Disgusting armpit hair on woman

TeddyTedson · 10-05-2012 10:23am #1

I saw this woman on the Craig Doyle show. She unashamedly was sprouting furry bits from her under arm. I think this is absolutely grotesque. What sort of feminist goes to such lengths to make these points.

Anyway, would any men be willing to go out with a woman with a vast amount of under arm hair? Maybe I am sexist, and even though it is natural it makes me want to puke.

danniemcq · 10-05-2012 10:24am

ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwww

craig doyle show?

Mr.Crinklewood · 10-05-2012 10:25am

She was kinda cute.

forfuxsake · 10-05-2012 10:26am

All humans grow hair. It is not like growing weed, it is a natural bodily process rather than a choice.

Not shaving it off is vomitous though.

Siuin · 10-05-2012 10:28am

It's a personal choice how much body hair a woman chooses to have, but at the same time she shouldn't be terribly surprised if people think she's gross. That interview with her was simply nasty- the thick hair on her legs just made me wonder what the state of her bush was

Would need to get a machete and go in Indiana Jones style to find her Temple of Doom :O

Cassidy28 · 10-05-2012 10:31am

A bit of a turn off if you ask me :P

a fat guy · 10-05-2012 10:34am

Look on the bright side, she can't complain about you staring at her boobs or anything like that.

Because you'll be disgusted by the armpit-hair.

biko · 10-05-2012 10:36am

TeddyTedson wrote: »

Maybe I am sexist, and even though it is natural it makes me want to puke.

Got it in one.

You've been conditioned by commercials/porn to want women hairless.

BengaLover · 10-05-2012 10:36am

Sure ye need something to keep ya warm in winter.

Plazaman · 10-05-2012 10:38am

Could be worse, due to my hatred with the power of the heat of a supernova for Craig Doyle, I was watching a different show on a different channel.

Much the same except this woman grew a penis. "Ladyboys" I think it was called. Give me armpit hair anytime.

Genghiz Cohen · 10-05-2012 10:39am

biko wrote: »

Got it in one.

You've been conditioned by commercials/porn to want women hairless.

So if porn-stars and actors stopped shaving, we'd all want hairy wimmen?

Likely :rolleyes:

Gummy Panda · 10-05-2012 10:39am

biko wrote: »

TeddyTedson wrote: »

Maybe I am sexist, and even though it is natural it makes me want to puke.

Got it in one.

You've been conditioned by commercials/porn to want women hairless.

Nah. Hairless feels and looks better.

hairyprincess · 10-05-2012 10:40am

Genghiz Cohen wrote: »

So if porn-stars and actors stopped shaving, we'd all want hairy wimmen?

Likely :rolleyes:

Whats wrong with hairy wimmen, eh eh??? :mad::eek::mad::eek::mad:

Sir Digby Chicken Caesar · 10-05-2012 10:42am

hairyprincess wrote: »

Whats wrong with hairy wimmen, eh eh??? :mad::eek::mad::eek::mad:

well they're thinking for themselves and taking on the manocracy inherent in western civilisation. cant be having that.

sbsquarepants · 10-05-2012 10:45am

TeddyTedson wrote: »

I saw this woman on the Craig Doyle show. She unashamedly was sprouting furry bits from her under arm. I think this is absolutely grotesque. What sort of feminist goes to such lengths to make these points.

Anyway, would any men be will to go out with a women with a vast amount of under arm hair? Maybe I am sexist, and even though it is natural it makes me want to puke.

Eughhhh! I was with a german lady many years ago who had very hairy armpits, among other things! But i was young and didn't know any better - not these days frauline, hit the fúcking autobahn you yeti!

hairyprincess wrote: »

Whats wrong with hairy wimmen, eh eh??? :mad::eek::mad::eek::mad:

Even for a princess, it's wrong, wrong, wrong!!

hoodwinked · 10-05-2012 10:45am

its just lazyness!

there are so many hair removal products out there or if worse comes to the worse just shave it!

smithcity · 10-05-2012 10:51am

hoodwinked wrote: »

its just lazyness!

there are so many hair removal products out there or if worse comes to the worse just shave it!

I dunno man, I find shaving my face to be a huge chore, I can't imagine having to do my legs and armpits all the time too.
If it doesn't bother her, let her be.

Cassidy28 · 10-05-2012 10:53am

Ah, sure she should let herself go.

biko · 10-05-2012 10:54am

Genghiz Cohen wrote: »

So if porn-stars and actors stopped shaving, we'd all want hairy wimmen?

Likely :rolleyes:

Yes, probably. You think you like something a certain way but tbh you're just led by the nose like the rest of us.
You're probably too young to know but hairless women "down there" is a pretty new concept. 20 years ago or so no porn stars shaved.
The whole underarm shaving biz started in US after WW1 when marketeers saw a new way to make money. Google "Caucasian Female Body Hair and American Culture" if you're interested.

bnt · 10-05-2012 10:55am

Remember the fuss years ago, when Julia Roberts appeared at a movie premiere with slightly hairy armpits? (photo) I thought she might have rushed on to the plane to London, after a month wrangling horses on her New Mexico ranch. I remember that the people screaming at her were almost all women, while men just aren't as fussed about a bit of body hair. You think some guy's going to kick her out of bed over a little stray undergrowth?

smash · 10-05-2012 10:55am

biko wrote: »

You're probably too young to know but hairless women "down there" is a pretty new concept.

yea... because in Roman times or Edwardian times women never shaved their pubes?

new concept my arse!

smithcity · 10-05-2012 10:56am

biko wrote: »

The whole underarm shaving biz started in US after WW1 when marketeers saw a new way to make money. Google "Caucasian Female Body Hair and American Culture" if you're interested.

Next you'll be suggesting that we don't really need 5 blades on a razor and that that's all a marketing ploy too.... Who do you work for?

Cassidy28 · 10-05-2012 10:56am

bnt wrote: »

Remember the fuss years ago, when Julia Roberts appeared at a movie premiere with slightly hairy armpits? (photo) I thought she might have rushed on to the plane to London, after a month wrangling horses on her New Mexico ranch. I remember that the people screaming at her were almost all women, while men just aren't as fussed about a bit of body hair. You think some guy's going to kick her out of bed over a little stray undergrowth?

I would

Mr. Presentable · 10-05-2012 10:56am

TeddyTedson wrote: »

I saw this woman on the Craig Doyle show. She unashamedly was sprouting furry bits from her under arm. I think this is absolutely grotesque. What sort of feminist goes to such lengths to make these points.

Anyway, would any men be will to go out with a women with a vast amount of under arm hair? Maybe I am sexist, and even though it is natural it makes me want to puke.

Grotesque :eek:

Want to puke :eek:

You wouldn't go out with a woman with hair in her armpit?

What is wrong with you? You need help if a spot of hair causes the above reaction, and if you are so fascinated with oxters you can't see beyond them. I don't think you are sexist, I think you are mental!

biko · 10-05-2012 10:59am

smash wrote: »

yea... because in Roman times or Edwardian times women never shaved their pubes?

new concept my arse!

Wow, you're much older than I would have thought.

beks101 · 10-05-2012 11:01am

hoodwinked wrote: »

its just lazyness!

there are so many hair removal products out there or if worse comes to the worse just shave it!

Right so, let's see you give a stab at shaving your legs and pits every day, getting your sack and crack waxed once a month, plucking your eyebrows every day and routinely removing any unsightly 'embarrassing' hairs (upper lip, chin, etc) whose growth deems you 'less of a man' for a few weeks and we'll see how you get on.

That was her point. Hair anywhere but on the head is ultimately deemed 'unfeminine' and 'embarrassing' for a woman, even though it's as natural on our bodies as it is on yours.

smash · 10-05-2012 11:04am

beks101 wrote: »

Hair anywhere but on the head is ultimately deemed 'unfeminine' and 'embarrassing' for a woman, even though it's as natural on our bodies as it is on yours.

Sorry but natural does not mean right.

Davidth88 · 10-05-2012 11:04am

I just have to say it......

99 Red balloons !!!

Mr Benevolent · 10-05-2012 11:04am

Ah first world problems, my favourite. Who really give a crap about underarm hair?

Ruralyoke · 10-05-2012 11:05am

hairyprincess wrote: »

Whats wrong with hairy wimmen, eh eh??? :mad::eek::mad::eek::mad:

Absolutely nothing.

It is the ultimate in sexiness.

Traps all the smells nicely too

smithcity · 10-05-2012 11:05am

smash wrote: »

Sorry but natural does not mean right.

I don't see how right or wrong comes into it, all she did was make a choice about her appearance. It's not as if she has a Charles Manson style swastika tattooed into her forehead or anything.

paddyandy · 10-05-2012 11:06am

Armpit hair has a very real function in that it 'transmits' signals to the other gender .Scent is sent out from there and elsewhere to say " she's ready" .
Long before chanel ...... nature was doing it her own way .

Fizzlesque · 10-05-2012 11:07am

TeddyTedson wrote: »

Maybe I am sexist, and even though it is natural it makes me want to puke.

You are. You've been conditioned.

Underarm hair isn't one of life's beautiful things - on men or women. Come to think of it, neither are underarms. Beats me why people have them on show at all.

I find male underarm hair just as unattractive as female underarm hair - but I can accept it exists without resorting to calling the person attached to the hair disgusting.

eviltwin · 10-05-2012 11:09am

Find it hard to understand the mentality that underarm hair on a woman is "disgusting" but "normal" for a man. Hair is hair surely??

beks101 · 10-05-2012 11:09am

smash wrote: »

Sorry but natural does not mean right.

So it's right for you guys, but not for us ladies?

All she's doing is challenging the social and cultural norm, at the risk of offending and disgusting the masses. Which I find is quite admirable.

No-one's going to force you to ride her or anything (though she's prettier than average as far as I can judge). Why the judgement, why not live and let live?

smithcity · 10-05-2012 11:11am

Was this woman on the Craig Doyle show for any reason other than her armpits, or was she there solely to discuss hair?

counterlock · 10-05-2012 11:13am

smithcity wrote: »

Was this woman on the Craig Doyle show for any reason other than her armpits, or was she there solely to discuss hair?

No Craig Doyle was trying to sell her some dodgy phne/broadband package

hairyprincess · 10-05-2012 11:13am

paddyandy wrote: »

Armpit hair has a very real function in that it 'transmits' signals to the other gender .Scent is sent out from there and elsewhere to say " she's ready" .
Long before chanel ...... nature was doing it her own way .

My transmitters must be blocked

paddyandy · 10-05-2012 11:23am

Simply dress modestly is the answer and add mystery which is essential if it's there at all these days .There's little left in the boundaries with the fashion houses having pushed them as far as possible .

Ruralyoke · 10-05-2012 11:29am

Surely I'm not alone in finding unshaven women a massive turn on?

smash · 10-05-2012 11:35am

beks101 wrote: »

So it's right for you guys, but not for us ladies?

Well that's a matter of opinion and everyone is entitled to one. I for one do not like hairy women.

Fizzlesque · 10-05-2012 11:41am

smash wrote: »

Well that's a matter of opinion and everyone is entitled to one. I for one do not like hairy women.

That's fair enough. We're all allowed to have our own likes and dislikes - I, for one, don't find men who are squeamish about a bit of body hair attractive.

smash · 10-05-2012 11:46am

Fizzlesque wrote: »

That's fair enough. We're all allowed to have our own likes and dislikes - I, for one, don't find men who are squeamish about a bit of body hair attractive.

squeamish has nothing to do with it. I think how a women takes care of herself says a lot. I would consider grooming to be big deal to be honest.

Ruralyoke · 10-05-2012 11:57am

smash wrote: »

squeamish has nothing to do with it. I think how a women takes care of herself says a lot. I would consider grooming to be big deal to be honest.

So does the decision not to shave = not grooming or not taking care?

Mr Benevolent · 10-05-2012 12:01pm

smash wrote: »

squeamish has nothing to do with it. I think how a women takes care of herself says a lot. I would consider grooming to be big deal to be honest.

Grooming. Right. So you shave your pits and your pubes? It's a big deal to be honest.

hairyprincess · 10-05-2012 12:01pm

Ruralyoke wrote: »

Surely I'm not alone in finding unshaven women a massive turn on?

Call me......:cool:

smash · 10-05-2012 12:02pm

Ruralyoke wrote: »

So does the decision not to shave = not grooming or not taking care?

well not shaving is not grooming. As for not taking care, well that's a matter of opinion too. In my eyes if you've decided to be hairy then it means you're either lazy or don't really care much about your appearance.

Fizzlesque · 10-05-2012 12:06pm

smash wrote: »

squeamish has nothing to do with it. I think how a women takes care of herself says a lot. I would consider grooming to be big deal to be honest.

What grooming do you do? Just trying to get an idea of what constitutes 'taking care of oneself' in your eyes.

TeddyTedson · 10-05-2012 12:08pm

Fizzlesque wrote: »

TeddyTedson wrote: »

Maybe I am sexist, and even though it is natural it makes me want to puke.

You are. You've been conditioned.

Underarm hair isn't one of life's beautiful things - on men or women. Come to think of it, neither are underarms. Beats me why people have them on show at all.

I find male underarm hair just as unattractive as female underarm hair - but I can accept it exists without resorting to calling the person attached to the hair disgusting.

I meant the under arm hair as disgusting. Phrased is badly.

oakleafsfree · 10-05-2012 12:10pm

teddy denson. such strong expression of revulsion. labelling her a feminist, disgusting and errrrm arm pit hair. I think you v never truly turned a woman on. sexually, i mean where she just doesnt give a toss. also...not chauvenist...just a bit of a bully, who demands that people should adhere to your conforms. and maybe she was maybe socially special. i.e. learning abilities etc. But, i bet you stared!!! and showed ur disgust with your facial expressions. If it had been me..i d have shoved my unruly hair, right in your nostrils!!! wow. your a man of great life experience! only those men of a certain age, put FEMALE body hair and feminism together. i call it...cant be flaming arsed!!! i m flaming spotless allover anyway!! wanna smell teddy?

TeddyTedson · 10-05-2012 12:12pm

oakleafsfree wrote: »

teddy denson. such strong expression of revulsion. labelling her a feminist, disgusting and errrrm arm pit hair. I think you v never truly turned a woman on. sexually, i mean where she just doesnt give a toss. also...not chauvenist...just a bit of a bully, who demands that people should adhere to your conforms. and maybe she was maybe socially special. i.e. learning abilities etc. But, i bet you stared!!! and showed ur disgust with your facial expressions. If it had been me..i d have shoved my unruly hair, right in your nostrils!!! wow. your a man of great life experience! only those men of a certain age, put FEMALE body hair and feminism together. i call it...cant be flaming arsed!!! i m flaming spotless allover anyway!! wanna smell teddy?

No, stay the fook away from me

Disgusting armpit hair on woman

Comments