Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Quotes & More Quotes by Atheists (sig fodder inside)

12346

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,783 ✭✭✭Mark Hamill


    Actually said by Dr Arroway in Contact, but whatevs.

    Carl Sagan wrote Contact.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,442 ✭✭✭Sulla Felix


    Carl Sagan wrote Contact.
    I know, I've read it several times. It's been a while since I've needed to use the APA or similar but isn't the convention to cite the character rather than the scriptwriter or author when dealing with fiction?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,783 ✭✭✭Mark Hamill


    I know, I've read it several times. It's been a while since I've needed to use the APA or similar but isn't the convention to cite the character rather than the scriptwriter or author when dealing with fiction?

    Oh, I thought you didn't realise :o. I don't know what the convention is, but I imagine the quote carries more weight with Sagans' name after it rather than a fictional scientists name.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,558 Mod ✭✭✭✭Dades


    I imagine the quote carries more weight with Sagans' name after it rather than a fictional scientists name.
    That's an interesting point. I'd imagine an scientific assertion certainly would carry more weight if the person was an "expert", but a quote in the form of a philosophical opinion should stand on it own I'd have thought.

    Like those occasional great quotes you read attributed to -unknown.


  • Registered Users Posts: 390 ✭✭sephir0th


    150-Faith-is-a-cop-out.jpg


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,105 ✭✭✭Kivaro


    Faith-is-a-cop-out ......

    I wish Faith was an opt-in system.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,862 ✭✭✭mikhail


    Oh, I thought you didn't realise :o. I don't know what the convention is, but I imagine the quote carries more weight with Sagans' name after it rather than a fictional scientists name.
    Sulla Felix is right. After all, if you wrote a novel in which one character was a bigot, you wouldn't want to hear his dialogue attributed to you as if you had said it yourself.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,442 ✭✭✭Sulla Felix


    mikhail wrote: »
    Oh, I thought you didn't realise :o. I don't know what the convention is, but I imagine the quote carries more weight with Sagans' name after it rather than a fictional scientists name.
    Sulla Felix is right. After all, if you wrote a novel in which one character was a bigot, you wouldn't want to hear his dialogue attributed to you as if you had said it yourself.
    I just couldn't in good conscience vote for a person who doesn't believe in God. Someone who honestly thinks the other ninety five percent of us suffer from some form of mass delusion. - Carl sagan.

    I'm gonnaw troll reddit with that.


  • Moderators Posts: 51,858 ✭✭✭✭Delirium


    tumblr_mabn6gFU4z1rvzyvqo1_500.png

    If you can read this, you're too close!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    Finally Dawkins has been given the Zen treatment.

    2012-09-18-dawkins.jpg?9d7bd4


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,753 ✭✭✭fitz0


    How stridently arrogant of him.

    :pac:


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,809 ✭✭✭CerebralCortex


    Jernal wrote: »
    Finally Dawkins has been given the Zen treatment.

    Of all the things Dawkins says this has to be has worst and most philosophically shallow. I hate it. I don't at all feel lucky that I get the opportunity to die and I would rather a smarter better designed/evolve entity existed in my place. I don't feel sorry for those better people because they don't exist. If I didn't exist I wouldn't feel unlucky because there is no a priori me. It's also sanctimonious and paints a picture of life I personally find ugly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    Of all the things Dawkins says this has to be has worst and most philosophically shallow. I hate it. I don't at all feel lucky that I get the opportunity to die and I would rather a smarter better designed/evolve entity existed in my place. I don't feel sorry for those better people because they don't exist. If I didn't exist I wouldn't feel unlucky because there is no a priori me. It's also sanctimonious and paints a picture of life I personally find ugly.

    I see where you're coming from and can't really disagree with it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,809 ✭✭✭CerebralCortex


    Jernal wrote: »
    I see where you're coming from and can't really disagree with it.

    I would class that outlook as humanist conservatism. The idea that you should love what you're given and not complain. It's the exact opposite thinking that brought me to atheism in the first place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,775 ✭✭✭✭Gbear


    f32ns.jpg

    I ****ing love Louis CK.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,775 ✭✭✭✭Gbear


    TRqg4.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,824 ✭✭✭ShooterSF


    I heard it first from Hitchens and it wouldn't surprise me if it originated with him, "don't swallow your moral code in tablet form"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,718 ✭✭✭The Mad Hatter


    Gbear wrote: »
    TRqg4.jpg

    Didn't think that sounded like Wilde, so I did a bit of Googling and it's turned up some interesting results. Wilde isn't the first person that quote has been misattributed to: there are earlier examples attributed to Charles Darwin, but referring to mathematicians, not religion. Even earlier than that it's been used by Lord Bowen to describe metaphysics and by William James on philosophy. H. L. Mencken put it neatly when he said "A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it."

    It seems likely to me that it was just a phrase in common use in the nineteenth century to describe anyone with a futile or pointless task. And, like a lot of phrases that come from the nineteenth century without a source attached, it's been attributed to Wilde, in the same way that any piece of anonymous British comedy winds up attributed to John Cleese.

    (I took most of that information from Wikiquote on Charles Darwin.)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,674 ✭✭✭Mardy Bum


    Didn't think that sounded like Wilde, so I did a bit of Googling and it's turned up some interesting results. Wilde isn't the first person that quote has been misattributed to: there are earlier examples attributed to Charles Darwin, but referring to mathematicians, not religion. Even earlier than that it's been used to describe metaphysicians and the job of a judge. It seems likely to me that it was just a phrase in common use in the nineteenth century to describe anyone with a futile or pointless task.

    I was thinking that myself Wilde actually said
    Religion does not help me. The faith that others give to what is unseen, I give to what I can touch and look at.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,775 ✭✭✭✭Gbear


    Didn't think that sounded like Wilde, so I did a bit of Googling and it's turned up some interesting results. Wilde isn't the first person that quote has been misattributed to: there are earlier examples attributed to Charles Darwin, but referring to mathematicians, not religion. Even earlier than that it's been used by Lord Bowen to describe metaphysics and by William James on philosophy. H. L. Mencken put it neatly when he said "A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it."

    It seems likely to me that it was just a phrase in common use in the nineteenth century to describe anyone with a futile or pointless task. And, like a lot of phrases that come from the nineteenth century without a source attached, it's been attributed to Wilde, in the same way that any piece of anonymous British comedy winds up attributed to John Cleese.

    (I took most of that information from Wikiquote on Charles Darwin.)

    Yeah, I was a bit suspicious but I googled it and it was attributed to him on several pages so I just went with it.

    Soz:o


  • Moderators Posts: 51,858 ✭✭✭✭Delirium


    "The basis of your religion is injustice. The Son of God the pure, the immaculate, the innocent, is sacrificed for the guilty. This proves his heroism, but no more does away with man's sin that a boy's volunteering to be flogged for another would exculpate a dunce from negligence." - Lord Byron.

    If you can read this, you're too close!



  • Moderators Posts: 51,858 ✭✭✭✭Delirium


    "Most Christian theologians have retreated from all things that their religion supposedly asserts; they take a much more 'modern' view than the average belivever. But by the time you've 'modernised' something like Christianity- starting off with 'Genesis was all just poetry' and ending up with 'Well, of course there's no such thing as a personal God' - there's not much point pretending that there's anything religious left. You might as well come clean and admit that you're an atheist with certain values, which are historical, cultural, biological and personal in origin, and have nothing to do with anything called God."

    -Greg Egan

    If you can read this, you're too close!



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,175 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    There's really nothing an agnostic can't do if he really doesn't know whether he believes in anything or not.
    -- Graham Chapman


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,420 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    A propos of Graham Champan:

    226772.jpg


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,442 ✭✭✭Sulla Felix


    You see, no one's going to help you Bubby, because there isn't anybody out there to do it. No one. We're all just complicated arrangements of atoms and subatomic particles - we don't live. But our atoms do move about in such a way as to give us identity and consciousness. We don't die; our atoms just rearrange themselves. There is no God. There can be no God; it's ridiculous to think in terms of a superior being. An inferior being, maybe, because we, we who don't even exist, we arrange our lives with more order and harmony than God ever arranged the earth. We measure; we plot; we create wonderful new things. We are the architects of our own existence. What a lunatic concept to bow down before a God who slaughters millions of innocent children, slowly and agonizingly starves them to death, beats them, tortures them, rejects them. What folly to even think that we should not insult such a God, damn him, think him out of existence. It is our duty to think God out of existence. It is our duty to insult him. **** you, God! Strike me down if you dare, you tyrant, you non-existent fraud! It is the duty of all human beings to think God out of existence. Then we have a future. Because then - and only then - do we take full responsibility for who we are. And that's what you must do, Bubby: think God out of existence; take responsibility for who you are.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,824 ✭✭✭ShooterSF


    Technically a deist I believe but I'm willing to look past that for such awesomeness.

    282757_700b.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    480288_292574414187707_1537364978_n.jpg

    Ain't that the truth!


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,247 ✭✭✭pauldla


    ^^^

    Oh, to be able to give mutliple thanks! Good on you, Bannasidhe.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    598629_302005473244601_1949553816_n.png


  • Registered Users Posts: 390 ✭✭sephir0th


    Carl Sagan wrote:
    “You might imagine an uncharitable extraterrestrial observer looking down on our species... - with us excitedly chattering, "The Universe is created for us! We're at the center! Everything pays homage to us!" - and concluding that our pretensions are amusing, our aspirations pathetic, that this must be the planet of the idiots.”



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,420 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    236271.jpg


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,371 ✭✭✭Obliq


    That's a pretty thought. Nice :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,193 ✭✭✭[Jackass]


    "All thinking men are atheists — Ernest Hemingway"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    [Jackass] wrote: »
    "All thinking men are atheists — Ernest Hemingway"

    The sexist old coot.

    :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,182 ✭✭✭Genghiz Cohen


    Bannasidhe wrote: »
    The sexist old coot.

    :pac:

    OMG CHECK UR PRIVLAGE!


  • Moderators Posts: 51,858 ✭✭✭✭Delirium


    Pale blue dot is ZenPencils #100 :)

    2013-01-21-sagan.jpg?9d7bd4

    If you can read this, you're too close!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    Was just about to post it. :D


  • Moderators Posts: 51,858 ✭✭✭✭Delirium


    figured you might :pac:

    If you can read this, you're too close!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,182 ✭✭✭Genghiz Cohen


    Jernal wrote: »
    Was just about to post it. :D

    It's been about 10 mins, it deserves another post.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    It's been about 10 mins, it deserves another post.

    How many PBD versions have we on this thread? Tomorrow or Thursday I shall go through the thread to see if we missed any obvious one. :D

    <3 PBD.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,718 ✭✭✭The Mad Hatter


    No matter how many times I read or hear that passage, it never gets less powerful or beautiful. I think some day I'll have to set it for choir.


  • Moderators Posts: 51,858 ✭✭✭✭Delirium


    From "Thinking of Answers" by A.C Grayling, from the "proving a negative section".
    For a simple case of proving a negative, by the way, consider how you prove the absence of pennies in a piggy-bank. You break it open and look inside: it is empty. On what grounds would you assert nevertheless that there might possibly still be pennies in there, only you cannot see or hear or feel or spend them?

    If you can read this, you're too close!



  • Registered Users Posts: 324 ✭✭Wereghost


    I don't know if Joseph Heller was theist or not, but this quote from Catch-22 struck me as ripe for inclusion:
    There's nothing mysterious about it, He's not working at all. He's playing. Or else He's forgotten all about us. That's the kind of God you people talk about, a country bumpkin, a clumsy, bungling, brainless, conceited, uncouth hayseed. Good God, how much reverence can you have for a Supreme Being who finds it necessary to include such phenomena as phlegm and tooth decay in His divine system of Creation? What in the world was running through that warped, evil, scatological mind of His when He robbed old people of the power to control their bowel movements? Why in the world did He ever create pain?

    Source: goodreads.com quotes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,775 ✭✭✭✭Gbear


    lsNmED9.jpg


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,105 ✭✭✭Kivaro


    From James Cameron:
    "I've sworn off agnosticism, which I now call cowardly atheism. I've come to the position that in the complete absence of any supporting data whatsover for the persistence of the individual in some spiritual form, it is necessary to operate under the provisional conclusion that there is no afterlife and then be ready to amend that if I find out otherwise."


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,105 ✭✭✭Kivaro


    I haven't heard this one before.
    From Ricky Gervais:
    "Since the beginning of recorded history, which is defined by the invention of writing by the Sumerians around 6,000 years ago, historians have cataloged over 3700 supernatural beings, of which 2870 can be considered deities."

    "So next time someone tells me they believe in God, I’ll say 'Oh which one? Zeus? Hades? Jupiter? Mars? Odin? Thor? Krishna? Vishnu? Ra?…' If they say 'Just God. I only believe in the one God,' I’ll point out that they are nearly as atheistic as me. I don’t believe in 2,870 gods, and they don’t believe in 2,869."


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,420 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,981 ✭✭✭[-0-]


    Kivaro wrote: »
    I haven't heard this one before.
    From Ricky Gervais:

    Really? Pretty sure he stole that.


  • Moderators Posts: 51,858 ✭✭✭✭Delirium


    2013-05-21-caitlinmoran.jpg

    If you can read this, you're too close!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,809 ✭✭✭CerebralCortex


    As an atheist there probably nothing I hate more than other atheists preaching to me how I should live my life. One of the big flaws with the above story board is that it presupposes that aging is always going to be the lead cause of morbidity.


Advertisement