Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

M6 - Galway City Ring Road [planning decision pending]

Options
13031333536169

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭antoobrien


    MYOB wrote: »
    Estimations based on known population, known number of students in the 3rd level institutions, etc. Just because its a very big number for you to try and argue around doesn't mean its not valid.

    Ah lets not get facts get in the way of a good rant MYOB.

    Speaking of....



    Total number of students in NUI Galway & GMIT(Galway campus) is estimated at 23,000. The population is just over 75,000 (depending on which census report one reads).

    I do believe that gives the 30% not travelling.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,913 ✭✭✭galwaycyclist


    antoobrien wrote: »
    That is in fact crap, when they introduced parking permits (I was attending at the time) they hit the students first and did everything they could to get them off campus. That backfired, so they provided facilities after several years.

    So we can say that unlike other obvious models for Universities associated with medieval towns they have not banned undergraduates from bringing cars on campus.
    According to citizens information there are two rates adjacent and non-adjacent. The adjacent rate applies to 45km, when I was going it was 15 miles.

    There you go.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,753 ✭✭✭SeanW


    TINA1984 wrote: »
    Ah MYOB responding with your usual tactfulness and grace. Maybe I'm reading it wrong but you seem to be wilfully ignoring the serious suggestions which Iwannahurl & Monument have proposed to reduce traffic congestion in the Galway urban area. Namely improved cycling infrastructure, increased road-pricing measures in the town centre and, perhaps most importantly, a severe crackdown on motorists wilfully breaking the law wilfully by parking illegally & speeding?
    Thank you for proving my point so cogently.
    antoobrien wrote: »
    260808.jpg

    There is no way for traffic to avoid the center of town.

    Again, giving specific reference to the map that anto posted, could you please explain how for example someone who has to get from, for example, Barna to Oranmore would be helped by "road pricing measures" (I assume you mean a London style congestion charge) and a "severe crackdown on motorists?" And how such would be SUPERIOR to the bypass?


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭antoobrien


    So we can say that unlike other obvious models for Universities associated with medieval towns they have not banned undergraduates from bringing cars on campus.

    I wasn't aware that NUI Galway was built inside the medieval town and that it has serious space restirctions.

    On no wait, neither of those two statements are true. NUI Galway was built outside the walled town (unlike oxbridge which grw up inside the towns) and they own land most of the way to the lake on the West side of the river.

    Another bad apples and oranges case GC, this is getting embarrassing for the anti bypass brigade.
    There you go.

    There I go what? If you're trying to make a point you're doing a damn good job of obfuscation.

    Ftr the record I'm going to amend my earlier statement that 15 miles was a cut off, but I can't remember if it was adjacent rate or total cut off. I'm trying to dig out the 1998 rules, they're very hard to find, all I can get is that there are about 4,000 grant holders in NUIG in 1998.

    I only know that I didn't get a grant (can't remember why) and was well inside that 15 miles - so it could have been a total cutoff.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,913 ✭✭✭galwaycyclist


    antoobrien wrote: »
    I wasn't aware that NUI Galway was built inside the medieval town and that it has serious space restirctions.

    On no wait, neither of those two statements are true. NUI Galway was built outside the walled town (unlike oxbridge which grw up inside the towns) and they own land most of the way to the lake on the West side of the river.

    Another bad apples and oranges case GC, this is getting embarrassing for the anti bypass brigade.

    So let me see if I understand your position. The fact that a large educational institution has land within a town centre that you claim to be congested by traffic means that it is ok for them to provide large quantities of car parking regardless of the traffic impacts?

    And the answer to the obvious traffic impacts is to build an outer bypass?


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,913 ✭✭✭galwaycyclist


    I should also point out that in Oxford they also make it difficult for staff to bring cars to work.

    http://www.admin.ox.ac.uk/estates/travel/carparking/
    Staff Parking

    Staff permits are issued solely on the basis of need as assessed against the criteria outlined in the regulations as opposed to status, length of service or any other factor.

    Staff are recommended to use the city's Park and Ride service or join the University car share scheme. Staff that need to bring their car into Oxford on a regular basis should read the University Car Parking Policy and Regulations before completing an application form for a car parking permit.

    Could the struggles of the new Park and Ride service have anything to do with the lack of similar restrictions in Galway?


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 67,765 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    From having used NUIGs carparks, as a visitor/contractor, they are already extremely restrictive; GMIT less so still on the awkward end of the scale. You appear to think there's acres of lined blacktop awaiting people to drive a ten minute walk when, quite clearly, there isn't.

    If you want to compare to another university town, taking an extremely poor example because it appears to be maybe the only one that supports your argument doesn't actually support your argument. Somewhere with modern universities as opposed to medieval ones would be a starter.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,296 ✭✭✭Frank Black


    Amusing and all as the thread sniping is, the fundamental question is, will this scheme ever get planning.
    I'm not an expert in the area and am happy to be corrected, but my understanding is if this scheme impacts on an SAC (and it will), then the proposing authority must demonstrate that there is no feasible alternative (inc public transport alternatives), and that there is an over-riding national importance to the scheme.
    I think the first hurdle could be cleared but for a city of 80,000, how will the second?
    It's my understanding that other schemes within the EU which have had to go down this route were in heavily populated areas in Germany or the UK.
    It will be interesting.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭Carawaystick


    It's probably worth reminding that the nta granted a bus operator a license to run a bus service in Galway at half the frequency the operator applied for.
    I think it was a 15 min headway service applied for and the nta decided that a half hourly service would serve the people of Galway better


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,851 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    that there is an over-riding national importance to the scheme.

    This scheme is top of the list cost/benefit analysis wise according to the Government. Reckon that counts as an over-riding national importance!

    Its not just about bypassing the city. Its about making the lives of everyone in the city easier and opening the city up for business. That is worth a small strip of land around Galway no questions asked.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,296 ✭✭✭Frank Black


    This scheme is top of the list cost/benefit analysis wise according to the Government. Reckon that counts as an over-riding national importance!

    Its not just about bypassing the city. Its about making the lives of everyone in the city easier and opening the city up for business. That is worth a small strip of land around Galway no questions asked.

    Cost/Benefit won't come into it. Not in terms of strategic national importance anyway (I'll try to dig out exact wording tomorrow).


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 14,072 Mod ✭✭✭✭monument


    antoobrien wrote: »
    I'm going to answer that BS with a map:

    260808.jpg

    There is no way for traffic to avoid the center of town.

    And I can call "BS" with an image from Street View, the N6 is not a "centre of town" type of setting:

    260894.JPG

    Edit: Also not town or city centre like:

    260895.JPG

    monument wrote: »
    A problem in general for Ireland is doing things halfarsed and then you have people claiming the things don't work.

    Park and ride in Galway as is currently being attempted is nothing like the Dutch example I gave.

    The cycle tracks in Galway meanwhile are some of the worst in the country. The network seems to be overall poorer than in Dublin.
    MYOB wrote: »
    ...or suggesting that something which is already being trialled is, erm, trialled. They are not serious suggestions, they are not even more than vague references....

    Wow! You're still making out that the half-arsed attempt at P&R in Galway is anywhere near like the system of P&R that I've pointed to.

    The P&R operator is complaining that others were supposed to be doing the marketing, it's just one route and it's been trialled at a time of year everybody on here agrees that congestion isn't that big of a problem! They also use coaches and depart from the coach station rather the square!!!

    Compare that to elsewhere, such as in the Netherlands where they put in a network of P&R routes and locations, where the city centre has bus priority, minimum car access and little on-street parking. Overall quite a different system!
    antoobrien wrote: »
    BS.

    It runs through the main shopping and residential areas east of the river - which existed before the road was planned. Any development that has happened around it is infill development, which if you listen to some people is a good thing, but apparently only when it happens in Dublin.

    Reading a map for knowledge is not doing your credibility any good.

    It's not "bs".

    The N6 inside Galway City is not a city centre type setting and it's outright daftness to claim otherwise.

    Give the map reading nonsense a rest, I've likely spent more time in Galway than some of your supporters on here.

    What ever happened with the glen of the downes or the hill of Tara road projects did they cause envoirnmental devastation as predicted?

    The M3 has been going great with compensation payments for low traffic levels! :rolleyes:

    MYOB wrote: »
    Estimations based on known population, known number of students in the 3rd level institutions, etc. Just because its a very big number for you to try and argue around doesn't mean its not valid.

    I'm making an informed estimation, possible an underestimation. You're not providing any examples at all at this stage.

    You plucked the figure out of nowhere just like David Drumm plucked the Anglo figure out of his ass.

    Or would you care to give a break down of your figure and how that relates to the student population and 30% of traffic.

    MYOB wrote: »
    ...except that we've had about that much of a traffic drop nationally due to the recession already.

    I can't see why a 10% national reduction stop the summer drop also being ~10%.

    antoobrien wrote: »
    The figures are based on the numbers of students attending and staff working in GMIT & NUI Galway that are basically off for the summer. The numbers of students are well known to be approx 10k in GMIT & 15k in NUI Galway. The predilection for holidays during the July is also well known - hence it being called part of the "high season."

    And you're subtracting the students and staff that walk / take the bus / cycle? There's no need for modal change there and that's what we were talking about -- the claim of 30%+ needed for modal change to have an effect.

    Any your 100% figure is all traffic in Galway and not the city population?

    And you're adding in the tourist traffic?

    All honest questions -- how you treat them is as usual up to you.

    It's probably worth reminding that the nta granted a bus operator a license to run a bus service in Galway at half the frequency the operator applied for.
    I think it was a 15 min headway service applied for and the nta decided that a half hourly service would serve the people of Galway better

    Most successful park and ride systems I've looked at run at 10min on peak and 15mins off peak. That's on top of the other problems pointed out above.

    Its not just about bypassing the city. Its about making the lives of everyone in the city easier and opening the city up for business.

    Ireland and the UK don't do bypasses very well -- elsewhere in Europe they have used bypass openings to radically improve the city inside of them, but we can't handle that thinking.

    That is worth a small strip of land around Galway no questions asked.

    This is back to the good old days of the boom talk again... something like:
    It will be good, there's no way it will go wrong, no need to ask question. Forget about the debate that's going on. Go hang your self if you think the bypass should not go ahead.

    MYOB wrote: »
    If you want to compare to another university town, taking an extremely poor example because it appears to be maybe the only one that supports your argument doesn't actually support your argument. Somewhere with modern universities as opposed to medieval ones would be a starter.

    Given the road network of Galway, his example does not seem to be that poor of an example.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 67,765 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    monument wrote: »
    And I can call "BS" with an image from Street View, the N6 is not a "centre of town" type of setting:

    6034073

    Link broken, but why do I suspect you've chosen the DC around Briarhill rather than, say, the roundabout at the shopping centre?
    monument wrote: »
    Wow! You're still making out that the half-arsed attempt at P&R in Galway is anywhere near like the system of P&R that I've pointed to.

    Wow! You're still completely refusing to move on from comparisons to a city that doesn't even vaguely resemble Galway.

    A P&R has been provided that should, be suitable for most non-passing traffic coming from one half of the city. It has been an abject failure. Blaming this on parking, which anyone who actually drives in Galway knows is not particularly easy or plentiful, is pathetic.

    monument wrote: »
    The N6 inside Galway City is not a city centre type setting and it's outright daftness to claim otherwise.

    Except for the major issue that, at a critical point of the alleged current "bypass", it is.
    monument wrote: »
    You plucked the figure out of nowhere just like David Drumm plucked the Anglo figure out of his ass.

    It was an educated estimate. Anto then provided figures that suggest that, if anything, its on the low side.

    monument wrote: »
    I can't see why a 10% national reduction stop the summer drop also being ~10%.

    I despair... and then you complain about actual decent estimates! Please, go learn some basic maths.
    monument wrote: »
    And you're subtracting the students and staff that walk / take the bus / cycle? There's no need for modal change there and that's what we were talking about -- the claim of 30%+ needed for modal change to have an effect.

    Any your 100% figure is all traffic in Galway and not the city population?

    And you're adding in the tourist traffic?

    All honest questions -- how you treat them is as usual up to you.

    And your acting as if the students are the sole cause of the summer drop?? :confused::confused:

    You still haven't come up with an example for us that's actually valid, I see.

    As always ends up being the case, I don't even see the point of engaging with you.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,753 ✭✭✭SeanW


    monument wrote: »
    And I can call "BS" with an image from Street View, the N6 is not a "centre of town" type of setting:
    But you cannot deny that East-West traffic is going unnecessarily through an urban setting. Perhaps not "centre of town" in all cases, but definitely dense-ish urban at minimum. To highlight the inadequacy of the current road for interurban travel, I point you to a post of Iwannahurls' some time back, complaining about motorists travelling 80-100kph on this part of the N6 because of a single housing estate access..

    6034073So which is it? Either the existing roads are suitable for interurban East-West traffic, or they - as Iwannahurl claimed - eseentially are not.

    For the three of you, (Iwannahurl, TINA1984, monument) the solution is - as it always is - screw the motorist.
    1. An iron-fist crackdown on "speeding" motorists etc.
    2. Also the same for illegal parking.
    3. A reduction in city centre parking.
    4. Increased parking charges.
    5. Take large amounts of road space away from motorists for bus lanes, cycle lanes etc.
    Again - AND THIS IS THE THIRD TIME I HAVE ASKED.

    With specific reference to the black route in antoobriens map (Barna - Oranmore) show us how someone who has to drive thar route benefits from your suggestions above, particularly given that the central problem (the bulk of the route being effectively on city streets) is not dealt with.

    And in an either-or scenario how is this SUPERIOR to having a bypass?

    At best, you are trying to solve one problem and labouring under the illusion that your preferred solutions to THAT problem, are solutions to another totally different problem. AT BEST.
    where the city centre has bus priority, minimum car access and little on-street parking. Overall quite a different system!
    Indeed. And I suspect it is the desire of certain posters to stick it to the motorist that is the guiding principle here.
    The N6 inside Galway City is not a city centre type setting and it's outright daftness to claim otherwise.
    Perhaps. But it's also outright daft to claim that it is an appropriate route for interurban East-West traffic that has no business in the City.
    The M3 has been going great with compensation payments for low traffic levels! :rolleyes:
    But. But. but it was going to demolish the hill of Tara or something. and seriously impair a site of UNESCO World Heritage importance and damage tourism and cause general HELL!! The same weapom I might add that is currently being used against the people of Slane.

    But it was BS. And people are suffering because the laws are so messed up as to allow serial objectors to road projects to make trouble so easily. As they did in Slane and it seems have moved on to Galway, and the N22.
    And you're adding in the tourist traffic?
    Tourist traffic ... damndest thing, when I was younger I often used to go to Salthill for a day or so. Sometimes by bus, sometimes by car. The place has a seaside promenade, amusement park and amusement/swimming pool and some cheap casinos. All in all, a worthwhile place to visit. It strikes me that the bypass, having a little bit of off-label use, would be great because visitors to Salthill arriving by road (which most would) have access to a route that uses less city streets, avoids University College Hospital (where the current N6 ends).
    Most successful park and ride systems I've looked at run at 10min on peak and 15mins off peak. That's on top of the other problems pointed out above.
    Interesting. But what does that have to do with East-West traffic? (Which, remember, is the raison d'ètre for the bypass)
    This is back to the good old days of the boom talk again... something like:
    It will be good, there's no way it will go wrong, no need to ask question. Forget about the debate that's going on. Go hang your self if you think the bypass should not go ahead.
    If Peter Sweetman and Save Newgrange etc. did decide to go hang themselves, the rest of us would be a lot better off.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 14,072 Mod ✭✭✭✭monument


    MYOB wrote: »
    Link broken, but why do I suspect you've chosen the DC around Briarhill rather than, say, the roundabout at the shopping centre?

    To me, none of it is town or city centre like.

    None of it draws images of the centre of Galway or the general meaning of a city or town centre.

    MYOB wrote: »
    Wow! You're still completely refusing to move on from comparisons to a city that doesn't even vaguely resemble Galway.

    A P&R has been provided that should, be suitable for most non-passing traffic coming from one half of the city. It has been an abject failure. Blaming this on parking, which anyone who actually drives in Galway knows is not particularly easy or plentiful, is pathetic.

    It's not about the first city I used as an example, it's not about any one city or example. It's about a host of issue which are not right, as I said in my last post, there's more than one issue:
    • cost is not right*
    • lower frequency
    • illigal parking is rampent (across Ireland)
    • it uses coaches rather than buses
    • issues with marketing
    • launched when congestion isn't as much of a problem
    • not a system of P&R, just one
    • no city centre changes
    • not using the central bus stops for departures
    • lack of bus priority with congested city centre streets and approaches

    * One of the key things is price and with the local council run P&R in the Netherlands the price is kept low (for example, in Den Bosch, it's €2 return / free parking) and the UK seems to have the same idea (£2 return / free parking).

    It has a fare bit going against it -- good luck to them.

    MYOB wrote: »
    Except for the major issue that, at a critical point of the alleged current "bypass", it is.

    As I said the last two times I put any name on it:
    • inner bypass / ring road / whatever
    • inner bypass / distributor road / whatever you're having your self

    I don't really care what name you put on it or what you want to see it as or call it.

    MYOB wrote: »
    I despair... and then you complain about actual decent estimates! Please, go learn some basic maths.

    See when you have: X -10% = Y

    You subtract 10% from X, but you can then subtract 10% from Y.

    MYOB wrote: »
    And your acting as if the students are the sole cause of the summer drop?? :confused::confused:

    You still haven't come up with an example for us that's actually valid, I see.

    As always ends up being the case, I don't even see the point of engaging with you.

    You're giving up when you had no breakdown and his breakdown was unclear or incomplete or both. And you have a problem with me asking questions.

    So, yeah, it seems this is looking more and more David Drumm-like.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 67,765 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    monument wrote: »
    To me, none of it is town or city centre like.

    None of it draws images of the centre of Galway or the general meaning of a city or town centre.

    For someone who likes Holland a lot, you have a very 1930s British ideal of what a city looks like.

    monument wrote: »
    See when you have: X -10% = Y

    You subtract 10% from X, but you can then subtract 10% from Y.

    You appear to be ignoring the point, again.
    monument wrote: »
    You're giving up when you had no breakdown and his breakdown was unclear or incomplete or both. And you have a problem with me asking questions.

    So, yeah, it seems this is looking more and more David Drumm-like.

    You can use your new-found catchphrase all you want, but it doesn't deal with the fact that you just don't seem to like the actual figures.

    Do I need to remind you that you yourself actually suggested 33%? Or does your petty little catchphrase mean that much to you that you're wiping your own memory now.

    Now - come up with a practical example, or get off the pot. Your attempts to evade actually doing this are getting hilarious.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 14,072 Mod ✭✭✭✭monument


    MYOB wrote: »
    For someone who likes Holland a lot, you have a very 1930s British ideal of what a city looks like.

    We were talking city centre? Because the Dutch city centres I talk about (bar a few) tend not to have four lanes of general traffic in them.

    MYOB wrote: »
    You appear to be ignoring the point, again.

    At this point I'm sure it's not that important, but I'm not ignoring your point -- I don't see it!

    MYOB wrote: »
    You can use your new-found catchphrase all you want, but it doesn't deal with the fact that you just don't seem to like the actual figures.

    Do I need to remind you that you yourself actually suggested 33%? Or does your petty little catchphrase mean that much to you that you're wiping your own memory now.

    Yea, I remember, I was basing that on double your first figure.

    As I said honest questions to try to establish where the figure was from, I was just trying to figure out where you were getting 30% from, but you can't give a breakdown so we'll leave it at that.

    MYOB wrote: »
    Now - come up with a practical example, or get off the pot. Your attempts to evade actually doing this are getting hilarious.

    Practical example of what exactly?

    SeanW wrote: »
    If Peter Sweetman and Save Newgrange etc. did decide to go hang themselves, the rest of us would be a lot better off.

    I've deleted the rest of my reply to you. It was actually quite detailed, so that's annoying but your comment here is too sickening.

    While even I don't see eye-to-eye with those people, they don't deserve comments like that. I've had heated arguments with people but I would never say that the rest of us would be better off without anybody here.

    Sometimes there's a point in interacting with people with the opposite views, but not when they come out with such sick comments.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 67,765 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    monument wrote: »
    We were talking city centre? Because the Dutch city centres I talk about (bar a few) tend not to have four lanes of general traffic in them.

    Because, amazingly, they all have bypasses... and you're ignoring the point AGAIN.
    monument wrote: »
    At this point I'm sure it's not that important, but I'm not ignoring your point -- I don't see it!

    Your claim that 10% could easily solve the congestion problems is fairly thoroughly disproved by the existing reduction in traffic figures. That is what you've ignored this time and before, actually. You appear to be attempting to weasel that a *further* 10% now, but that was not your original claim. At that, I doubt a further 10% is likely to do much either, as Galway is that heavily above capacity to begin with.
    monument wrote: »
    Yea, I remember, I was basing that on double your first figure.

    As I said honest questions to try to establish where the figure was from, I was just trying to figure out where you were getting 30% from, but you can't give a breakdown so we'll leave it at that.

    You offered it as a valid figure, yet when given workings for a slightly lesser figure, you attempt to throw them out. Just how many more holes do you intend to punch in your own argument?
    monument wrote: »
    Practical example of what exactly?

    A city of similar parameters to Galway where there was a very, very large modal shift (I'll let you go for something less than your suggested 33% if you want) and hence reduction in traffic.

    All you've done is try argue away the parameters so what's left can match a previous example.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,753 ✭✭✭SeanW


    monument wrote: »
    I've deleted the rest of my reply to you. It was actually quite detailed, so that's annoying but your comment here is too sickening.

    While even I don't see eye-to-eye with those people, they don't deserve comments like that. I've had heated arguments with people but I would never say that the rest of us would be better off without anybody here.

    Sometimes there's a point in interacting with people with the opposite views, but not when they come out with such sick comments.
    At least you wrote a response, after I asked your side multiple times (having been ignored each time) what cycle lanes, parking restrictions and a clampdown on speed had to do with substituting for a bypass for longer-distance traffic not wanting to be in Galway City.

    It should have been obvious that I was being quasi-faecetious (sp?) about Peter Sweetman, Save Newgrange etc.
    Obviously I would prefer they grew up, got a life.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 14,072 Mod ✭✭✭✭monument


    MYOB wrote: »
    Because, amazingly, they all have bypasses... and you're ignoring the point AGAIN.

    Nope, addressed this some time ago now:

    Dutch motorway network which mainly acts as bypasses to these cities go some where beyond just to the other side of a city.

    To simplify it: Galway has feck all west of the city, while Dutch cities have other Durch cities and other countries's cities around them.

    MYOB wrote: »
    Your claim that 10% could easily solve the congestion problems is fairly thoroughly disproved by the existing reduction in traffic figures. That is what you've ignored this time and before, actually. You appear to be attempting to weasel that a *further* 10% now, but that was not your original claim. At that, I doubt a further 10% is likely to do much either, as Galway is that heavily above capacity to begin with.

    I was talking in genral terms: a 10% drop could look a 30% drop. I was not at any point putting a firm figure on it. When I mentioned 2/6 -- that was just your number x2.

    Me asking questions does not equal me arguing a point.

    MYOB wrote: »
    You offered it as a valid figure, yet when given workings for a slightly lesser figure, you attempt to throw them out. Just how many more holes do you intend to punch in your own argument?

    I've said some posts back now when I first questioned your figure that I do not see 30% as impossable modal shift target.

    And me questioning your figure is just that, I want to know where it comes from.
    It's not about the wider argument or being argumentative.

    MYOB wrote: »
    A city of similar parameters to Galway where there was a very, very large modal shift (I'll let you go for something less than your suggested 33% if you want) and hence reduction in traffic.

    All you've done is try argue away the parameters so what's left can match a previous example.

    I find it hard to find a city of similar makeup to Galway, even without the modal shift.

    The principals remain the same regardless: Give more attractive space and priority over to walking, cycling and public transport and these will gain.

    In the city centre you give the options: bother get one of the limited parking spaces, or switch to bus at a P&R and get into town quicker, or just walk or cycle if those suit.

    You can go on about parameters all day long but we'd just be going around in circle. I'm not doing guess work on figures and route options -- these kind of things take ages to get right.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,296 ✭✭✭Frank Black


    Cost/Benefit won't come into it. Not in terms of strategic national importance anyway (I'll try to dig out exact wording tomorrow).

    The wording from Article 6(2) to 6(4) of the Habitats directive (which is enshrined in EU law) states "If in spite of a negative assessment of the implications for the site and in the absence of alternative solutions, a plan or project must nevertheless be carried out for imperative reasons of overriding public interest, including those of a social or economic nature.

    Where the site concerned hosts a priority natural habitat type and/or a priority species, the only considerations which may be raised are those relating to human health or public safety, to beneficial consequences of primary importance for the environment or, further to an opinion from the Commission, to other imperative reasons of overriding public interest."

    From the above - human health/public safety won't come into it - so it will come down to demonstrating that that project is of 'overriding public interest'.

    Like I say - for a city of just 80,000, how will this be achieved?


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 67,765 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    monument wrote: »
    Nope, addressed this some time ago now:

    Dutch motorway network which mainly acts as bypasses to these cities go some where beyond just to the other side of a city.

    To simplify it: Galway has feck all west of the city, while Dutch cities have other Durch cities and other countries's cities around them.

    You're avoiding the point still. The makeup of the Dutch motorway network is pretty damn irrelevant to what their cities look like, which, may I remind you, is what you're trying to discuss here.
    monument wrote: »
    I was talking in genral terms: a 10% drop could look a 30% drop. I was not at any point putting a firm figure on it. When I mentioned 2/6 -- that was just your number x2.

    Me asking questions does not equal me arguing a point.

    And again. This is not what you were discussing.

    monument wrote: »
    I've said some posts back now when I first questioned your figure that I do not see 30% as impossable modal shift target.

    And me questioning your figure is just that, I want to know where it comes from.
    It's not about the wider argument or being argumentative.

    And you've not given any solid reasons or any examples as to why you don't think its not impossible. So you're avoiding the point, again.

    monument wrote: »
    I find it hard to find a city of similar makeup to Galway, even without the modal shift.

    The principals remain the same regardless: Give more attractive space and priority over to walking, cycling and public transport and these will gain.

    In the city centre you give the options: bother get one of the limited parking spaces, or switch to bus at a P&R and get into town quicker, or just walk or cycle if those suit.

    You can go on about parameters all day long but we'd just be going around in circle. I'm not doing guess work on figures and route options -- these kind of things take ages to get right.

    Translation: I can't give an example, so I'm just going to ignore everything and insist that its both possible and a better idea than a bypass, despite having no evidence for either.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭antoobrien


    I should also point out that in Oxford they also make it difficult for staff to bring cars to work.

    http://www.admin.ox.ac.uk/estates/travel/carparking/


    Does the fact that Oxbridge traditionally houses students & staff, making the parking issue a pretty much moot point there, where netiehr Galway instituion have such a hisotry have any place in this discussion?

    Could the struggles of the new Park and Ride service have anything to do with the lack of similar restrictions in Galway?

    In a word, no.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭antoobrien


    monument wrote: »
    And I can call "BS" with an image from Street View, the N6 is not a "centre of town" type of setting:

    https://us.v-cdn.net/6034073/uploads/attachments/5842/260894.JPG



    Edit: Also not town or city centre like:

    https://us.v-cdn.net/6034073/uploads/attachments/5842/260895.JPG


    Your total ignorence is showing again, that's two views of Terryland forest Park, 800m from Eyre square and at the fringes of the city center. It's an attempt at bringing aa wooded/forest setting to the center of Galway.

    monument wrote: »
    Wow! You're still making out that the half-arsed attempt at P&R in Galway is anywhere near like the system of P&R that I've pointed to.

    The P&R operator is complaining that others were supposed to be doing the marketing, it's just one route and it's been trialled at a time of year everybody on here agrees that congestion isn't that big of a problem! They also use coaches and depart from the coach station rather the square!!!

    Jaysus Els Saviour Christo but that's ignorant. The coach station is right beside the square and if you were in Galway yesterday you'd know that it was a total no go area.
    monument wrote: »
    Compare that to elsewhere, such as in the Netherlands where they put in a network of P&R routes and locations, where the city centre has bus priority, minimum car access and little on-street parking. Overall quite a different system!

    Ah more bs about thinks that have been proved to be failures in Galway.

    monument wrote: »
    It's not "bs".

    The N6 inside Galway City is not a city centre type setting and it's outright daftness to claim otherwise.

    Says you, people who know Galway know otherwise.
    monument wrote: »
    Give the map reading nonsense a rest, I've likely spent more time in Galway than some of your supporters on here.

    No, it's pretty clear that you know less about Galway than pretty much anyone on this thread and you are getting your total lack of knowledge from looking at maps.


    monument wrote: »
    The M3 has been going great with compensation payments for low traffic levels! :rolleyes:

    The M3 at Dunshaughlin is carrying 85% (14,000) of the N3's 2008 traffic level (16750) of the N3 that is hardly failure.

    The only failure with the M3 is the brainfart of putting in minimum traffic levels.


    monument wrote: »
    You plucked the figure out of nowhere just like David Drumm plucked the Anglo figure out of his ass.

    Or would you care to give a break down of your figure and how that relates to the student population and 30% of traffic.

    I've already shown a link that states 23,000 students attend both Galway campuses. That's 30% of the population trying to get to two fixed points every day.






    monument wrote: »
    And you're subtracting the students and staff that walk / take the bus / cycle?


    No, not subtracting including, I don't discriminate.
    monument wrote: »
    There's no need for modal change there and that's what we were talking about -- the claim of 30%+ needed for modal change to have an effect.

    No you're trying to not talk about the need to build a bypass. Modal change has nothing to do with the traffic coming in from out if town.


    monument wrote: »
    Any your 100% figure is all traffic in Galway and not the city population?
    monument wrote: »
    No, as stated the city population.
    monument wrote: »
    And you're adding in the tourist traffic?

    Tourist traffic in may? You're not from around here are you?
    monument wrote: »
    All honest questions -- how you treat them is as usual up to you.

    They may be honest, but they are as usual an disengenuous attempt to distract from the topic at hand.


    monument wrote: »
    Most successful park and ride systems I've looked at run at 10min on peak and 15mins off peak. That's on top of the other problems pointed out above.

    When the P&R started it rans as frequently as the most frequent buses in Galway and still failed.


    monument wrote: »
    Ireland and the UK don't do bypasses very well -- elsewhere in Europe they have used bypass openings to radically improve the city inside of them, but we can't handle that thinking.

    We generally do bypasses badly because of idiots who thing that we should built "just enough" instead of doing what we should do and go way the f**k over capacity because it's a 30 year projected not a 3 month one.


    monument wrote: »
    Given the road network of Galway, his example does not seem to be that poor of an example.

    The example is as poor as any other one thrown out because oxbridge have traditions of housing staff & students onsite, going back to medieval times and neither Galway institution are medieval. The only staff that's housed in site in the uni is the president and student housing is only a very recent addition to the history of both institutions.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 14,072 Mod ✭✭✭✭monument


    MYOB wrote: »
    You're avoiding the point still. The makeup of the Dutch motorway network is pretty damn irrelevant to what their cities look like, which, may I remind you, is what you're trying to discuss here.

    Not at all.

    There's noting to justify motorway west of Galway, while there are places to justify motorway around many Dutch cities.

    That's my point. You can disagree or have your own view or whatever, but I'm leaving my point at that.


    MYOB wrote: »
    And again. This is not what you were discussing.

    If you think so, sure, whatever. I've already outlined my view.

    MYOB wrote: »
    And you've not given any solid reasons or any examples as to why you don't think its not impossible. So you're avoiding the point, again.

    I have: Large percentages of people driving or being driven short to mid distances -- ripe for modal shift if the conditions are changed.

    MYOB wrote: »
    Translation: I can't give an example, so I'm just going to ignore everything and insist that its both possible and a better idea than a bypass, despite having no evidence for either.

    Translation: Galway is different it won't work.

    That's basically what you're saying. It's an excuse used worldwide about bike share, bus gates, car-free streets, tram lines, bus lanes etc.

    Opponents of these things do exactly what you're doing -- they claim other countries are different.

    As already said: The principals remain the same regardless: Give more attractive space and priority over to walking, cycling and public transport and these will gain.

    You know the following already, I know you're too smart not to: In the centre of Galway that space has to be taken away from private cars, from parking to lanes etc.

    But Galway is different I'm sure some will claim. It'll result in the death of the city and not modal change. That's an echo of what was said worldwide of now successful projects.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭antoobrien


    From the above - human health/public safety won't come into it - so it will come down to demonstrating that that project is of 'overriding public interest'.

    Like I say - for a city of just 80,000, how will this be achieved?

    Little things like this

    260957.jpg

    That is a picture of 3 ambulances caught in traffic at about 5.30 last night.

    There were no accidents, roadworks or anything bar the weather to blame, but every Eastbound road out of Galway save Wellpark Rd was backed up to the next set of lights/roundbaout/junction.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭antoobrien


    monument wrote: »
    I have: Large percentages of people driving or being driven short to mid distances -- ripe for modal shift if the conditions are changed.

    Those large % are rubbish predicated on radius not distance travelled. They'd be relevant if we all had helicopters.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,913 ✭✭✭galwaycyclist


    antoobrien wrote: »
    The example is as poor as any other one thrown out because oxbridge have traditions of housing staff & students onsite, going back to medieval times and neither Galway institution are medieval. The only staff that's housed in site in the uni is the president and student housing is only a very recent addition to the history of both institutions.

    I see so then if I understand correctly, it is your contention that there is insufficient supply of rental accommodation within 2-5km (walking or cycling distance) of either NUI, Galway or GMIT?

    Or if that is not what you are saying then what exactly is your point?


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 67,765 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    monument wrote: »
    I have: Large percentages of people driving or being driven short to mid distances -- ripe for modal shift if the conditions are changed.

    And large percentages are doing long distances. Nowhere have you given even a vague indication that enough modal shift can occur to negate the need for a bypass - despite constantly arguing that that is the case.

    monument wrote: »
    Translation: Galway is different it won't work.

    Its different from every example you've given us so far, yes.

    If you can show us a similar city that managed to get the massive change required, please do. Otherwise, you are providing little more than hot air.

    Either you are arguing that, and willing to show evidence that, enough traffic can be removed to entirely negate the need for a bypass up to its design year; or your arguments are for a different forum and have absolutely no place here. Currently, it all points to the latter.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭antoobrien


    I see so then if I understand correctly, it is your contention that there is insufficient supply of rental accommodation within 2-5km (walking or cycling distance) of either NUI, Galway or GMIT?

    Or if that is not what you are saying then what exactly is your point?

    My point is that your analogy is, as usual when it comes to anything GCOB related, flawed.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement