Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Maths and Theoretical Physics Course Thread TR031 TR035

1246789

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 144 ✭✭dabh


    Following up on the theme of textbooks:

    Recently-published mathematics textbooks from well-known academic publishers tend to be expensive.

    The most important text for any module is that which you copy down from the blackboard, or that which the lecturer supplies in the form of printed notes. That is the text upon which you will be examined.

    It is commonplace for lecturers to include textbook recommendations on their module descriptions. They do not necessarily expect the majority of students in their modules to buy such books.

    Some lecturers though will specify a particular textbook, which they expect students to acquire.

    Many mathematics professors worldwide make their course notes freely available for download on the Internet.

    Some textbooks are regarded as classics, and deservedly so.

    A good mathematics textbook does not go out-of-date. And there is no reason why a textbook on an established area of mathematics published in the last few years should be better than a well-regarded textbook first published forty or fifty years ago.

    If you buy that glossy, massive, expensive 'Calculus with Algebraic Geometry' tome, chances are that you would not find time to work through it in your first year. And you are probably unlikely to return to it in later life.

    The textbooks you would be likely to return to in later life, if you continue into mathematical research, are those relevant to degree level courses (third and fourth year).

    TCD has an extensive library, and some of its books may be borrowed by students.

    The Dublin University Mathematical Society (Mathsoc) has a library of its own.

    If you are thinking of buying a particular textbook, it probably makes sense to examine a library copy before shelling out.


  • Registered Users Posts: 33 asdfghjz


    You can get through your degree without buying anything. But anyway, the book stores are open all year, if you find that you actually need to buy something, well then you can just go buy it. There's certainly no reason to do it now.
    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 992 ✭✭✭fh041205


    Aoibheann wrote: »
    Actually, did you have many timetable clashes last year/the year before? If so, did you just vary which you went to/get notes off others/something else?

    Yea I remember the timetabling being a nightmare. Especially with CS courses and MA courses since neither department seemed to be aware of what the other was doing.

    If I ever had two lectures at the same time, I felt it would be unfair to favour one over the other, and thus attended neither. Although if you had someone else with the same clash as yourself, you could go to one and they could go to the other I guess.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,038 ✭✭✭sponsoredwalk


    Yo, so starting next week (well, the week after!)!

    01: What's this computer C+ class like? Any possible youtube videos
    anybody could recommend that would go into similar topics would be
    awesome :cool:

    02: How come the 'advanced calculus' class has been moved to the
    second semester?

    03: What about differential equations? I know it's done in second year
    with emphasis on systems & existence/uniqueness etc... But I mean the
    more elementary kind isn't so easy either! For example the contents of
    this book contain a heckload, each topic of which can be gone into in far
    more detail which I don't see being done in any of the courses.

    04: What about classical differential geometry? I'm looking into it in
    small steps & I know there isn't that much to the course, & I know you
    do find parts of it in vector calculus books, but still there's a lot you
    could do there, a lot that would provide motivation for the manifold
    stuff. Is it a waste of time to do the old style diff geom because it's more
    than covered in the available course or what?

    05: I know people put a lot of emphasis on the fact you can switch from
    TP to math but not the other way around, but I mean don't you get
    enough physics to choose from in 3rd & 4th year in the math course so
    that you could do graduate work in QFT, GR etc...?


  • Registered Users Posts: 927 ✭✭✭Maybe_Memories


    05: I know people put a lot of emphasis on the fact you can switch from
    TP to math but not the other way around, but I mean don't you get
    enough physics to choose from in 3rd & 4th year in the math course so
    that you could do graduate work in QFT, GR etc...?

    This is the only question I can really give a proper answer to.

    It really doesn't matter which you do. You can become a theoretical physicist through the maths course if you wanted. I emailed some university in England about a M.Sc in TP, particularly in Quantum Mechanics and related areas, and they said if you got a 2.1 in Maths from Trinity you'd be fine.

    To be honest if you wanted to be a TP you might actually be better off with the maths degree; more tools for the job, so to speak.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,038 ✭✭✭sponsoredwalk


    This is the only question I can really give a proper answer to.

    It really doesn't matter which you do. You can become a theoretical physicist through the maths course if you wanted. I emailed some university in England about a M.Sc in TP, particularly in Quantum Mechanics and related areas, and they said if you got a 2.1 in Maths from Trinity you'd be fine.

    To be honest if you wanted to be a TP you might actually be better off with the maths degree; more tools for the job, so to speak.

    Sweet, thanks. And thanks for the JNF post, motivated me this week to
    learn as much as I could about it. I still can't exactly solve any problems
    :rolleyes: But at least I understand why direct sums, invariant subspaces, Jordan
    blocks, jordan bases are used & how they are developed & which is all I
    really want to know for now. Tough stuff!


  • Registered Users Posts: 144 ✭✭dabh


    A clue to what the JF TP changes are about is the inclusion of MA1262.

    And if you want to get a feel for how the TP programme was structured for much of its existence, check out the 'Modules from previous years' on the Maths website, and take the time machine back a decade or so ago.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,851 ✭✭✭PurpleFistMixer


    05: I know people put a lot of emphasis on the fact you can switch from
    TP to math but not the other way around, but I mean don't you get
    enough physics to choose from in 3rd & 4th year in the math course so
    that you could do graduate work in QFT, GR etc...?
    Well, the TP courses in QFT/GR etc. are all in the maths department, so if you want to go into those you're fine (maybe even better set if you want to go into highly mathematical stuff). If you want to go into solid state physics/nanoscience/anything even slighlty applied I'm going to say you're better off doing TP. The common TP->Maths route is transferring before the start of third year, which means you miss out entirely on any solid state physics. This is probably why a lot of people do it (it is much more applied than most people seem to want) so it's not surprising, but imo* if there's any chance you might want to go into experimental/applied/not theoretical physics afterwards, TP is a safer bet.

    That said, places that do postgrads are never too specific about what kind of degrees they expect, so in all likelihood you could go from a degree in maths into a postgrad in experimental physics without too much difficulty (though if you started in maths it could be hard, no labs and all that...), it just might be slightly easier with a TP degree.

    *disclaimer: I am a person who almost transferred into maths in third year and was then convinced to stay in TP, so I feel slightly obligated to defend this somewhat underrepresented side.


  • Registered Users Posts: 927 ✭✭✭Maybe_Memories


    So, for anyone worried about the Linear Algebra schol exam being different since Vlad left, I emailed the school and here's the story;

    It'll be the same syllabus but the style of questions will be different.
    Timoney says there's not much point in sample papers for schol exams since the questions will probably be completely different but that we'll probably need some.


  • Registered Users Posts: 17 KarlD93


    Anyone know what the PLLT place is on the JF timetable and where it is? Doesn't really say anywhere


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,851 ✭✭✭PurpleFistMixer


    Gonna guess it stands for "physics large lecture theatre" which probably means the Schrodinger lecture theatre.


  • Registered Users Posts: 30 larkin1993


    How many physics modules are there in first year because my timetable is only showing "PHYSICS FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS" and the hours seem to be only adding up to 21 or so?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,383 ✭✭✭Aoibheann


    Would any of those 21 hours be a three hour lab session? If not, that's probably/possibly what's yet to be added. I think I had ~24 hours in first year TP.


  • Registered Users Posts: 30 larkin1993


    We have our 3 hour lab on wednesday :/ unless theres 2?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,383 ✭✭✭Aoibheann


    Nah, you just have the one. You're probably missing out on a tutorial or two - you'll get a small group one for physics assigned to you soon enough, and possibly the problem solving class in maths too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 267 ✭✭Tears in Rain


    Anyone else totally pumped for second year TP? :> Gonna be boss!


  • Registered Users Posts: 927 ✭✭✭Maybe_Memories


    Anyone else totally pumped for second year TP? :> Gonna be boss!

    Hell yes!

    Well, maths, not TP, but that's a minor detail... :pac:


    Really looking forward to Advanced Mechanics and Equations of Mathematical Physics! Mostly because it;s an excuse to do some PDEs. :p


  • Registered Users Posts: 17 KarlD93


    Mathsoc Doughnuts tomorrow, Yay! :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 30 larkin1993


    Who would you talk to about getting some of the first year tp books second hand?


  • Registered Users Posts: 34 Phil92


    There's a secondhand book sale on the 5th of October, and a lot of them can also just be loaned out from the library.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 927 ✭✭✭Maybe_Memories


    I hear all the first years are being terrified by the epsilon-delta definition :p

    Also, Mechanics, you're amazing, yet insane.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 992 ✭✭✭fh041205


    I hear all the first years are being terrified by the epsilon-delta definition :p

    Not much changes in the maths department!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 763 ✭✭✭Bottleopener


    Oh analysis, how I love/hate thee =P
    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users Posts: 927 ✭✭✭Maybe_Memories


    Most of the second year Maths and TPs are pretty freaked out by Mechanics.
    Could just be taking a while to sink in. All the stuff we did a week and a half ago I'm only understanding now. :o


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,082 ✭✭✭Fringe


    Did he do Noether's Theorem? That takes really long to sink in.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,851 ✭✭✭PurpleFistMixer


    Most of the second year Maths and TPs are pretty freaked out by Mechanics.
    Could just be taking a while to sink in. All the stuff we did a week and a half ago I'm only understanding now. :o
    Welcome to the rest of your degree.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 267 ✭✭Tears in Rain


    Fringe wrote: »
    Did he do Noether's Theorem? That takes really long to sink in.

    Yeah, he did Noether's Theorem, I still don't quite understand the derivation, though it's slowly starting to make sense the longer I stare at it.

    I have no idea what the best way to learn for this course is, L&L seems a useful reference after you've already learned the material, but there doesn't seem to be much to help you understand the material in the first place. The best thing I've found so far is Chapter 19 of Vol.II of Feynman's Lectures which explained the derivation of the Euler-Lagrange Equations perfectly for me, but I've found nothing comparable for the rest of the course, or for solving problems :/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,851 ✭✭✭PurpleFistMixer


    I believe Goldstein is recommended reading for the course. I only looked at it briefly though so I'm not qualified to judge its usefulness. In fact I can't remember how I learned mechanics, aside from tormenting myself weekly with the problem sets.


  • Registered Users Posts: 927 ✭✭✭Maybe_Memories


    Noether's Theorem explained itself to me last night in a dream.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 927 ✭✭✭Maybe_Memories


    Figured I'd ask this hear instead of the schol thread.

    So the schol exam in maths. How similar is it to homework problems/final exams?

    I've been looking at old schol papers, and Real Analysis and Mechanics seem to be very much the same as homework/tutorials/theorems proved in class/definitions.

    Is this a general thing for most of the modules?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,851 ✭✭✭PurpleFistMixer


    Figured I'd ask this hear instead of the schol thread.

    So the schol exam in maths. How similar is it to homework problems/final exams?

    I've been looking at old schol papers, and Real Analysis and Mechanics seem to be very much the same as homework/tutorials/theorems proved in class/definitions.

    Is this a general thing for most of the modules?
    Regarding mechanics, I am disappointed you are not aware of the existence of this.

    General exam advice: look at past papers. Some lecturers ask a lot of bookwork/repetitive questions which is evident when you do such analysis.


  • Registered Users Posts: 927 ✭✭✭Maybe_Memories


    Regarding mechanics, I am disappointed you are not aware of the existence of this.

    I've seen that. Just wasn't sure if he'd be taking questions straight from it or what the story is. :o


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,851 ✭✭✭PurpleFistMixer


    I've seen that. Just wasn't sure if he'd be taking questions straight from it or what the story is. :o
    Expect some variations on a theme, but pretty much that's what you need to know. That said, mechanics (+methods) was my worst schol paper so maybe I don't know anything!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,082 ✭✭✭Fringe


    Have you been invited to the dropbox folder? There are Mechanics and Geometry notes in there that are very worthwhile.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,383 ✭✭✭Aoibheann


    Such modesty there! You couldn't possibly be referring to your own lovely geom solutions, could you? :pac:

    Maybe_Memories, as Fringe says, there's a dropbox folder with some useful notes that I made last year and it's been added to by loads of people over the course of the year. Send me a PM and I'll invite you to it. :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,851 ✭✭✭PurpleFistMixer


    Also many of the maths students have notes on their personal webpages, if you look around.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,383 ✭✭✭Aoibheann


    Those webpages are ridiculously useful. So many helpful sets of notes, your own included! I should really get around to getting mine typed up.. Some day!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81 ✭✭luciemc


    Have any of you applied for/gone on an erasmus or do you know any maths students who have? Google says it's possible within the maths department? I was thinking of applying to transfer to TCD Maths but a year in France is offered with the course I'm doing now and I'm not sure I want to give that up? There are links for further info on TCD's website but I can't access them as I obviously don't have a college username/password. Any would help appreciated! :)


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,372 Mod ✭✭✭✭andrew


    Woah, the whole having personal web pages on which you share notes thing is awesome. It'd be nice if the arts block was nerdy enough to pick up that habit.


  • Registered Users Posts: 144 ✭✭dabh


    luciemc wrote: »
    Have any of you applied for/gone on an erasmus or do you know any maths students who have? Google says it's possible within the maths department? I was thinking of applying to transfer to TCD Maths but a year in France is offered with the course I'm doing now and I'm not sure I want to give that up? There are links for further info on TCD's website but I can't access them as I obviously don't have a college username/password. Any would help appreciated! :)

    Two third-year students studied abroad on an ERASMUS exchange in 2011/12. Maybe complete up-to-date information on possible destinations is not available on the Web, or is difficult to locate. If you want further information, maybe you should consider emailing the School of Mathematics: mathdep@maths.tcd.ie


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,851 ✭✭✭PurpleFistMixer


    Those third years had to pretty much set up the entire thing themselves though.


  • Registered Users Posts: 927 ✭✭✭Maybe_Memories


    Surprised this thread isn't booming.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 267 ✭✭Tears in Rain


    We're all too busy studying for schols/curling ourselves into a little ball in the corner and crying ourselves to sleep


  • Registered Users Posts: 927 ✭✭✭Maybe_Memories


    Ah schols... I'm dreading paper 3. Half tempted to leave out Groups or Metrics.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,263 ✭✭✭ride-the-spiral


    Oh god, can't wait for the fun of schols next year. :o


  • Registered Users Posts: 927 ✭✭✭Maybe_Memories


    It's full of lolz.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,851 ✭✭✭PurpleFistMixer


    Studying for things can be strangely enjoyable, or at least that's what I found when I was doing schols. Nothing like waking up in the middle of the night with the burning desire to prove that the pullback commutes with the differential.


  • Registered Users Posts: 927 ✭✭✭Maybe_Memories


    Studying for things can be strangely enjoyable, or at least that's what I found when I was doing schols. Nothing like waking up in the middle of the night with the burning desire to prove that the pullback commutes with the differential.

    I actually really enjoy studying mechanics and complex analysis. (despite hating the lectures)

    Oddly enough with mechanics I understand the theory perfectly yet can't solve a lot of the problems. But I think the main reason for that is because in his solutions he'll have z=x^2 + y^2 and then differentiate that and square it, and it works out fairly nicely, as opposed to the actual problems where
    z=k(x^2 + y^2 -2x + 4y.) :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,851 ✭✭✭PurpleFistMixer


    But I think the main reason for that is because in his solutions he'll have z=x^2 + y^2 and then differentiate that and square it, and it works out fairly nicely, as opposed to the actual problems where
    z=k(x^2 + y^2 -2x + 4y.) :pac:
    Just complete the square, z=k ( (x-1)^2 + (y+2)^2 - 5 ), change variables x-> x-1, y->y+2, differentiate, same basic thing? Also there are solutions to the mechanics problems floating around that were done by students which may be more helpful.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 267 ✭✭Tears in Rain


    Spend the better part of the last 2 days studying...the first 15 pages of Landau & Lifshitz...fml


  • Advertisement
Advertisement