Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Jurassic World

1246724

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,053 ✭✭✭✭Overheal




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    pixelburp wrote: »
    Admittedly, it has been a long time since I saw both sequels, but I seem to recall enjoying the grim tone & atmosphere of #3, along with the more straightforward plotting; Lost World felt like Spielberg on autopilot, a hack-job adaptation of the novel (which itself wasn't great, true) and a film that somehow made a T-Rex rampage through San Diego feel dull & pedestrian.
    I also remember the irritating child character managing to somersault-kick a raptor through a wall, so that's enough reason to hate on #2 ;)

    Grim tone and atmosphere? They tweed up the classic musical score and had tonnes of cutsey family crap (at least in TLW Malcom and his kid didn't really like each other). Then you had weird stuff like Tea Leoni shouting through a megaphone, "What's a bad idea!?!?" on dinosaur island and a mobile phone going off in a dino's belly.


    In it's defense, there were some cool bits such as the Spino tearing up the plane and the raptors were fairly cool overall.
    I can't forgive the ending though.
    A palaeobotanist has the authority to send in the marines now?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,696 ✭✭✭Jonny7


    Loved 1 and 2

    JP3 was an abomination


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,966 ✭✭✭✭syklops


    Galvasean wrote: »
    That reminds me, there WAS a bit in the Lost World book where a T. rex humped one of the vehicles...

    Don't remember that bit.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    syklops wrote: »
    Don't remember that bit.

    Or did he pee on it? Been a while since I read it, but there was a bit with a T-rex peeing/spunking on a vehicle window.
    Any takers?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,966 ✭✭✭✭syklops


    Galvasean wrote: »
    Or did he pee on it? Been a while since I read it, but there was a bit with a T-rex peeing/spunking on a vehicle window.
    Any takers?

    As in do I volunteer to read it again to find the bit? Not now, but Ive got an 18 hour passage on a boat on Saturday. I'll fire it onto the kindle. I'll let you know if I find it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 180 ✭✭FreezeUp


    Jonny7 wrote: »
    Loved 1 and 2

    JP3 was an abomination

    I thought 2 was poor also. 1 is a classic though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,966 ✭✭✭✭syklops


    FreezeUp wrote: »
    I thought 2 was poor also. 1 is a classic though.

    I liked 2 but part of that is down to my nerdy love of the hardware. The excursion vehicles, and the modded jeeps for catching the Dinosaurs. I think I drooled when I saw them first time round.

    To be fair, nothing was ever going to approach the first one. JP 1 is a masterpiece. I mean, you know you are going to see as a movie with dinosaurs in it. You get a glimpse of the raptor at the start, but you are just as amazed as Alan Grant when you get the first glimpse of the brachiosaurs. Even now, when I watch it, I can see Alan Grants face, and then you see Ellie's face, and you know its coming, and the music starts and you hear the call of the Brachiosaur and its just amazing. The Lost World and everything / anything else was never going to beat that moment.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Ha; according to Trevorrow the dinosaurs won't have feathers, recent discoveries be-damned:

    https://twitter.com/colintrevorrow/statuses/314384734190985217


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    pixelburp wrote: »
    Ha; according to Trevorrow the dinosaurs won't have feathers, recent discoveries be-damned:

    https://twitter.com/colintrevorrow/statuses/314384734190985217

    Continuity is more important at this stage one would reckon.
    Also, if the dinos started sprouting feathers all of a sudden that could hardly be considered accurate either.

    Something something frog DNA...


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 15,814 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You can keep your Jurassic Park 4, The Asylum's Age of Dinosaurs looks like the kind of low budget trash that's guaranteed to be perfect post pub fun.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    I hope T-Rex gets revenge. It will be like Rocky defeating Apollo in Rocky II. T-Rex the underdog comes back from the clutches of death, only to knock out the Spinosaurus by vicious headbutt.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,143 ✭✭✭D-FENS


    pixelburp wrote: »
    Lost World felt like Spielberg on autopilot, a hack-job adaptation of the novel (which itself wasn't great, true)

    I enjoyed the book, thought there was some really chilling moments like when the 'raptors are darting across the field to attack someone, but in full view of the person rather than under the cover of the high grass like in the movie, and when they were jumping up at the tree house / hide trying to get the people up there. Also the T-Rex feeding the baddie to his young was better i.e baddie realised he's been lured into the T-Rex's nest for that purpose.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    Richard Attenborough has been moved to a care home due to 'deteriorating mental health'. I guess that's the last we'll see of John Hammond so. :(


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Music Moderators, Regional Midlands Moderators Posts: 24,126 Mod ✭✭✭✭Angron


    Galvasean wrote: »
    Richard Attenborough has been moved to a care home due to 'deteriorating mental health'. I guess that's the last we'll see of John Hammond so. :(
    Ah crap, that's really sad news :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,820 ✭✭✭grames_bond


    Galvasean wrote: »
    Richard Attenborough has been moved to a care home due to 'deteriorating mental health'. I guess that's the last we'll see of John Hammond so. :(

    :( that's horrible news!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,032 ✭✭✭SmokeyEyes


    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/celebritynews/9954199/Film-director-Richard-Attenborough-moved-to-care-home.html

    Article on it here, poor man but hopefully him and his wife are living in comfort there!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,295 ✭✭✭✭Duggy747


    Only logical route is to get David Attenborough in there :pac:
    article-1339263-0C7FBFC5000005DC-128_634x466.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,798 ✭✭✭✭DrumSteve


    Duggy747 wrote: »
    Only logical route is to get David Attenborough in there :pac:
    article-1339263-0C7FBFC5000005DC-128_634x466.jpg

    Or have him do a documentary on Jurrassic Park as if it was real.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    DrumSteve wrote: »
    Or have him do a documentary on Jurrassic Park as if it was real.

    Oh heavens no! Enough people thought that mermaid mockumentary was real..


  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 1,856 ✭✭✭paddy kerins


    Been postponed indefinitely
    In coordination with filmmakers, Universal has decided to release Jurassic Park 4 at a later date giving the studio and filmmakers adequate time to bring audiences the best possible version of the fourth installment in Universal’s beloved franchise. We could not be more excited about the vision that Colin Trevorrow has created for this film, and we look forward to watching as he and the producers create another great chapter in this franchise's storied history.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,680 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sad Professor


    Trevorrow was out scouting locations and everything. Script problems, I assume. Although it was never going to be ready for next year anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,375 ✭✭✭DoesNotCompute


    Been postponed indefinitely

    Probably for the best, considering how terrible JP3 was


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,597 ✭✭✭dan1895


    Postponed? Don't you mean extinct?

    *gets coat.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    Probably for the best. An overly-tight schedule ruined JP/// so I'd rather 4 wasn't a rush job too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,224 ✭✭✭✭Marty McFly


    Yeh good to see there taking the sensible approach still sounds like it's going ahead just not a rush job.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Music Moderators, Regional Midlands Moderators Posts: 24,126 Mod ✭✭✭✭Angron


    I didn't hate 3 :( I mean it wasn't the best film ever, but I liked it all right.

    Then again, I've seen so many bad films because of my friends it's easy to see the good side of some films :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    Yeh good to see there taking the sensible approach still sounds like it's going ahead just not a rush job.

    Confirmed for 2015.

    To be shot in 3d.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,224 ✭✭✭✭Marty McFly


    Galvasean wrote: »
    Confirmed for 2015.

    To be shot in 3d.


    I was liking the first part of that post until I saw the 3D bit :(. Still be interesting to see what they do with it With Spielberg still producing hopefully it wont be a mess.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    Well generally shot in 3D > 3D conversion. that said, apparently the 3D reissue of JP1 has some of the best 3D ever commited to cinema. I'd comment more if they'd hurry up and release it already! :mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,224 ✭✭✭✭Marty McFly


    Galvasean wrote: »
    Well generally shot in 3D > 3D conversion. that said, apparently the 3D reissue of JP1 has some of the best 3D ever commited to cinema. I'd comment more if they'd hurry up and release it already! :mad:


    Ah im just not a fan of 3D in any shape or form, find it gimmicky really and I'm also one of the people it causes headaches in.

    But yeh hurry up, was only watching Jurrasic Park the other day still looks amazing to this day.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,788 ✭✭✭✭krudler


    Galvasean wrote: »
    Well generally shot in 3D > 3D conversion. that said, apparently the 3D reissue of JP1 has some of the best 3D ever commited to cinema. I'd comment more if they'd hurry up and release it already! :mad:

    stumbled across this the other day, some guy recorded the audio of the audience at the 3D re-release in the States, over eager US audiences annoy me at times but when its something you've seen a load of times and people get into it its kinda cool.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,922 ✭✭✭McLoughlin


    Galvasean wrote: »
    Well generally shot in 3D > 3D conversion. that said, apparently the 3D reissue of JP1 has some of the best 3D ever commited to cinema. I'd comment more if they'd hurry up and release it already! :mad:

    Imported the 3D Blu over a month ago Jurassic Park 3D is fantastic allot of work went into it great immersion and depth.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,942 ✭✭✭missingtime


    krudler wrote: »
    stumbled across this the other day, some guy recorded the audio of the audience at the 3D re-release in the States, over eager US audiences annoy me at times but when its something you've seen a load of times and people get into it its kinda cool.

    Goosebumps! So many goosebumps!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    August my friends... August....


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,101 ✭✭✭NUTZZ




  • Registered Users Posts: 4,597 ✭✭✭dan1895




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,788 ✭✭✭✭krudler


    Giant sea dino in a lagoon? that's ripped straight out of the MEG books (which are great fun, and someone should really get round to making the movies)


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Galvasean wrote: »

    Hmmm, so basically it's a retread of JP1 only this time the park is genuinely open & will (presumably) feature more extras & panicky crowds when everything goes wrong. There's nothing wrong with that of course - there are only so many variations you can make of the entire concept, a glorified palaeontological creature-feature - I just hope they don't try to slavishly echo the beats of the first film out of some misguided desire for nostalgia and nods to the fans; that almost never works.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,788 ✭✭✭✭krudler


    pixelburp wrote: »
    Hmmm, so basically it's a retread of JP1 only this time the park is genuinely open & will (presumably) feature more extras & panicky crowds when everything goes wrong. There's nothing wrong with that of course - there are only so many variations you can make of the entire concept, a glorified palaeontological creature-feature - I just hope they don't try to slavishly echo the beats of the first film out of some misguided desire for nostalgia and nods to the fans; that almost never works.

    I always found it odd they never went back to the original JP, the sequels are both set on Site B. Would have been cool to see what years of unchecked dino breeding had resulted in on the original island. Or set it between JP and The Lost World with a cleanup team going in to try salvage what's left of the park. I never read the Lost World book but is there anything mentioned about what happened after Hammond and the rest left the park? they hardly just left it to rot.


  • Administrators, Computer Games Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 32,396 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Mickeroo


    krudler wrote: »
    I always found it odd they never went back to the original JP, the sequels are both set on Site B. Would have been cool to see what years of unchecked dino breeding had resulted in on the original island. Or set it between JP and The Lost World with a cleanup team going in to try salvage what's left of the park. I never read the Lost World book but is there anything mentioned about what happened after Hammond and the rest left the park? they hardly just left it to rot.

    Wasn't the original thinking that all the dinos on Site A would be dead because they were engineered to need some su[pplement to keep them alive where as the ones on Site B never needed this, which was the reason they lost control of them. I think (Galvasean will know better) they changed since though that the Site A dinos evolved to not need the supplement or something "Life finds a way" and all that.

    Could be good, I liked the angle of making
    T-Rex and the Raptors heroes of sorts, hell t-Rex alread saved the da in the first film anyway!
    .

    I still want the dino-men with guns idea to happen though :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,788 ✭✭✭✭krudler


    Mickeroo wrote: »
    Wasn't the original thinking that all the dinos on Site A would be dead because they were engineered to need some su[pplement to keep them alive where as the ones on Site B never needed this, which was the reason they lost control of them. I think (Galvasean will know better) they changed since though that the Site A dinos evolved to not need the supplement or something "Life finds a way" and all that.

    Could be good, I liked the angle of making
    T-Rex and the Raptors heroes of sorts, hell t-Rex alread saved the da in the first film anyway!
    .

    I still want the dino-men with guns idea to happen though :(

    Malcolm asks Hammond in the beginning of the Lost World how the dinos are still alive without lyciene ( I think) on Site B too, maybe its just sloppy writing tbh. Although they probably engineered all the dinos with the deficiency as a safeguard from birth. Maybe the naturally born ones don't have it or something.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,224 ✭✭✭✭Marty McFly


    I don't know sounds horrendous to be honest shot specifically in 3D and using tamed dinosaurs to fight the threat, sounds like a Piranha 3D in the making.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,788 ✭✭✭✭krudler


    I don't mind the shot in 3D aspect if they're going to do 3D then doing it right is preferable to crappy post-production jobs. I avoid 3D where I can anyway. Tame dinos does sound absolutely stupid though. Whatever about a docile triceratops or something but a pet Velociraptor? pfff. They should go the full hog and make them like The Flintstones if they're going that stupid, flying to the island on a Pterodactyl, using a Brachiosaur as an escalator or slide etc.


  • Administrators, Computer Games Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 32,396 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Mickeroo


    It's no more ridiculous than tamed lions and tigers really, the're just animals at the end of the day. T-rex harder to believe due to it's size I suppose.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,788 ✭✭✭✭krudler


    Mickeroo wrote: »
    It's no more ridiculous than tamed lions and tigers really, the're just animals at the end of the day. T-rex harder to believe due to it's size I suppose.

    I suppose, they are just animals at the end of the day, if they can make a killer whale do tricks why not a a giant lizard. we may finally get to see this:



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,680 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sad Professor


    Are we sure this isn't a reboot?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,966 ✭✭✭✭syklops


    Galvasean wrote: »

    Jaws meets Jurassic Park and Spielberg is not involved.

    Hmmm,


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,358 ✭✭✭Geekness1234


    That sounds God awful,I'm pretty disappointed.. :(


  • Advertisement
Advertisement