nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

FPL Team Value 2016/2017

Colking

I saw a request on another thread about Team Value and chasing/not chasing it and decided to start a new thread for this year.

I consciously chose last year to heavily chase value and it killed my OR. I'm hoping to take a more balanced approach this year and see how it goes.

Last year was a bit of an anomaly though as Mahrez, Vardy, Payet, Delle Alli, as must haves and Deeney, Ighalo, Wilson must haves at different stages. This meant that you could have a lot of cash and it was not as effective.

This year is shaping up slightly different with Kun, Ibra, Hazard all looking like must haves and when Giroud comes back for Arsenal maybe Sanchez will be also.

I posted regularly in the 2015/2016 Value thread so I could use it as a comparison this year.

Below is the warts and all progression, starting with the last post of the season where I had made a great RV of £9M but average OR of 91k

I finished the season with an OR of 80k but I definitely lost serious points by an over adherence to value chasing.

Let it be a salutary lesson to me this season

Colking wrote: »

03-05-2016

Posting for Next Season as a comparison

TV: 110.7
RV: 109.0
OR: 91K

Colking wrote: »

16-03-2016

It lets you seriously invest in GK and DEF if you want, while still having a template mid and attack.

I need to find a better policy for next year though. That value has cost me 92 points in hits (not the most accurate metric but a significant one).

Time will tell over the rest of the season if it can help to pay it back but I doubt it.

Colking wrote: »

16-03-2016

I think next year there will be less hunting of value and more concentrating on not taking hits:

TV: 111.4
RV: 108.7
OR: 124K

Colking wrote: »

24-02-2016

Doesn't look like much has changed in a month

TV: 111.3
RV: 108.0
OR: 156K

High RV doesn't yet seem important. It might help out a bit over the next few doubles and skinny's (to use a phrase somebody coined earlier )

Colking wrote: »

01-02-2016

TV: 111.0
RV: 107.1
OR: 125K

De Bruyne getting injured has put a dampener on my plans. I was planning on

De Bruyne, Sanchez, Ozil, Alli, Payet
Kane, Lukaku, Aguero

Might take a look at Hazard instead. As FHFC has pointed out it could be an option to burn value during double gameweeks/blanks when you wouldn't be afraid to rotate out built up value.

Colking wrote: »

15-01-2016

TV 110.4
RV 106.4
OR 314K

It's nice to be able to afford expensive players but not many of them are really firing this season so it's a bit like being a millionaire on a desert island :pac:

If Sanchez comes back to the fold in good form and the likes of Hazard and other expensive flops then it could create some potential differential.

Colking wrote: »

09-12-2015

We'll see how these values fluctuate over Christmas

TV: 107.6
RV: 104.9

OR: 165k

Colking wrote: »

23-11-2015

TV: 105.9
RV: 104.0

OR: 81k

Colking wrote: »

09-11-2015

TV 106.1
RV 103.6
OR 153K

Colking wrote: »

28-10-2015

GW 5 WC

TV : 104.0 + 1.8 Bank = 105.8

RV : 103.2

OR: 152k

Colking wrote: »

05-10-2015

No I'm sticking with Mahrez right now, will keep an eye on it though as the Tinkerman is doing his normal tinkering ........

Had Mahrez from GW2
I had Gomis and Ayew at points (made some nice cash out of them)
YaYa to KDB (had Yaya from GW2 so that was good.)
Jumped from Martial to Pelle last night (.2 there)
Gomez from Liverpool

Lost .1 on Bentaleb at the start (what can you do)

This is the rest of them

It's not too bad at this stage but there are plenty out there who have much better.

Colking wrote: »

05-10-2015

I had a rough plan to take a few more points hits than normal pre-Christmas to make RV but I might start to slow it down a little now.

TV 103.9
RV 102.2

OR 165K

Colking wrote: »

17-09-2015

Looks like you're edging it so far.

A more balanced look at it though would be to give your total resale value and Overall Rank

TV 102.8
Resale 101.0
OR 759k

Colking wrote: »

01-09-2015

WC currently underway 102.2 TV with a 100.7 Resale. Hopefully this continues to grow nicely over the next 2 weeks.

Colking wrote: »

25-08-2015

A GW3 WC was pretty good for price alright. My resale is 100.4 though with no WC. If you're prepared to take the odd -4 you can keep your TV high and keep the WC.

I've not seem prices drop this quickly and for so many players that were supposed to be semi safe before though.

If you let it the TV could really start to affect your choices of player (which would be foolish I think)

Does anyone think that we could see a return to the TV of a few seasons ago when it was normal enough to have an extra 3m upwards built up ?

Colking wrote: »

19-08-2015

£100.7 TV at moment but hoping for another .3 tonight. WC not in play.

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

bantee

bantee wrote: »

TV: 102.4
RV: 100.8
OR: 92k

TV: 103
RV: 101.4
OR: 59k

wrestlemaniac

wrestlemaniac wrote: »

TV: 103.0
ITB: 0.1
RV: 101.3
OR: 125k

TV: 103.2
ITB: 0.2
RV: 101.2
OR: 317k

FHFC

TV: 103.0
RV: 101.4
OR: 110k

Have dropped 0.3 or 0.4 of RV though silly mistakes which irritates me greatly.

billymitchell

TV: 100m
RV: 99.1m
OR: 640k

This is really going to hurt me later on in the season

Jaggo

Jaggo wrote: »

TV 102.5
Rv 101.0
Overall 70k bit only 3 players today.

Week 8:
TV 103.4
RV 101.7
OR 88k

Making loads of money. Plan to spend it on goldfish for the office and Mercedes' for the staff.

Jaggo

Jaggo wrote: »

TV 102.5
Rv 101.0
Overall 70k bit only 3 players today.

Week 8:
TV 103.4
RV 101.7
OR 88k

Making loads of money. Plan to spend it on goldfish for the office and Mercedes' for the staff.

[Deleted User]

[Deleted User] wrote: »

TV - 101.9

RV - 100.6

OA - 695 k

Shocking stuff. Have had to take about 3-4 hits to protect team value.

TV - 102.7

RV - 101.4

OR - 183k

TacT

Was at:
TV 102.2 (0.4itb)
RV 100.9
OR 37.9k

TacT

TV 103.2K
RV 101.5K
OR 135K
0.0 ITB

jive

TV: 102.8
RV: 101.4
OR: 35K

spock.

TV: 103.1m (101.8 + 1.3itb)
RV: 101.5m
OR: 222k

Scorpion Sting

TV: 102.7
RV: 101.0
OR: 371k

Ziegler1988

TV: 102.8m
RV: 101.5m
OR: 161k

iroced

Colking wrote: »

TV 103.3 (1.3 Improvement)
RV 101.9 (.6 Improvement)
OR 284K (309k Improvement)

That's a huge resale!

iroced wrote: »

After WC and cashing in £0.4m profit from Hazard, Ibra & KDB (this latter one just during WC week).

TV: £102.4m
RV: £100.9m
OR: 445k

TV: £103.6m
RV: £101.6m
OR: 91k

Improvement everywhere

, particularly resale-wise where I proportionally gained more than from TV (and I did lose £0.1m resale from Antonio yesterday night :P before Sunderland at home... people are either mad or geniuses :pac:).

Hopefully, I can cash in on Jaku, Foster & Capoue before they lose value. Thing is for who...

Sooner or Later

Sooner or Later wrote: »

TV 101.8 (100.7 + 1.1 ITB)
RV 100.5
OR 256K

TV 102.2 (99.3 + 2.9 ITB) (0.4 improvement)
RV 100.8 (0.3 improvement)
OR 795k (459k disimprovement)

FHFC

FHFC wrote: »

TV 102.4
RV 100.9
OR 24k

It's slow going this year with the variability...i.e. players shooting up but coming back down again. Aguero and especially Hazard and Zlatan. Selling Hazard and Ibra has preserved gains although that was not the motivation.

TV 102.6
RV 101.2
OR 100K

Colking

Colking wrote: »

TV 102.3
RV 101.3
OR 593K

TV 103.3 (1.3 Improvement)
RV 101.9 (.6 Improvement)
OR 284K (309k Improvement)

Father Hernandez

Father Hernandez wrote: »

Cheers for sending on this way. Last year was a fluke year, this year I'll be looking to be a lot more balanced with transfers and TV.

100.5 at the moment and with Firmino dropping tonight, will be looking to get him out. Jaku & Amat should see me go up 0.2

OR: 47,573
TV: 101.7
RV: 100.5

bantee

TV: 102.4
RV: 100.8
OR: 92k

Scorpion Sting

Scorpion Sting wrote: »

TV: 101.7 (.4 improvement)
RV: 100.5 (.2 improvement)
OR: 274k (187k improvement)

TV: 102.6
RV: 101.0
OR: 278k

Practically the same rank 4 weeks on. Would have liked to have a slightly bigger team value by now but I suppose it's still decent.