Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

PARAS OR ROYAL MARINES ???

Options
13

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭cruasder777


    RMD wrote: »
    The SAS don't have command over any UK SOF units other than that of their own regiment. SAS, SBS AND SRR all stand on an equal footing within UKSF.


    Lol, the Director Special Forces (DSF) is nearly always a former SAS brigader or colonel. He is the director of all UKSOF.

    The SAS control UKSOF forces beacuse commanders of UKSF are normally former SAS commanders, hence the SBS opposition to coming under that command/control when they became the Special Boat service in 87 and moved to Hereford, nowadays even their selection is run by the SAS.

    The SRR are a continum of 14 Int coy an SAS creation with SAS command.


    "UKSF was formed in 1987 to draw together the Army's Special Air Service (SAS) and the Special Boat Squadron Royal Marines (SBS), which was renamed the Special Boat Service at the same time, into a unified command, based around the former Director SAS who was given the additional title of Director Special Forces. The directorate has been expanded by the creation of the Joint Special Forces Aviation Wing, the Special Reconnaissance Regiment and the Special Forces Support Group."



    .......It was the SAS reward from Mrs T for the Iranian embassy siege, the Falklands and NI. The control of all UKSOF units put under the control of a former SAS director general in 87.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,246 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran



    What do you think the Iranians would regard a captured PF patrol as muppet ?

    [Mod]All right, calm down.[/mod]
    dont dispute that, all am saying is other nations regard such units as Special Forces

    I don't believe the US would. I am reminded of US Marine Force Recon units. They are capable of carrying out some of the roles traditionally associated with Special Forces units, but they are not capable of carrying out the same range of roles as Special Forces units. As a result, Force Recon are categorised as "Special Operations Capable" not "Special Forces." Thus, you'll find hard-core Force Recon Marines who like nothing better than living on roots and slugs for five weeks conducting deep recon, but you will not generally find those same Force Recon Marines growing long beards and integrating with a local community to aid in a fight as SF personnel do.

    US Army Pathfinders don't even make it to the Special Operations Capable category as far as I know. If HALO jumps are required to be a pathfinder, you don't need to be SF to wear the do the HALO to wear the Pathfinder badge.

    NTM


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,662 ✭✭✭RMD


    Lol, the Director Special Forces (DSF) is nearly always a former SAS brigader or colonel. He is the director of all UKSOF.

    The SAS control UKSOF forces beacuse commanders of UKSF are normally former SAS commanders, hence the SBS opposition to coming under that command/control when they became the Special Boat service in 87 and moved to Hereford, nowadays even their selection is run by the SAS.

    The SRR are a continum of 14 Int coy an SAS creation with SAS command.


    "UKSF was formed in 1987 to draw together the Army's Special Air Service (SAS) and the Special Boat Squadron Royal Marines (SBS), which was renamed the Special Boat Service at the same time, into a unified command, based around the former Director SAS who was given the additional title of Director Special Forces. The directorate has been expanded by the creation of the Joint Special Forces Aviation Wing, the Special Reconnaissance Regiment and the Special Forces Support Group."



    .......It was the SAS reward from Mrs T for the Iranian embassy siege, the Falklands and NI. The control of all UKSOF units put under the control of a former SAS director general in 87.

    By your logic then, if a former SBS brigadier / colonel became the CO of UKSF, the SBS would control the UKSF at that time. See how skewed that is of a logic?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭cruasder777


    [Mod]All right, calm down.[/mod]



    I don't believe the US would. I am reminded of US Marine Force Recon units. They are capable of carrying out some of the roles traditionally associated with Special Forces units, but they are not capable of carrying out the same range of roles as Special Forces units. As a result, Force Recon are categorised as "Special Operations Capable" not "Special Forces." Thus, you'll find hard-core Force Recon Marines who like nothing better than living on roots and slugs for five weeks conducting deep recon, but you will not generally find those same Force Recon Marines growing long beards and integrating with a local community to aid in a fight as SF personnel do.

    US Army Pathfinders don't even make it to the Special Operations Capable category as far as I know. If HALO jumps are required to be a pathfinder, you don't need to be SF to wear the do the HALO to wear the Pathfinder badge.

    NTM


    The whole hearts and minds living with the natives SOF thing has only been around since the late 1950s.

    The ISTAR Pathfinder role in Afghanistan is effectively a special forces role, its alot more then recon.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭cruasder777


    RMD wrote: »
    By your logic then, if a former SBS brigadier / colonel became the CO of UKSF, the SBS would control the UKSF at that time. See how skewed that is of a logic?


    Every UKSOF Major General bar 1 (who was regular army) has been an ex SAS commander.

    The UKSOF forces directorate is overwhelmingly staffed with SAS officers, their input into who becomes Major General is an overwhelming factor.

    All UKSOF operations are run from Credenhill, where the SAS are based.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,497 ✭✭✭Poccington


    The whole hearts and minds living with the natives SOF thing has only been around since the late 1950s.

    The ISTAR Pathfinder role in Afghanistan is effectively a special forces role, its alot more then recon.

    While the ISTAR role certainly goes beyond the taskings of a conventional Recce Platoon, I dunno if it quite justifies a Unit being deemed SOF.

    Although, if that is the case.... I'm growing a beard in work. :p


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,166 ✭✭✭twinytwo


    Crusader777

    Until you can quote something other than here say and wikipedia... ill continue to laugh at you.

    Unless you are infact in UKSF???... which i highly doubt, you have no way to actually prove other than the sources mentioned above any of the tripe you are spouting.

    AT the end of the day no matter how hard you try to avoid the fact.. the Pathfinders are not SF... you can spout on about halo jumping and LRP and 6 week run outs or how hard they are... it still dosent make them SF's

    You mentioned that there training is harder than the SRR??... can you prove this fact??... do you know from first hand experience????

    As perviously stated while the pathfinders may be a highly trained unit, they have not passed the UKSF selection and are therefore not and never will be (no matter how much you wish it) Special forces.

    By your very own logic...the RMML's would be SF right??... guess what... they arnt either.

    Let me ask you.... what is the primary role of the pathfinders???

    As regards your iran comment... they would be regarded as foreign soldiers, armed agressors who had breached international law by setting foot in a foreign state, without the prior approval of its government, which would then be considered an act of war.


  • Registered Users Posts: 133 ✭✭IrelandDylan


    The pathfinders aren't a part of the SAS. Are they under the command of the UKSF like the SAS, SBS, SRR and SFSG? I think not. They are a part of the PARAs. As the above said, if they're SF, shouldn't the Royal Marines Mountain Leaders be SF too? Although their selection is much like that of UKSF, they're primary role is reconnaissance, nothing else.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭cruasder777


    You guys really dont have a clue, Pathfinders ISTAR ops in Afghanistan are in the remit of Special forces ops, PFs have done long range patrols with the SAS there. We know they are not OFFICIALLY SOF but their role often is.

    Pathfinders sometimes also serve with/alongside G sqn 22 SAS in other places, rumour is also in Libya.

    18] The Pathfinders, alongside the UKSF,[19] oversaw the uneasy truce and were used to establish links between the warring factions and monitor any hostile activities.Operation Essential Harvest - With the rise in ethnic tension overspilling in to violence in Republic of Macedonia between ethnic Albanian, National Liberation Army (NLA) and Macedonian security forces, the British Government sent a force to oversee a NATO-led ceasefire.[18The Pathfinders, alongside the UKSF,[19] oversaw the uneasy truce and were used to establish links between the warring factions and monitor any hostile activities


    ^ Berry, Jessica; Lusher, Adam (19 August 2001). "Macedonia strife threatens Nato mission". The Daily Telegraph (London). http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/macedonia/1337938/Macedonia-strife-threatens-Nato-mission.html.



    The 400-strong advanced British contingent, to be in position by tonight, includes a Pathfinder platoon trained in covert reconnaissance. They will assist members of the SAS who are already in Macedonia, mapping rebel positions and assessing the weaponry available to each side.


    Operation Agricola - In June 1999, the Pathfinder Platoon was deployed to Kosovo. It operated behind enemy lines providing reconnaissance and forward air control(with the SAS). Once NATO forces entered Kosovo, the Platoon provided a defensive screen around Pristina International Airport prior to the arrival of the Russian forces.[17]



    Operation Telic - In Iraq, The primary mission for the teams was to conduct mobile surveillance/fighting patrols behind enemy lines in support of UK and US forces. After the hostilities, the unit were redeployed on the Iran/Iraq border as well as carrying out "snatch squad" tasks on suspected Ba'athist war criminals in Maysan (Once again with 22 SAS)



    .......Are posters still claiming they have no special forces role ?..........LOL

    As for twintytwo I suggest you lay off the drink.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,195 ✭✭✭goldie fish


    Yet another wiki cut and paste from crusader...


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭cruasder777


    Yet another wiki cut and paste from crusader...


    Other wise you would simply say I made it up.

    Like you guys do, lol


    I actually also posted a link to an article on a SOF operation they did alongside the SAS. Why not pretend you never noticed.


  • Registered Users Posts: 133 ✭✭IrelandDylan


    Honestly like, Wiki is written by normal people, it's not official. Articles from newspapers are true 5% of the time. They do RECONNAISSANCE, which if you hadf even read the articles, you would of known. The SF NEED Reconnaissance Operators to do their stuff for future operations. Doesn't mean they go in and do the operations with the SAS, they help with the pre-operational reconnaissance. Please go back to COD lad.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭cruasder777


    Honestly like, Wiki is written by normal people, it's not official. Articles from newspapers are true 5% of the time. They do RECONNAISSANCE, which if you hadf even read the articles, you would of known. The SF NEED Reconnaissance Operators to do their stuff for future operations. Doesn't mean they go in and do the operations with the SAS, they help with the pre-operational reconnaissance. Please go back to COD lad.

    Why are you inventing bs ?

    So the Daily Telegraph made this up ?

    The 400-strong advanced British contingent, to be in position by tonight, includes a Pathfinder platoon trained in covert reconnaissance. They will assist members of the SAS who are already in Macedonia, mapping rebel positions and assessing the weaponry available to each side.


    .................You people really are full of .....:rolleyes:


    They are now on half SF pay, this pay was sanctioned by the MoD review body as an 'advanced parachutist pay(HAPC)' to cover the HALO/HAHO role.


  • Registered Users Posts: 133 ✭✭IrelandDylan


    As I said, ASSISTING the SAS in Reconnaissance. You're some thick lad.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭cruasder777


    As I said, ASSISTING the SAS in Reconnaissance. You're some thick lad.


    ......If they are out on operations serving alongside the SAS......that makes it a SOF role, muppet :rolleyes:


    Is this not a SOF role ?
    Operation Agricola - In June 1999, the Pathfinder Platoon was deployed to Kosovo. It operated behind enemy lines providing reconnaissance and forward air control(with the SAS). Once NATO forces entered Kosovo, the Platoon provided a defensive screen around Pristina International Airport prior to the arrival of the Russian forces.[17]



    Operation Telic - In Iraq, The primary mission for the teams was to conduct mobile surveillance/fighting patrols behind enemy lines in support of UK and US forces. After the hostilities, the unit were redeployed on the Iran/Iraq border as well as carrying out "snatch squad" tasks on suspected Ba'athist war criminals in Maysan (Once again with 22 SAS)


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,148 ✭✭✭✭Lemming


    Honestly like, Wiki is written by normal people, it's not official.

    Not taking sides here or anything, but wikipedia entries can be written by anybody, which includes "normal" people. Which is why wikipedia, however often accurate it may be, is not a guaruanteed, 100% reliable source.

    The entries in question could well have been written by someone kosher, but you just can't prove it.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭cruasder777


    The pathfinders aren't a part of the SAS. Are they under the command of the UKSF like the SAS, SBS, SRR and SFSG? I think not. They are a part of the PARAs. As the above said, if they're SF, shouldn't the Royal Marines Mountain Leaders be SF too? Although their selection is much like that of UKSF, they're primary role is reconnaissance, nothing else.


    On operations where the Pathfinders serve with the SAS they come under the command of UK SOF.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭cruasder777


    BBC Programme from the early 90s on the Pathfinders....2mins 20...."the PFs have strong links to the SAS". Shows them training in the jungle with the SAS, with non standard issue weapons.13.45.. Defence secretary, "the Pathfinders are also involved in rescues"(JRRF, op Barras Sierra Leone 2000)
    14.40 good to see an Irish guardsman in the PFs.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/p00fgprc/Defence_of_the_Realm_Phantom_Platoon/


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭cruasder777


    Pathfinders practising Special Forces SOPs 2mins 15 seconds.


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvile3oxAjM&feature=related


  • Registered Users Posts: 133 ✭✭IrelandDylan


    The PARAs assisted the SAS in the rescue operation in Sierra Leone, does that make them SOF? No. The PARAs brochure says ''The PARAs have strong links to the SAS'' Does that make them SOF? No. This lad here says he's a pathfinder. Obviously, we cant confirm that, but can you tell me where he says the Pathfinders are SOF? http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080127045017AA5LEQz
    The Pathfinder Platoon is a specialist unit of the British Army which provdes deep reconnaissance and offensive operations beyond the forward edge of battle area as a brigade asset of 16 Air Assault Brigade.
    The training is intense and we also train with th Special Air service ( in fact about 65% of the SAS come from the Parachute regiment).
    Pathfinders, along with UKSF( United Kingdom Special Forces), avoid the glare of publicity. Due to its guarded nature, many people (including serving officers and servicemen within HM Forces) are unaware to the units true role, tasks and missions.

    Boom.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭cruasder777


    The PARAs assisted the SAS in the rescue operation in Sierra Leone, does that make them SOF? No. The PARAs brochure says ''The PARAs have strong links to the SAS'' Does that make them SOF? No. This lad here says he's a pathfinder. Obviously, we cant confirm that, but can you tell me where he says the Pathfinders are SOF? http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080127045017AA5LEQz







    Boom.




    Where did anyone say they were officially Special Forces ?

    But the fact is they are selected as and train as Special Forces and sometimes take part in Special Forces operations alongside the SAS, they are under SAS command when they do so. They also train with 22 SAS on various exercises.


    Operation Barras was an SAS recue operation which the PFs also took part in......Ie A special Forces operation for any slow learners.



    Your link back ups what I said, including the fact they do SAS Phase 1 Brecon selection.



    "The training is intense and we also train with th Special Air service ( in fact about 65% of the SAS come from the Parachute regiment).

    The platoon is an element of the Brigade Headquarters and based in Colchester, Essex.

    The platoon is formed of a number of which can operate independently or as part of a larger forward element under a Field Headquarters headed by a Captain, supported by a Sergeant.

    The teams operate in with between 4-6 men and are commanded a by senior Patrol Commander whose rank can range from Sergeant to Private ( similar to the SAS).

    Phase 1 begins with the standard British Army fitness tests including Battle Fitness Test and swimming proficiency and includes the tests undertaken during P Company; '2 Miler' (3 km), '8 Miler' (13 km) and '10 Miler' (16 km) speed marches carrying SA-80 rifle and Bergen but with more demanding time objectives and at greater weight loads.

    Fitness and Navigation - Individual
    The Brecon Beacons
    Enlarge
    The Brecon Beacons

    Phase 2 is similar to the hill phase of UKSF(United Kingdom Special Forces) selection; a series of long, solo marches over the Brecon Beacons, Black Mountains and Elan Valley carrying personal equipment, leading to a heavy individual load. Routes are traversed at a minimum 4 km/h, covering an average of 29 km with a 60 pound bergen and rifle.


    Performance is testing with progress hampered by frequent inclement weather and poor conditions underfoot. Foot injuries and blisters are common, adding to the psychological challenge of individual performance and the loss rate at this stage in training is high.

    The final challenge in this phase is a 40 mile (60 km) tab taking in all the highest peaks in the Southern Wales region.




    Security and secrecy

    Pathfinders, along with UKSF( United Kingdom Special Forces), avoid the glare of publicity. Due to its guarded nature, many people (including serving officers and servicemen within HM Forces) are unaware to the units true role, tasks and missions. This has subsequently led to a number of security errors wherby names and photos of operators have been leaked to the media.

    Pathfinders are granted an enormous amount of flexibility and autonomy. They do not maintain any general uniformed presence and civilian clothing is the norm on or off duty. Uniforms are rarely worn, if at all, with any markings, names, or branch names on them. Hair styles and facial hair are allowed to grow to civilian standards in order for the force to be able to blend in and not be immediately recognized as military personnel."


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭cruasder777


    As I said, ASSISTING the SAS in Reconnaissance. You're some thick lad.

    More then reconnasiance also * Battlespace preparation by sabotage and offensive raiding in the medium and deep battlespace....As Your link states.


    Whos thick ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,497 ✭✭✭Poccington


    Lads, the next person to insult someone, call someone a walt etc. will be getting an infraction.

    **** sake, I'm sure you can all argue a point without resorting to insults.

    Also, can we keep the copy and paste stuff to a mimimum? It clogs up the thread, so it'd be handier to just provide a link where possible.

    Thanks.


  • Registered Users Posts: 133 ✭✭IrelandDylan


    More then reconnasiance also * Battlespace preparation by sabotage and offensive raiding in the medium and deep battlespace....As Your link states.


    Whos thick ?

    In that quote, I was referring to the article you posted.
    Where did anyone say they were officially Special Forces ?

    But the fact is they are selected as and train as Special Forces and sometimes take part in Special Forces operations alongside the SAS, they are under SAS command when they do so. They also train with 22 SAS on various exercises.
    No-where in that link does it say they do the SAS Phase One Selection. Just because they train with SF, doesn't mean they ARE SF. Support elements will often be needed, that doesn't mean they become SF for a day.
    Operation Barras was an SAS recue operation which the PFs also took part in......Ie A special Forces operation for any slow learners.
    That was 1 PARA, not the pathfinders.


    Your link back ups what I said, including the fact they do SAS Phase 1 Brecon selection.
    I dont see that written anywhere.


    "The training is intense and we also train with th Special Air service ( in fact about 65% of the SAS come from the Parachute regiment).

    The platoon is an element of the Brigade Headquarters and based in Colchester, Essex.

    The platoon is formed of a number of which can operate independently or as part of a larger forward element under a Field Headquarters headed by a Captain, supported by a Sergeant.

    The teams operate in with between 4-6 men and are commanded a by senior Patrol Commander whose rank can range from Sergeant to Private ( similar to the SAS).

    Phase 1 begins with the standard British Army fitness tests including Battle Fitness Test and swimming proficiency and includes the tests undertaken during P Company; '2 Miler' (3 km), '8 Miler' (13 km) and '10 Miler' (16 km) speed marches carrying SA-80 rifle and Bergen but with more demanding time objectives and at greater weight loads.

    Fitness and Navigation - Individual
    The Brecon Beacons
    Enlarge
    The Brecon Beacons

    Phase 2 is similar to the hill phase of UKSF(United Kingdom Special Forces) selection; a series of long, solo marches over the Brecon Beacons, Black Mountains and Elan Valley carrying personal equipment, leading to a heavy individual load. Routes are traversed at a minimum 4 km/h, covering an average of 29 km with a 60 pound bergen and rifle.


    Performance is testing with progress hampered by frequent inclement weather and poor conditions underfoot. Foot injuries and blisters are common, adding to the psychological challenge of individual performance and the loss rate at this stage in training is high.

    The final challenge in this phase is a 40 mile (60 km) tab taking in all the highest peaks in the Southern Wales region.




    Security and secrecy

    Pathfinders, along with UKSF( United Kingdom Special Forces), avoid the glare of publicity. Due to its guarded nature, many people (including serving officers and servicemen within HM Forces) are unaware to the units true role, tasks and missions. This has subsequently led to a number of security errors wherby names and photos of operators have been leaked to the media.

    Pathfinders are granted an enormous amount of flexibility and autonomy. They do not maintain any general uniformed presence and civilian clothing is the norm on or off duty. Uniforms are rarely worn, if at all, with any markings, names, or branch names on them. Hair styles and facial hair are allowed to grow to civilian standards in order for the force to be able to blend in and not be immediately recognized as military personnel."


    I still cant see where it says it, only it's something similar.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭cruasder777


    The Pathfinders were also involved in operation Barras as part of the JRRF.


    Your link states the do the Hill phase of UK Special Forces selection, also known as Brecon Phase 1


    "Phase 2(Pathfinder selection) is similar to the hill phase of UKSF(United Kingdom Special Forces) selection"...It ends with the same 40 miler/long drag the SAS do on selection.......read your link.


    http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080127045017AA5LEQz



    So lets get this right, they do the same Tabbing distances, inc the long drag and the selection course length, also the escape and evasion part, the course takes place in the same area with the same SAS instructors......but you are claiming its not the same as the SAS hill phase only similar.LOL


  • Registered Users Posts: 133 ✭✭IrelandDylan


    Awh jeez, we'll be here all night at this rate. Quote from the Pathfinder: Phase 2 is similar to the hill phase of UKSF(United Kingdom Special Forces) selection;

    Notice: Similar.

    Also, where does it ever say the Pathfinders were there?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭cruasder777


    Awh jeez, we'll be here all night at this rate. Quote from the Pathfinder: Phase 2 is similar to the hill phase of UKSF(United Kingdom Special Forces) selection;

    Notice: Similar.

    Also, where does it ever say the Pathfinders were there?


    Why dont you bother to read your link ?

    So If I run 100m on an athetics track and another person runs 100m on another part of the track, this is not the same but similar ?:rolleyes:

    Jesus wept


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,518 ✭✭✭OS119


    Jesus wept

    i don't think i've read so much utter shite in my life.

    i would suggest to people that the 'ignore' function is the cure for this problem.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭cruasder777


    twinytwo wrote: »
    Crusader777

    Until you can quote something other than here say and wikipedia... ill continue to laugh at you.

    Unless you are infact in UKSF???... which i highly doubt, you have no way to actually prove other than the sources mentioned above any of the tripe you are spouting.

    AT the end of the day no matter how hard you try to avoid the fact.. the Pathfinders are not SF... you can spout on about halo jumping and LRP and 6 week run outs or how hard they are... it still dosent make them SF's

    You mentioned that there training is harder than the SRR??... can you prove this fact??... do you know from first hand experience????

    As perviously stated while the pathfinders may be a highly trained unit, they have not passed the UKSF selection and are therefore not and never will be (no matter how much you wish it) Special forces.

    By your very own logic...the RMML's would be SF right??... guess what... they arnt either.

    Let me ask you.... what is the primary role of the pathfinders???

    As regards your iran comment... they would be regarded as foreign soldiers, armed agressors who had breached international law by setting foot in a foreign state, without the prior approval of its government, which would then be considered an act of war.




    Heres the role of the Pathfinders in Iraq, behind enemy lines, in a green role SOF role, just to prove the point.





    Betrayed behind enemy lines: Army captain breaks silence on elite unit's fight for survival
    Only outstanding valour and luck saved British soldiers trapped by Iraq's feared Republican Guard

    British soldiers were abandoned behind enemy lines after a secret mission went disastrously wrong, their commander has revealed after almost a decade of silence.

    For the first time, Captain David Blakeley, 33, has spoken of how his patrol of just nine men were surrounded by hundreds of Saddam Hussein’s most feared troops after being sent far ahead of the frontline during the initial invasion of Iraq.

    Based on hopelessly inaccurate intelligence, the Pathfinders – an elite airborne specialist reconnaissance unit – had been dispatched to recce an airfield hundreds of kilometres north of the British position for a potential airborne insertion of paratroopers. The area, far from being “relatively benign” as they had been told, was swarming with Republican Guard and Fedayeen. Realising they were boxed in and out numbered, they called for air support only to be told none was available.

    Alone and surrounded, they fought their way back through repeated ambushes, saved by incredible luck and valour that would earn the unit two Military Crosses.

    t was just days into the Iraq invasion and the six Pathfinders and three Royal Engineers had been sent north of the American front line to recce Qalat Sikar airfield – 120km north of Nasiriyah.

    On 23 March 2003 they reached Nasiriyah, where the US Marine advance had been stalled by unexpected resistance in a battle that would cost them 29 men. Aware they had just 12 hours to complete their mission, the British patrol of three land rover WMIKs, loaded with six machine guns, moved through the frontline at last light, passing “zombie like”, shell shocked marines still recovering their dead.

    Relying on US intelligence, they were stunned to suddenly find themselves in the middle of an Iraqi camp, Capt Blakeley explained: “They didn’t do anything because it was so outrageous. They didn’t expect us to suddenly move through their position.”

    Now 80km north of the frontline, sporadic fire turned intense, continued the former officer: “We started to hear the crack, it was getting closer and Tricky who was on the 50-cal (heavy machine gun) said he could hear mortars so we pulled off the road in a snap ambush, using the cover of some trees.”

    They watched as the headlights of 15 pick up trucks, each carrying a dozen of Iraq's feared Fedayeen in their distinctive white uniforms, drive past and realised they were trapped behind enemy lines.

    Unable to go north or south, they headed east towards their objective only to find themselves boxed in by a canal, shadowy armed figures in the near distance. Debating whether to finish the last 40km on foot, they decided their only advantage was the speed and firepower of their vehicles and agreed they would call in air support.

    “I was told instantly by a senior officer there was no air. It was like swallowing acid. They didn’t say wait out, we were not told they would try. Tricky said ‘ask again for combat recovery’ but I was told again there was nothing available. It was crushing, devastating. We were totally on our own, abandoned.”


    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/betrayed-behind-enemy-lines-army-captain-breaks-silence-on-elite-units-fight-for-survival-7715789.html]



    In a fortnight's time Pathfinder – A Special Forces Mission Behind Enemy Lines – will reveal the entire operation as well as the ugly story of how they were left to possible capture or death by their senior commanders.


    .....NOTE THE BOOK TITLE

    Its so good to be proven right. :-)


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 564 ✭✭✭thecommietommy


    Alone and surrounded, they fought their way back through repeated ambushes, saved by incredible luck and valour that would earn the unit two Military Crosses.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/betrayed-behind-enemy-lines-army-captain-breaks-silence-on-elite-units-fight-for-survival-7715789.html]

    In a fortnight's time Pathfinder – A Special Forces Mission Behind Enemy Lines – will reveal the entire operation as well as the ugly story of how they were left to possible capture or death by their senior commanders.


    .....NOTE THE BOOK TITLE

    Its so good to be proven right. :-)
    Give it time and it will be found out to be nonsense like Bravo Two Zero :D


Advertisement