Madeleine McCann killer conspiracy

Any following the Sonia Poulton vs Jim Gamble -dispute on this case?

Sapphire3 wrote: »

No, I haven't heard anything about that yet...can you provide some links, so that I can check it out please? Thanks.

9 September: SY receive 'dossier of Twitter trolls´ and abuse given by the mccann family



1 October 2014: doorsteps twitter troll Brenda Leyland Sky News Crime Correspondent Martin Brunt - she invites him in and they have a private chat. The media go mad incorrectly attributing tweets to @sweepyface (Brenda). Here is her tweeting history: http://greptweet.com/u/sweepyface/sweepyface.txt
Jim Gamble hails it as great work by Martin Brunt.



Friday 3 October 2014: Gerry McCann calls for example to made of ‘vile’ internet trolls http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/oct/03/gerry-mccann-calls-example-made-vile-internet-trolls

Brenda is found dead in hotel room -not the first "suicide" in this case. It must be noted that death threats had been made to brenda previously and they identified her family and address and put it on twitter.

Sonia Poultan (journo) makes video declaring questioning Madelines death does not make us trolls. Now she´s making a documentary about the untold story of Madeline. Jim Gamble (former head of CEOP) is an avid supporter of the mccanns and declares their innocence every chance he gets. She doorsteps Kate Mccann for an interview. Jim Gamble says it´s terrible.


Poulton wants to interview Gamble for the documentary and wrote and open letter as follows:

OPEN LETTER TO JIM GAMBLE #MCCANN


Following your Twitter attack on me yesterday - and continued today - I reiterate my request to invite you for an interview with regard the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.

I was shocked by your vitriolic outburst regarding doorstepping the McCanns. Given that you were not there when it occurred I find you speak without full knowledge of the situation. For a former policeman to speak without understanding of what I have or have not done, is worrying given your high media profile around this case.

For the record, I approached the McCanns at their Leicester home. This is a practice you have publicly applauded when it applied to a single, older woman expressing an opinion e.g. Brenda Leyland also from Leicester. And yet, apparently, it is not to your taste when it comes to those who are at the heart of a story of enormous public investment.

Doorstepping, in matters of public interest, is a valid journalistic tool and I stand-by my decision to do it in this case.

This approach followed interview requests to the McCanns and I made it clear that there were unanswered questions - even more than the 48 police questions that Kate refused to answer when it came to searching for her child - and I sought to help by using whatever appropriate tools I have at my disposable. It is the McCanns who use the expression 'No Stone Unturned' and I believe what I set out to do then, and continue to do, assists rather than obstructs that.

When I received no response to an interview, after several requests over the period of a year, I realised that I had a public duty to pursue this. Thus, myself and a small camera crew went to the McCanns house and asked to talk with them.

Kate, I should point out, didn't find my approach at all 'attacking' as you insist on shrieking all over Twitter, until I told her why I was there and what questions the public - the very public who have been funding the search both through private donations and the current Operation Grange investigation - want answering.

I am not dissuaded from this action even by your use of emotive words in an apparent attempt to create a negative narrative about this documentary and what we are setting out to do. I am relieved that the wider discerning public are finally getting a glimpse of the machinations of those claiming to seek justice for Madeleine McCann.

I have previously asked you for an interview for the documentary I am making called 'The Untold Story of Madeleine McCann'. This is for a number of reasons.

There is your involvement in calling for legal punishment of those you regard as 'trolls' when, in fact, they are mostly just the people who dispute the official version of events surrounding Madeleine's disappearance.

Also, I wish to address the fact that you were involved in the Sky report by Martin Brunt - which featured the doorstepping of Brenda Leyland several days before her death - coupled with your euphoric public congratulations of this action on the day the report was repeatedly aired.

The Sky report, as you know, was based on a so-called dossier of those who oppose the official abduction story. I am given to understand that I feature in that dossier, as did Brenda Leyland. It is no secret that people involved in said dossier were in contact with you prior to Martin Brunt doorstepping Brenda Leyland. People, I have evidence of, who were involved in continually bullying and provoking Brenda Leyland.

Given that experts and commentators have now had a chance to examine Brenda Leyland's social network output regarding the case, and have concluded that she was not a 'troll', I believe - along with many others - that you have questions to answer regarding your role in her public hounding.

I am making this an open letter because I am aware of the deep public interest surrounding the disappearance of Madeleine, not least the millions of pounds that hard-pressed British taxpayers are funding for this, but also because you chose to be public in your condemnation of me and this documentary.

It is also, unquestionably, a unique-ly 'online case' in some regards in that many, many people globally have flocked to the Internet to express their horror at the case receiving such biased reporting in mainstream media.

It is an open secret that the McCann's version of events is widely disputed. Due, in part, to the inability of the couple and their friends to present a consistent account of events. This is out there in the public domain thanks to the work of the Portuguese Police. So it is that people have taken, en masse, to the Internet to express anger, dismay and frustration at the coverage which frequently fails to match reality.

I know you are aware that there are significant rumours surrounding your involvement with the McCanns during the time you were in public office at CEOP. I have seen the tweets that people send to you and the Facebook comments made about you.

I understand what it means to be smeared and I believe that I have a responsibility, as a journalist (of almost three decades), to put those accusations to you. I am not interfering with any on-going police investigation just doing what journalists are supposed to do.

I find it alarming, as do many Twitter observers, that you chose to use social media in a futile attempt to undermine me professionally with childish insults. All the while encouraging your followers to behave in a mob-like fashion towards me. Is this not contrary to what you claim to represent?

However, as many have pointed out, your public attacks have merely served to reinforce what people already believe regarding your somewhat blinkered approach to this case. Certainly, the way you have behaved over the last 24 hours towards myself and others has presented us with the perfect way to illustrate this in the documentary.

As a former policeman, I cannot fathom why you continue to insist that an abduction is the only reasonable conclusion to the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.

For those who have taken time to truly look at the case - those same people you block on Twitter and refer to as ranters and trolls - and away from the PR-led version of the media coverage, it is clear that there is so much more to the disappearance of Madeleine McCann than we are frequently led to believe.

I wonder, have the facts become immaterial in your quest to defend the McCanns at any cost? I am happy to be proved wrong.

So, Mr. Gamble, what is it to be? I offer you a full recorded interview (and a final mutual agreement of your contribution to the documentary) so you can be assured that your message will not be taken out of context.

I hope, rather than continuing to behave in a deeply unprofessional, evasive and questionable manner, that you take up this invitation.

If you choose not to, then people will make up their own mind why this might be. Your call.


Sonia Poulton
January 28, 2015


Jim replied saying no


Just a few things (I´ve probably forgotten more)


Gerry had a CEOP manual in Portugal
Brenda did not tweet any death threats to the mcanns but she was tweeting about a certain Nanny / There were worse things and threats said on twitter wrongly attributed to @sweepyface, but they´re had been death threats made against her and outing of where she lived and pictures of her family & house posted.
Very convenient Gerry calls for action and action happens
Mccanns don´t read twitter, yet the dossier was handed in by the mccanns
Jim Gamble...I´m not too sure what to make of him yet. But he is determined to declare their innocence and comes across as very aggressive in his tweets. He supports bullying by the pro-mcann side (as they refer to themselves). He´s a former police officer and head of CEOP but ....~? if his interests lie in protecting children, why is he most vocal about parents who abandoned their children to go drinking and is a staunch protester of their innocence or any wrong doing (even leaving them alone seems alright with him)
Another "suicide" the other was the lad who spent all his money going to Portugal to search for Madeline
What did Brenda and Martin Brunt talk about in their private chat? He threatened her publicly with police action and crown prosecution where there was none.



And then there´s the libel trial....

Sapphire3 wrote: »

No, I haven't heard anything about that yet...can you provide some links, so that I can check it out please? Thanks.

I think it's a Twitter dispute Bjork is referring to, you will have to follow them on Twitter.

bjork wrote: »

Latest layer of conspiracy: Poulton is not an independent journo and is being paid by dark forces

Poulton is a rather opiniated character who seems to have fallen out with a lot of people but I did like the way she showed up that lightweight Nick Clegg.

Delighted to see this evening that a Portuguese court has ffound in favour of the McCanns in their libel case vs the odious Goncarlo Amaral. He has to pay them €500000 and costs awarded against him of €106000.
Also the Judge ordered that all remaining copies of his nasty little pamphlet "The Truth of the Lie" be returned for destruction.
I hope that the McCanns can now persue the cowardly internet trolls who 8 years later continue to persecute this family who have suffered so grievously.

noway12345 wrote: »

The scent of death in the boot of their car?

Expand please on your theory as to when and how she died why they decided to take an extraordinary course of action in hiding it, how they moved the body while under the glare of the world's press, how they have managed to keep up the pretense for 8 years and how literally 100s of detectives from 2 separate jurisdictions have been drawn into this huge conspiracy.

bjork wrote: »

This is a new documentary - Very good I must say

An older one by the same lad

Eagerly awaiting this one

Lottery winner and jailbird Lee Ryan to make bizarre documentary about Madeleine McCann

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/437328/Madeleine-McCann-conspiracy-Lee-Ryan-Lotto-Lag-documentrary

but then

https://mobile.twitter.com/LeeTaylorRyan/status/590054655985590272/actions

How old was the second video? Was he referring to last christmas?

I hope Amaral appeals.