Eircode - its implemetation (merged)

oscarBravo · 10-12-2015 6:52pm

gizmo555 wrote: »

Why would you adopt them? What use are they?

If you're a customer of mine, they allow me to provide a faster and more efficient service to you.

Now, none of my customers realised that this was the case until it was explained to them. I'm sure they all thought the same as you: unless every citizen and company in the country was using them several times a day within hours of their introduction, they are clearly useless. Then, out of the blue, a real-world use for that hitherto pointless code appears.

And that's how adoption happens: gradually. Most people aren't using them, because they don't need them. But then, over time, they find that some service providers can offer a more efficient service when they provide an Eircode; they find that more and more online retailers provide an Eircode field; they find in many cases that if they enter that field first, they don't have to type the rest of their address; eventually they can use it for turn-by-turn navigation (or they figure out that they already can)...

It's a process. The ever-present idea seems to be that Eircodes are an utter failure because they didn't achieve 100% adoption within a week. That's not how it works.

Many people would also suspect that a significant reason for their introduction is to make it easier to apply household-based charges like water, property tax, the proposed broadcasting charge, etc.

Please, please tell me that you don't think tax evasion is a compelling reason not to adopt postcodes.

Lastly, Eircode are being disingenuous on the privacy implications of the system of uniquely identifiying individual properties. They deny on the FAQ page of their website that they hold any personal data, which is completely contrary to the view of the Data Protection Commissioner. The Commissioner highlighted that no other country uses postcodes which uniquely identify houses.

An Eircode has precisely the same privacy implications as a unique address. No more, no less.

El Gato Grande · 10-12-2015 6:55pm

gizmo555 wrote: »

They may not be dead, but they're not showing much signs of life. I've yet to come across any Irish business which requires me to provide my Eircode to conduct a transaction with them and indeed, most businesses don't seem to use them themselves.

To take an example, here are the addresses of the three utility companies I have accounts with for my household, as published on their websites:
Vodafone Ireland Limited, Mountainview, Leopardstown, Dublin 18, Ireland

Irish Water, Colvill House, 24-26 Talbot Street, Dublin 1

Viridian Energy Limited, t/a Energia, Mill House, Ashtowngate, Navan Road, Dublin 15

Not an Eircode to be seen . . .

While you may find them helpful, it's clear most people and businesses see no particular benefit to using them. I can count on the fingers of one hand the number of times I've seen an Eircode on correspondence I've received since they were introduced.

Enter Nenagh E45 into Google Maps and you can see there is something happening !

gctest50 · 10-12-2015 7:04pm

Originally Posted by seanaway View Post
Eircode is DEAD end of...

looking much healthier these days :

https://www.google.cm/search?q=N37+P7D7

people in Camaroon can find Athlone Town Football Club no problem

.

gizmo555 · 10-12-2015 7:06pm

oscarBravo wrote: »

And that's how adoption happens: gradually.

At the risk of repeating myself, it would be a start if An Post adopted it . . . it is meant to be a postcode system.

oscarBravo wrote: »

eventually they can use it for turn-by-turn navigation (or they figure out that they already can)...

What satnav systems currently provide turn-by-turn navigation from the direct input of an Eircode? I'm genuinely interested to know, because Google Maps doesn't, nor do the two other GPS devices that I own. This is something I would use if I could easily and without undue cost.

oscarBravo wrote: »

An Eircode has precisely the same privacy implications as a unique address. No more, no less.

That's precisely the point. A person's unique address is personal data, as is their Eircode. But Eircode denies this.

gctest50 · 10-12-2015 7:14pm

gizmo555 wrote: »

.............

What satnav systems currently provide turn-by-turn navigation from the direct input of an Eircode? I'm genuinely interested to know, because Google Maps doesn't, nor do the two other GPS devices that I own. This is something I would use if I could easily and without undue cost.

.

.

http://www.gocode.ie/

Download our free GO Code iPhone app to see how it works. They work on Tom Tom satnavs too.

We’re the company that successfully brought together the winning consortium for the new National Postcode System for Ireland – Eircode. (see About Us section.)

oscarBravo · 10-12-2015 7:18pm

gizmo555 wrote: »

At the risk of repeating myself, it would be a start if An Post adopted it . . . it is meant to be a postcode system.

It would help if they actively encouraged its use, yes. But An Post didn't want a postcode system that would hurt their dominant market position. It seems that a lot of people feel the same way.

What satnav systems currently provide turn-by-turn navigation from the direct input of an Eircode?

None. The Eircode website launches Google Maps if used on a phone.

Nice "direct input" red herring, but that's not what I said.

That's precisely the point. A person's unique address is personal data, as is their Eircode. But Eircode denies this.

They do?

gizmo555 · 10-12-2015 7:18pm

Does your app work with Eircodes?

gizmo555 · 10-12-2015 7:24pm

oscarBravo wrote: »

Nice "direct input" red herring, but that's not what I said.

Not a red herring at all. I can get turn-by-turn navigation to anywhere in Britain or Northern Ireland by putting in just the postcode. And I don't need to be online with access to a website to do this. Eircode is broken by comparison.

oscarBravo wrote: »

They do?

Is my personal data held on the Eircode database?

There is no personal data on the Eircode database or Eircode Finder. It does include business names, which in some cases can be the name of an individual, particularly for small businesses or sole traders.

http://www.eircode.ie/faqs

oscarBravo · 10-12-2015 7:38pm

gizmo555 wrote: »

Not a red herring at all. I can get turn-by-turn navigation to anywhere in Britain or Northern Ireland by putting in just the postcode. And I don't need to be online with access to a website to do this. Eircode is broken by comparison.

Let me break this down for you. I said: "...eventually they can use it for turn-by-turn navigation (or they figure out that they already can)..."

This is a true statement. You can, right now, use Eircodes for turn-by turn navigation.

You then changed the subject, and introduced a new qualifier: "What satnav systems currently provide turn-by-turn navigation from the direct input of an Eircode?"

That, my friend, is what's known as a straw man. You are arguing against a claim I didn't make.

Is my personal data held on the Eircode database?

There is no personal data on the Eircode database or Eircode Finder. It does include business names, which in some cases can be the name of an individual, particularly for small businesses or sole traders.

http://www.eircode.ie/faqs

From the Data Protection Act:

..."personal data" means data relating to a living individual who is or can be identified either from the data or from the data in conjunction with other information that is in, or is likely to come into, the possession of the data controller...

If I give you a randomly-chosen entry from the Eircode database, and no other data, can you identify a living individual from that information?

Sam Russell · 10-12-2015 7:39pm

TheChizler wrote: »

In the interim, on your pc you can shrink the window down to mobile size and click "get directions", it will link to the location in Google Maps. The coordinates will be in the URL.

To think you have to take unusual measures to get an Eircode app to work on a PC says a lot about the design of the whole system. Why can "Get Directions" not be available in full screen? It goes back to my point many moons ago about having to have a PC in your pocket if you want to use Eircode.

gizmo555 · 10-12-2015 9:48pm

oscarBravo wrote: »

You are arguing against a claim I didn't make.

No, I'm making a claim of my own. The claim is that Eircode is not practical for use with satnavs and won't be until one can enter a code directly into the device and get directions, without having to be online at the time. You may be satisfied with the method you describe, I wouldn't be.

oscarBravo wrote: »

From the Data Protection Act . . .

If I give you a randomly-chosen entry from the Eircode database, and no other data, can you identify a living individual from that information?

I'm very well aware of the definition of personal data. So is the Data Protection Commissioner. From her annual report for 2014:

It is clear (particularly in light of the rate of single-occupancy households in Ireland) that the Eircode should be regarded as personal data, under the definition in the Data Protection Acts 1988 and 2003.

While it is true that, on its own, Eircode is merely a unique identifier for an address and not a person, it is equally the case that in most contexts of its envisaged usage, a data controller will likely have additional information that would then allow identification of an individual person.

Anyway, the bottom line is that there is little or no incentive for the public to use Eircodes. It's supposed to be a postcode system, but An Post all but ignore it. (Although at least they quote their own Eircode as part of their postal address on their home page, which is more than you do yourself!)

oscarBravo · 10-12-2015 10:07pm

gizmo555 wrote: »

No, I'm making a claim of my own.

Well, you made it in the form of a question in response to a post of mine, so you can see where the confusion may have arisen.

The claim is that Eircode is not practical for use with satnavs and won't be until one can enter a code directly into the device and get directions, without having to be online at the time. You may be satisfied with the method you describe, I wouldn't be.

I didn't say I was satisfied; I said something that was true. You keep rephrasing it so you can argue with it, but none of your rephrasing will make what I said untrue.

I'm very well aware of the definition of personal data. So is the Data Protection Commissioner. From her annual report for 2014:

It is clear (particularly in light of the rate of single-occupancy households in Ireland) that the Eircode should be regarded as personal data, under the definition in the Data Protection Acts 1988 and 2003.

While it is true that, on its own, Eircode is merely a unique identifier for an address and not a person, it is equally the case that in most contexts of its envisaged usage, a data controller will likely have additional information that would then allow identification of an individual person.

That doesn't contradict Eircode's statement.

As a registered data controller, I consider an Eircode to be part of an address, and as such personal data - but the Eircode database doesn't contain personally identifying information per se.

Anyway, the bottom line is that there is little or no incentive for the public to use Eircodes. It's supposed to be a postcode system, but An Post all but ignore it. (Although at least they quote their own Eircode as part of their postal address on their home page, which is more than you do yourself!)

Hah, I was wondering when that would be thrown in my face.

We're in the middle of an office move. It doesn't make sense to put our old Eircode on the website; when the new address is finalised, the new Eircode will be on the website.

10-12-2015 10:26pm

TheChizler wrote: »

In the interim, on your pc you can shrink the window down to mobile size and click "get directions", it will link to the location in Google Maps. The coordinates will be in the URL.

How do you mean by shrink to mobile size?

Maybe im taking you up wrong, but i've 'restored down' and fiddled about with the window size/aspect ratio etc but no new options appear?

Can i view the mobile version of the site on my PC or something like that? Would be of help to get redirected to Maps with a location.

oscarBravo · 10-12-2015 10:31pm

Deleted User wrote: »

How do you mean by shrink to mobile size? Maybe im taking you up wrong, but i've 'restored down' and fiddled about with the window size/aspect ratio etc but no new options appear?

Can i view the mobile version of the site on my PC or something like that? Would be of help to get redirected to Maps with a location.

Resize the browser until it's as narrow as shown above, and the "Directions" button appears.

Bacchus · 10-12-2015 10:34pm

gizmo555 wrote: »

I'm very well aware of the definition of personal data.

It doesn't seem that you are if you consider an address (without any personally identifiable information attached) to be personal data. Addresses are public domain. Names attached to addresses would make it PII.

GJG · 11-12-2015 9:14am

gizmo555 wrote: »

They may not be dead, but they're not showing much signs of life. I've yet to come across any Irish business which requires me to provide my Eircode to conduct a transaction with them and indeed, most businesses don't seem to use them themselves.

To take an example, here are the addresses of the three utility companies I have accounts with for my household, as published on their websites:
Vodafone Ireland Limited, Mountainview, Leopardstown, Dublin 18, Ireland

Irish Water, Colvill House, 24-26 Talbot Street, Dublin 1

Viridian Energy Limited, t/a Energia, Mill House, Ashtowngate, Navan Road, Dublin 15

Not an Eircode to be seen . . .

While you may find them helpful, it's clear most people and businesses see no particular benefit to using them. I can count on the fingers of one hand the number of times I've seen an Eircode on correspondence I've received since they were introduced.

So you are basing that conclusion on the fact that you are able to find three companies that don't list their Eircode online yet? I can find 17,000 in Dublin 1 alone that are listing it on their website. There may be some false positives in there, but also many omissions, I'm only counting websites where the Eircode immediately follows the word Dublin, and where a space is left between the D01 and the rest of the postcode.

gizmo555 wrote: »

Lastly, Eircode are being disingenuous on the privacy implications of the system of uniquely identifiying individual properties. They deny on the FAQ page of their website that they hold any personal data, which is completely contrary to the view of the Data Protection Commissioner. The Commissioner highlighted that no other country uses postcodes which uniquely identify houses.

Eircodes are public information, just like any other part (or the whole) of your address. They allow the 40 per cent of addresses that were previously non-unique to be uniquely identified. If you (or the Data Protection Commissioner) think that has some unacceptable consequences, then you need to explain why those consequences are not already happening to the 60 per cent of addresses that were unique already; or to the 100 per cent of addresses in the north that are unique, or all those in almost every other developed country.

The fact that Eircode alone can uniquely identify an address (rather than the postcode plus the house number as in the north) is immaterial. In either case, a short sequence of characters identify every property uniquely. Complaints about some mystery unacceptable consequences of unique addresses only arose after Eircode was introduced - it seems to me that it is just people casting around for any begrudgery they can find.

gizmo555 wrote: »

Many people would also suspect that a significant reason for their introduction is to make it easier to apply household-based charges like water, property tax, the proposed broadcasting charge, etc.

Well, when you complaint is that Eircode will make tax evasion harder, you really are scraping the barrel.

gizmo555 · 11-12-2015 10:38am

GJG wrote: »

So you are basing that conclusion on the fact that you are able to find three companies that don't list their Eircode online yet?

I pointed out that three of the biggest utility companies in the country (and Oscar) don't. That speaks for itself. Your search is near meaningless as a measure of Eircode use. For example, 1,680 or 10% of your results relate to a single Eircode, D02 HW77. (You searched on D02, not D01.)

GJG wrote: »

Eircodes are public information, just like any other part (or the whole) of your address. They allow the 40 per cent of addresses that were previously non-unique to be uniquely identified. If you (or the Data Protection Commissioner) think that has some unacceptable consequences, then you need to explain why those consequences are not already happening to the 60 per cent of addresses that were unique already; or to the 100 per cent of addresses in the north that are unique, or all those in almost every other developed country.

The point is that Eircode deny on their website that they hold any personal data, not what the possible consequences are. Clearly they, you and Oscar know better than the Data Protection Commissioner.

GJG wrote: »

Well, when you complaint is that Eircode will make tax evasion harder, you really are scraping the barrel.

I'm not complaining. I'm observing that if people perceive - rightly, in my view - that Eircodes will facilitate the easier imposition of taxes and charges, many will be much less likely to use them. So the slow adoption mentioned by Oscar will be slower still.

And, yet again, I observe that this will make no difference to the postal service. So we're spending €27m at a time of unprecedented cutbacks in public spending to devise and implement a postcode which provides no benefit to users of the postal service. I'll leave it at that, because I'm getting bored with repeating myself.

Bacchus · 11-12-2015 10:41am

gizmo555 wrote: »

The point is that Eircode deny on their website that they hold any personal data, not what the possible consequences are. Clearly they, you and Oscar know better than the Data Protection Commissioner.

They don't hold any personal data though (as has been pointed out to you already). Personal data is something that can identify an individual. An address (without a name) does not do this. Addresses are in the public domain.

I think you'll find the Data Protection Commissioner agrees with this so it's not a matter of that person "knowing better".

Bacchus · 11-12-2015 10:46am

Interesting, I had a read over the DPC report. Ok, I do disagree with them when they say in it "should" be considered personal data. It's also worth highlighting that they only say "should". It's a recommendation, not something that is put into law. So, Eircode do not break any law here.

At best, an address or an eircode should be considered non-sensitive PII (as opposed to sensitive PII which should be protected). There probably are some considerations to take into account 'how' it is used internally at Eircode as sometimes the link between two pieces of non-sensitive PII can reveal some sensitive PII. There's nothing to suggest though that this is the case at Eircode.

GJG · 11-12-2015 11:05am

gizmo555 wrote: »

I pointed out that three of the biggest utility companies in the country (and Oscar) don't. That speaks for itself. Your search is near meaningless as a measure of Eircode use. For example, 1,680 or 10% of your results relate to a single Eircode, D02 HW77. (You searched on D02, not D01.)

Um, no.

I think you don't know how to use Google, if you don't understand why your search gives you the wrong answer of 1,680 instances of that code and this search which gives the correct answer of 24. Slight difference.

gizmo555 wrote: »

The point is that Eircode deny on their website that they hold any personal data, not what the possible consequences are. Clearly they, you and Oscar know better than the Data Protection Commissioner.

Why is that the point? Why would a silly argument over semantics be more important than the actual, real-world consequences?

gizmo555 wrote: »

I'm not complaining. I'm observing that if people perceive - rightly, in my view - that Eircodes will facilitate the easier imposition of taxes and charges, many will be much less likely to use them. So the slow adoption mentioned by Oscar will be slower still.

It facilitates the easier tackling of tax evasion. Imposing taxes is one thing, collecting them is what we are talking about. Are you aware of any evidence that the adoption of postcodes in other countries has been hampered by an attachment to tax evasion?

Eliminating confusion and managing data efficiently benefits the whole of society, even if it catches out a few cheats and people who benefitted from that confusion and inefficiency. That provides a real economic benefit. It will take a few years to bed in, but at a stroke we have tackled a whole raft of problems. What are your constructive suggestions?

Bacchus · 11-12-2015 11:23am

Sorry for multiple posts. This topic quiet interesting and it's far more complex than I originally thought.

I was coming from the POV that an address is a publicly available piece of information, therefore a postcode is no different. However, because this database is publicly searchable and the eircode will specify an exact location, there is the potential to use the eircodes in conjunction with other data, and this might reveal some personal data about an individual. In that case, all addresses should also be protected but I guess the distinction is that they are not in a searchable database.

To go slightly off topic, I wonder have the same considerations been given the property price register? From that, if you know someone who bought recently in a county (but not the specific area), you can go online there and narrow down what houses sold in around that time period. My point here is that, addresses are such a public piece of information that while they can be considered to leak personal data, they are vital to how services are delivered. If postcodes can't be listed in a directory, then shouldn't we be burning all the phone books out there? Again, the key difference appears to be that eircodes are searchable.... but if they're not searchable... how do you find your own eircode? How does that work in the UK or elsewhere?

Sorry for rambling... as I said, it's an interesting challenge. On the one hand, an effective searchable postcode system is very useful, on the other hand, there is the potential for the system to reveal personal data when used in conjunction with other data.

MBSnr · 11-12-2015 11:41am

GJG wrote: »

Um, no.

I think you don't know how to use Google

Hmmm.
It isn't as much as you think.

Search for “Dublin D02”

After page 16 you get this.

"In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 155 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included."

If you search again with the omitted result, there are duplications of the same Eircode repeatedly appearing.

Also there's only 187 (20 pages) for "Dublin D01"

In the 1000s perhaps. Certainly no way near 17,000 anyhow, so let's not band that figure about any more as proof....

L1011 · 11-12-2015 11:58am

An Posts Christmas stamp booklet uses eircodes on all address examples. Some inconsistency in their refusal to use them!

oscarBravo · 11-12-2015 12:13pm

gizmo555 wrote: »

The point is that Eircode deny on their website that they hold any personal data, not what the possible consequences are. Clearly they, you and Oscar know better than the Data Protection Commissioner.

They don't hold personal data, and the DPC hasn't said that they hold personal data. There is no contradiction.

Bacchus · 11-12-2015 1:38pm

oscarBravo wrote: »

They don't hold personal data, and the DPC hasn't said that they hold personal data. There is no contradiction.

Though it is actually worth noting that recommendation of the DPC is that it "should" be considered personal data.

Under the data protection acts...

"Personal data means data relating to a living individual who is or can be identified either from the data or from the data in conjunction with other information that is in, or is likely to come into, the possession of the data controller"

It is the "in conjunction with other info" bit that I think is relevant when talking about the Eircodes.

As I said earlier though, the scenarios where you use an Eircode are the same as where you use an address (which reveals the same information) so it is interesting that Eircodes are deemed to be personal data but addresses aren't. Again, as I said, the distinction must be because the Eircodes are on a public searchable database whereas addresses are not.

I'm very much pro-Eircode and hope it gets wider adoption but there are some valid questions about the privacy of personal data there.

View · 11-12-2015 1:46pm

Using Dublin examples to prove or disprove the existence of support for Eircodes is poor as most of Dublin already had post codes. The real test is whether the areas outside the previous Dublin post code areas are using them or not.

anothernight · 11-12-2015 2:09pm

Bacchus wrote: »

but if they're not searchable... how do you find your own eircode? How does that work in the UK or elsewhere?

In the countries I've lived in with a postcode (including the UK), there was no need for the average user (i.e., not businesses) to look up your postcode* because it was a compulsory part of the address, so you just know it. To me, having to look up your own postcode online is akin to looking up your house number, or the name of your county. Not saying it was the wrong way to implement it, but it does seem really weird. I don't understand how they allowed Eircode to go ahead without making it a compulsory part of people's addresses. But I am biased by all my previous postcode experiences.

*There are look up services online for the places I've lived which used postcodes, but they are so irrelevant to me that I never even knew of their existence until about 2 minutes ago, when I googled it.

GJG · 11-12-2015 3:43pm

MBSnr wrote: »

Hmmm.
It isn't as much as you think.

Search for “Dublin D02”

After page 16 you get this.

"In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 155 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included."

If you search again with the omitted result, there are duplications of the same Eircode repeatedly appearing.

Also there's only 187 (20 pages) for "Dublin D01"

In the 1000s perhaps. Certainly no way near 17,000 anyhow, so let's not band that figure about any more as proof....

You're just not correct; you seem to be confusing the total number of results that Google displays with the total number of results finds. Google are well aware of the adage that "the best place to hide a body is on Page 2 of Google's search results", so they don't waste resources showing you the results after the first few pages. This feature is well documented.

This fits a pattern of the Eircode begrudgers; strident claims of anything negative about Eircode, based on hasty assumptions, misunderstandings or just plain falsehoods. We've had claims that the Rock of Cashel or UCD won't get any or enough Eircodes (false), that the database would take up 2GB (it's 1 per cent of that) that Eircode forgot to give a code to 50,000 houses (they didn't).

I think that the fact that I can rebut two false claims with a few seconds googling before lunchtime shows that some people are so anxious to knock Eircode that they will believe - or at least say - almost anything.

oscarBravo · 11-12-2015 4:36pm

Bacchus wrote: »

Though it is actually worth noting that recommendation of the DPC is that it "should" be considered personal data.

Yes. I consider it personal data, because I store it in a database in conjunction with a person's name, and as such the precautions I'm legally required to take to protect personal data apply.

Eircode don't store personally-identifying information in the ECAD. Therefore it's not personal data, which is what they've said. There is no contradiction.

MBSnr · 11-12-2015 6:03pm

GJG wrote: »

This fits a pattern of the Eircode begrudgers;.

Right. You obviously don't know I am a fan of them....

Anyhow there aren't 17K unique Eircodes in "Dublin D02" on company websites. That we agree on right? I said in the 1000s. Did you read that bit?

GJG · 11-12-2015 6:21pm

MBSnr wrote: »

Right. You obviously don't know I am a fan of them....

Anyhow there aren't 17K unique Eircodes in "Dublin D02" on company websites. That we agree on right? I said in the 1000s. Did you read that bit?

There are 17k unique pages with "Dublin D02" on them, which is what I said in the first place.

plodder · 11-12-2015 7:00pm

Bacchus wrote: »

Sorry for multiple posts. This topic quiet interesting and it's far more complex than I originally thought.

I was coming from the POV that an address is a publicly available piece of information, therefore a postcode is no different. However, because this database is publicly searchable and the eircode will specify an exact location, there is the potential to use the eircodes in conjunction with other data, and this might reveal some personal data about an individual. In that case, all addresses should also be protected but I guess the distinction is that they are not in a searchable database.

To go slightly off topic, I wonder have the same considerations been given the property price register? From that, if you know someone who bought recently in a county (but not the specific area), you can go online there and narrow down what houses sold in around that time period. My point here is that, addresses are such a public piece of information that while they can be considered to leak personal data, they are vital to how services are delivered. If postcodes can't be listed in a directory, then shouldn't we be burning all the phone books out there? Again, the key difference appears to be that eircodes are searchable.... but if they're not searchable... how do you find your own eircode? How does that work in the UK or elsewhere?

Sorry for rambling... as I said, it's an interesting challenge. On the one hand, an effective searchable postcode system is very useful, on the other hand, there is the potential for the system to reveal personal data when used in conjunction with other data.

Exactly, and there's another interesting angle. People may expect that personally identifying information is protected when you click the little check box when you set up accounts on websites. But a lot of these websites won't know that Eircodes are potentially identifying and their privacy policies often say that non identifying information such as postcodes may be shared with "carefully selected" third parties. So, your Eircode (ie your address) could end up in all manner of supposedly anonymised statistics that get bought and sold on the internet.

oscarBravo · 11-12-2015 8:02pm

plodder wrote: »

Exactly, and there's another interesting angle. People may expect that personally identifying information is protected when you click the little check box when you set up accounts on websites. But a lot of these websites won't know that Eircodes are potentially identifying and their privacy policies often say that non identifying information such as postcodes may be shared with "carefully selected" third parties. So, your Eircode (ie your address) could end up in all manner of supposedly anonymised statistics that get bought and sold on the internet.

That's a potential data privacy breach on the part of the website operator, not Eircode.

ECAD still doesn't contain personal data.

gizmo555 · 11-12-2015 9:13pm

oscarBravo wrote: »

ECAD still doesn't contain personal data.

It's impossible for you to say that without knowing what other data is in or is likely to come into the possession of Eircode.

Even without knowing that, we can say they are categorically wrong to claim that their records relating to the premises of sole traders which include their names are not personal data.

oscarBravo · 11-12-2015 10:54pm

gizmo555 wrote: »

It's impossible for you to say that without knowing what other data is in or is likely to come into the possession of Eircode.

And it's impossible for anyone to say for certain that any company isn't lying through its teeth in its privacy statements.

There's a presumption in the absence of evidence to the contrary that a data controller is compliant with its legal obligations. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it's fair to assume that they are compliant.

Even without knowing that, we can say they are categorically wrong to claim that their records relating to the premises of sole traders which include their names are not personal data.

If only they made that clear on their website.

12-12-2015 12:06am

oscarBravo wrote: »

Resize the browser until it's as narrow as shown above, and the "Directions" button appears.

Yeah, that actually does seem to work! Delighted to have found that out! Cheers.

Now I might actually be able to use Eircodes if they're supplied to me

(I also notice that they're raised it from 15 searches per day to 50. Nothing a history-clear wouldn't sort out anyway, but good to see it being made less hassle.)

plodder · 12-12-2015 10:35am

oscarBravo wrote: »

That's a potential data privacy breach on the part of the website operator, not Eircode..

What if the website is outside this jurisdiction, and doesn't know anything about Eircodes?

oscarBravo · 12-12-2015 11:12pm

plodder wrote: »

What if the website is outside this jurisdiction, and doesn't know anything about Eircodes?

What if it is?

byrnefm · 16-12-2015 12:26am

Now I'm sure this is just coincidence but I received a letter in the post today (handwritten) with my address and Eircode on it .. and it was postmarked in Athlone on 15.12.2015 .. and arrived in this morning's post. Now that is fast processing!

So even though the Eircode probably made no difference to the letter's speed of delivery, it certainly did not slow it down any!

oscarBravo · 16-12-2015 4:36pm

We kicked off a process today to systematically canvass all our active customers for their Eircode. We're sending each of them an SMS asking them to reply with their Eircode.

The response rate is fairly respectable so far (I don't have an easy way to get exact numbers, but I'll work on it), with a decent percentage (maybe 20% or so) replying more or less straight away with their Eircode.

On top of that, we've had one reply asking "what's an Eircode?", one saying "my Eircode is xxx, but you should be using Loc8 codes", and one saying "never use it and never will".

It's not a scientific poll by any means, but it tends to suggest a broad acceptance rather than a broad rejection of Eircode as a concept.

anothernight · 16-12-2015 5:16pm

oscarBravo wrote: »

It's not a scientific poll by any means, but it tends to suggest a broad acceptance rather than a broad rejection of Eircode as a concept.

If a business I normally use for a service (or whatever it is you do) asks me for non-personal information that is clearly used for admin purposes, I will give them that information. Nothing to do with whether I accept its existence. Did you think everyone who considers Eircode badly implemented would just refuse to give you theirs? That would be bizarre imo.

When a form asks me for my PPS number I don't refuse to write it down either, even if I don't think it's a particularly well-designed personal identification system. Same with loads of other bits of information. Hell, I think the Leap card payment system is terribly designed and yet I still have one in my wallet for when I'm in Dublin.

oscarBravo · 16-12-2015 5:22pm

It wasn't intended as a comment on how wonderfully designed people think the code is; it's a question of to what extent people know or can quickly access their Eircode and are willing to provide it on request.

For what it's worth, the number of "what's an Eircode?" replies has now reached a grand total of two.

anothernight · 16-12-2015 5:33pm

Fair enough. The fact that you included "broad rejection" as the other option made it sound like you thought people who disliked it would just refuse to give it to you or something. I suspect a lot of people (me!) would provide it not out of willingness per se, but simply because it was requested and there was no reason not to give it. More indifference than acceptance, I suppose.

My mother doesn't follow Irish media and she had no clue that Eircode was a thing because she never received anything in the post about it until well after it was implemented. I'm actually surprised you got two responses from people who didn't know it existed! I would've thought the number would be vanishingly small.

Sam Russell · 16-12-2015 8:46pm

How many of the 80% who did not reply had no idea what an Eircode was or had no idea what their own one was?

Also, have you verified the codes you received?

Personally, I would supply my Eircode to a company I dealt with if they requested it, but I do not live at an address that has a non-unique address. If a company has my address, they can look up my Eircode.

oscarBravo · 16-12-2015 9:05pm

Sam Russell wrote: »

How many of the 80% who did not reply had no idea what an Eircode was or had no idea what their own one was?

How on earth would I know that?

Also, have you verified the codes you received?

Of course.

I have integrated Eircode lookups into our internal systems. When I enter an Eircode on the customer details page, it shows me the address from the ECAD. If the address is obviously different from what's on file, it's likely that they've typo'd the code, and we can clarify with them.

Personally, I would supply my Eircode to a company I dealt with if they requested it, but I do not live at an address that has a non-unique address. If a company has my address, they can look up my Eircode.

The vast, vast majority of my customers have non-unique addresses, hence (a) the usefulness of Eircodes to me, and (b) why I'm asking customers for their Eircode rather than wasting time on an address matching process.

View · 16-12-2015 10:14pm

The main problem with having introduced an address code here is that we have no proper addressing system here.

What do I mean by "proper addressing system"?

In many other countries, the local authority maintains an official register of all addresses within its area. It, and it alone, has the power to approve new addresses and it typically has the power to officially order address changes if it so requires. Thus, within a local authority area, there is no duplication of addresses nor is there any confusion about what any given address is.

That is not the case here.

So, when a post code was created for a property here, no attempt was made to verify if the property's actual address was correct or if it was completely inaccurate.

Now though with the post code system, we are heading down the road of reverse engineering an address from given post codes. Thus, if your address is wrong or contains superfluous data, tough, as that wrong information will courtesy of IT become your address irrespective of its accuracy.

GJG · 17-12-2015 12:23pm

View wrote: »

The main problem with having introduced an address code here is that we have no proper addressing system here.

What do I mean by "proper addressing system"?

In many other countries, the local authority maintains an official register of all addresses within its area. It, and it alone, has the power to approve new addresses and it typically has the power to officially order address changes if it so requires. Thus, within a local authority area, there is no duplication of addresses nor is there any confusion about what any given address is.

That is not the case here.

So, when a post code was created for a property here, no attempt was made to verify if the property's actual address was correct or if it was completely inaccurate.

Now though with the post code system, we are heading down the road of reverse engineering an address from given post codes. Thus, if your address is wrong or contains superfluous data, tough, as that wrong information will courtesy of IT become your address irrespective of its accuracy.

I think you are correct that the haphazard nature of addressing is unfortunate. You say that introducing Eircode before what you regard as a 'proper addressing system' is the 'main problem'. Other than 'Don't start from here', what exactly is your suggested solution?

Reforming addresses, with or without Eircode, is likely to be impossibly difficult because of local attachment to anachronistic and contradictory place-names, with a variety of spellings, borders and social meanings. This is why people who were against Eircode for narrow commercial reasons demanded that everyone's address be changed before Eircode was introduced. They knew it would never happen, although they never explained why it might be necessary.

I think that Eircode has reduced or eliminated the need to reform addresses - it just sidestepped an issue that would have been politically impossible to address directly. If you don't agree, there is nothing about Eircode that prevents you from campaigning for such reform.

Sam Russell · 17-12-2015 6:07pm

GJG wrote: »

I think you are correct that the haphazard nature of addressing is unfortunate. You say that introducing Eircode before what you regard as a 'proper addressing system' is the 'main problem'. Other than 'Don't start from here', what exactly is your suggested solution?

The first step is quite obviously to appoint an 'Address Regulator' which should be the local planning office, or alternatively, the Revenue Commissioners as they collect property tax.

The next step is to define what an 'official' address is. Historically, it is, for rural addresses, House name (if it has one), Townland, Barony, County. This could of course be modernised, but a road name and house number would be relatively easy to add. Addressee offers a suggestion (in conjunction with others on the same road) and 'Address Regulator' agrees or suggests an alternative - for example should it be a duplicate.

To do this a start has to be made, and for a start to be made there has to be political will and that is sadly lacking.

oscarBravo · 17-12-2015 7:22pm

We got another reply today, containing an Eircode but also the message: "Please don't use Eircode. Nobody else is. There are much better systems."

Are there? In the sense of technically more useful for various reasons, it could be argued that there are. But "better" for me ultimately boils down to "more useful".

The level of response from our customer base to the question "what's your Eircode?" has been, on balance, pretty impressive. If the question had been "what's your Loc8 code?" or "what's your GoCode?", or even "what's your what3words code?" - would we have received such a response?

We're up to four "what's an Eircode?" responses. You think we'd only have received four "what's a Loc8 code?" replies? For better or worse, people have been informed of their Eircode.

What's the best system? The one that gives me the information I need.

17-12-2015 8:01pm

How many of those "what's an eircode" would have answered correctly if you had asked for the postcode?

Eircode - its implemetation (merged)

Comments