PlaneSpeeking wrote: » So ignore the evidence in the post - which YOU asked for - and instead make a personal attack ? Nice. Done engaging with you, just not worth it.
Unless you are so small minded than you let personal prejudices get in the way of a boost for the country ?
Hotblack Desiato wrote: » Really? It's August. Hotels in Dublin and in most other places will be full anyway. So maybe what you're really getting at is that it'll give some of them an excuse to jack up prices?
nthclare wrote: » Protesting against the pope is like arguing with a narcissist..... Do you seriously think he'll give a toss over a protest or feel any empathy for the cause of a protest....feck no.... I could think of more productive things to do that day to be honest....
nthclare wrote: I could think of more productive things to do that day to be honest....
Hotblack Desiato wrote: » Ah come on. How many nuns born in the 80s are there? Are there even any? Nobody is being punished for the cover-up, and financially the RCC is laughing all the way to the bank while giving the taxpayer the metaphorical finger.
DEFTLEFTHAND wrote: » There most be.
DEFTLEFTHAND wrote: » Worldwide, Catholic Church vocations are at their highest since the 1970s. I imagine we'll see foreign missionaries sent to Ireland in the coming decades if vocations fail to pick up here.
Doctor Jimbob wrote: » It would bring in a lot more money if public transport wasn't being made free for the day. I'm indifferent to the visit as a whole, but the free transport part is a joke.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » well feel free to do those things and let others who think differently do what they want to do.
Leroy42 wrote: » Its not the Pope that the protest is aimed at really. It is a protest at the state welcoming such a person. It is telling those in charge they people have serious issues with the CC, the Pope being the figurehead.
nthclare wrote: » Of course sure thats common sense, I appreciate your feedback. Its always good to have an opinion. Im reading over my post here and see nothing to do with not giving anyone the freedom to protest. Can you point out where it suggest I'm against a protest ?
nthclare wrote: » Do you seriously think the people in charge care ? Im not a Catholic myself, im one of those heathens......
DEFTLEFTHAND wrote: » There most be. Worldwide, Catholic Church vocations are at their highest since the 1970s.
Taytoland wrote: » I have decided to attend this event. So I'll be driving down on the day.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » Taytoland wrote: » I have decided to attend this event. So I'll be driving down on the day. Why would a unionist go to see the pope?
ohnonotgmail wrote: » Why would a unionist go to see the pope?
nthclare wrote: » Why would a sea angler look over the bridge into a river ?
Graces7 wrote: » Not true. Child Protection guidelines were voluntarily adopted by every diocese and parish to put minds at peace - and after false accusations had been made.. Norah Walls etc.
Seth Brundle wrote: » The RCC only brought in these rules because of the numerous abuse allegations, most of whom were credible to the point that the church uswd donations to silence the victims (presumably the swearing to secrecy stunt didn't work). The church did not volunteer to bring in these steps but rather was pushed there by the flood if allegations which many members were aware of but kept secret. Had the PR not been so bad on the business there is no indication that it would have brought on the changes: the previous decades or centuries are testament to this!
Sycamore Tree wrote: » :D:D To see fish? What a great question. What's the answer? I fish Black Head for mackeral but I always look over the salmon weir bridge...
PlaneSpeeking wrote: » Leroy42 wrote: » So you think the institutional cover up should go unpunished? Nice Cathy Newman attempt there. Unpunished, no. Anyone who laid a hand on a child should be punished. Anyone who it has been proved knew, should be jailed also. But I fail to see how a nun born in the 80s is somehow responsible for the sins of a priest in her diocese long since dead. The wrong people are being punished - it's now revenge rather than justice. If any money went to counselling I'd have no problem but handing over hundreds of thouands that could and should be used for charitable reasons is wrong. I had the living sh**e knocked out of me for 16 years by nuns, my dad and granddad were taught by the Christian Brothers. I don't expect a bean nor would I seek it out.
Leroy42 wrote: » So you think the institutional cover up should go unpunished?