nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

simple poll for the Atheists

pacquiao

would love to see what you think

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Child Item

Comments

Paparazzo

Vague question is vague.

Do these people look vastly different?

In my opinion, yes, they bloody well do. What can such a vague question achieve?

Mistress 69

psychward wrote: »

I'll second that but only if the female ones have flat topped heads upon which a beer mug and remote control can sit easily without slipping.

Bet you would not say that to these girls!

Galvasean

Mistress 69 wrote: »

Bet you would not say that to these girls!

I would too. A flat topped head would be an improvement to said women for me to balance my glass of beer on while I <snip and banned> on Wednesdays.

Mistress 69

Naughty boy...............:pac::p

Tomk1

pacquiao wrote: »

You can cry troll all you like , that is what i expected from some of you. I'm far from a troll,bail out of the discussion that's fine.
Personally I'm non religious and i believe in evolution.

Prove it say F*CK god & allah and I ''pacquiao'' do not believe in god or allah (awaiting the new definition of 'non-religious')

pacquiao wrote: »

After looking at the results of the poll i have to say I'm a bit confused.
I didn't expect there to be a massive number of people denying evolution and it's effects on the various races of people.

Biology 101 if you can reproduce with it, your the same race, aka if you can reproduce with a Troll then... you'r a Troll. To Classify Humans that lost their colour over 10,000 yrs as a seperate race is plain silly

pacquiao wrote: »

Take the Chinese for example. If i'm allowed to generalise,....

:rolleyes: What! nexted your'll be on about Red-heads.

recedite

Hobbits have already been discovered (dead!)at Flores, Indonesia.
Recent DNA evidence suggests a small amount of Neandertal blood in modern Europeans, and a certain amount of Denisovan blood in modern Orientals.
There was a thread about it here a while ago;
http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2056439844
In theory then, that means that those two were not separate species to us, but separate subspecies or races or breeds or types or whatever. So "Homo neanderthalensis" is now "Homo Sapiens neanderthalensis."
On that basis, there is actually a lot less human diversity around now compared to 100,000 years ago.

Anyway, a good definition of "racism" is when someone discriminates on the basis of race. It is possible to acknowledge human diversity without ever discriminating on the basis of a label attached to somebody else.

Child Item