Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Motorway from Dublin to Sligo Needed Badly

24567

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,961 ✭✭✭blackwhite


    Jayop wrote: »
    Again, this is the Sligo forum. If the thread was in a general forum, a Dublin forum or a transport forum then I'd be more inclined to have a big picture view, but it's here and as such it's posts should be related to Sligo.

    Anyone complaining about that csstkebaldwin road getting funded is an arse. The amount dead on it is scandalous.

    Focussing on what we can realistically get or hope to get tends to be a more useful way to spend time than pretending there's no constraints on anything.


    The complaints likely came from people who'd never driven in the north-west, let alone on that stretch of the N4. But it's the same mentality as those complaining about infrastructure in Dublin, or Cork, or Galway, or anywhere else, getting funded ahead of their own region


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,388 ✭✭✭✭Jayop


    blackwhite wrote: »
    Focussing on what we can realistically get or hope to get tends to be a more useful way to spend time than pretending there's no constraints on anything.


    The complaints likely came from people who'd never driven in the north-west, let alone on that stretch of the N4. But it's the same mentality as those complaining about infrastructure in Dublin, or Cork, or Galway, or anywhere else, getting funded ahead of their own region

    I am realistic the kinnegad to longford section of the n4 should be motorway. After that a mix of duel carriage way and decent non death trap single lane would suffice.

    Also with this new holiday center in longford there's another reason to extend the motorway.

    I don't complain about other people getting roads that are needed. Or hospitals that are needed or schools or whatever. It would be nice though if well over a quarter of the country could get a decent road to the capital and a decent road from letterkenny to galway. Given the decision to close hospital services in the nw it would be nice to be able to get to the the new "centers of excellence".

    While there's not a limitless pool for infrastructure, it's an investment in the future and can be paid for by borrowing. It also provides an immediate boost to the economy.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,461 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    blackwhite wrote: »
    Focussing on what we can realistically get or hope to get tends to be a more useful way to spend time than pretending there's no constraints on anything.


    The complaints likely came from people who'd never driven in the north-west, let alone on that stretch of the N4. But it's the same mentality as those complaining about infrastructure in Dublin, or Cork, or Galway, or anywhere else, getting funded ahead of their own region
    There can't be any realistic complaints about the N4 Collooney - Castlebaldwin scheme. It's a pathetic stretch of road and badly needs doing. Seeing as roads with that traffic volume are done to Type 2 DC standard, and it'd be foolish to upgrade it only for it to be upgraded again it's justified as a Type 2 DC. It'll completely transform the stretch of road. The other sections of the N4 (bar Longford-Mullingar which I believe was planned as Type 1 DC) are also planned to be done to this standard. It's completely appropriate and not overkill, which a Motorway would be.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,388 ✭✭✭✭Jayop


    marno21 wrote: »
    There can't be any realistic complaints about the N4 Collooney - Castlebaldwin scheme. It's a pathetic stretch of road and badly needs doing. Seeing as roads with that traffic volume are done to Type 2 DC standard, and it'd be foolish to upgrade it only for it to be upgraded again it's justified as a Type 2 DC. It'll completely transform the stretch of road. The other sections of the N4 (bar Longford-Mullingar which I believe was planned as Type 1 DC) are also planned to be done to this standard. It's completely appropriate and not overkill, which a Motorway would be.

    So you think the motorway should come to longford thus serving the n4 and n5?

    Edit. Trying to figure out the difference between type 1 and type 2 DC. Could you please give me an example of each.

    I assume type 2 would be like coloorneyto Sligo and type 1 would be what is the far side of Carrick with no hard shoulder?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,961 ✭✭✭blackwhite


    Jayop wrote: »
    I am realistic the kinnegad to longford section of the n4 should be motorway. After that a mix of duel carriage way and decent non death trap single lane would suffice.

    Also with this new holiday center in longford there's another reason to extend the motorway.

    I don't complain about other people getting roads that are needed. Or hospitals that are needed or schools or whatever. It would be nice though if well over a quarter of the country could get a decent road to the capital and a decent road from letterkenny to galway. Given the decision to close hospital services in the nw it would be nice to be able to get to the the new "centers of excellence".

    While there's not a limitless pool for infrastructure, it's an investment in the future and can be paid for by borrowing. It also provides an immediate boost to the economy.

    Agreed on all of that.

    Mullingar to Roosky had been at initial planning stages, but was suspended with no sign now of when it'll reactivate.

    Sligo actually did well compared to many counties in the 2016-2021 Capital Investment Plan - Castlebaldwin-Collooney and the Eastern bridge over the Garavogue both included.
    The extension of the M17/M18 to Tuam will hopefully mark the first phase of the Atlantic Corridor as well.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,388 ✭✭✭✭Jayop


    blackwhite wrote: »
    Agreed on all of that.

    Mullingar to Roosky had been at initial planning stages, but was suspended with no sign now of when it'll reactivate.

    Sligo actually did well compared to many counties in the 2016-2021 Capital Investment Plan - Castlebaldwin-Collooney and the Eastern bridge over the Garavogue both included.
    The extension of the M17/M18 to Tuam will hopefully mark the first phase of the Atlantic Corridor as well.

    The Eastern bridge? Is that the doorley park bridge? I thought that was canned. Would be a great addition if it got the go ahead.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,961 ✭✭✭blackwhite


    marno21 wrote: »
    There can't be any realistic complaints about the N4 Collooney - Castlebaldwin scheme. It's a pathetic stretch of road and badly needs doing. Seeing as roads with that traffic volume are done to Type 2 DC standard, and it'd be foolish to upgrade it only for it to be upgraded again it's justified as a Type 2 DC. It'll completely transform the stretch of road. The other sections of the N4 (bar Longford-Mullingar which I believe was planned as Type 1 DC) are also planned to be done to this standard. It's completely appropriate and not overkill, which a Motorway would be.

    I fully agree - I drive the road most weekends coming home, so I'm fully aware of how bad it is.

    I was pointing out that when parochialism takes over, projects that are actually very deserving can get blamed for "taking funding" from something else.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,961 ✭✭✭blackwhite


    Jayop wrote: »
    The Eastern bridge? Is that the doorley park bridge? I thought that was canned. Would be a great addition if it got the go ahead.

    Supposed to link from Ash Lane across the Garavogue, with a relief road going out to the south of the town

    Edit:
    It'd be a great boost for getting some business back into Cleveragh


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,388 ✭✭✭✭Jayop


    blackwhite wrote: »
    I fully agree - I drive the road most weekends coming home, so I'm fully aware of how bad it is.

    I was pointing out that when parochialism takes over, projects that are actually very deserving can get blamed for "taking funding" from something else.

    And that blame game is all usually rubbish. Pretty much every thread I see talking about investment in the West in rail (which I completely think isn't needed) to roads always has a few people come in to point out Dublin Dublin something something.

    We know Dublin needs infrastructure, the reason it's in a state isn't because of a bit of a road outside Sligo, it's because of the idiots planning. The luas not connecting like. The fact there is a tunnel dug iirc for a metro and no train going. That wastefulness and bad planning us the problem.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,461 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Jayop wrote: »
    So you think the motorway should come to longford thus serving the n4 and n5?

    Edit. Trying to figure out the difference between type 1 and type 2 DC. Could you please give me an example of each.

    I assume type 2 would be like coloorneyto Sligo and type 1 would be what is the far side of Carrick with no hard shoulder?
    Type 1 DC is the same standard as the N4 Collooney-Sligo scheme or the N4 Mullingar BP. It can have motorway restrictions or not.

    Type 2 DC is the same as the N4 Dromod-Roosky section. 4x 3.5m running lanes seperated by a wire barrier and no hard shoulders. Junctions can be compact grade seperated or roundabouts.

    For the rest of the N4: Collooney-Castlebaldwin, Carrick-on-Shannon-Dromod & Roosky-Longford can be Type 2. Mullingar-Longford should be Type 1.

    The N5 Ballaghaderreen-Scramoge will be Single Carraigeway. The N5 Westport-Turlough will be Type 2 DC.

    The N4 Sligo BP was planned as Type 1 DC and the N15 north of Sligo for 6/7km was also planned as Type 1 DC. There was to be a Type 1 DC approach from the north similar to the one from the south already built. The N15 north of Sligo badly needs doing as well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,841 ✭✭✭✭Andy From Sligo


    Jayop wrote: »
    I am realistic the kinnegad to longford section of the n4 should be motorway. After that a mix of duel carriage way and decent non death trap single lane would suffice.

    Also with this new holiday center in longford there's another reason to extend the motorway.

    I don't complain about other people getting roads that are needed. Or hospitals that are needed or schools or whatever. It would be nice though if well over a quarter of the country could get a decent road to the capital and a decent road from letterkenny to galway. Given the decision to close hospital services in the nw it would be nice to be able to get to the the new "centers of excellence".

    While there's not a limitless pool for infrastructure, it's an investment in the future and can be paid for by borrowing. It also provides an immediate boost to the economy.

    Are we still eligible for funds from the european union for our roads still like the projects that were happening in the late 90's or does the funding just come from the Irish government now for roads?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 310 ✭✭Melanoma


    As a richer country we give to the EU but for a poor or less developed part of Ireland we can apply for funding back. Its just we are net contributors.

    The EU gifted us lots of cash for telecoms, roads and still is giving agriculture lots of money.

    I'd say with brexit money will be tighter in say 5 years time. They did contribute too. Whales got some back and Scotland and less Developed parts of England. reckon we will be giving about 5% more to the EU then.

    Assuming that the whole things still exists then.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,461 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Are we still eligible for funds from the european union for our roads still like the projects that were happening in the late 90's or does the funding just come from the Irish government now for roads?

    At the moment the only part of the road network eligible for European funding is the TEN-T Core network, which compromises the N7, N8, M50, N28 and Limerick-Foynes. The schemes being funded are:

    M7 Naas/Newbridge widening
    N8/N25 Dunkettle Interchange
    M28 Cork-Ringaskiddy
    N21/N69 Limerick-Foynes


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,841 ✭✭✭✭Andy From Sligo


    I suppose it sounds like it would never get the go ahead then, but if the money were there and they started building the motorway now is there a rough average time frame for how long it would take to complete? would we be talking under 5 years? ... under 10 years? - i suppose its hard to say isnt it? - if we were talking of linking up at the M4 junction in westmeath which is a distance of around 142kilometres


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,388 ✭✭✭✭Jayop


    Andy I think we need to temper the wants. A proper dual carriage way linking to the motorway at mullingar or even better at longford would be good enough.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,567 ✭✭✭Irish_rat


    Lads it'll never be motorway to Sligo, upgrade a few sections to type 2 DC if needs be and maybe some more HQDC near Mullingar but that's it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,224 ✭✭✭overshoot


    All irrelevant and sounds like it would never get the go ahead but if the money were there and they started building the motorway now is there a rough average time frame for how long it would take to complete? would we be talking under 5 years? ... under 10 years? - i suppose its hard to say isnt it? - if we were talking of linking up at the M4 junction in westmeath which is a distance of around 142kilometres

    or cost.... based on the cheapest section of the Dublin Galway motorway....
    142km x 8.1million per km = €1.15 Billion.

    There is published traffic counters if you want to see viability. 20k cars may use the dual carrigeway around ballisodare but by Castlebaldwin / Dromod is 6500 - 7000. Longford is 11,000 rising to 18000 at mullingar, 40,000 by Maynooth.
    Its a long way from ever needing a motorway, even if sligo's population doubled, its only really that area served, south donegal has the N3, Ballina - Charlestown will not join the road until longford


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,478 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    Motorway as far as Longford. The traffic figures justify it. Good standard single carriageway or dual after that is perfectly acceptable. Lot of the N4 is of very high standard.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,841 ✭✭✭✭Andy From Sligo


    road_high wrote: »
    Motorway as far as Longford. The traffic figures justify it. Good standard single carriageway or dual after that is perfectly acceptable. Lot of the N4 is of very high standard.

    cant do 120kmh on the N4 (legally!!) - have to share with learner drivers, pedestrians, tractors, slow vehicles and bicycles & Mopeds, and horses!! - when you want to get to and from dublin in the quickest possible time you dont want to be wrestling with those other road users that would be allowed on the N4 - you wanna put down your foot (or select cruise control) and go!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,478 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    cant do 120kmh on the N4 (legally!!) - have to share with learner drivers, pedestrians, tractors, slow vehicles and bicycles & Mopeds, and horses!! - when you want to get to and from dublin in the quickest possible time you dont want to be wrestling with those other road users that would be allowed on the N4 - you wanna put down your foot (or select cruise control) and go!

    Of course, it's not a motorway. There isn't one just justified beyond Longford at present, just improvements to the existing N4 and a bypass around Carrick on Shannon. There are far worse roads in the country with more traffic. Lot of this was improved in the last few decades.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,388 ✭✭✭✭Jayop


    If you could bypass Carrick from the start of the R368 to close to the L3656 then that would save a serious amount of time on the Sligo-Dub journey.

    https://www.google.ie/maps/place/Carrick-On-Shannon,+Co.+Leitrim/@53.9366366,-8.093147,14z/data=!4m5!3m4!1s0x485e85aa1e1709db:0x5c9d5bba717806d5!8m2!3d53.9451156!4d-8.0861879

    Edit: And to a lesser exten Newtownforbes but that's never really a bottleneck but the people of the town must be so pissed off with the passing traffic.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,841 ✭✭✭✭Andy From Sligo


    road_high wrote: »
    Of course, it's not a motorway. There isn't one just justified beyond Longford at present, just improvements to the existing N4 and a bypass around Carrick on Shannon. There are far worse roads in the country with more traffic. Lot of this was improved in the last few decades.

    Depends who you talk to , and whether they make the trip regularly I am sure - at the risk of repeating meself and sounding like a broken road i'm also sure if there were one then a lot of people would use it across the board and will bring more people to the northwest including businesses , tourists as well as other benefits to the area and consequently more business I'm sure people going the other way as well from the Northwest up to Dublin


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,478 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    Depends who you talk to , and whether they make the trip regularly I am sure - at the risk of repeating meself and sounding like a broken road i'm also sure if there were one then a lot of people would use it across the board and will bring more people to the northwest including businesses , tourists as well as other benefits to the area and consequently more business I'm sure people going the other way as well from the Northwest up to Dublin

    Of course it's a wonderful idea but in the times we live in, we have to prioritise scarce funding to the roads that need it most. The present N4 is down the list as regards that. No one disputes the obvious benefits.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,841 ✭✭✭✭Andy From Sligo


    I wonder on the present route even as it stands you have to slow down to 50kmh, as you go through towns/places bends and narrow bits and railway crossings and roundabouts and traffic lights still (that havent been bypassed) - loads I bet (havent travelled the route for a while as you might have guessed) and even when works are completed on the N4 if there will still be bits where you have to slow down last time I did travel to Dublin (as a passenger) I got right fed up with the journey and keep slowing down and speeding up - so I choose the train on the very rare occasion I go to Dublin now


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,841 ✭✭✭✭Andy From Sligo


    road_high wrote: »
    Of course it's a wonderful idea but in the times we live in, we have to prioritise scarce funding to the roads that need it most. The present N4 is down the list as regards that. No one disputes the obvious benefits.

    I dont know how much Tolls bring in.. are they very effective? - I think people would be prepared to pay a toll towards payment of the introduction of a new motorway built and then as I said earlier maybe european funding might be able to be used?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,917 ✭✭✭red sean


    cant do 120kmh on the N4 (legally!!) - have to share with learner drivers, pedestrians, tractors, slow vehicles and bicycles & Mopeds, and horses!! - when you want to get to and from dublin in the quickest possible time you dont want to be wrestling with those other road users that would be allowed on the N4 - you wanna put down your foot (or select cruise control) and go!
    N4 is faster than the M50 a lot of the time!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,224 ✭✭✭overshoot


    Depends who you talk to , and whether they make the trip regularly I am sure - at the risk of repeating meself and sounding like a broken road i'm also sure if there were one then a lot of people would use it across the board and will bring more people to the northwest including businesses , tourists as well as other benefits to the area and consequently more business I'm sure people going the other way as well from the Northwest up to Dublin
    The NRA wont care who you talk to, they will look at those traffic surveys and say they need to be doubled in places to justify a motorway. I clicked around the country and couldnt find any below 10k.
    As i said in my post, its very easy to throw out the term northwest to increase your points validity but a motorway to sligo will only really serve county sligo and the area close around it beyond longford.
    Given it would cost over 1.15billion for a motorway, as handy as it would be, its simply not worth it on a national scale. a 2+1 dual carraigeway or 2+2 minus hard shoulder on the other hand would be a different argument.

    On how much tolls bring in... nearest survey point -maynooth - 40k vehicles x 2.90(min) = 116k per day x 365 = 116million per year. Id say effective if in the right location. Lets wind that to the section of the road with 7k cars - 20k a day = 7.5 million a year... would almost pay for kilometer of the motorway. Would you pay 2 tolls to dublin though?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,382 ✭✭✭topmanamillion


    Jayop wrote: »
    If you could bypass Carrick from the start of the R368 to close to the L3656 then that would save a serious amount of time on the Sligo-Dub journey.

    https://www.google.ie/maps/place/Carrick-On-Shannon,+Co.+Leitrim/@53.9366366,-8.093147,14z/data=!4m5!3m4!1s0x485e85aa1e1709db:0x5c9d5bba717806d5!8m2!3d53.9451156!4d-8.0861879

    Edit: And to a lesser exten Newtownforbes but that's never really a bottleneck but the people of the town must be so pissed off with the passing traffic.

    This is desperately needed. Carrick is an absolute nightmare.
    Any sort of an obstruction on the roundabouts or any event like a circus or match in Carrick and traffic just starts piling up for miles in either direction.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,841 ✭✭✭✭Andy From Sligo


    overshoot wrote: »
    The NRA wont care who you talk to, they will look at those traffic surveys and say they need to be doubled in places to justify a motorway. I clicked around the country and couldnt find any below 10k.
    As i said in my post, its very easy to throw out the term northwest to increase your points validity but a motorway to sligo will only really serve county sligo and the area close around it beyond longford.
    Given it would cost over 1.15billion for a motorway, as handy as it would be, its simply not worth it on a national scale. a 2+1 dual carraigeway or 2+2 minus hard shoulder on the other hand would be a different argument.

    On how much tolls bring in... nearest survey point -maynooth - 40k vehicles x 2.90(min) = 116k per day x 365 = 116million per year. Id say effective if in the right location. Lets wind that to the section of the road with 7k cars - 20k a day = 7.5 million a year... would almost pay for kilometer of the motorway. Would you pay 2 tolls to dublin though?

    it makes sense what you say .. I suppose this idea of a motorway should have been pushed or at least started in the tiger years , anything and everything was being built and given the go ahead then ...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,478 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    I dont know how much Tolls bring in.. are they very effective? - I think people would be prepared to pay a toll towards payment of the introduction of a new motorway built and then as I said earlier maybe european funding might be able to be used?

    Not on roads that are more lightly trafficked. Avoid if at all possible. Ones such as the M3 have been costing the taxpayer extra as traffic numbers have been less than expected.
    Best hope is M4 extension to Longford and upgrades beyond as needed. A full motorway is decades away if at all.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,388 ✭✭✭✭Jayop


    road_high wrote: »
    Not on roads that are more lightly trafficked. Avoid if at all possible. Ones such as the M3 have been costing the taxpayer extra as traffic numbers have been less than expected.
    Best hope is M4 extension to Longford and upgrades beyond as needed. A full motorway is decades away if at all.

    Roughly what's the cost difference between a HQDC and a motorway? To my eye they seem to be built to a very similar spec.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,841 ✭✭✭✭Andy From Sligo


    Jayop wrote: »
    Roughly what's the cost difference between a HQDC and a motorway? To my eye they seem to be built to a very similar spec.

    true, thats a good point, id be interested to know too


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,382 ✭✭✭topmanamillion


    Jayop wrote: »
    Roughly what's the cost difference between a HQDC and a motorway? To my eye they seem to be built to a very similar spec.

    Cost would be obviously based on the length of the road/the speed of the build so wouldn't really tell it much.

    "Many motorways in Ireland are opened as dual carriageways and subsequently have motorway regulations applied to them. From a legal viewpoint, this is easier."
    http://www.irishmotorwayinfo.com/inex/roads/misc/standards.html

    So there really isn't any difference and its a loophole to get around legal red tape seems to be the answer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,841 ✭✭✭✭Andy From Sligo


    Cost would be obviously based on the length of the road/the speed of the build so wouldn't really tell it much.

    "Many motorways in Ireland are opened as dual carriageways and subsequently have motorway regulations applied to them. From a legal viewpoint, this is easier."
    http://www.irishmotorwayinfo.com/inex/roads/misc/standards.html

    So there really isn't any difference and its a loophole to get around legal red tape seems to be the answer.

    I likes the sound of that :)


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,461 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Jayop wrote: »
    Roughly what's the cost difference between a HQDC and a motorway? To my eye they seem to be built to a very similar spec.

    None. HQDCs and motorways in Ireland these days are built to the same standard (that is Type 1 DC). Before in Ireland motorway was an extremely high standard (2x3.75m running lanes, 3m hard shoulder, grass median, full grade seperation), nowadays it's lower (2x3.5m running lanes, 2.5m hard shoulder, narrow concrete median, compact grade seperation allowed).
    road_high wrote: »
    Motorway as far as Longford. The traffic figures justify it. Good standard single carriageway or dual after that is perfectly acceptable. Lot of the N4 is of very high standard.

    This is likely how it'll be built. Mullingar-Longford may or may not have motorway restrictions. The N4 around Boyle is perfectly acceptable for the volume of traffic it carries.
    Jayop wrote: »
    If you could bypass Carrick from the start of the R368 to close to the L3656 then that would save a serious amount of time on the Sligo-Dub journey.

    https://www.google.ie/maps/place/Carrick-On-Shannon,+Co.+Leitrim/@53.9366366,-8.093147,14z/data=!4m5!3m4!1s0x485e85aa1e1709db:0x5c9d5bba717806d5!8m2!3d53.9451156!4d-8.0861879

    Edit: And to a lesser exten Newtownforbes but that's never really a bottleneck but the people of the town must be so pissed off with the passing traffic.

    There was a route selected back in the day but I can't find the pdf of it cos Leitrim CoCo have it taken down. If I can find it I'll post it up here.


    Newtownforbes will be taken care of by the N4 Mullingar-Roosky scheme.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,841 ✭✭✭✭Andy From Sligo


    Hate that little stretch you have to slow down to 50kmh in Castlebaldwin too - dont even think its gradual slow down coming from sligo side, you have to go from 100kmph to 50kmph - that and slowing down in Carrick on shannon


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,293 ✭✭✭✭Mint Sauce


    Totally pitting aside the cost to build, the demand, the need, etc.

    On one hand a motorway would be great, on the other hand, my half tank of petrol up and down, would probably become 3/4s of a tank, and would be even more hard to stay awake on that night run from Dublin Airport.

    On a total side note, Andy, when did you last do the run. There are no level crossings between here and Dublin!

    :p


  • Registered Users Posts: 142 ✭✭londonred


    Any kind of upgrade is badly needed nothing more frustrating than coming over the dual carriageway at Mullingar and getting stuck behind cattle trucks and gob****es driving at 60kh with few chances to overtake , I use the N4 and N5 a lot there was some talk by Enda of upgrading the N4 to Carrick then a new road to Frenchpark which would fix the N5 as well as there are some brutal stretches on that road after Strokestown . I can never understand why 3 of the main roads out of Sligo to Dublin , Belfast and Galway are a disgrace in Sligo is this the councils or the politicans fault , the N17 is very dangerous between Ballincarrow to Curry again few chances to overtake.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,841 ✭✭✭✭Andy From Sligo


    Mint Sauce wrote: »
    Totally pitting aside the cost to build, the demand, the need, etc.

    On one hand a motorway would be great, on the other hand, my half tank of petrol up and down, would probably become 3/4s of a tank, and would be even more hard to stay awake on that night run from Dublin Airport.

    On a total side note, Andy, when did you last do the run. There are no level crossings between here and Dublin!

    :p

    if it were a motorway and you were doing 120kmh most of the way and not slowing down and speeding up and stop starting in top gear most of the time it would actually be more economical for your car/petrol tank :)

    yes, I couldnt place the year (lol) I last travelled up there by car ..... because I hate the roads and it takes to long to get up there ;) .. ah but sure if there was a motorway sure , be a different kettle of fish , id be flying up and down all the time (or is it down and across?)

    Thats good they tarmacked over the railway crossings now sure ;)

    You would definately need a couple or few 24hr Service stations along the route to break up the journey and have a rest and stretch your legs


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,110 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Don't really need a motorway, just get rid of the hard shoulder and use the space for frequent and numerous overtaking lanes - all for the cost of a few truckloads of paint and a few signs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,841 ✭✭✭✭Andy From Sligo


    londonred wrote: »
    ...the N17 is very dangerous between Ballincarrow to Curry again few chances to overtake.

    ah yeah that is awful bad too


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,841 ✭✭✭✭Andy From Sligo


    cnocbui wrote: »
    Don't really need a motorway, just get rid of the hard shoulder and use the space for frequent and numerous overtaking lanes - all for the cost of a few truckloads of paint and a few signs.

    remove hard shoulder and end up driving/skidding down a ditch .. theres no kerbing at the edges! - theres another problem in itself ... a lot of it would need barriers at the edge of the roadside


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,110 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    remove hard shoulder and end up driving/skidding down a ditch .. theres no kerbing at the edges! - theres another problem in itself ... a lot of it would need barriers at the edge of the roadside

    Speak for yourself. I have driven a fair few Km on roads without a shoulder and have never come close to going bush.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,841 ✭✭✭✭Andy From Sligo


    cnocbui wrote: »
    Don't really need a motorway, just get rid of the hard shoulder and use the space for frequent and numerous overtaking lanes - all for the cost of a few truckloads of paint and a few signs.

    you are forgetting about all the red tape that would have to be involved in such a thing and of course someone / some people will have to make a killing out of a project like this :)


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,461 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    The opening of the M17 will speed up journey times on the N17, especially between Sligo and south of Galway (Limerick, Cork) meaning that vehicles will be under less pressure to make up time. There is a bad need for another scheme to be progressed on the N17 though in the coming years. These are how it was split up before:

    N17 Tuam-Claremorris (from the end of the Tuam BP to the southern end of the Claremorris BP) Type 2 DC
    N17 Knock-Tobercurry - Type 2 DC
    N17 Tobercurry BP - Type 2 DC
    N17 Tobercurry-Collooney - Type 2 DC

    Basically the whole N17 bar the Knock/Claremorris BP which is a very high standard single carraigeway. The parts in Sligo need attention badly.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,110 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    you are forgetting about all the red tape that would have to be involved in such a thing and of course someone / some people will have to make a killing out of a project like this :)

    Nothing a hand full of lads and some work in the dead of night couldn't bypass.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,388 ✭✭✭✭Jayop


    marno21 wrote: »
    The opening of the M17 will speed up journey times on the N17, especially between Sligo and south of Galway (Limerick, Cork) meaning that vehicles will be under less pressure to make up time. There is a bad need for another scheme to be progressed on the N17 though in the coming years. These are how it was split up before:

    N17 Tuam-Claremorris (from the end of the Tuam BP to the southern end of the Claremorris BP) Type 2 DC
    N17 Knock-Tobercurry - Type 2 DC
    N17 Tobercurry BP - Type 2 DC
    N17 Tobercurry-Collooney - Type 2 DC

    Basically the whole N17 bar the Knock/Claremorris BP which is a very high standard single carraigeway. The parts in Sligo need attention badly.

    Being selfish I'd prefer this to be the priority.

    What's the 3rd one? Tubber to BP?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 910 ✭✭✭BlinkingLights


    Melanoma wrote: »
    As a richer country we give to the EU but for a poor or less developed part of Ireland we can apply for funding back. Its just we are net contributors.

    The EU gifted us lots of cash for telecoms, roads and still is giving agriculture lots of money.

    I'd say with brexit money will be tighter in say 5 years time. They did contribute too. Whales got some back and Scotland and less Developed parts of England. reckon we will be giving about 5% more to the EU then.

    Assuming that the whole things still exists then.

    They contributed but they also took a lot back out of the budget. There were a lot of UK areas that were higher priority for EU recent years than Ireland's West/Northwest

    Also the UK has the Thatcher negotiated rebate which knocks a huge % off.
    France for example is very comparable to the UK population and GDP but has a real bet contribution nearly twice as high!

    The UK rebate is becoming very hard to justify particularly when you're asking much less economically developed members to cough up more etc etc


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,293 ✭✭✭✭Mint Sauce


    if it were a motorway and you were doing 120kmh most of the way and not slowing down and speeding up and stop starting in top gear most of the time it would actually be more economical for your car/petrol tank :)

    yes, I couldnt place the year (lol) I last travelled up there by car ..... because I hate the roads and it takes to long to get up there ;) .. ah but sure if there was a motorway sure , be a different kettle of fish , id be flying up and down all the time (or is it down and across?)

    Thats good they tarmacked over the railway crossings now sure ;)

    You would definately need a couple or few 24hr Service stations along the route to break up the journey and have a rest and stretch your legs

    Not sure about the economics. Once I go over 110, the revs go into the 4K, and you can nearly see the fuel gauge moving.

    Sure I could just go at 110, but where would the fun be in that.

    :D

    And it would definitely require a services or two, around Carrick or Longford, in addition to the one at Enfeild.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,461 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Jayop wrote: »
    Being selfish I'd prefer this to be the priority.

    What's the 3rd one? Tubber to BP?
    Sorry, BP = Bypass. The scheme is "N17 Tobercurry Bypass". It's to divide the N17 up into usable schemes. The N17 Knock-Tobercurry one is mostly in Mayo, then the N17 Tobercurry Bypass skirts around Tobercurry and joins the future N17 Tobercurry-Collooney scheme which will meet the N4 at the roundabout near Collooney. The reason for this is to divide up the Sligo section into two seperate schemes as all together it would be too big.

    By the way, the rest of the N17 planned as DC north of Tuam will have NO hard shoulders, bar the single carraigeway section around Knock and Claremorris which will likely be left as is.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement