....... wrote: » This post has been deleted.
....... wrote: » Currently a foetuses right to life trumps a woman's right to bodily autonomy. This should not be the case. It shouldn't even be questioned!
J C wrote: » They do actually ... the love and forgiveness of Jesus Christ is the only way to stop their hurt for doing such an irreversible thing. No Human Being can undo the damage done ... and only Jesus Christ can forgive it.Matthew 11:28-30 King James Version (KJV) 28 Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. 29 Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest unto your souls. 30 For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light. Women and their unborn children need access to the best medical care possible ... but doctors don't need their hands untied to kill one of them, just because the woman decides that she wants to 'evict' her unborn child. Tenants will have more rights of occupation than unborn children, if the 8th is repealed ... and tenants don't die, if they are evicted. Christians are Jesus Christ's representatives on Earth ... so we are fully authorised by Him to hand out His love and forgiveness ... to all who ask for it. Quote :- 'Before I formed you in the womb, I knew you.' (God).
Katie Full Leak wrote: » Whether people think it's a child or not. It is a human foetus. That's what people want to kill. As I've said , people here have advocated that it's not a human but not one has told me what they think it is...I patiently await an answer on that one!
J C wrote: » That is what they are ... innocent little angels destined for the right hand of God ... and they're certainly not tumours or dogs, like they have so disparagingly been described on this thread.
david75 wrote: » What a load of baloney. Oh. Wait. Yeah I think you’ll find the almost entire majority of people voting in this will be turned off completely by peoplexlike yourself pushing their god bothering bible crap on them. Good luck with that.
Achasanai wrote: » Can fetuses go straight to heaven, though? I thought baptism and accepting Jesus as our saviour was a prerequisite?
WhiteRoses wrote: Your first paragraph once again speaks volumes of your compempt, disdain, lack of respect and distrust of women. You aren’t even trying to hide it any more. It’s clear for all to see.
david75 wrote: Is anybody else seeing the sudden shift in tone and language among certain very regular pro life posters here at certain periods?
pilly wrote: » The masks slips every so often rose and they expose the same evil attitude that the nuns of old had. Thankfully nuns as a breed are soon to be extinct in Ireland and hopefully the extremists will follow. As a true Christian I'm disgusted by the hatred, contempt and envy shown towards women in this thread but it won't keep me awake.
pilly wrote: » How do you mean? When the masks slips?
david75 wrote: » Is anybody else seeing the sudden shift in tone and language among certain very regular pro life posters here at certain periods?
david75 wrote: » Kind of. Certain posters end up sounding like certain other posters. It’s almost as if there’s a few people taking shifts running different accounts. Gonna PM a moderator about it.
pilly wrote: » Again, you know typing something in bold doesn't make it a fact don't You?
WhiteRoses wrote: » Your first paragraph once again speaks volumes of your compempt, disdain, lack of respect and distrust of women. You aren’t even trying to hide it any more. It’s clear for all to see. Spare me with your ‘innocent little angels’ rubbish. You can go on and on as much as you like, nothing on this earth qualifies you to interfere in my healthcare and in my bodily autonomy. Very soon our constitution will be changed to reflect that. Then you’ll have to find something else to preach about and interfere in. What next??
david75 wrote: » They don’t need the love and forgiveness of Jesus Christ. They need access to appropriate medical care in their own country and doctors need their hands untied to provide it. You can keep the love and forgiveness. It’s up to Jesus to hand that out, not you or I.
david75 wrote: Gonna PM a moderator about it.
J C wrote: The continuous self-pity and false claims that anybody 'who calls it like it is' ... is automatically anti-women is wearing very thin ... especially, when the extreme feminists are simultaneously demanding to kill fellow women with impunity ... just because they happen to be unborn.
david75 wrote: Some easy jiggery pokery and digging up ISPs will soon tell it’s own tale.
pilly wrote: » I feel no self-pity. Feel only pity for you. I would hate to carry the kind of hatred around that would make me tell a woman to be more careful about what she lets in her womb.
J C wrote: » ... I'd call that good advice if she is saying that she doesn't want anything in there, in the first place.:)
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » And for those of us who couldnt give a tiny shiney sh/te about it?
J C wrote: » God loves you nonetheless ... and Jesus Christ came that all might be Saved ... but He won't force you.
david75 wrote: » Including you your opinion or your bible. None of the above have any place in any woman’s womb.
WhiteRoses wrote: » Is that you Oweny????
david75 wrote: » Thank you. This is what I was just askin about a short while ago. Sudd n and dramatic shifts in language and tone. Sounds like it’s one possibly two poster using multiple accounts throughout the thread. Which is against boards rules I believe.
