_Dara_ wrote: » We’re a long, long way from that. It won’t be happening any time soon. Ireland won’t be leading the world on the issue. If it ever does happen, it should also come with a strict deadline so that a woman can have an abortion if she discovers that the man will not be contributing. No deciding in the eight month of pregnancy that being a father is not for him. I really hope nobody votes no to repeal for the reason that men can’t opt out. The two issues are not going to be decided together. It’ll be a whole other campaign.
SusieBlue wrote: » Its not murder. No matter how many times you try to insist, it simply isn't.
kumate_champ07 wrote: » what isnt murder?
kumate_champ07 wrote: » if the law is changed and murder is allowed in certain circumstances well I guess I'll have to live with it murder is already legal in wars ,capital punishment, and of course abortions in many countries.
cnocbui wrote: » Trolling, apparently.
kumate_champ07 wrote: » will it get the same kind of support from liberals as Repeal? or will that situation remain the same because men are 'privileged' and should be happy with what they have
kumate_champ07 wrote: » abortion in Ireland is considered murder at the moment(when its not to save the mothers life) its an unlawful killing, that is the definition people want to change the law so that the killing is lawful.
kumate_champ07 wrote: civilized society and the natural kingdom are separated by the 'law',
kumate_champ07 wrote: the law is based on 'morals' - rules that were agreed upon so that we could decrease murder,stealing,and rape in our species, and try to live in harmony
kumate_champ07 wrote: if the law is changed and murder is allowed in certain circumstances well I guess I'll have to live with it
kumate_champ07 wrote: murder is already legal in wars ,capital punishment, and of course abortions in many countries.
kumate_champ07 wrote: abortion in Ireland is considered murder at the moment(when its not to save the mothers life)
Triceratops Ballet wrote: » We're not voting on murder though are we? We're not even voting on abortion, we're voting on the 8th amendment.
SusieBlue wrote: » No it isn't. If it was considered murder, we wouldn't have written it into our constitution to permit women to travel for abortions. That isn't just allowing it, or sweeping it under the carpet, we actually wrote it into our constitution that this is allowed. Surely if it were considered murder, we'd be prosecuting these women to the highest point of the law, for the crime of going abroad to cruelly execute an innocent child? Surely nothing would be too much trouble to prevent these callous murders from happening? Oh wait. We don't. Because aborting Irish children is absolutely fine, according to the Pro Lifers, so long as it doesn't happen in Ireland. Which is the biggest load of hypocritical NIMBYism whataboutery ever.
eviltwin wrote: » No it's not. It's not legal but it's a completely separate crime to murder in every way. There doesn't seem to be any public interest in jailing all these so called murderers which is telling enough in itself.
kumate_champ07 wrote: » the definition of murder is 'an unlawful killing' you can pretend to yourself that its not murder if that makes you feel better, but it doesnt change anything. the fact that it happens alot also doesnt change anything, or that there isnt enough enough prison space,police time & court time to pursue every case perhaps its just an acceptable type of murder. and one day it will be made legal in Ireland.
eviltwin wrote: » You might consider it murder but the law does not agree and most people don't agree. Otherwise we'd have people looking for those who have abortions to be jailed and I don't see anyone calling for that do you? Even women who break the law by having abortions here aren't being prosecuted despite the potential 14 yrs sentence. So what does that say? As someone who is open about having an abortion I've never had anyone close to me judge me over it, I can't imagine a similar reaction if I stabbed a person.
kumate_champ07 wrote: we're voting on something that was put in place and ignored. it would be better to stop ignoring whats there in the first place. The government should engage with the religious institutions that have been obstructing current legislation
kumate_champ07 wrote: » it says you didnt read everything I wrote
eviltwin wrote: » It's says your logic is bs. There is no public or state appetite to prosecute women because most people don't see it as that big a deal.
kumate_champ07 wrote: » you might not agree with my logic, but I seem to be one of the few using logic a lot of people dont see that type of murder as a big deal
eviltwin wrote: » What logic? You said women aren't prosecuted because of lack of resources. How do you know that's the reason?Wouldn't you think there would be the resources to charge even a few? If I went to my local garda station to 'confess' I'd be laughed out of it.
kumate_champ07 wrote: » you left out this part that I wrote at the end "perhaps its just an acceptable type of murder."
eviltwin wrote: » It's acceptable because it's not murder.
kumate_champ07 wrote: » whats your definition of murder?
eviltwin wrote: » The legal definition sums it up for me
kumate_champ07 wrote: » which is?
eviltwin wrote: » Google it.