Agent Coulson wrote: » Rusev = Marc Mero...... Lana = Sable storyline coming I guess.
LeeJM wrote: » Id like to see them redo an old storyline.................remember Tazz started picking on JR and Jerry Lawler had to defend him and they had a match at SummerSlam 2000. Well Id like to see a heel start to pick on Cole and for a few weeks JBL would find it funny but slowly he would start to get annoyed by it until eventually he comes to Coles aid. Only difference is I would have the heel go over JBL somehow but still have ppl realise you can only go so far with Cole before JBL will say enough. Looking at the roster only guys I could see working as the heel in that situation would be Adam Rose, Bo Dallas or maybe Stardust
Riddle101 wrote: » Sheamus comes to my mind. He could get his lead pipe out again. Or maybe Wade Barrett even.
Omackeral wrote: » The Freebird Rule makes no sense really.
Omackeral wrote: » The only way I think it works well is if it's given to a heel group from a heel authority. Gives them an unfair edge. Like the Spirit Squad, they were working for the McMahons and all 5 were allowed to defend it. That was good for a bit of heat. What makes the New Day allowed to do it? I'm not saying I dislike the rule btw, just think it needs a bit of context in my book.
LeeJM wrote: » I actually dont think it worked for the Spirit Squad as there was way too many variations of the team. I think it works best on a 3 man unit like New Day where the 3 offer something different for all types of title challengers. Big E brings the power and strength, Kofi brings the speed and athleticism and Xavier brings the cunning. Its a great 3 man unit in theory. Kayfabe wise like Leggo said the contract probably just said New Day not Kofi & Big E of New Day, fairly easy way to explain it. And IMO the best use of the Freebird Rule was the Jersey Triad of summer 99 in WCW. That just worked so well
Moneymaker wrote: » So is Cesaro ever gonna get a strong singles push? Him catching Big E like a football(knees didnt even buckle!) on Sunday was one of the most impressive displays of strength ive seen in a while.
Stereomaniac wrote: » Whatever it takes to enjoy the product that WWE, or any wrestling company for that matter, is producing. I have always said it on here, if you don't enjoy watching something, it makes no sense to continue watching it, especially if it used to be so good. I get that sometimes.
beakerjoe wrote: » I love WWF/E. I cant watch any other product. Ive tried with New Japan, TNA, ROH and Ive never really got into any of them not matter how good certain parts of their product is. Ill always be a WWE guy and the current product has turned me off. I keep waiting for it to improve and their have been flashes of doing the right thing over the last few months, but they simply dont follow up on any of their good work. Ill keep my eye on here still but for now, Im not watching Raw. Maybe Ill pick it up again in the run up to MITB which is a few months away.