homerjay2005 wrote: » The chain of events leading to this crash is starting to grow. As I said earlier, there's likely to be 5 or 6 actual causes of this once the final report comes out.
cosanostra wrote: » This video posted by the navy shows that the recovery process will be quite challenging https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1278630312219862&id=101764433239795
DOCARCH wrote: » If there is no progress in recovery today, nothing will probably happen tomorrow as gale force winds are forecast.
Calina wrote: » I am concerned that the Air Corps is short personnel for flying and air traffic control out of hours. Even outside the context of what happened to R116 this needs to be queried and addressed.
Henry Ford III wrote: » I'm not comfortable with some of the speculative posts on what could have brought down this helicopter. It could have been any of dozens of reasons and it adds nothing to just guess one of them.
sjb25 wrote: » +1 seems to be a few armchair accident investigators able to determine what has happened from speculation and phone apps
cosanostra wrote: » 116 couldn't establish comms with 118 they requested shannon attempt they also couldn't reach them and got a commercial airliner to attempt which also failed
Discodog wrote: » I don't think that this can be discounted. No matter how much technical equipment is fitted to aircraft you can still have accidents, by a technical failure, human failure or a combination of both. The whole basis of investigation is that nothing is ruled out.
Irish Steve wrote: » I am not going to speculate on the nature of the event that resulted in the end of the flight 116 into water,
Irish Steve wrote: » so the suggestions that have been made about accidentally flying into an obstacle or the water while searching for their intended landing point needs to be put into context, and discounted.
Irish Steve wrote: » The other thing that can be discounted is that this accident occurred due to a shortage of fuel,
irishgeo wrote: » This is the same air corps that phoned up the minister in 2010 stating they could do it for far cheaper than CHC were being paid.
elastico wrote: » So why go ruling out 2 theories yourself then?:rolleyes:
homerjay2005 wrote: » pretty big change from what the independent were saying yesterday to today. they were sure there was no mechanical failure and today, they are saying that something did go wrong with the equipment. what is clear so far looks like is the following -Air Corps plane not available to fly so they covered instead. They had fuel on board so they didnt run out of fuel. They were arriving in Blacksod to refuel. Visibility was "poor" They flew out to sea and back in to descend - standard operational procedure. They couldnt contact Rescue 118 and tried to use other means of doing so. Last known location was just off blackrock island and they were operating at very high speed. No mayday signal was received so what every happened, happened quick. Search area and location of FDR beacon suggest crash site is close by to Blackrock island - so what ever did happen, happened there. the above gives impression seems to been alot happening for the crew to deal with and if an electrical failure happened, it was sudden and no time to recover.
elastico wrote: But this now appears to be a possibility as investigators seem to be heading back to the island now, and somebody on here yesterday claimed debris had been found in and around the lighthouse.
Negative_G wrote: » The personnel issues in the Air Corps (and the Defence Forces as a whole) have been well documented over the last several years. It was well documented only several weeks ago that the Air Corps were unable to guarantee a service to paitents on the transplant list outside of working hours due to ATC/Pilot constraints. The general public has no interest in Defence matters and as a result, the politicians don't either. As with most things politically, you can make as much noise as possible but generally nothing will be done until something has happened. Reactive leadership at its finest. Have you any source for this or is this just agenda based rhetoric?
Dial Hard wrote: » Well if someone on here said it, it must be true...
elastico wrote: » I believe Juergen white said it on the radio earlier.
Discodog wrote: » A critical factor will be where the debris is located on the Island. If it's well above the strand line then it suggests a collision. Whatever happened it appears to have been sudden & catastrophic. People need to remember that pilot error isn't any indication of incompetence of a slur. Humans make mistakes, even the best ones. We all rightly praise Sullenburger but the reality is that he was incredibly lucky as well as skilled. Sometimes a pilot feels that the instruments are wrong, when they are correct. Other times he can believe they are right when they are wrong.