Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

7 days or 7 billion years?

2456789

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,714 ✭✭✭✭Earthhorse


    we're not decended from apes. we share a common ancestor.

    And did he live in the sea?
    Sam Vimes wrote: »
    Why do we need a new flu vaccine every year? That's right, evolution :P

    So you admit it's a bad thing. This is what happens when we listen to scientists.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,479 ✭✭✭✭philologos


    The poll could have been much much more clear.

    One can believe in Evolution, and Old Age Creationism at the same time. It's dishonest to say that it is Evolution vs the rest. Many of the others incorporate evolution.

    Could have been an honest mistake mind :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,976 ✭✭✭✭humanji


    Sam Vimes wrote: »
    Animals have been observed to adapt gradually over generations. The best explanation for this observable fact is what we call evolution. There might be some small details of the theory that are not totally accurate, such as how the theory was updated because Darwin's original theory didn't take account of genes, but the fact remains that animals have been observed to adapt over generations and all of the evidence says that they do it by the process of natural selection.

    Why do we need a new flu vaccine every year? That's right, evolution :P

    As has been suggested, google evolution is both a theory and a fact
    Don't get my wrong, I believe in evolution. I just know that it hasn't been proven. As you say, there are holes in it. Claiming it's fact simply because scientist use different definitions of the wor "fact" is bullsh*t. It's still the most obvious and likely explanation.

    Twilightning stated that it was fact and that you can't believe in a fact. Well, unless you're an Empiricist, I suppose.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,976 ✭✭✭✭humanji


    Jakkass wrote: »
    The poll could have been much much more clear.

    One can believe in Evolution, and Old Age Creationism at the same time. It's dishonest to say that it is Evolution vs the rest. Many of the others incorporate evolution.

    Could have been an honest mistake mind :)
    I think he was going for a lighthearted joke thread, but it backfired. :D

    Though I am interested to know who voted for "Other" and what that other is.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,235 ✭✭✭iregk


    bluto63 wrote: »
    While I believe in Evolution, it doesn't fully explain what we're doing here.

    Who says we're here to do anything?

    Why do people have this definite belief that life must have a meaning or an end goal?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 909 ✭✭✭mobius42


    The poll is a trick question as the only theory there is Evolution. A theory is something that explains a set of phenomena. The religious "theories" explain nothing at all.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,479 ✭✭✭✭philologos


    iregk wrote: »
    Who says we're here to do anything?

    Why do people have this definite belief that life must have a meaning or an end goal?

    Why do people have this definite belief that life doesn't have any meaning at all and that we are here for absolutely nothing at all?

    I personally find that much much harder to believe.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,368 ✭✭✭Smart Bug


    keano_afc wrote: »
    That was in the OP. I think its safe to say the thread has strayed somewhat.


    You could say it has evolved.




    Or God made it so, whatever...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,611 ✭✭✭✭Sam Vimes


    humanji wrote: »
    Don't get my wrong, I believe in evolution. I just know that it hasn't been proven. As you say, there are holes in it. Claiming it's fact simply because scientist use different definitions of the wor "fact" is bullsh*t. It's still the most obvious and likely explanation.

    Twilightning stated that it was fact and that you can't believe in a fact. Well, unless you're an Empiricist, I suppose.

    When people say that evolution is a fact they mean that adaptation through natural selection is a fact because it has been observed to be true. They know that there is a possibility that some details of the theory are wrong.

    @Jakkass, people who think that evolution is guided by god do not understand evolution. If it's being guided then it's no longer natural selection, it's divine selection


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,235 ✭✭✭iregk


    Jakkass wrote: »
    Why do people have this definite belief that life doesn't have any meaning at all and that we are here for absolutely nothing at all?

    I personally find that much much harder to believe.

    Possibly because there are more signs towards that than there are to the reason for life!


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,711 ✭✭✭keano_afc


    Smart Bug wrote: »
    You could say it has evolved.




    Or God made it so, whatever...

    :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,368 ✭✭✭Smart Bug


    Jakkass wrote: »
    The poll could have been much much more clear.

    One can believe in Evolution, and Old Age Creationism at the same time. It's dishonest to say that it is Evolution vs the rest. Many of the others incorporate evolution.

    Could have been an honest mistake mind :)


    By intelligent design, I created the poll to evolve along this path...I work in mysterious ways. :p


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,479 ✭✭✭✭philologos


    iregk wrote: »
    Possibly because there are more signs towards that than there are to the reason for life!

    I disagree that there are any more signs for the hypothesis you put across than for the hypothesis that there is meaning or purpose to the way we are. Anyone who is in any way inquisitive cannot accept that the world is meaningless.

    What signs are you referring to?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,976 ✭✭✭✭humanji


    Sam Vimes wrote: »
    When people say that evolution is a fact they mean that adaptation through natural selection is a fact because it has been observed to be true. They know that there is a possibility that some details of the theory are wrong.

    @Jakkass, people who think that evolution is guided by god do not understand evolution. If it's being guided then it's no longer natural selection, it's divine selection
    Yes, but people claim that we evolved from all sorts of primordial goo based on this. This isn't proof. It's just evidence to support the theory. There's a huge difference.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 909 ✭✭✭mobius42


    Jakkass wrote: »
    Why do people have this definite belief that life doesn't have any meaning at all and that we are here for absolutely nothing at all?

    I personally find that much much harder to believe.

    I was wondering when the "proof from lack of imagination" argument would crop up. It's not about what's easier or harder to believe, it's about what is true. There is no evidence to suggest that there is a meaning of life.

    Of course, this means that the meaning of your life can be whatever you want it to be. Just because there is no grand, cosmic meaning of life doesn't mean that we should all be nihilists.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 994 ✭✭✭Twin-go


    Earthhorse wrote: »
    And another thing; if man came out of the ocean billions of years ago...how come apes don't live in the water?
    ...

    "Man" did not come out of the ocean billions of years ago, nor did apes.

    It was a different creature that evolved into many different land based animals.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,069 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    humanji wrote: »
    Yes, but people claim that we evolved from all sorts of primordial goo based on this. This isn't proof. It's just evidence to support the theory. There's a huge difference.

    Claims are claims, and some illogical claims are made by some illogical people.

    The evidence is clear for anyone that's willing to see it, just look at the evolution of the eye


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,190 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    humanji wrote: »
    Yes, but people claim that we evolved from all sorts of primordial goo based on this.

    Looking at our beloved minister for health, the human race stopped evolving several million years ago, so.

    Poof goes the evolutionary based theory. ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,235 ✭✭✭iregk


    Jakkass wrote: »
    I disagree that there are any more signs for the hypothesis you put across than for the hypothesis that there is meaning or purpose to the way we are. Anyone who is in any way inquisitive cannot accept that the world is meaningless.

    What signs are you referring to?

    I'm not sure if we are dragging this off topic or not but what the hell.

    Let me ask you this. What do you think life is? Do you believe that when you die you will be met at a set of pearly gates and asked what is the meaning of life?

    What will you say?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 909 ✭✭✭mobius42


    Earthhorse wrote: »
    And another thing; if man came out of the ocean billions of years ago...how come apes don't live in the water?

    Please tell me that you're trolling.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,255 ✭✭✭✭The_Minister


    Smart Bug wrote: »
    This is a link to the Christianity forum - a forum I don't believe would be condusive to an un-biased/humourous debate on evolution theories.

    And you're in After Hours for...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    Jakkass wrote: »
    I disagree that there are any more signs for the hypothesis you put across than for the hypothesis that there is meaning or purpose to the way we are. Anyone who is in any way inquisitive cannot accept that the world is meaningless.

    What signs are you referring to?
    Meaning does not exist outside of the heads of a few animals. Animals give things meaning, humans just ran with it trying to turn our symbolism into some all powerful theory of everything.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,368 ✭✭✭Smart Bug


    Pherekydes wrote: »
    Looking at our beloved minister for health, the human race stopped evolving several million years ago, so.

    Poof goes the evolutionary based theory. ;)


    There's a whole theory of how humanity, through medical advances has allowed the 'naturally unfit' not only to continue to exist, but actively breed, thereby weakening the genetic viability of the entire human race. That's where the worthy practice of Eugenics comes in. Maybe the Nazis had some good ideas in there somewhere...


    Wow, it took 5 pages to satisfy Godwin's Law, I'm shocked...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,611 ✭✭✭✭Sam Vimes


    humanji wrote: »
    Yes, but people claim that we evolved from all sorts of primordial goo based on this. This isn't proof. It's just evidence to support the theory. There's a huge difference.

    I see. Yes that is a theory and not proof. Just because adaptation through natural selection is a fact doesn't mean that every theory you come up with based on it is a fact


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,190 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    Smart Bug wrote: »
    Wow, it took 5 pages to satisfy Godwin's Law, I'm shocked...

    Some of us are on page 2. (We have evolved to tweak our preferences :pac:)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,069 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    Smart Bug wrote: »
    There's a whole theory of how humanity, through medical advances has allowed the 'naturally unfit' not only to continue to exist, but actively breed, thereby weakening the genetic viability of the entire human race. That's where the worthy practice of Eugenics comes in. Maybe the Nazis had some good ideas in there somewhere...


    Unnatural is the new natural, the same rules still apply. Adaption to environment is what survival of the fittest is all about


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,479 ✭✭✭✭philologos


    mobius42 wrote: »
    I was wondering when the "proof from lack of imagination" argument would crop up. It's not about what's easier or harder to believe, it's about what is true. There is no evidence to suggest that there is a meaning of life.

    I never intended it as "proof", but rather as a point of debate. I can't possibly fathom why on earth the world would exist the way it does if there was no purpose behind it.

    This is the stumbling block as to why I cannot be an atheist, and not only why I cannot be, but why I don't want to be an atheist. I find the idea that a world would exist without significance to be absolutely absurd.

    As for evidence, as someone who believes in divine revelation I personally do believe that we have a purpose in living our lives out in respect to God, and in respect to other people and to leave a positive mark on this world before we leave. I also have an idea of why the world is a challenging place to live in amongst other things. Atheism doesn't offer a worldview at all.
    mobius42 wrote: »
    Of course, this means that the meaning of your life can be whatever you want it to be. Just because there is no grand, cosmic meaning of life doesn't mean that we should all be nihilists.

    I don't believe that meaning is something which is contrived by humans. The pure reason I don't accept that the earth doesn't have meaning is because I have an iniquisitive mind, or a philosophical mind you could say. I believe in a concept of truth, and falsity, and I don't believe this is contrived by humans. I'm in search of the truth what is behind this all.

    For me rejecting that there is meaning is an open door to nihilism or existentialism. I don't buy into postmodernism.
    iregk wrote: »
    I'm not sure if we are dragging this off topic or not but what the hell.

    Of course we aren't. The question basically surrounds the question why do you think life is the way it is. I think it is because God has created life, and that God has given us a purpose which we can accept or reject.
    iregk wrote: »
    Let me ask you this. What do you think life is? Do you believe that when you die you will be met at a set of pearly gates and asked what is the meaning of life?

    What will you say?

    I will say this. Life is about understanding the world you live in. It's about developing a relationship with God, learning to love and serve Him in the world, and to reach out to other people so as to make the world a better place as when you came into it.

    When I die, I don't believe I will be met with a set of pearly gates. Rather I believe that I will have to make an account for everything I have done, or everything that I have said. Nothing will be a secret to anyone about what I have done for the worse or for the better in my life. Jesus Christ will determine whether or not I have been faithful to Him in this lifetime when He will judge mankind, and determine if I believed in His saving death on the cross, and whether or not I was in the book of Life. On determining this, if He decides that I have witnessed to His glory, I will spend eternity with God. If not I will spend eternity in punishment. That's my belief on what happens in the hereafter.

    However I will emphasise, that I am focused more on what Christianity can do in the world now, rather than what the afterlife will be like.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,389 ✭✭✭✭Saruman


    I can't believe there is no option for "The force" :D
    Kudos on the Atari Jaguar option though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,714 ✭✭✭✭Earthhorse


    mobius42 wrote: »
    Please tell me that you're trolling.

    No, I'm not "trolling".


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 174 ✭✭NilByMouth


    I dont really care how we got to were we are as a species,just glad to be sitting in front of a pc on a sunny day like this typing cr!ap


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,479 ✭✭✭✭philologos


    Earthhorse: Evolutionary biology doesn't say that humans descended from apes, rather that humans and apes have a common ancestor like the fossil that was discovered in Germany recently. This common ancestor changed in two different directions (of course more, but I'm referring in simple terms to humans and apes), one into the apes that we commonly know as primates, and one into homosapiens and so on through very very minor genetic changes over a long period of time. This is what I have grasped anyway. Changes which are to the detriment of the species cause it to die out, leaving only the species with the beneficial changes to survive and adapt to it's environment (This is referred to as natural selection). The argument is that only after millions of years did humans and apes become so different from eachother.

    Further evolution in human species has according to current theory given us our regional differences, as people have adapted to their different environments.

    Someone feel free to correct if I'm wrong.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,235 ✭✭✭iregk


    Jakkass wrote: »
    I will say this. Life is about understanding the world you live in. It's about developing a relationship with God, learning to love and serve Him in the world, and to reach out to other people so as to make the world a better place as when you came into it.

    That is all I needed to hear.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 576 ✭✭✭pts


    Jakkass wrote: »
    .
    .
    .
    stuff
    .
    .
    .
    .
    I tldr'd your post in case people don't want to read through the whole thing :D
    http://www.jesusandmo.net/strips/2008-12-17.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,220 ✭✭✭✭biko


    Smart Bug wrote: »
    It's 200 years since Darwin's birth
    You can say Happy Birthday here :D
    I think this also clarifies my position is this matter.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 994 ✭✭✭Twin-go


    Jakkass wrote: »
    I never intended it as "proof", but rather as a point of debate. I can't possibly fathom why on earth the world would exist the way it does if there was no purpose behind it.

    This is the stumbling block as to why I cannot be an atheist, and not only why I cannot be, but why I don't want to be an atheist. I find the idea that a world would exist without significance to be absolutely absurd.

    As for evidence, as someone who believes in divine revelation I personally do believe that we have a purpose in living our lives out in respect to God, and in respect to other people and to leave a positive mark on this world before we leave. I also have an idea of why the world is a challenging place to live in amongst other things. Atheism doesn't offer a worldview at all.



    I don't believe that meaning is something which is contrived by humans. The pure reason I don't accept that the earth doesn't have meaning is because I have an iniquisitive mind, or a philosophical mind you could say. I believe in a concept of truth, and falsity, and I don't believe this is contrived by humans. I'm in search of the truth what is behind this all.

    For me rejecting that there is meaning is an open door to nihilism or existentialism. I don't buy into postmodernism.



    Of course we aren't. The question basically surrounds the question why do you think life is the way it is. I think it is because God has created life, and that God has given us a purpose which we can accept or reject.



    I will say this. Life is about understanding the world you live in. It's about developing a relationship with God, learning to love and serve Him in the world, and to reach out to other people so as to make the world a better place as when you came into it.

    When I die, I don't believe I will be met with a set of pearly gates. Rather I believe that I will have to make an account for everything I have done, or everything that I have said. Nothing will be a secret to anyone about what I have done for the worse or for the better in my life. Jesus Christ will determine whether or not I have been faithful to Him in this lifetime when He will judge mankind, and determine if I believed in His saving death on the cross, and whether or not I was in the book of Life. On determining this, if He decides that I have witnessed to His glory, I will spend eternity with God. If not I will spend eternity in punishment. That's my belief on what happens in the hereafter.

    However I will emphasise, that I am focused more on what Christianity can do in the world now, rather than what the afterlife will be like.


    Sorry Jackass but there is no evidence of God. Religion is a man made invention. Things done in the name of religion have caused much pain and suffering in the world. Can Man not be trusted to create or own moral code? Do we need one more reason to be at war?

    Most religions preach love thy neighbour but practice love thy neighbour if he believes what you believe.

    Crusades, jihads, holy wars, child abuse and done in the name of one God or another or in the case of the latter covered up by thoes that claim to serve him. I doubt if God exsited he would let

    Why not worship Zeus, Thor or any other countless "Gods" for the acient cultures?

    Religion is for the closed minded. It's the easy explaination.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,479 ✭✭✭✭philologos


    pts wrote: »
    I tldr'd your post in case people don't want to read through the whole thing :D
    http://www.jesusandmo.net/strips/2008-12-17.jpg

    It would have been a cool cartoon strip if I believed that religion and science were opposed to eachother. Currently I don't. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 576 ✭✭✭pts


    Jakkass wrote: »
    It would have been a cool cartoon strip if I believed that religion and science were opposed to eachother. Currently I don't. :)

    I know, semi joking. In all fairness though the 1st half of the comic more or less summarises a common theological argument. The 2nd half pokes fun at that argument. But I do think it raises a valid point.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 884 ✭✭✭ya-ba-da-ba-doo


    Its evolution for me.. But the thing that boggles me is where that first organism came from. How can this first organism just appear from nowhere and evolve over the years?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,479 ✭✭✭✭philologos


    Twin-go wrote: »
    Sorry Jackass but there is no evidence of God. Religion is a man made invention. Things done in the name of religion have caused much pain and suffering in the world. Can Man not be trusted to create or own moral code? Do we need one more reason to be at war?

    I disagree with you. There is no proof for God's existence of lack thereof. However there is indication for why Christianity is probably true. Many authors deal with these topics and it's just a matter of your own initiative to listen to their arguments. William Lane Craig, Lee Strobel, Allister McGrath, C.S Lewis, Ravi Zacharias amongst other truly brilliant Christian apologists all bring interesting reasons for why God most likely existed and why the Bible is most likely true to the table.

    So yes, it's a debate, but that doesn't mean that there aren't strong reasons for believing in Christ in a world that promotes reason and education.

    Can man not be trusted to create a moral code? No definitely not given mans track record :). I don't think morals are created anyway. I think they exist universally.
    Twin-go wrote: »
    Most religions preach love thy neighbour but practice love thy neighbour if he believes what you believe.

    I like you think that's wrong.
    Twin-go wrote: »
    Crusades, jihads, holy wars, child abuse and done in the name of one God or another or in the case of the latter covered up by thoes that claim to serve him. I doubt if God exsited he would let

    I consider the Crusades to be abhorrent, and many Christians did at the time too according to historical sources. Likewise with child abuse.

    These aren't the product of religion anyway, but rather the abuse of religion by man. There are examples where people have abused atheism too.
    Twin-go wrote: »
    Why not worship Zeus, Thor or any other countless "Gods" for the acient cultures?

    I haven't been posed with good reasons to, like I have been for Christianity.
    Twin-go wrote: »
    Religion is for the closed minded. It's the easy explaination.

    Funny how it wasn't until I opened my mind to consider it until I found it for real :). After a little more than two years being committed to Christianity I have to say that it certainly isn't the easy path or the easy way out.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,611 ✭✭✭✭Sam Vimes


    pts wrote: »
    I know, semi joking. In all fairness though the 1st half of the comic more or less summarises a common theological argument. The 2nd half pokes fun at that argument. But I do think it raises a valid point.

    Us pastafarians answer the really important questions such as "why is the sky green?" and "why does cheese?", two questions science is completely unable to answer. They say stuff like "the sky is not green" and "that question makes no sense" but we all know that's nonsense :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 962 ✭✭✭darjeeling


    Jakkass wrote: »
    Earthhorse: Evolutionary biology doesn't say that humans descended from apes, rather that humans and apes have a common ancestor like the fossil that was discovered in Germany recently. This common ancestor changed in two different directions (of course more, but I'm referring in simple terms to humans and apes), one into the apes that we commonly know as primates, and one into homosapiens and so on through very very minor genetic changes over a long period of time. This is what I have grasped anyway. Changes which are to the detriment of the species cause it to die out, leaving only the species with the beneficial changes to survive and adapt to it's environment (This is referred to as natural selection). The argument is that only after millions of years did humans and apes become so different from eachother.

    Further evolution in human species has according to current theory given us our regional differences, as people have adapted to their different environments.

    Someone feel free to correct if I'm wrong.

    You're wrong! ;)

    Celebrity German fossil primate 'Ida' died way before the common ancestor of humans and other apes. She was alive almost 50 million years ago (although she's probably now back on Twitter), and the Johnny-come-lately apes didn't show up for another 20 million or so. Humans and chimps only split 5-7 million years ago.

    Lemurs, tarsiers, monkeys (old & new world), apes - which include us - are all primates. Yes, bishops are primates too.

    And that 'detriment of the species' talk is as near as it gets to heresy in evolution.

    The rest, you have grasped correctly. Opposable thumbs be praised!

    Here endeth the lesson.

    .


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 994 ✭✭✭Twin-go


    [/quote]Funny how it wasn't until I opened my mind to consider it until I found it for real :). After a little more than two years being committed to Christianity I have to say that it certainly isn't the easy path or the easy way out.[/quote]

    In my view I feel that I am open mind in so far as, if I was shown concrete proof of the exsistance of God I would acept it. The majority Christians will believe in God even if they are shown proof to the contry.

    This is the only life we have so we'd better make the most of it. We did not have any consciousness before conception nor will there be an afterlife. Carpe Diem.

    Christianity as we know it today steams from Medevil ideoligy and is outdated. As more and more people learn to think for themselves less and less will turn to religion.

    The most stable countries to live in with the least amount of social disorder are countries where Atheists are in the Majority.

    What was it that opened your mind and give you such a strong commitment to Christianity?


  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 35,945 Mod ✭✭✭✭dr.bollocko


    Ye gads.
    Big words.
    Scary.
    /runs.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 909 ✭✭✭mobius42


    Jakkass wrote: »
    I never intended it as "proof", but rather as a point of debate. I can't possibly fathom why on earth the world would exist the way it does if there was no purpose behind it. This is the stumbling block as to why I cannot be an atheist, and not only why I cannot be, but why I don't want to be an atheist. I find the idea that a world would exist without significance to be absolutely absurd.
    Okay, so you can't imagine how the world has no purpose, fair enough. However, this is no way strengthens or lends credence to your argument. Saying you can't imagine something is not proof of anything beyond your closed-mindedness.


    Jakkass wrote: »
    As for evidence, as someone who believes in divine revelation I personally do believe that we have a purpose in living our lives out in respect to God, and in respect to other people and to leave a positive mark on this world before we leave. I also have an idea of why the world is a challenging place to live in amongst other things.
    You say "as or evidence" and then go on to talk about divine revelation. I find it terrifying that you think this is evidence of anything.
    Jakkass wrote: »
    Atheism doesn't offer a worldview at all.
    Nor does it claim to. It's about reality, not painting a pretty picture of the world. Atheism is not a philosophy, it is merely a lack of belief in a deity due to lack of evidence.
    Jakkass wrote: »
    I don't believe that meaning is something which is contrived by humans. The pure reason I don't accept that the earth doesn't have meaning is because I have an iniquisitive mind, or a philosophical mind you could say. I believe in a concept of truth, and falsity, and I don't believe this is contrived by humans. I'm in search of the truth what is behind this all.
    Basically, you are saying that inquisitiveness is proof of the meaning of life. This is so logically incoherent that I had to re-read it several times to make sure that I wasn't misinterpreting you. Also, your entire philosopy seems to be based on faith. If it really is about finding out truth, why do you have absolutely no evidence to back up your claims? I think the real reason people refuse to accept the fact that life might not have a grand meaning is fear. They are afraid that no-one is in charge and that everything they do is meaningless.

    Jakkass wrote: »
    I will say this. Life is about understanding the world you live in. It's about developing a relationship with God,
    There is a huge chasm between those two sentences. You say it is about developing a relationship with God. Why? Which God? What is God? How does believing in God further understanding of anything?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,714 ✭✭✭✭Earthhorse


    Ye gads.
    Big words.
    Scary.
    /runs.

    Too much fibre in your diet.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,479 ✭✭✭✭philologos


    Twin-go wrote: »
    In my view I feel that I am open mind in so far as, if I was shown concrete proof of the exsistance of God I would acept it. The majority Christians will believe in God even if they are shown proof to the contry.

    You say that the majority of Christians will believe in God even if they are shown proof to the contrary. How do you know this given that there is currently no proof?
    Twin-go wrote: »
    This is the only life we have so we'd better make the most of it. We did not have any consciousness before conception nor will there be an afterlife. Carpe Diem.

    I don't agree that it is our only life, but what I will say is that we should strive to make it as best for everyone as possible. I don't agree with you on consciousness, or afterlife because you have no means of assessment apart from a hunch. However, why don't you think that people who have faith are making the best of their lives?

    This is one thing that comes up a lot. I think by having faith in God I am making the most of my life.
    Twin-go wrote: »
    Christianity as we know it today steams from Medevil ideoligy and is outdated. As more and more people learn to think for themselves less and less will turn to religion.

    I think for myself, and in this independent thought process I decided to follow God. By the by, Christianity as we know it today is based on Judaism just as it was in the first century :)
    Twin-go wrote: »
    The most stable countries to live in with the least amount of social disorder are countries where Atheists are in the Majority.

    Nonsense. Anyone who says this is picking and choosing. Why does nobody consider China or North Korea in these assessments they make? Interesting bias no?
    Twin-go wrote: »
    What was it that opened your mind and give you such a strong commitment to Christianity?

    Curiosity. I guess that was the primary of many factors.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,611 ✭✭✭✭Sam Vimes


    Jakkass wrote: »
    Nonsense. Anyone who says this is picking and choosing. Why does nobody consider China or North Korea in these assessments they make? Interesting bias no?

    Because those people are not necessarily atheists. Instead they have to say they are because they'll be executed if they don't. Slight difference. Those countries are an example of the problems with totalitarian states that brutalise their people, not atheism


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,479 ✭✭✭✭philologos


    mobius42 wrote: »
    Okay, so you can't imagine how the world has no purpose, fair enough. However, this is no way strengthens or lends credence to your argument. Saying you can't imagine something is not proof of anything beyond your closed-mindedness.

    I never said that it did give credence. It's just absolutely absurd to suggest that something exists, not only just something, but a place where we as humanity invest so much of our time and effort in, to end up with it being "meaningless".

    I don't consider it closed minded to use a bit of common sense and reason.
    mobius42 wrote: »
    You say "as or evidence" and then go on to talk about divine revelation. I find it terrifying that you think this is evidence of anything.

    I consider divine revelation to be a record of communication between God and prophets. It's not "evidence" that is the concern however. The debate surrounds indication. What indicates to you that God exists, or what indicates to you that God does not. As for someone who cannot see how God can be indicated for, or what suggests that God exists, I would reccommend that you read some apologetics.
    mobius42 wrote: »
    Nor does it claim to. It's about reality, not painting a pretty picture of the world. Atheism is not a philosophy, it is merely a lack of belief in a deity due to lack of evidence.

    Atheism has nothing to do with reality, it's a mere denial. Whether or not such a denial is accurate in reality is a totally different question.
    mobius42 wrote: »
    Basically, you are saying that inquisitiveness is proof of the meaning of life. This is so logically incoherent that I had to re-read it several times to make sure that I wasn't misinterpreting you. Also, your entire philosopy seems to be based on faith. If it really is about finding out truth, why do you have absolutely no evidence to back up your claims? I think the real reason people refuse to accept the fact that life might not have a grand meaning is fear. They are afraid that no-one is in charge and that everything they do is meaningless.

    No, I'm not. I'm merely saying that there is only so far atheism can go in satisfying someones intellectual curiosity.

    As for my entire philosophy being based on faith, no it isn't really. I believe there are genuine reasons besides for faith why believing in God is reasonable. Faith and reason go hand in hand in terms of a Christian outlook. Likewise, reason is absolutely useless on its own, it must go hand in hand with empiricism or what one can gain through experience.

    Christians reason the Biblical scriptures because it is considered to be a chronology of peoples experiences. However, it is important also to have indication external to the Biblical text.
    mobius42 wrote: »
    There is a huge chasm between those two sentences. You say it is about developing a relationship with God. Why? Which God? What is God? How does believing in God further understanding of anything?

    Which God? - The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob seems to be the most reasonable to me.

    Why? - Why believe in God? Investigate what Christians actually argue. I've listed quite a few authors so far on this thread that give pretty clear reasons why one should believe in God.

    What is God? - This is where divine revelation kicks in. God revealed Himself to prophets and reveals Himself to us on a daily basis in our daily lives as Christians.

    How does believing in God further understanding? - Well belief in God requires people to assess issues beyond a face value approach. Isolating what we can know to what we can only see at face value is a rather limiting worldview.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,848 ✭✭✭bleg


    humanji wrote: »
    If you can prove that it's 100% fact then there are a whole load of evolutionary biologists who would like you to explain it to them.



    whilst the theory of evolution by natural selection is a theory, it is a fact that evolution happens.

    just because the theory of gravity was a theory doesn't mean gravity didn't exist.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,190 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    Sam Vimes wrote: »
    Those countries are an example of the problems with totalitarian states that brutalise their people, not atheism

    And they do it in the name of atheism, whether they admit it or not.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement