp home". The Bandwagon is when an outsider gathers a gain in momentum and sleeping supporters are more inclined to bother to vote. I wouldn't hold too much faith in the LL's poll as it's probably reactionary divilment:). But if it gets much publicity it could tighten the margins in what was, and still is, a one horse race." I have only been tuning in and out of the Irish national radio stations today but I did notice that there's been no poll results or much chat about tonight's debate.
Johnny Dogs wrote: » Not just after hours. Check out the online poll in the limerick leader. Not far away from this one.
Johnny Dogs wrote: » Why would they bother going after Casey if he's only going to Hoover up around 2% of the votes according to many around here? I would have thought the runaway favourite, would be in everyone's crosshairs, if anyone was serious about deposing him? :cool:
haley79 wrote: » seanie gallagher will be definitely going after micky d he has been seething for the last 7 years and i'm sure has being building up his arsenal of dirt against micky d, especially how flathúilach he is being with our tax dollars
AndrewJRenko wrote: » They probably will be going in all guns blazing, because none of them have the political smarts to know that voters generally don't like seeing politicians fighting. Voters generally don't care about who is factually right or wrong. Duffy really should know this given his supposed professional expertise.
Wheeliebin30 wrote: » Let’s hope Casey keeps it steady tonight and doesn’t get drawn into some ridiculous argument.
haley79 wrote: » he just has to be himself