Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Dublin Bus using M50

Options
  • 24-08-2015 6:05pm
    #1
    Hammer15
    Registered Users Posts: 34 ✭


    Hey,

    Something that's been bothering me for awhile now as I see it on a daily basis;

    Dublin Bus vehicles using the M50 crawling along at 65-70km/h causing a tailback behind them. Surely this isn't safe for them and other road users.

    I understand that these vehicles may be limited to this speed for safety reasons, but at the same time it's putting others at risk by causing vehicles to take evasive action as they approach because their going so slow.


«1

Comments

  • Options
    #2
    oppenheimer1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,084 ✭✭✭oppenheimer1


    It's not as if double decker buses are invisible and then suddenly pop out of nowhere.

    DB buses are speed limited so they can't go any faster however they are just as entitled to the road as you. Drive with due care and attention and you won't have any problems.


  • Options
    #3
    coylemj
    Registered Users Posts: 25,361 ✭✭✭✭coylemj


    Hammer15 wrote: »
    .... it's putting others at risk by causing vehicles to take evasive action as they approach because their going so slow.

    When do they need to take 'evasive action'? If it's when they come up behind the bus then they need to get their vision examined. With proper eyesight and intelligent judgement, you should be able to make the appropriate decisions about 2 kms before you reach the bus. It's the old dear in the Yaris doing a constant 60 kph in the middle lane that you need to be worrying about, not a large vehicle like a bus that you can literally see from miles away.


  • Options
    #4
    Carawaystick
    Registered Users Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭Carawaystick


    Wait til schools are back next week and 65kmh will seem like a great speed to travel at...
    Vehicles using motorway only have to be able to travel faster than 50kmh.
    Drivers using a motorway have to be tested and found competent*


    *unless they were head of the road safety authority and just bought a license instead of passing a test like.


  • Options
    #5
    AlekSmart
    Registered Users Posts: 14,005 ✭✭✭✭AlekSmart


    Hammer15 wrote: »
    Hey,

    Something that's been bothering me for awhile now as I see it on a daily basis;

    Dublin Bus vehicles using the M50 crawling along at 65-70km/h causing a tailback behind them. Surely this isn't safe for them and other road users.

    I understand that these vehicles may be limited to this speed for safety reasons, but at the same time it's putting others at risk by causing vehicles to take evasive action as they approach because their going so slow.

    No law being broken by the Bus using the Motorway.

    65 Kmph is the maximum limit for a Large Public Service Vehicle which has provision for standing passengers.

    All posted Speed Limits are just that,Limits,rather than targets which must be met.
    In the case of Motorways,vehicles must be capable of,but not restricted to,maintaining a Minimum speed of 50 Kmph.

    It might be worth reviewing the use of the term "Evasive Action" which could infer a certain lack of awareness on the part of the following driver,which would indicate the only one "Putting others at risk" is the driver taking evasive action in non-emergency situation.

    As both a Busdriver and a regular M50 user,I would suggest making full use of forward observations and planning plus the remaining 2 lanes,to overtake in a safe & controlled manner before moving back into the appropriate driving lane.

    The M50 represents a very clear example of our National lack of forward planning in traffic management terms,however it is drivers rather than vehicle types who are responsible for safety.


    Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.

    Charles Mackay (1812-1889)



  • Options
    #6
    Jamie2k9
    Registered Users Posts: 10,677 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    I understand that these vehicles may be limited to this speed for safety reasons, but at the same time it's putting others at risk by causing vehicles to take evasive action as they approach because their going so slow.

    Not as risky as the utter incompetence of the majority of Irish road users who cannot use a 2 lane motorway never mind a 3 lane like the M50/N7.

    They are the ones that have a lot to answer for slowing people down and causing long tailback.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #7
    cgcsb
    Registered Users Posts: 9,287 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    OP, why not just overtake said bus?


  • Options
    #8
    Hilly Bill
    Registered Users Posts: 6,039 ✭✭✭Hilly Bill


    Maybe it wasnt the number he wanted :).


  • Options
    #9
    Hammer15
    Registered Users Posts: 34 ✭Hammer15


    oppenheimer1 wrote: »
    It's not as if double decker buses are invisible and then suddenly pop out of nowhere.

    DB buses are speed limited so they can't go any faster however they are just as entitled to the road as you. Drive with due care and attention and you won't have any problems.

    I fully agree with you regarding its fully visible, but I have to ask, on a road that most vehicles if not all are travelling withing the 85-100km/h range, travelling below 66kmh is dangerous IMO.

    I never said it was me that had a problem, it's merely an observation that I'm witnessing on a daily basis.


  • Options
    #10
    Hammer15
    Registered Users Posts: 34 ✭Hammer15


    coylemj wrote: »
    When do they need to take 'evasive action'? If it's when they come up behind the bus then they need to get their vision examined. With proper eyesight and intelligent judgement, you should be able to make the appropriate decisions about 2 kms before you reach the bus. It's the old dear in the Yaris doing a constant 60 kph in the middle lane that you need to be worrying about, not a large vehicle like a bus that you can literally see from miles away.


    Evasive action maybe wasn't the correct term to use here - lets just say all traffic is travelling around the speed limit and then suddenly a que of traffic caused by said vehicle driving less than 66kmph. It's well known on the m50 that drivers jam on when faced with a que, causing a domino effect of brake lights for a kilometre behind said que.

    All this for no reason except a large passenger vehicle which again IMO is causing an obstruction in lane one. It's like having a tractor on the motorway. It's bad enough on there without this carry on. What's the difference here with a bus rather than an old dear in her Yaris? Both travelling at unacceptable and unsafe speed for this road.

    Again, not a problem for me per se, but other drivers which I see everyday.


  • Options
    #11
    Hammer15
    Registered Users Posts: 34 ✭Hammer15


    Jamie2k9 wrote: »
    Not as risky as the utter incompetence of the majority of Irish road users who cannot use a 2 lane motorway never mind a 3 lane like the M50/N7.

    They are the ones that have a lot to answer for slowing people down and causing long tailback.



    Fully agree here too. Lane 3 should be empty most of the time and only used for overtaking. Very rarely enforced here unlike the UK.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #12
    markpb
    Registered Users Posts: 9,259 ✭✭✭markpb


    Hammer15 wrote: »
    on a road that most vehicles if not all are travelling withing the 85-100km/h range

    If only :(


  • Options
    #13
    Carawaystick
    Registered Users Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭Carawaystick


    Carawaystick wrote: »
    Wait til schools are back next week and 65kmh will seem like a great speed to travel at...
    Ah, no need to wait any longer...

    Could be worse OP, could be a bus in the middle lane of a 120kmh motorway like the 41X this morning.


  • Options
    #14
    the groutch
    Closed Accounts Posts: 16,096 ✭✭✭✭the groutch


    Hammer15 wrote: »
    on a road that most vehicles if not all are travelling withing the 85-100km/h range, travelling below 66kmh is dangerous IMO.
    Hammer15 wrote: »
    All this for no reason except a large passenger vehicle which again IMO is causing an obstruction in lane one........Both travelling at unacceptable and unsafe speed for this road.

    then why isn't the legal minimum speed 70kmph rather than 50?
    maybe because it isn't actually dangerous and certain drivers are overly impatient, or inept at overtaking.


  • Options
    #15
    Carawaystick
    Registered Users Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭Carawaystick


    There's no legal minimum speed, there's just a minimum, maximum speed of vehicles to use the motorway. i.e. the maximum speed of vehicles has to be >= 50kmh

    If there was a minimum speed, sher how would you stop at traffic lights on a motorway?


  • Options
    #16
    end of the road
    Registered Users Posts: 28,998 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    Hammer15 wrote: »
    on a road that most vehicles if not all are travelling withing the 85-100km/h range, travelling below 66kmh is dangerous IMO.

    the relevant road legislation says otherwise, so no it isn't

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Options
    #17
    OldMrBrennan83
    Closed Accounts Posts: 26,658 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    This post has been deleted.


  • Options
    #18
    foggy_lad
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,373 ✭✭✭✭foggy_lad


    Hammer15 wrote: »
    Hey,

    Something that's been bothering me for awhile now as I see it on a daily basis;

    Dublin Bus vehicles using the M50 crawling along at 65-70km/h causing a tailback behind them. Surely this isn't safe for them and other road users.

    I understand that these vehicles may be limited to this speed for safety reasons, but at the same time it's putting others at risk by causing vehicles to take evasive action as they approach because their going so slow.
    These slower vehicles are putting nobody at any increased risk!

    It is people who consider themselves "better" drivers and who feel the laws of physics shouldn't or simply don't apply to them that put all other road users at risk whether they be riding up the back end of other cars on the motorway or making dangerous overtaking manoeuvres on national primary and trunk roads, and all because they are too thick to wait behind a vehicle they consider is not worthy of being in front of them.

    IMO the road warriors who go around pointing out the mistakes of others are no better than the inconsiderate impatient numpties who tailgate and are always trying to get ahead!


    Basically the problem is not with the slow speed of vehicle in front but it is the lack of care and attention and often high speed of the vehicle that approaches from behind that causes crashes!


  • Options
    #19
    Rackstar
    Registered Users Posts: 1,347 ✭✭✭Rackstar


    Convinced Boards are creating these threads to troll users and get more people posting and reading, me included.


  • Options
    #20
    RustyNut
    Registered Users Posts: 3,430 ✭✭✭RustyNut


    Hammer15 wrote: »
    All this for no reason except a large passenger vehicle which again IMO is causing an obstruction in lane one. It's like having a tractor on the motorway. It's bad enough on there without this carry on. What's the difference here with a bus rather than an old dear in her Yaris? Both travelling at unacceptable and unsafe speed for this road.

    A bus travelling in lane 1 of a motorway at 60+kph is not an obstruction its traffic.


  • Options
    #21
    GTE
    Registered Users Posts: 3,911 ✭✭✭GTE


    Hammer15 wrote: »
    travelling below 66kmh is dangerous IMO.

    That argument for regular sized vehicles is reasonable, as the closing speeds vs. viability can cause problems.

    That said, to make that point with a bus as the basis, really makes very little sense. There is so much else wrong with driving in Ireland that I would be thoroughly disappointed in people who seriously see this as a problem.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #22
    foggy_lad
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,373 ✭✭✭✭foggy_lad


    bbk wrote: »
    That argument for regular sized vehicles is reasonable, as the closing speeds vs. viability can cause problems.

    That said, to make that point with a bus as the basis, really makes very little sense. There is so much else wrong with driving in Ireland that I would be thoroughly disappointed in people who seriously see this as a problem.
    No it is not reasonable! you are supposed to be awake and alert on all roads, setting the cruise control does not mean 40winks for the driver!

    If you have any issue at all in seeing a car ahead that is travelling at 50kph and slowing down before you hit it regardless of your initial speed then you need to be stopped from driving as you are a menace on any road!


  • Options
    #23
    Muahahaha
    Registered Users Posts: 19,615 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    Rackstar wrote: »
    Convinced Boards are creating these threads to troll users and get more people posting and reading, me included.

    You should see sister site thejournal.ie ,read the comments section where one half of people use their real name and the other half use fake names to troll the first half.

    Anyway just wondering, I presume modren tractors and JCB's can reach 65kph- do they ever use the m50 much? I've seen tractors on the M4 a few times, but never on the m50


  • Options
    #24
    Sn@kebite
    Registered Users Posts: 253 ✭✭Sn@kebite


    Those pesky bus drivers following the rules of the road!

    If only they used the M50 like the yellow school buses do on drag racing strips. I'd take the bus meself!

    Seriously, who is more likely to be a danger to you/I on the roads; a bus, or these boy racers with their blue lights under the cars, using the m50 as a race track. We have to put up with it, it's the only way buses can be safe, they can't stop like a car can if they are going 100kph.


  • Options
    #25
    GTE
    Registered Users Posts: 3,911 ✭✭✭GTE


    foggy_lad wrote: »
    No it is not reasonable! you are supposed to be awake and alert on all roads, setting the cruise control does not mean 40winks for the driver!

    Nah, I can not take you seriously there. Cruise control this, 40 winks that.

    What my point is, thanks for asking me to explain, is that regular sized vehicles (car) which drive slower are more difficult to notice than large ones (bus) in any given situation on an empty road. This difficulty is not significant, which I would assume you agree with.

    The significant difficult arises when the road gets busier. Other cars and vans can simply block the field of vision enough to mask the slow moving car; and, someone elses bad or lack of reaction to a slow moving car can cause some issues for everyone else.

    The main point of my post is that it is surprising that the OP would use vehicles like buses as an example of danger on roads like the M50 due to their speed. They are easiest to spot and judge the speed of for visual perception and driving know-how reasons.

    Anyway, I am not sure why you felt it necessary to imply that I use or support the use of cruise control as an opportunity to sleep at the wheel or that I am a menace on the roads for saying buses are the easiest vehicle to judge the speed of. Very disappointing. :rolleyes:


  • Options
    #26
    foggy_lad
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,373 ✭✭✭✭foggy_lad


    If a van or lorry you are following changes lane and reveals a slower moving car in front and you have trouble adjusting your speed to avoid crashing into the back of that vehicle then you are both too fast and too close to that vehicle!

    A vehicle must not be driven at a speed exceeding that which will enable its driver to bring it to a halt within a distance the driver can see to be clear.


  • Options
    #27
    micraX
    Registered Users Posts: 752 ✭✭✭micraX


    Muahahaha wrote: »
    You should see sister site thejournal.ie ,read the comments section where one half of people use their real name and the other half use fake names to troll the first half.

    Anyway just wondering, I presume modren tractors and JCB's can reach 65kph- do they ever use the m50 much? I've seen tractors on the M4 a few times, but never on the m50

    Yeah tractors use it, I know loads of people that have, once your over 50k your grand. I've been up and down m1 loads of times myself


  • Options
    #28
    The J Stands for Jay
    Registered Users Posts: 5,675 ✭✭✭The J Stands for Jay


    Carawaystick wrote: »
    There's no legal minimum speed, there's just a minimum, maximum speed of vehicles to use the motorway. i.e. the maximum speed of vehicles has to be >= 50kmh

    If there was a minimum speed, sher how would you stop at traffic lights on a motorway?

    Motorways don't have traffic lights.


  • Options
    #29
    micraX
    Registered Users Posts: 752 ✭✭✭micraX


    McGaggs wrote: »
    Motorways don't have traffic lights.

    Port tunnel does and thats technically part of m50


  • Options
    #30
    The J Stands for Jay
    Registered Users Posts: 5,675 ✭✭✭The J Stands for Jay


    micraX wrote: »
    Port tunnel does and thats technically part of m50

    Tunnels have additional rules. Where are the traffic lights in the Port Tunnel?


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #31
    L1011
    Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 67,922 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    McGaggs wrote: »
    Tunnels have additional rules. Where are the traffic lights in the Port Tunnel?

    Before entry and constantly within


Advertisement