Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

rothschild will own Ireland

1356

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 246 ✭✭colm1234


    coco1981 wrote: »
    don't think its contradictory at all, maybe i didn't explain myself clearly. You have to get your news somewhere because you can't be everywhere to see everything. I choose to trust what i read in most of the mainstream media, opinion pieces are a different thing obviously.

    you just keep proving my point, and what do you think of my comments about the fluoride in your water being used to make you docile,submissive and stupid this combined with the media you are being fed is a form of brainwashing. suppose this is also a theory ? Hitler did not think so


  • Registered Users Posts: 635 ✭✭✭SEANoftheDEAD


    colm1234 wrote: »
    you just keep proving my point, and what do you think of my comments about the fluoride in your water being used to make you docile,submissive and stupid this combined with the media you are being fed is a form of brainwashing. suppose this is also a theory ? Hitler did not think so

    I think you choose to believe all these theories because you feel it gives your little life purpose and when you see someone washing there teeth you can warn them of the NWO's big plan to make them docile and take over the world. Get a grip kid, come back down to Earth.

    Im big into my CTs too, but i wouldnt go as far as to say some of the things your saying here. I dont know how many times posters have asked ye to back up your claims and ye keep avoiding their questions.

    So again, how are Rothchilds gonna own Ireland?
    i've gone threw 7pages here and not a fact in sight


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 246 ✭✭colm1234


    I think you choose to believe all these theories because you feel it gives your little life purpose and when you see someone washing there teeth you can warn them of the NWO's big plan to make them docile and take over the world. Get a grip kid, come back down to Earth.

    Im big into my CTs too, but i wouldnt go as far as to say some of the things your saying here. I dont know how many times posters have asked ye to back up your claims and ye keep avoiding their questions.

    So again, how are Rothchilds gonna own Ireland?
    i've gone threw 7pages here and not a fact in sight
    thats just it do you question the news in the same way ? no because the man on tv told me so it must be true, im done arguing people can read the thread and make up their own minds. I must be wrong because the rothschilds are just giving ireland so much money out of the goodness of their hearts. nothing to do with the fact we could never pay it back, and what do you suppose happens then. so you just sit back relax and wait for it to happen buddy all because your scared of having a different opinion other than what you are told is the norm, if you really went through 7 pages im sure there are a few facts also try do a bit of research yourself


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,743 ✭✭✭MrMatisse


    How is it? If they happened to be catholic would you also put any criticism down to the fact that they are catholic?

    The whole paranoid notion that they control the world is ludicrous but I don't see how it's anti-Semitic.. that's just a tired argument that people trot out whenever jewish people happen to be on the receiving end of any negativity.

    This family have been blamed for all sorts of things over the years because they are Jewish.

    Why do the wallenbergs, Duke of Westminster or agnelli's not attract these type of comments.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,894 ✭✭✭✭phantom_lord


    colm1234 wrote: »
    thats just it do you question the news in the same way ? no because the man on tv told me so it must be true, im done arguing people can read the thread and make up their own minds. I must be wrong because the rothschilds are just giving ireland so much money out of the goodness of their hearts. nothing to do with the fact we could never pay it back, and what do you suppose happens then. so you just sit back relax and wait for it to happen buddy all because your scared of having a different opinion other than what you are told is the norm, if you really went through 7 pages im sure there are a few facts also try do a bit of research yourself

    Are you implying that we should believe you just because you said it? Cause I've done research and I found that everything you said is wrong.

    If anything you strike me as the type that reads a ct site or youtube video and immediately swallows everything you're told, seems like you're more of a sheep than anyone in this thread.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 246 ✭✭colm1234


    Are you implying that we should believe you just because you said it? Cause I've done research and I found that everything you said is wrong.

    If anything you strike me as the type that reads a ct site or youtube video and immediately swallows everything you're told, seems like you're more of a sheep than anyone in this thread.
    being one of the sheep would imply that I do as im told and believe everything im told just to fit in with everyone else. that argument works both ways why should I believe everything you guys or the media tell me, obviously I see the same main stream news as everyone else only difference is I dont take it as gospel, everything is open to debate in my eyes and every one is entitled to their opinion. im not saying im 100% right but when you sit back and weigh it all up it just seems to make sense


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,894 ✭✭✭✭phantom_lord


    colm1234 wrote: »
    being one of the sheep would imply that I do as im told and believe everything im told just to fit in with everyone else.

    That's exactly what you do though. You do it to fit in with other conspiracy theorists though.
    colm1234 wrote: »
    every one is entitled to their opinion. im not saying im 100% right but when you sit back and weigh it all up it just seems to make sense

    Not about factual matters. How does it make sense when it's untrue? Rothschild isn't giving 85bn to Ireland, he doesn't own the IMF, he isn't going to own Ireland.


  • Registered Users Posts: 635 ✭✭✭SEANoftheDEAD


    colm1234 wrote: »
    thats just it do you question the news in the same way ? no because the man on tv told me so it must be true, im done arguing people can read the thread and make up their own minds. I must be wrong because the rothschilds are just giving ireland so much money out of the goodness of their hearts. nothing to do with the fact we could never pay it back, and what do you suppose happens then. so you just sit back relax and wait for it to happen buddy all because your scared of having a different opinion other than what you are told is the norm, if you really went through 7 pages im sure there are a few facts also try do a bit of research yourself

    I would always keep an open mind when it comes to the media especially the US and UK streams. I do be very skeptical when it comes to both media and CTs. For example I love Von Danikens books, there a great read, but that dosnt mean I believe every thing he says.

    As for Irelands debt, our money is coming from the ECB and the IMF and its our own fault that these institutions have to bail us out. Our own government that we voted in balls our country up. Theres no hiden agenda that the Rothchilds secretly wanna take over Ireland. If anything there keeping us a float.

    Theres no CT here mate, if you wanna talk about Irelands debt etc, im sure there a different thread going. Otherwise I think we're gonna keep going in circles here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,069 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    MrMatisse wrote: »
    This family have been blamed for all sorts of things over the years because they are Jewish.

    Why do the wallenbergs, Duke of Westminster or agnelli's not attract these type of comments.

    I'm sure that people have targeted them about certain things just because they're Jewish, but that doesn't imply that everyone who criticises or questions them or their motives is an ant-Semite. Perhaps the reason that the Rothschild name is mentioned more so than the Agnellis or Wallenbergs is because it's a name that pops up far more often and to a far wider degree than that of others.

    The Agnellis are not Irish bondholders.. and they are not government advisers.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3 Vittore


    I really liked the video Colm. This is true, this is what it's about.
    There is another video called The Moneymasters which you can watch on googlevideo I think. It's a bit longer, but worth to watch it.


  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 8,331 ✭✭✭Brown Bomber


    Cause I've done research and I found that everything you said is wrong.

    :pac:

    You sound exactly like Alex Jones.


  • Site Banned Posts: 8,331 ✭✭✭Brown Bomber


    MrMatisse wrote: »
    This family have been blamed for all sorts of things over the years because they are Jewish.

    Why do the wallenbergs, Duke of Westminster or agnelli's not attract these type of comments.
    MrMatisse wrote: »
    This family have been blamed for all sorts of things over the years because they are Jewish.

    Why do the wallenbergs, Duke of Westminster or agnelli's not attract these type of comments.

    That's laughable.

    They are blamed because they tend to be at the forefront (or in the shadows) of all these shenanigans.

    As bondholders and government advisors the Irish case is a good example.

    Another which is in the news would be Ivory Coast.

    When IMF stooge and then Ivory Coast Prime Minister Ouattara raped the Ivory Coast and it's people of it's natural resources through heavily linked French multinationals Bollore and Boygues.
    Supervisory Board Éric de ROTHSCHILD, Chairman
    André LEVY LANG, Vice-Chairman (*)

    Members of the Supervisory Board:
    Martin BOUYGUES (*)
    http://www.paris-orleans.com/en-gb/la-societe/gouvernement-d-entreprise.html
    By the end of the 1970s, Bolloré faced bankruptcy. In order to save the company, Vincent Bolloré asked friend and mentor Edmond de Rothschild to buy the family-owned business in 1975.

    Ouatarra's French wedding was officiated by then French mayor and (former?) Mossad agent Sarkozy in the 90's. Sarkozy is also a long time friend of Bollore - He travelled in Bollore's private jet to vacation on his luxury yacht off the coast of Malta. He then lied claiming Bollore had no business dealings with the state when:
    Last year, the Bollore group's SDV logistics subsidiary won a contract to operate an internal courier service for the foreign ministry over a four-year period, a deal worth between €1.4-million and €5.6-million.
    In June 2005, SDV was awarded a four-year contract to run a commercial air freight service for the French defence ministry, worth an estimated €36-million.

    And now Sarkozy is a cheerleader for putting Ouatarra back into power.

    For his Rothschild friends.
    PARIS (Reuters) - Ivory Coast President Laurent Gbagbo aims to renegotiate a 2005 electricity distribution contract with France's Bouygues if he wins Sunday's elections, according to a newspaper interview.
    Responding to perceived underinvestment in the West African country's economy and power infrastructure, Gbagbo told Le Journal du Dimanche the Bouygues contract was "not very good".
    http://af.reuters.com/article/topNews/idAFJOE69T03420101030


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21 noel1717




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21 noel1717


    I would always keep an open mind when it comes to the media especially the US and UK streams. I do be very skeptical when it comes to both media and CTs. For example I love Von Danikens books, there a great read, but that dosnt mean I believe every thing he says.

    As for Irelands debt, our money is coming from the ECB and the IMF and its our own fault that these institutions have to bail us out. Our own government that we voted in balls our country up. Theres no hiden agenda that the Rothchilds secretly wanna take over Ireland. If anything there keeping us a float.

    Theres no CT here mate, if you wanna talk about Irelands debt etc, im sure there a different thread going. Otherwise I think we're gonna keep going in circles here.
    http://democraticright.blogspot.com/2010/12/anglo-irish-bank-owned-by-rothschild.html?spref=fb have a read son


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,296 ✭✭✭coco0981


    noel1717 wrote: »

    That article is a blog from some person i've personally never heard of, how are we meant to put any faith in it.
    For instance he says rothschild group owns the IMF which is wrong. He also says it owns Anglo Irish which is also wrong, being a bondholder does not mean you own something!!!

    By the way did you find the source for that statistic yet??? i.e that 95% of all conspiracy theories are proven correct in time??


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21 noel1717


    95% of all Conspiracies are found to be true in time,

    Conspiracy Theories, Through out mans History resulted in either the Death sentence Torture Imprisonment or just being mocked for questioning the establishment.

    Conspiracy

    1 the world is Round 2 the earth goes around the sun 3 there is but one God

    4 Conspiracy Theory for Ancient Rome

    The 9 most shocking http://bit.ly/hkwbn7

    Maggie Thatcher more than doubled the level of Fluoride in drinking water, During the troubles in the north.

    The list goes on and on, But these are just Conspiracies some one died or was jailed or was just laughed at.

    95% of all CONSPIRACIES IN TIME WILL BE PROVEN TRUE.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21 noel1717


    coco1981 wrote: »
    That article is a blog from some person i've personally never heard of, how are we meant to put any faith in it.
    For instance he says rothschild group owns the IMF which is wrong. He also says it owns Anglo Irish which is also wrong, being a bondholder does not mean you own something!!!

    By the way did you find the source for that statistic yet??? i.e that 95% of all conspiracy theories are proven correct in time??

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPWH5TlbloU Take a look at this, since I feel your not operating on the same platform, it,s in a format you will understand. it,s in regard to Rothschild.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21 noel1717


    coco1981 wrote: »
    That article is a blog from some person i've personally never heard of, how are we meant to put any faith in it.
    For instance he says rothschild group owns the IMF which is wrong. He also says it owns Anglo Irish which is also wrong, being a bondholder does not mean you own something!!!

    By the way did you find the source for that statistic yet??? i.e that 95% of all conspiracy theories are proven correct in time??

    By the way I make a point of never replying a post to a closed mind, since this would be pointless, My aim is to assist people in seeing the truth.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,296 ✭✭✭coco0981


    noel1717 wrote: »
    95% of all Conspiracies are found to be true in time,

    Conspiracy Theories, Through out mans History resulted in either the Death sentence Torture Imprisonment or just being mocked for questioning the establishment.

    Conspiracy

    1 the world is Round 2 the earth goes around the sun 3 there is but one God

    4 Conspiracy Theory for Ancient Rome

    The 9 most shocking http://bit.ly/hkwbn7

    Maggie Thatcher more than doubled the level of Fluoride in drinking water, During the troubles in the north.

    The list goes on and on, But these are just Conspiracies some one died or was jailed or was just laughed at.

    95% of all CONSPIRACIES IN TIME WILL BE PROVEN TRUE.
    but thats still not a source for the statistic you quoted, just a random statement from you that we are meant to believe with no factual backup.

    Of the 4 that you quoted 3 are not even conspiracies, they are just lack of scientific knowledge. Not sure what the rome one is about??


    Sorry


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,296 ✭✭✭coco0981


    noel1717 wrote: »
    By the way I make a point of never replying a post to a closed mind, since this would be pointless, My aim is to assist people in seeing the truth.

    Thats weak!!!!

    I pointed out 2 mistakes as i see them in the link you provided, am i wrong in what i said?? Do you believe that rothschild owns both the imf and anglo??


  • Registered Users Posts: 635 ✭✭✭SEANoftheDEAD


    noel1717 wrote: »

    That dosn't prove anything? on top of that, it was based on a Wikipedia article which as we all know, can't be gospel.

    I wish people could come on here with statments and be able to back em up, rather than creating threads, posting randomly with youtube links etc that say/prove jack ****!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21 noel1717


    coco1981 wrote: »
    Thats weak!!!!

    I pointed out 2 mistakes as i see them in the link you provided, am i wrong in what i said?? Do you believe that rothschild owns both the imf and anglo??

    Rothschild invented the IMF and the US Federal Reserve anglo Irish is but peanuts to them, and was used in Irelands Downfall for refusing US Cargo to enter Air space en-route to Israel with Armaments.

    You really need to open your mind and start seeing the truth


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21 noel1717


    That dosn't prove anything? on top of that, it was based on a Wikipedia article which as we all know, can't be gospel.

    I wish people could come on here with statments and be able to back em up, rather than creating threads, posting randomly with youtube links etc that say/prove jack ****!
    The Idea is for you to open your mind we are here for one month then move on.
    Stop Watching TV, stop believing run of the mill Journalism, You your father and his before him have been lied to, get rid of your arrogance and Open your eye,s.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21 noel1717


    coco1981 wrote: »
    Thats weak!!!!

    I pointed out 2 mistakes as i see them in the link you provided, am i wrong in what i said?? Do you believe that rothschild owns both the imf and anglo??

    You are an enabler, this is the term we use for somebody incapable of operating outside the system, they enable it, as for weak that is something you can aspire to.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21 noel1717


    That dosn't prove anything? on top of that, it was based on a Wikipedia article which as we all know, can't be gospel.

    I wish people could come on here with statments and be able to back em up, rather than creating threads, posting randomly with youtube links etc that say/prove jack ****!

    I did,nt realise you owned the Boards, being so self righteous you probably could resolve all Ireland,s if not the world,s problem,s such an incredulous little Enabler.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,296 ✭✭✭coco0981


    noel1717 wrote: »
    Rothschild invented the IMF and the US Federal Reserve

    Where is your source for this???


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 246 ✭✭colm1234


    who cares where he sourced it from coco its a shame you dont question what you see on tv as much


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,296 ✭✭✭coco0981


    noel1717 wrote: »
    Stop Watching TV, stop believing run of the mill Journalism.

    So instead of taking our news from international news outlets we are meant to be listening to every anti capitalist keyboard warrior with a blog for the "truth". Like the fella in the link you provided in post no 114. Some guy in the blogospere, that article has obvious factual errors to anyone who will look at it objectively. i mean seriously is that where you get your "news" from????:eek::eek:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,296 ✭✭✭coco0981


    colm1234 wrote: »
    who cares where he sourced it from coco its a shame you dont question what you see on tv as much

    :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 246 ✭✭colm1234


    coco its obvious that you dont want to believe anything other than what you are told in the papers you are a well trained pawn,I believe that just as frustrating as it is to try to open they eyes of others, it is as frustrating for them in knowing that there isn't much they can do about a "corrupt" government even if they do believe/accept or know it. They don't have the time, the energy, the resources to make the necessary changes is what they think. Not understanding that knowledge equals power and change can only be affected through a mass movement.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 635 ✭✭✭SEANoftheDEAD


    noel1717 wrote: »
    The Idea is for you to open your mind we are here for one month then move on.
    Stop Watching TV, stop believing run of the mill Journalism, You your father and his before him have been lied to, get rid of your arrogance and Open your eye,s.

    i think you should close your eyes mate...


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,869 ✭✭✭Mahatma coat


    Who Owns the B.I.S???
    the central bank of central Banks, the people who ultimatley control the Flow and Value of money.

    I'm having a little difficulty finding anything Mainstream that answers tat in anything but the most vague its an international agreement.

    however most of the Blog sites suggest its another Rothschield front.

    which would make sense.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,329 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Who Owns the B.I.S???
    the central bank of central Banks, the people who ultimatley control the Flow and Value of money.

    I'm having a little difficulty finding anything Mainstream that answers tat in anything but the most vague its an international agreement.

    however most of the Blog sites suggest its another Rothschield front.

    which would make sense.

    Blogs.....bastions of facts and unbias analysis.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,869 ✭✭✭Mahatma coat


    well at least there is analysis, I'm not seein anything of the sort from the links you provided.

    How abnout this tho, instead of attackin the source how about you discuss the content, if as you seem to believe there is nothing untoward going on here then it shouldnt take long to assert your position.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,225 ✭✭✭Yitzhak Rabin


    Colm and Noel, less of the personal jibes.

    Let me draw everyones attention to this part of the CT forum charter:

    Please don't use sweeping generalisations which indirectly attack or belittle other posters here. Posts which are insulting to those who believe conspiracies / the mainstream, for example, may be considered to be insulting to other posters, and as such will not be tolerated.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 246 ✭✭colm1234


    yekahs wrote: »
    Colm and Noel, less of the personal jibes.

    Let me draw everyones attention to this part of the CT forum charter:

    Please don't use sweeping generalisations which indirectly attack or belittle other posters here. Posts which are insulting to those who believe conspiracies / the mainstream, for example, may be considered to be insulting to other posters, and as such will not be tolerated.

    I think if you look through this thread you will see we are not the only ones dishing out personal jibes I think you will find everyone has dished out their fair share. what you really mean is im a mod I dont agree with what you are saying, I can ban you so do as I say :D ................now its time for my 3 day break, peace out everyone :cool:


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,225 ✭✭✭Yitzhak Rabin


    colm1234 wrote: »
    I think if you look through this thread you will see we are not the only ones dishing out personal jibes I think you will find everyone has dished out their fair share. what you really mean is im a mod I dont agree with what you are saying, I can ban you so do as I say :D ................now its time for my 3 day break, peace out everyone :cool:

    I couldn't care less what your opinion is on this topic. I just had a quick glance over the last two pages, and yourself and noel were the two who I had noticed giving the whole 'you are a sheep' spiel. Also you may notice I pointed out that the warning was for everyone as I'm well aware that there are two sides to everything. See you in three days.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,092 ✭✭✭CiaranMT


    Must be having a slow day - got all the way to page 6 before I realised this was another case of new year, new CTers knowing the world and attempting to put us all right.. :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,674 ✭✭✭Faith+1


    CiaranMT wrote: »
    Must be having a slow day - got all the way to page 6 before I realised this was another case of new year, new CTers knowing the world and attempting to put us all right.. :pac:

    Lol


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,001 ✭✭✭Mr. Loverman


    colm1234 wrote: »
    not at all, its your god given right to make up your own mind, but rather than believing everything you are told why not just open your mind, maybe look in to it a bit more. or is it you are scared to accept anything else other than what the media tells you because that is your comfort zone

    I question everything and always try to see if the person saying x has a vested interest in saying x, but it seems a bit simple to say someone believes whatever they are told just because they can see how silly/immature it is to think the Rothschilds own Ireland or that there is some sort of global conspiracy to control Ireland.

    The reality is most people are stupid, and those in power are often stupider than most. Yes they may be a bit corrupt and want to make as much money as possible, but nearly every person is like that.

    Let me ask you this: what would be so bad about the Rothschilds owning Ireland? Surely they can't be much worse than FF?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21 noel1717


    Time to move on I think, Irish world renowned Ignorance in action, Believe your media, Papers, TV, Radio, etc, and of course your Honest Politicians, you are worth each other, in the mean time we will sit back and laugh while Rothschild,s IMF rape,s Ireland of every asset she has Just like Argentina, the know it all,s on this Board will soon find themselves eating out of the bin,s, not so smart then eh boy,s.


  • Registered Users Posts: 635 ✭✭✭SEANoftheDEAD


    noel1717 wrote: »
    Time to move on I think, Irish world renowned Ignorance in action, Believe your media, Papers, TV, Radio, etc, and of course your Honest Politicians, you are worth each other, in the mean time we will sit back and laugh while Rothschild,s IMF rape,s Ireland of every asset she has Just like Argentina, the know it all,s on this Board will soon find themselves eating out of the bin,s, not so smart then eh boy,s.

    Really? and lets say these events do happen... how will you avoid eating from bins? You obviously have the forsight and know it all, so why are ye still here?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,001 ✭✭✭Mr. Loverman


    noel1717 wrote: »
    Time to move on I think, Irish world renowned Ignorance in action, Believe your media, Papers, TV, Radio, etc, and of course your Honest Politicians, you are worth each other, in the mean time we will sit back and laugh while Rothschild,s IMF rape,s Ireland of every asset she has Just like Argentina, the know it all,s on this Board will soon find themselves eating out of the bin,s, not so smart then eh boy,s.

    I don't know anyone who believes what the media and government say.

    Not sure if you really believe what you are saying.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,069 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL



    Let me ask you this: what would be so bad about the Rothschilds owning Ireland? Surely they can't be much worse than FF?

    Are you for real? What would be so bad about a private entity owning a country? I'm pretty sure FF never owned us, they were elected to run the place and did it badly. I'd love to think you were joking with the above statement but I've seen that same attitude from many people recently, that we'd be better off with zero control over how our country is managed.. and it's pathetic


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,831 ✭✭✭Torakx


    Would we all agree the irish government has been for the most part hijacked by selfish politicians and business men looking to take advantage while they have control to make money and power?

    If we all agree on that which i would think so.Then lets all hug and make friends :D
    We can then discuss a bit more in detail as to how exactly the Rothchilds are/arent involved with the IMF and Ireland and i might add Greece to that list too,maybe portugal next for the big hit as ive been hearing rumours.

    As a side question anyone happen to remember if there was a bilderberg meeting in portugal in the last 5 years?
    Thats about the same timeframe i noticed for the greece collapse/riots.
    Ireland had theirs not long ago i think, so im predicting a substantial riot/depression around 2014-2015 :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 728 ✭✭✭joebucks


    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/the-rothschild-story-a-golden-era-ends-for-a-secretive-dynasty-756388.html
    The Rothschild story: A golden era ends for a secretive dynasty
    This week NM Rothschild & Sons pulled out of trading in gold, the commodity that made their name in banking

    By Paul Vallely
    Friday, 16 April 2004

    The news that the bankers Rothschild are to withdraw from the gold market, in which they have been a major player for two centuries, has been hailed as the end of an era.

    The news that the bankers Rothschild are to withdraw from the gold market, in which they have been a major player for two centuries, has been hailed as the end of an era.

    In one sense, of course, it is. This was the company that smuggled gold coins across the English Channel to finance the Duke of Wellington's advance through France to his final triumph at Waterloo over Napoleon (who, it turned out, had also borrowed money from the Rothschilds).

    But in another way it marks out the continuation of an even older tradition - the ability of the family which has founded one of the world's largest private banking dynasties to sustain their secretive fortune, which industry insiders count not in billions but in trillions, and keep it within the family.

    Secrecy has been a hallmark of the Rothschilds from the outset. Mayer Amschel Rothschild, the son of an itinerant money lender and goldsmith who settled in the Jewish ghetto in Frankfurt-am-Main in 1744, specialised not just in clever accounting practices but also kept secret books and subterranean vaults which he ensured were never the privy of auditor, lawyer or taxman.

    As the paterfamilias became more successful he despatched four of his five sons to different European capitals to take advantage of the rise of capitalism and the growth of international trade. Nathan he sent to London, James to Paris, Saloman to Vienna, and Carl to Naples, keeping the eldest, Amschel, at home with him in Prussia. Of these the two most important proved to be London and Paris, where the two main branches of the family developed a friendly rivalry, with the English branch developing the edge in business and the French in philanthropy, the arts and winemaking. But then in 1996 Amschel Rothschild, a 41-year-old man who had lived in the flamboyant style of many of his ancestors, hanged himself in a Paris hotel room. He was the Rothschild who had been groomed to take over as head of the English arm of the dynasty.

    So when the bank's chairman Sir Evelyn de Rothschild retired earlier this year the succession passed to the French side of the family. Baron David de Rothschild, who had been running the family's Paris-based bank, inherited.

    None of the Rothschild enterprises have been banks in the sense as understood by the man or woman in the street. What Mayer Rothschild founded in the 1760s was a business which grew from the humble beginning of selling rare coins to becoming the prime moneylender to greedy and spendthrift governments across Europe. One German contemporary quipped that Mayer was "the pride of Israel ... before whose money box kings and emperors humbly bow". And the novelist Thackeray said of Nathan that he was "not king of the Jews, but the Jew of the kings". The brothers financed both sides in the Napoleonic wars and in the Austro-Prussian war too.

    It has long been supposed that Nathan increased the family fortune 20-fold by speculating on the outcome of the Battle of Waterloo in 1815. The Rothschilds had a network of agents throughout Europe who, using fast boats, coded letters and carrier pigeons, got information to the family ahead of official sources. Victor Rothschild, third baron and former chairman of the London bank, N M Rothschild, always maintained that Nathan had made a killing by encouraging rumours that Wellington had lost when he knew he had won, though the historian Niall Ferguson in his magisterial history of the family recently disputed that.

    Certainly, for all the family motto of Concordia, Integritas, Industria (Unity, Integrity, Industry), Nathan's ability to depress stock prices by using the network of agents to spread rumours, true or false, and then buy the stock up after people panicked, was legendary.

    More significant, however, was that in the process the Rothschilds created the world of banking as we know it today. Nathan operated principally as an underwriter and speculator in the early 19th-century bond market. He and his brothers invented, or at any rate popularised, the government bond, which allowed investors, big and small, to buy bits of the debts of sovereign states by purchasing fixed-interest bearer bonds.

    Governments liked this because they could use them to raise colossal sums of money. Investors liked them because they could be traded - at prices that fluctuated in relation to the performance of the issuing government - and shrewd investors could make big sums. It brought investment in railways, the industrial revolution and ventures like the Suez Canal. The Rothschilds got a cut of everything.

    It was a new kind of power. "I care not what puppet is placed upon the throne of England to rule the Empire on which the sun never sets. The man who controls Britain's money supply controls the British Empire, and I control the British money supply," Nathan said. The family developed a lack of awe for the powerful and important. A pompous aristocrat one day called on Nathan who was head down at his desk. Without looking up, the banker said: "Take a chair." His caller, affronted, said: "You are speaking to the Prince of Thurn and Taxis." To which Rothschild replied: "Take two chairs." At one point he even rescued the Bank of England after a run on gold caused the collapse of 145 banks. In 1885 he was given the hereditary title of Baron Rothschild.

    Many of the distinct characteristics of the family can be traced back to the will of the founder Mayer Rothschild. It stipulated that no public inventory should be made of his estate; that key positions in the House of Rothschild were to be held by family members; that the eldest son should inherit unless the rest agreed otherwise; that the family was to intermarry with first and second cousins to keep the fortune together; that anyone disputing these terms would be struck from the will. And that all this should apply in perpetuity.

    In part this was about preserving not just their Jewish identity but a self-conscious position as role models for their poorer co-religionists. The Rothschilds expended much effort and money pressing for Jewish emancipation and equality across the continent.

    Their Jewish solidarity was not heterogeneous. In 1938 Nathan's great-great-grandson, Victor, shocked an audience by saying that in spite of "the slow murder of 600,000 people" on the continent "we probably all agree that there is something unsatisfactory in refugees encroaching on the privacy of our country, even for relatively short periods of time." And the family split over the question of the dream of a Jewish homeland, with some members supporting the first Zionist settlement in Palestine and the Balfour declaration and others opposing it on the grounds that it would encourage anti-Semites to question the existing national identities of assimilated Jews around the rest of the world. None of which has allayed the wild fears of anti-Semites who throughout the 20th century branded the Rothschilds as part of a Jewish plot to take over the world.

    The world has changed around the Rothschilds. At one point Nathan Rothschild was the richest man in Britain and probably in the world. In today's terms he was wealthier than Bill Gates. But they never gained the foothold in America they needed. The world became corporate. Private banking got left behind.

    Still, the family has moved down only from fabulously rich to enormously wealthy. And they adjusted to the times. They made billions in the 1980s from Margaret Thatcher's privatisations of state-owned industries on which they advised. In France after their bank was nationalised by the Socialist president Francois Mitterrand they slowly built a new business which, under Baron David de Rothschild, has risen to the top ranks of the merger and acquisition league tables. They have pulled out of retail fund management - into which they went with much fanfare only three years back - and now they are pulling out of oil and gold in favour of the higher-margin areas of private banking and wealth management.

    Do not spend too many tears. In 1997 the family's Swiss holding company increased its profits by 66 per cent. The firm is not called Rothschild Continuation for nothing.

    Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812), Founder of the family business

    Mayer, orphaned at the age of 12, was forced to make his own living with the help of the good name of his father in Frankfurt. He carved out a self-taught career as a dealer in coins and medals, branching out into state loans and trade in general commodities. He established the family name by placing a Roman eagle on a red shield (Rothschild in German) over the door of his counting house.

    Mayer established one of the Rothschild firm's principles: to settle for less profit to ensure long-term business ties. A brisk market in English textiles prompted him to send one of five sons, Nathan, to England.

    Jacob, 4th Baron Rothschild (b. 1936), Head of the English side of the family

    Chairman of NM Rothschild before resigning in 1980 to run Rothschild Investment Trust. He chaired the National Heritage Memorial Fund, handing out £1.2bn of lottery grants. He restored Waddesdon Manor, right, the family pile, and chairs Yad Hanadiv, the family foundation in Israel, which donated the Knesset and Supreme Court to the state

    David de Rothschild (b. 1942), Head of the French family

    The head of the French family, David de Rothschild has escaped two catastrophes in France: he was born in New York after the Luftwaffe seized the family home in Paris and his mother fled from Nazi Europe; and, in 1981, President Mitterrand nationalised the French financial empire, Banque Rothschild. David and his cousins started afresh with PO Gestion, renamed PO Banque and thenRothschild & Cie Banque.

    Seven Generations and two Centuries of Banking

    1760s The orphaned Mayer Amschel Rothschild starts a coins and medals business in Frankfurt

    1789 Mayer appointed an agent to William IX of Hanau

    1798 Mayer's son Nathan leaves Frankfurt to become a textile and general merchant in Manchester

    1812 Nathan's brother James establishes a banking house in Paris

    1815 The English branch of the Rothschilds supply gold to the Duke of Wellington's campaign at Waterloo

    1820 Nathan's brother settles in Vienna; his brother Carl starts a business in Naples

    1836 Nathan dies

    1840 NM Rothschild and Sons becomes one of the Bank of England's bullion brokers

    1850s Great houses are built. Bordeaux vineyards of Mouton and Lafite are acquired

    1875 Lionel de Rothschild raises finance for British stake in the Suez Canal

    1887 Rothschilds funds the creation of the diamond dealers De Beers

    1901 With no male heirs, the Frankfurt dynasty comes to an end

    1919 NM Rothschild & Sons chair new daily fixing of the gold price

    1926 The company finances the spread of the London Underground

    1929 Beginning of difficult years for family. Wall Street crash; rise of Nazi Europe

    1960s Rothschilds look to US; start of Rothschild Inc

    1981 France nationalises the highly successful Paris House but the family refuses defeat and starts new business.

    1985 Rothschilds advises on British Gas privatisation

    2004 An international banking dynasty, Rothschild have 40 countries worldwide

    I presume the bit in bold is a typo and meant to mean that Rothschild have offices in 40 countries worldwide??


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,001 ✭✭✭Mr. Loverman


    Are you for real? What would be so bad about a private entity owning a country? I'm pretty sure FF never owned us, they were elected to run the place and did it badly. I'd love to think you were joking with the above statement but I've seen that same attitude from many people recently, that we'd be better off with zero control over how our country is managed.. and it's pathetic

    I was assuming owning was just a figure of speech.

    Obviously the Rothschilds are not going to own Ireland like the way you own your trousers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,831 ✭✭✭Torakx


    Ye its more like the way the government own your house, land ,car(and kids^^) but you hold the bond :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 634 ✭✭✭loldog


    joebucks wrote: »
    I presume the bit in bold is a typo and meant to mean that Rothschild have offices in 40 countries worldwide??

    LOL. No. :)
    .


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,029 ✭✭✭shedweller


    I was assuming owning was just a figure of speech.

    Obviously the Rothschilds are not going to own Ireland like the way you own your trousers.
    Correct, it is a figure of speech. What it really means is that we are giving them a load of money to pay back their gamble that lost. Great thing they have going on there.
    A few years ago we bitched amd moaned about how much the port tunnel cost.
    Small change compared to what we are rather quietly paying for nothing tangible now. :mad:


Advertisement