Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

N22 - Macroom to Ballyvourney (Macroom Bypass) [open to traffic]

1356757

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,963 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    Having the N18 so close to Bunratty castle is ridiculous, you have to admit. It ruins the place.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭Irish and Proud


    Having the N18 so close to Bunratty castle is ridiculous, you have to admit. It ruins the place.

    ...but the former N18 is even closer and is IMO more culpable with it's concrete bridge right up against the old stone bridge.


  • Registered Users Posts: 66 ✭✭imangry29


    http://highcourtsearch.courts.ie/hcslive/court_lists.show?sessionID=1336701148&yearNo=2011&recordNo=431&processType=JR

    6 days of Judicial Review hearing complete, judgement reserved until 30th October. Pity this was not resolved before the stimulus announced (although the big 3 announced by Howlin were always going to go before this anyway). IMO this should also go ahead before Galway Outer Bypass though it seems that comes first...

    At around €200 million (and for just 22km!!) - this bypass would make Tralee-Killarney-Cork-Waterford-Rosslare a fairly decent route once and for all (esp New Ross bypass in the mix), not to mention safe. Cork Airport - Lakes of Killarney in approx. 1 hour has a nice ring to it. Is a bit of joined up thinking between Transport and Tourism a little too much to ask? They are in the one Dept now after all...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,561 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    Thing is, if you are going from Waterford to Killarney, you'd take the N72 between Dungarvan and Killarney. This new road really only favours journeys between Killarney and Cork and prob as far as Youghal.

    Would be nice to see the N72 between Fermoy and Mallow done because it's an absolute disgrace at the moment.


  • Registered Users Posts: 66 ✭✭imangry29


    True, although N72 Mallow-Killarney is a shockingly dangerous route. At least N22 is (officially) a national primary, although you wouldn't know it driving it! Once the Bandon and Sarsfield flyovers, Dunkettle and Macroom-Ballyv done, it will be interesting to compare journey times N22 vs. N72 on the longer distances like Kerry-Waterford. For tourism, the N22 links (or exits) to all the main tourist spots in the South. Think its a better sell esp to foreigners who ain't too comfortable on our smaller roads. Getting N22 (and N25) right can only be to the major benefit of Cork Airport, getting bums on planes and into the country spending. Not that tourism should be the main reason for building the road.... the treachorous state of Ballyvourney - Macroom does enough talking.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,561 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    HQDC to the far side of Macroom would be fantastic. 120kph speed limit ideally.

    What sort of road will be built for the Macroom to Ballyvourney section ? Wide single lane with the occassional climbing lane ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 66 ✭✭imangry29


    I think they're going for HQDC over the full length! My memory of reading ABP inspector report was that he favoured it for macroom bypass but thought it was unnecessary for stretch to Ballyvourney. Then the board decided in favour of the NRA/ CCC move for full HQDC. I'm open to correction on that tho.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    I think HQDC is appropriate east of and around Macroom (and to 2 or 3km west of it ).

    I do feel 2+2 is the best solution west of there, honest!


  • Registered Users Posts: 66 ✭✭imangry29




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,058 ✭✭✭niloc1951


    To me it looks like the same old attitude from the Councils NRA etc. that they want to do what they want and while they engage in public consultations it is only for window dressing.
    It seems to have the same flavour as the infamous 'bottomless bog' saga on the M7 route.

    It begs the question, how many more projects have been steam-rolled (excuse the pun) through with disregard for public opinion and/or our heritage and environment but have been routed to facilitate the political and financial aspirations of the public servants/representatives involved.

    BTW, notwithstanding the above it is an absolute disgrace that the section of the N22 in question has not been bypassed/upgraded many years ago.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭Irish and Proud


    imangry29 wrote: »

    The inspector recommended refusal AFAIK and ABP ignored him? I didn't get to read much of the article, but if this is what the case centers on and the appeal is successful, then that potentially re-opens the case surrounding the Slane Bypass - the inspector recommended approval for that road and ABP decided to refuse. It works both ways! :cool:


  • Registered Users Posts: 66 ✭✭imangry29


    It wasn't straight forward refusal. The Inspector recommended go ahead for full HQDC bypass of Macroom but to stop it west of the town. Inspector recommended refusal of section from Macroom to Kerry (bypassing Ballyvourney and Ballymakeera) citing decrease in traffic volumes (i.e. could HQDC be justified after Macroom) as well as concerns regarding visual amenity of the route as proposed.

    The Board (IMHO correctly) decided that the full route should go ahead. The Board's report strongly counters arguments made by the Inspector. A Macroom Bypass on its own would leave one of the most treachorous and narrow sections of national primary road intact through Ballyvourney, while average speeds are increased on the approach from the east. For those that know the road, imagine coming off a HQDC around Macroom (prob travelling at 120km/hr a la Ballincollig Bypass??) and returning to the twisting ribbon of road that follows! Even if a reduced upgrade was to follow after the bypass section, the inherent problems with that are already on display where the Ballincollig bypass terminates at the west. The Board identified the importance of the route between Cork and Tralee/Killarney. The National Spatial Strategy has some merit in trying to plan the future development of the country. Ensuring consistent high quality links between Gateways and hubs should be the focus of the limited capital spend on new roads. To suggest a fantastic new bypass for Macroom but to leave the adjoining stretch fit for donkeys and carts, as it is, would by typical Irish short-sightedness. The country will one day be out of recession. The new road has to cater for the capacity of decades and possibly generations to come. The public transport option of rail (indirectly via Mallow) will also never compete.

    I don't think the road is being bulldozed through. On the contrary, the upgrade for one of the least safe roads in Ireland has been the subject of prolonged public scrutiny since 2001 (Constraints Report published) through the County Council, An Bord Pleanala and judicial review. The route has already been shifted to cater for the Kerry Slug. In most other countries, a primary route like this would have been "bulldozed" through long ago. Tralee - Killarney - County Bounds is mostly a good road. Ballincollig Bypass - N40 flyovers to Dunkettle is soon to be a very good road. Let's just clear this 22km nightmare in the middle once and for all. It will still leave room for improvement east of Macroom to Lissarda.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,151 ✭✭✭holdfast


    What is the current situation, I have read the last few replies. But I cannot understand if the road proposal overcome the objections ? If so what would be the next stage ?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    The Judge Reserved Judgement in July and us due to give us her judgement by late October.


  • Registered Users Posts: 83 ✭✭irishshadowfax


    Surely people will start asking questions again with the current road works...road rage is hitting new levels in the evening passing through Macroom, what a****hole, no longer needs a bypass, it needs to be bulldozed...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,543 ✭✭✭tinner777


    Surely people will start asking questions again with the current road works...road rage is hitting new levels in the evening passing through Macroom, what a****hole, no longer needs a bypass, it needs to be bulldozed...

    lol, and then stuck behind some clown going 70kph all the way from macroom to ballincollig with a line of traffic behind him :mad:


  • Registered Users Posts: 66 ✭✭imangry29


    Judgement on Judicial Review pushed back to 12th November.

    http://highcourtsearch.courts.ie/hcslive/court_lists.show?sessionID=371787688&yearNo=2011&recordNo=431&processType=JR

    Anyone up to speed on the legal mumbo jumbo of abbreviations that appear in the right hand column entitled "Note" on the page linked above? Hopefully JDT actually stands for Judgement?


  • Registered Users Posts: 83 ✭✭irishshadowfax


    imangry29 wrote: »
    Judgement on Judicial Review pushed back to 12th November.

    http://highcourtsearch.courts.ie/hcslive/court_lists.show?sessionID=371787688&yearNo=2011&recordNo=431&processType=JR

    Anyone up to speed on the legal mumbo jumbo of abbreviations that appear in the right hand column entitled "Note" on the page linked above? Hopefully JDT actually stands for Judgement?

    Hi imangry, the link brings up "Expired Session"... It's hard to see money being ploughed into the road at the moment because that could all be put towards the bypass... I can't believe they let Bord Gais dig up the whole town when 1) there is already roadworks between ****croom and Ballyvourney and 2) no one is opting for Gas right now...

    Bottom line is the towns people and businesses despite all their talk do not want a bypass, who would ever go near the place unless they broke down...


  • Registered Users Posts: 83 ✭✭irishshadowfax


    Has there been any updates from the judgment which was pushed back to 12th November?

    I cannot find any info on courts.ie or on any media outlets. It's difficult to comprehend the lack of coverage this matter is receiving for such a major project. Fair play to the Corkman.ie for the two detailed articles during the year. Last coverage on the N22 from the inept 'Irish' Examiner was April 2011...


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    Looks like the 10th of December now. It may be related to the Galway Bypass 'advocates' 'opinion' due this week I think.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,963 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    Any news?

    On this note, a woman was awarded €170,000 after her baby was delivered stillborn. Kerry Hospital sent her to Cork Hospital in an Ambulance.

    http://www.rte.ie/news/2012/1214/woman-awarded-170-000-after-loss-of-baby.html

    Emphasis mine.
    A woman whose baby was delivered stillborn after being sent on a two-hour ambulance journey has been awarded €170,000 damages against the HSE at the High Court.

    She attended Kerry General Hospital in Tralee, when the hospital decided to send her 110km away by ambulance to Cork without a blood transfusion on board.

    Two hours to do 110km is shameful, and a good bit of it is this section. 60kmh is the average along here, its so twisty you cant get any faster. And this is without the overtaking problem.... cars would pull in for an ambulance (wherever they can)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,474 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    Any news?

    On this note, a woman was awarded €170,000 after her baby was delivered stillborn. Kerry Hospital sent her to Cork Hospital in an Ambulance.

    http://www.rte.ie/news/2012/1214/woman-awarded-170-000-after-loss-of-baby.html

    Emphasis mine.



    Two hours to do 110km is shameful, and a good bit of it is this section. 60kmh is the average along here, its so twisty you cant get any faster. And this is without the overtaking problem.... cars would pull in for an ambulance (wherever they can)

    I really think Macroom bypass and Adare bypasses would have been far more beneficial for Kerry than the millions being ploughed into the Tralee one for now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,561 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    mfitzy wrote: »
    I really think Macroom bypass and Adare bypasses would have been far more beneficial for Kerry than the millions being ploughed into the Tralee one for now.

    Yes. But these bypasses wouldn't be build in Co Kerry and so it wouldn't give the same big effect, as silly as this sounds.


    Is the plan still to do with HQDC all the way to Macroom ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 66 ✭✭imangry29


    Credit to the Corkman for coverage on this (only show in town to their credit) - 2 articles from November and December:
    http://www.corkman.ie/news/high-court-finds-n22-planning-process-fair-3303807.html
    http://www.corkman.ie/news/leave-sought-to-appeal-n22-ruling-3330727.html
    Good news and a concrete judgement delivered. Appellant's legal arguments "misconceived". Planning process was "lengthy, public and fair".
    "The Judge said she found no material flaws in the procedure of the Board, and that it had due regard to the material before it."
    Not across the line yet, appellants are appealling for leave to appeal to Supreme Court, to be heard in March!

    For the little information it provides on the case thus far, see Courts.ie, use High Court Search function and enter 2011 (year) 431 (case number) and specify that 'Proceedings' are JR Judicial Review (from dropdown). Judgement delivered 10th December, no sign of that text yet on the website.

    Agree completely that Adare (what a shame on that!) and Macroom schemes would be of far greater benefit to Kerry, than the Tralee bypass (which will only benefit Tralee road users at a local level). Kerry is totally isolated on the national road network, arguably more so than the North West and requires connectivity for the benefit of the entire county.


  • Registered Users Posts: 66 ✭✭imangry29


    Yes. But these bypasses wouldn't be build in Co Kerry and so it wouldn't give the same big effect, as silly as this sounds.

    Is the plan still to do with HQDC all the way to Macroom ?[/QUOTE]

    It's HQDC over the full length (22km), starting just West of Ballyvourney (joining the decent WS2/2+1 scheme from Killarney) and finishing just East of Macroom, meeting old road once again i.e. from Macroom to Cork, we still have a crap, winding section of road (west of Lissarda). Lissarda bypass next on the wishlist if Macroom scheme ever built, ha http://www.corkrdo.ie/n22_baile_buirne_to_macroom_introduction.php! But living with road east of Macroom is a very small price to get this one over the line.

    There seems to be confusion on what the route actually is in a lot of past posts, so refresher map attached (from EIS published on corkrdo.ie website).


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 66 ✭✭imangry29


    Court hearing for leave to appeal to Supreme Court adjourned to 22 April (and who knows how long more again after that ... Easy to see how the legal profession makes a living). Cork CoCo minutes from Feb show scheme allocated €400,000 for 2013 from NRA to progress land acquisition, subject to positive outcome in court. (Dunkettle awarded €200,000 also subject to outcome of statutory proceedings)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,963 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    Good to see Dunkettle seems to be shooting up the priority list.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    imangry29 wrote: »
    Court hearing for leave to appeal to Supreme Court adjourned to 22 April (and who knows how long more again after that ...

    A Long time if they accept that there is a case to argue, they are severely backlogged. The judgement is online.

    http://courts.ie/judgments.nsf/6681dee4565ecf2c80256e7e0052005b/d5dbb853b1cb295580257afe005ba07b?OpenDocument&Highlight=0,STACK

    It contains the following 2 sections.
    19. I am not clear as to why Mr. Sweetman was joined as a notice party in these proceedings. At the hearing he sought to address me on various matters which were not the subject of the leave granted in the case and were not related to that leave. I therefore declined to hear his submissions.

    and
    20. The applicants have raised a very wide-ranging variety of arguments and have referred the court to a very large number of authorities. It seems to me that many of the arguments are misconceived and have no application to the case in hand. For example, it is not possible to argue that the oral hearing process under the Planning Acts can in any way constitute an attack on the fundamental Constitutional rights of the applicants. Participation in such a hearing is an entitlement, not an obligation or a burden, and as a matter of law can not be seen as an infringement of the right to liberty or the right to earn a livelihood. On a different tack, English law relating to Royal parks cannot be assumed to be relevant on the basis that some of the land in question once belonged to the kings of Munster.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,144 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Item 20 sounds like a Monty Python quote.


  • Registered Users Posts: 66 ✭✭imangry29


    NRA Annual Report 2012 and Programme 2013 available to download on the NRA website (under General Publications). Page 11 indicates what's on the agenda after current PPP package. Nice to see N22 scheme at the top of the list for whatever reason (usually the schemes are listed in order of road number) :) Fingers crossed now on court judgement this month! Fred Barry hinting though that nothing beyond the PPPs will start during govt lifetime (page 2).


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,144 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    A few mistakes on that list; should say N8/25/40 Dunkettle Interchange not N7/N25 and should say N69 Listowel Bypass not N86.
    The N14 schemes are dependent on the A5 and that's run into difficulties in NI so that puts less pressure on us to complete our parts. So only the first 6 schemes are worth talking about and likely to proceed. 3 Duals, 1 single, one junction upgrade and one motorway widening.
    imangry29 wrote: »
    Fred Barry hinting though that nothing beyond the PPPs will start during govt lifetime (page 2).
    I'm still holding out hope that they're being conservative and increased road investment will come to be seen as desirable soon enough.


  • Registered Users Posts: 66 ✭✭imangry29


    The High Court saga rumbles on. Judgement reserved on 30 April in the Stack Shanahan application for leave to appeal their failed case to the Supreme Court. Justice O'Malley suspends judgement on application to 19 July.


  • Registered Users Posts: 70 ✭✭cillo2000


    I know it's a pure guessing game - but does anyone have any idea what reduction we'll see in the travel time between Cork and Killarney? I assume the build will take 2-3 years as long as they don't dig up something of historical interest.....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,561 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    What are the exact plans for this route ?

    HQDC to Macroom and single lane carriageway past Ballyvourney to tie into the new road the other side ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,963 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    AFAIK it was HQDC to Macroom, then 2+2 from there to tie into the current good S2 that is past Ballyvourney.

    The planned HQDC from the end of the Ballincollig bypass to the start of the Macroom - Ballyvourney 2+2 has been suspended.


  • Registered Users Posts: 83 ✭✭irishshadowfax


    Have ye seen the speed trap signs have moved to Macroom and Ballyvourney towns now also, 50km limit in BV, impossible to abide by early in the morning... Some fuc'king money making rackets


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,561 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    What sort of saving will they be making by going with 2+2 over HQDC for the Macroom to Ballyvourney section.

    It's only about 15 miles (or less) and the whole section will have to be an offline build.


  • Registered Users Posts: 70 ✭✭cillo2000


    From the PDF that was attached I make it out to be 22KM - I'm heading home this weekend so I'll see how long it takes me to do this 22KM section. I assume once it's done I should be able to do it in under 15min doing 100KPH. I'd say it takes at least 30min at the moment.

    When the cork roundabouts are finished and this road is complete (god only knows when) I reckon I'll be able to do Dublin to Kenmare in about 3hrs :D, it's 3.5 at the moment.


  • Registered Users Posts: 83 ✭✭irishshadowfax


    U wouldn't be driving a red golf by any chance Cillo?!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,058 ✭✭✭niloc1951


    Referring to the most recent population growth figures to 2041 it looks like our population will grow between 20% and 60% depending on various factors.
    An interesting subset of figures is that the population of 15 to 64 year olds (predominantly the 'of driving age' part) is projected to grow between 0% and 50%.

    Working from the basis of the N25 between Kinsale Beg east of Youghal and Wexford which is mostly Wide S2 (except for the Waterford by-pass) and provides excellent and predictable travel times, a similar type with 2+1 sections, would seem to be all that is required between Ballincollig and the western side of Ballyvourney.
    It would of course be wise to 'future proof' the route with over and under bridges at important junctions, like for example the one on the N21 at Croom.

    The days of grandiose schemes to serve the egos of politicians need to be consigned to the grave.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,963 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    2+2 is overspecced, but the argument was that it costs only 10% more than 2+1 so they might as well. 2+1 hasn't gone down well here anyway due to apalling driver behavior at the end of the '2' sections.


  • Registered Users Posts: 70 ✭✭cillo2000


    Aye Ger ;) - you missed a good party last weekend.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,561 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    2+2 is overspecced, but the argument was that it costs only 10% more than 2+1 so they might as well. 2+1 hasn't gone down well here anyway due to apalling driver behavior at the end of the '2' sections.

    It's not just at the end that appalling driver behaviour happens.

    So many times I've seen on the Cork - Limerick road where a person will take an entire stretch of dual carriageway section to just overtake one car.

    2+1 is about as frustrating to drive as it gets. It gives you a taste of being able to overtake slower traffic, but in reality it doesn't work as about half of Irish motorist have no lane discipline.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 378 ✭✭Quickelles


    about half of Irish motorist have no lane discipline.

    Much less than half but many more than are required to screw the system up.


  • Registered Users Posts: 66 ✭✭imangry29


    cillo2000 wrote: »
    I know it's a pure guessing game - but does anyone have any idea what reduction we'll see in the travel time between Cork and Killarney? I assume the build will take 2-3 years as long as they don't dig up something of historical interest.....

    Drove Killarney to Cork this morning, no hold up in Macroom around 7.50am so this must be repeated mid afternoon / evening when traffic goes slower or comes to a stop. Anyway, the section of road being replaced W of ballyvourney to just E of Macroom took me 20 mins 26s in no great hurry. The new 22km route at 100km/hr would be 13 mins 12s (or saving 7mins 14s). The usual delay in Macroom can add about 5 to 10 mins on to this so i'd estimate a saving of anywhere between 5 and 18 mins depending on traffic in Macroom and how fast you'd typically drive through or around the town. This conservatively assumes a law abiding speed of 100km/hr on the new road of course... N22 motorists are very law abiding... ;) A 120km/hr stretch on HQDC around Macroom (a la Ballincollig) would be a help.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,058 ✭✭✭niloc1951


    imangry29 wrote: »
    Drove Killarney to Cork this morning, no hold up in Macroom around 7.50am so this must be repeated mid afternoon / evening when traffic goes slower or comes to a stop. Anyway, the section of road being replaced W of ballyvourney to just E of Macroom took me 20 mins 26s in no great hurry. The new 22km route at 100km/hr would be 13 mins 12s (or saving 7mins 14s). The usual delay in Macroom can add about 5 to 10 mins on to this so i'd estimate a saving of anywhere between 5 and 18 mins depending on traffic in Macroom and how fast you'd typically drive through or around the town. This conservatively assumes a law abiding speed of 100km/hr on the new road of course... N22 motorists are very law abiding... ;) A 120km/hr stretch on HQDC around Macroom (a la Ballincollig) would be a help.

    No argument there, but add in a slow moving hay stack or heavily laden truck or some one towing a caravan or any other of the types of large/heavy vehicles entitled to use our roads but don't have the performance of a modern car on narrow hilly/bendy sections and your twenty and your bit minutes could turn out to be more likely thirty five and a bit as there are virtually no safe places to overtake such vehicles and the inevitable queue of traffic behind them.


  • Registered Users Posts: 66 ✭✭imangry29


    Fully agree, i experience it all too often!! That's why i said I must repeat under more typical conditions. Doing reverse journey tomorrow, will try it going through Macroom on a Fri eve.


  • Registered Users Posts: 66 ✭✭imangry29


    Interesting update from Minister Varadkar during the week. http://oireachtasdebates.oireachtas.ie/debates%20authoring/debateswebpack.nsf/(indexlookupdail)/20130515~BB?opendocument#BB00700

    "...To ensure there might be projects suitable for inclusion in future phases of the PPP programme in the medium term, the NRA has decided to take a number of projects through the planning process to develop a pipeline of potential future projects. In this regard, I understand the NRA intends to submit to the N5 Westport to Turlough project and the N5 Colloney to Castlebaldwin project to An Bord Pleanála later in the year. The Macroom bypass project was approved by An Bord Pleanála in April 2011. However, a judicial review against the approval of the scheme was heard and rejected by the High Court. I understand the applicant has sought leave to appeal against the High Court’s decision. A determination on whether leave to appeal will be granted is due to be made in July. Depending on the outcome of the latter, this is a project which the NRA may give consideration to including in a future round of PPP projects."

    A lot of 'maybe's and 'ifs' but with the right outcome in July, looks like Macroom would be top of the queue for the next PPP round based on above - particularly if delay continues in Galway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,802 ✭✭✭Apogee


    From Saturday's Irish Times - see attached.

    On a related question, why are the 60 km/h speed limits still in force eventhough the roadworks between Macroom and Ballyvourney were apparently completed months ago?


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 378 ✭✭Quickelles


    Apogee wrote: »
    From Saturday's Irish Times - see attached.

    Great news! Some anti-roads nonsense put in it's box :D


Advertisement