Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Commissioner Callinan resigns with immediate effect

245

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,730 ✭✭✭✭Fred Swanson


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users Posts: 105 ✭✭Hitchroun


    This post has been deleted.

    Look if you want to have a mature discussion we can continue, but if you're going to go off ranting and raving head over to After Hours.


  • Registered Users Posts: 543 ✭✭✭Shady Tady


    Neither are the Gardaí.

    I have no time for members of a corrupt organisation where one hand washes the other.

    The legal profession?


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,213 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Hitchroun wrote: »
    The Smithwicks report found nothing, the Judge overseeing it did suggest that the gardai were more loyal to the AGS than honest admittedly.

    3 retired gardai from the 1980's does not reflect on the AGS's current culture.

    Do you have any other examples?

    Edit: More to the point, this investigation was not carried out by GSOC.
    I didn`t suggest it was carried out by GSOC, and perhaps the Judges "suggestion" had a bearing on why the report found nothing. A "suggestion that Callinan said he would never accept.
    But then again, he wouldn`t as he was accused by the Judge for directing his counsel for doing the same.

    As for any other examples. GSOC`s attempts to get to the bottom of the drug smuggler/garda informant Kieran Boylan affair?


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,213 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Hitchroun wrote: »
    The Smithwicks report found nothing, the Judge overseeing it did suggest that the gardai were more loyal to the AGS than honest admittedly.

    3 retired gardai from the 1980's does not reflect on the AGS's current culture.

    Do you have any other examples?

    Edit: More to the point, this investigation was not carried out by GSOC.

    Btw, callinans comment to the PAC that only 2 out of a force of 13000 had a problem with penalty points, in light of recent findings re penalty points, does tend to say a lot about garda culture


  • Registered Users Posts: 105 ✭✭Hitchroun


    charlie14 wrote: »
    I didn`t suggest it was carried out by GSOC, and perhaps the Judges "suggestion" had a bearing on why the report found nothing. A "suggestion that Callinan said he would never accept.
    But then again, he wouldn`t as he was accused by the Judge for directing his counsel for doing the same.

    As for any other examples. GSOC`s attempts to get to the bottom of the drug smuggler/garda informant Kieran Boylan affair?

    I would have to agree with you there, GSOC did complain about delays between the gardai and themselves. Hopefully further measures will be taken come the reforms review in June. However if its delays we're worried about then it would be far from the "out of control" police force the AGS have been referred to.


    charlie14 wrote: »
    Btw, callinans comment to the PAC that only 2 out of a force of 13000 had a problem with penalty points, in light of recent findings re penalty points, does tend to say a lot about garda culture

    I think it said more about Callinan than anything else. Look what happened when two members finally did say something, they were thrown to the dogs. I can't say I would be interested in putting my career on the line in the same manner knowing what kind of backing I would recieve from the commissioner.


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,213 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Hitchroun wrote: »
    I would have to agree with you there, GSOC did complain about delays between the gardai and themselves. Hopefully further measures will be taken come the reforms review in June. However if its delays we're worried about then it would be far from the "out of control" police force the AGS have been referred to.





    I think it said more about Callinan than anything else. Look what happened when two members finally did say something, they were thrown to the dogs. I can't say I would be interested in putting my career on the line in the same manner knowing what kind of backing I would recieve from the commissioner.

    Unless there is a change in attitude from AGS in general, in all grades, towards GSOC from what presently appears to be the case, all the reviews in the world aren`t going to make any difference.
    I can well understand your point about putting a career on the line, but for me anyway, the real "disgusting" revealation in all this was the treatment of Mc Cabe and Wilson by other members of the force in their own areas. That does not reflect well on the current culture within AGS


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18 ubercool


    Very sad news, and end to a meteoric career after 41 years of service.

    I think it is a shame he resigned. But I think he was right not to withdraw the remarks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,082 ✭✭✭bravestar


    charlie14 wrote: »
    Unless there is a change in attitude from AGS in general, in all grades, towards GSOC from what presently appears to be the case, all the reviews in the world aren`t going to make any difference.
    I can well understand your point about putting a career on the line, but for me anyway, the real "disgusting" revealation in all this was the treatment of Mc Cabe and Wilson by other members of the force in their own areas. That does not reflect well on the current culture within AGS

    Maybe GSOC should change their attitude towards members of AGS and some progress will be made.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 15,213 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    ubercool wrote: »
    Very sad news, and end to a meteoric career after 41 years of service.

    I think it is a shame he resigned. But I think he was right not to withdraw the remarks.

    I also think it`s a shame he resigned.
    For not withdrawing the remark when he was given the chance to at the PAC, and especially his refusal to apologise since McCabe and Wilson have been totally vindicated, he should have been sacked.


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,213 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    bravestar wrote: »
    Maybe GSOC should change their attitude towards members of AGS and some progress will be made.

    From my understanding GSOC`s mandate are as an oversight body for AGS.
    How would you see them can changing their attitude towards doing this?


  • Registered Users Posts: 543 ✭✭✭Shady Tady


    It's looking like a general election, the **** is hitting the fan, shatter won't sleep tonight!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18 ubercool


    What's going on?


  • Registered Users Posts: 543 ✭✭✭Shady Tady


    ubercool wrote: »
    What's going on?

    Vacencies in the following jobs next week

    Garda commissioner
    Minister for justice
    Attorney general
    Taoiseach
    Janitor in the Dail


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 222 ✭✭Kinzig


    Shady Tady wrote: »
    Vacencies in the following jobs next week

    Garda commissioner
    Minister for justice
    Attorney general
    Taoiseach
    Janitor in the Dail

    Good God dont be tainting the janitor!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 543 ✭✭✭Shady Tady


    Kinzig wrote: »
    Good God dont be tainting the janitor!

    He'll never go back after the clean up job he'll have this week!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,009 ✭✭✭sopretty


    AGS is corrupt from the very top right down to the very bottom from what I see. With a clean out at the top, maybe a few at the lower echelons might manage to muster up the courage to behave with honesty and integrity and not cow-tow to the 'top' for fear of being bullied. Delighted to see him gone.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,730 ✭✭✭✭Fred Swanson


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,082 ✭✭✭bravestar


    charlie14 wrote: »
    From my understanding GSOC`s mandate are as an oversight body for AGS.
    How would you see them can changing their attitude towards doing this?

    Their mandate has nothing to do with their attitude while conducting themselves.


  • Registered Users Posts: 543 ✭✭✭Shady Tady


    I agree 100% with you there. A good broom is needed.

    Any old brush will do when you want to paint everyone with the same brush


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,730 ✭✭✭✭Fred Swanson


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,213 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    bravestar wrote: »
    Their mandate has nothing to do with their attitude while conducting themselves.

    I haven`t heard or read anything about their attitude conducting themselves other than what I`ve seen with regards to the bugging controversy, and from what I could see they were the only party to come out of that with any credit.
    Maybe I`ve missed something here, and if so, I`d be gratefull if you could maybe enlighten me on this attitude they have?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,800 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Shady Tady wrote: »
    Vacencies in the following jobs next week

    Garda commissioner
    Minister for justice
    Attorney general
    Taoiseach
    Janitor in the Dail


    I doubt it's something that will bring down the government short term but it is something that will certainly leave them with a black eye going into the next General Election whenever that may be. Shatter has to be a goner although I think he will try and hang on in there by Endas coat tails. He doesn't strike me as the kind of guy to have enough class to hold his hands up and walk away which btw neither did Calinan as he walked without retracting his disgraceful slurs towards both Gardai.

    The Calinan comments re: the two Garda whistleblowers were an absolute disgrace. Whistleblowing is almost always the last resort for someone to expose systematic corruption and or wrongdoing within an organisation. For someone to do it from within AGS takes a good deal of bravery. They should have been commended and not condemned.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,282 ✭✭✭✭Potential-Monke


    charlie14 wrote: »
    I haven`t heard or read anything about their attitude conducting themselves other than what I`ve seen with regards to the bugging controversy, and from what I could see they were the only party to come out of that with any credit.
    Maybe I`ve missed something here, and if so, I`d be gratefull if you could maybe enlighten me on this attitude they have?

    - Basically, they treat each member (with very few exceptions) as guilty before hearing their side.
    - Their demeanour and attitude towards members accused (falsly accused mostly) of wrongdoing is shocking, but nothing you hear in the general media due to data protection or Gardaí getting wronged is not good news.
    - They have the power to "blue light" it to a members house and "arrest" them in the middle of the night, if they deem it so (and have done).
    - They expect the member accused to drop everything and devote their entire time to their investigation, completely ignoring the fact that the same member has his own investigations, on extremely limited time, to carry out.
    - They also do not inform you of what you have been accused of until they decide that it's time to interview you,
    - and quite often you get a letter saying that a complaint against you is not being investigated, but that is the first time you hear about it.
    - They also do not prosecute, or recommend to prosecute, those who make proven, false allegations (very few exceptions).
    - They are out to get members into court and prove a point that their positions are merited, regardless of the effect it can and does have on the members concerned, even if innocent.

    I agree that they are needed, but they are not impartial, in my opinion. There is more i could say, but i'd be in breach of Data Protection and would probably be hounded by the authorities for having this opinion.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,009 ✭✭✭sopretty


    -

    I agree that they are needed, but they are not impartial, in my opinion. There is more i could say, but i'd be in breach of Data Protection and would probably be hounded by the authorities for having this opinion.

    Hounded by what authorities?


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,213 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    - Basically, they treat each member (with very few exceptions) as guilty before hearing their side.
    - Their demeanour and attitude towards members accused (falsly accused mostly) of wrongdoing is shocking, but nothing you hear in the general media due to data protection or Gardaí getting wronged is not good news.
    - They have the power to "blue light" it to a members house and "arrest" them in the middle of the night, if they deem it so (and have done).
    - They expect the member accused to drop everything and devote their entire time to their investigation, completely ignoring the fact that the same member has his own investigations, on extremely limited time, to carry out.
    - They also do not inform you of what you have been accused of until they decide that it's time to interview you,
    - and quite often you get a letter saying that a complaint against you is not being investigated, but that is the first time you hear about it.
    - They also do not prosecute, or recommend to prosecute, those who make proven, false allegations.
    - They are out to get members into court and prove a point that their positions are merited, regardless of the effect it can and does have on the members concerned, even if innocent.

    I agree that they are needed, but they are not impartial, in my opinion. There is more i could say, but i'd be in breach of Data Protection and would probably be hounded by the authorities for having this opinion.

    Sounds pretty much the same procedures as AGS when carrying out investigations of alledged wrongdoing by members of the general public.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,730 ✭✭✭✭Fred Swanson


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,463 ✭✭✭marienbad


    - Basically, they treat each member (with very few exceptions) as guilty before hearing their side.
    - Their demeanour and attitude towards members accused (falsly accused mostly) of wrongdoing is shocking, but nothing you hear in the general media due to data protection or Gardaí getting wronged is not good news.
    - They have the power to "blue light" it to a members house and "arrest" them in the middle of the night, if they deem it so (and have done).
    - They expect the member accused to drop everything and devote their entire time to their investigation, completely ignoring the fact that the same member has his own investigations, on extremely limited time, to carry out.
    - They also do not inform you of what you have been accused of until they decide that it's time to interview you,
    - and quite often you get a letter saying that a complaint against you is not being investigated, but that is the first time you hear about it.
    - They also do not prosecute, or recommend to prosecute, those who make proven, false allegations (very few exceptions).
    - They are out to get members into court and prove a point that their positions are merited, regardless of the effect it can and does have on the members concerned, even if innocent.

    I agree that they are needed, but they are not impartial, in my opinion. There is more i could say, but i'd be in breach of Data Protection and would probably be hounded by the authorities for having this opinion.

    So not much different that how the Gardaí treat the public then ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,883 ✭✭✭pa990


    Not what I have been told. I was told that a member is told that an allegation has been made and who had made it.

    You've been told wrong.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,282 ✭✭✭✭Potential-Monke


    sopretty wrote: »
    Hounded by what authorities?

    AGS management and Government, for possibly breaching the Data Protection Act, the Official Secrets Act or the Garda Code.
    charlie14 wrote: »
    Sounds pretty much the same procedures as AGS when carrying out investigations of alledged wrongdoing by members of the general public.
    marienbad wrote: »
    So not much different that how the Gardaí treat the public then ?

    Yes, because every single Garda does that to every single person who is a potential suspect. Seriously, do ye just hear someone in the pub talking bollix and decide that the entire force does this? Some of them don't even make sense when changed to the general public. Being sensationalist for the sake of it. Sigh...
    This post has been deleted.

    Nope, you were informed wrong. The first we hear about an allegation against us is when GSOC decide that they're not going ahead with it, or that they want an interview in the immediate future.

    As is always the case when people have their mind made up against the Gardaí, they refuse to listen to reason, or even to step back and think about what they're typing. Someone asked for a list, i gave a list, and people are already jumping on the bandwagon and claiming that every Garda is corrupt and only out to catch the innocent.

    I will tell you one thing though, with attitudes like that, ye will soon have no force to be giving out about, because i personally am getting sick to my teeth of people treating me like mud under their shoe, and all i'm trying to do is my bit for my country. Callinan and Co. are on the complete opposite side of the country to me, and i have no idea what they were up to, or who's back they were rubbing. I go to work every day and carry out my duty to the best of my ability, within the merits of legality, and constantly with an understanding of what victims of crime are going through.

    But i'm quite close to giving up. It's beginning to have a severe effect on my mental stability to have to listen to people generalising and lumping me in with the bad apples that are in every walk of life. I went from being proactive and going out of my way to be the best at what i was doing (as i would have in any job) to wishing away the time i'm at work. I want to continue doing this job, but between idiotic management, the public crying out for the blood of every member, and laws that protect the criminal and not the victims, i'm seriously considering quitting, even with a mortgage and loans to pay.

    And i'm one of many, many members who are thinking the exact same. So cry out, blame all for the actions of a few, and soon ye will get what ye deserve.

    Oh, i should also add that everything i've said in this thread is my opinion, and not representative of any club and/or organisation.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,288 ✭✭✭source


    For proof of what potential-monke is saying, you only have to look back a few months to the two members who were prosecuted for assault in cork.

    Their crime was using an issued weapon in the prescribed manner against a violent prisoner.

    They were left with a huge legal bill when the judge threw the case out of court.

    GSOC only care about high profile prosecutions against Gardai to show they are "making a difference" it's nothing short of a PR exercise.

    I personally had a complaint made against me to GSOC, I was exonerated when it was proved I wasn't working the night the incident was supposed to have happened. My sergeant was interviewed as were other sergeants in the station. The first I had heard about the allegation was when I got a letter saying I was no longer being investigated. No hint if what I was alleged to have done, nothing!

    When I asked questions about it, I was told I'd be best of to leave it lie and was left to guess for myself what the implications would be if I pursued it.

    I'm no longer a member of AGS, though I remember feeling the same as Potential-Monke when I was in the job. AGS is one of the best police forces in the world, our training model and specialist units are replicated in other countries. Yet our public believe AGS is useless. I'm not saying AGS is perfect, and with every large organisation you will have assholes who bring the rest down. But. Corruption is not as widespread as some on here would lead you to believe.

    GSOC aren't the shining beacon the public think it is, if AGS conducted investigations in the same manner as GSOC do then there'd massive public outcry.


  • Registered Users Posts: 105 ✭✭Hitchroun


    source wrote: »
    For proof of what potential-monke is saying, you only have to look back a few months to the two members who were prosecuted for assault in cork.

    Their crime was using an issued weapon in the prescribed manner against a violent prisoner.

    They were left with a huge legal bill when the judge threw the case out of court.

    GSOC only care about high profile prosecutions against Gardai to show they are "making a difference" it's nothing short of a PR exercise.

    I personally had a complaint made against me to GSOC, I was exonerated when it was priced I wasn't working the night the incident was supposed to have happened. My sergeant was interviewed as were other sergeants in the station. The first I had heard about the allegation was when I got a letter saying I was no longer being investigated. No hint if what I was alleged to have done, nothing!

    When I asked questions about it, I was told I'd be best of to leave it lie and was left to guess for myself what the implications would be if I pursued it.

    I'm no longer a member of AGS, though I render feeling the same as Potential-Monke when I was in the job.

    GSOC aren't the shining beacon the public think it is, if AGS conducted investigations in the same manner as GSOC do then there'd massive public outcry.


    Does the allegation remain on your record? (I.e. can it affect promotion changes?)

    Can you share why you left with us?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,288 ✭✭✭source


    Hitchroun wrote: »
    Does the allegation remain on your record? (I.e. can it affect promotion changes?)

    Can you share why you left with us?

    I was signed off medically unfit to continue, I don't want to be any more specific than that for obvious reasons.

    I'm not sure if it stays on your record, but I wouldn't be surprised.


  • Registered Users Posts: 105 ✭✭Hitchroun


    source wrote: »
    I was signed off medically unfit to continue, I don't want to be any more specific than that for obvious reasons.

    I'm not sure if it stays on your record, but I wouldn't be surprised.

    Completely understandable.

    I've heard the same of other police forces in America for example, strange practice for those that have been vindicated.


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,213 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Lads I can understand your annoyance at the view of the general public is that all Garda are being lumped with the sins of the few, but as a member of said general public reading what is written here, you`re not doing much to dispell that view, coming across as "everybody`s out of step but our Paddy".
    In Callinan`s own words, only two members of the force of over 13,000 found anything wrong with the penalty points issue,plus the then harassment of said two by members of the force, in even their own areas.
    That is what the general public see and have heard from both Morris and Smithwicks. That there is a culture of protecting their own from any criticism within the Garda at the cost of truth.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,009 ✭✭✭sopretty


    AGS management and Government, for possibly breaching the Data Protection Act, the Official Secrets Act or the Garda Code.

    So you acknowledge that AGS management hound you for having an opinion and expressing it? This surely is not healthy, nor conducive to reform. This is why GSOC is needed. This is why reform is needed. To stamp out this culture of bullying, corruption, collusion and incompetence. From the top down, rather from the bottom up.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 194 ✭✭D.Campbell


    Hitchroun wrote: »
    Surely this is the opposite of what happened.

    The government was made aware of the practice in November 2013.
    they have been bugged 30 years sweet divine how on earth can we as a nation depend on the law if its under their noses and they can see they have been tapped hello out there proof is in the pudding.
    30 years and we as a nation expect them to solved investigation :eek::eek:
    its a bad outcome if they knew it or if they are now saying they didn't
    a sure ya in Mexico they have no internet access :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,156 ✭✭✭Iwannahurl


    ubercool wrote: »
    a meteoric career after 41 years of service.

    :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,288 ✭✭✭source


    D.Campbell wrote: »
    they have been bugged 30 years sweet divine how on earth can we as a nation depend on the law if its under their noses and they can see they have been tapped hello out there proof is in the pudding.
    30 years and we as a nation expect them to solved investigation :eek::eek:
    its a bad outcome if they knew it or if they are now saying they didn't
    a sure ya in Mexico they have no internet access :rolleyes:

    AGS phones were not bugged or tapped, they were recorded as part of a large phone network. Same as Vodafone's, o2's, Airtricity, or any call centre for that matter.

    The issue is that members and the public were not made aware this system was in place. Management knew it was there, that is the issue.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,282 ✭✭✭✭Potential-Monke


    sopretty wrote: »
    So you acknowledge that AGS management hound you for having an opinion and expressing it? This surely is not healthy, nor conducive to reform. This is why GSOC is needed. This is why reform is needed. To stamp out this culture of bullying, corruption, collusion and incompetence. From the top down, rather from the bottom up.

    I can have an opinion, but it has to be aired through the proper channels when it concerns Data Sensitive information, or issues and/or concerns about procedures or actions. I cannot use names, stations or figures which are only known internally on a public forum, be it here on boards, Facebook or to the media. If i'm in breach of the Data Protection Act, the Official Secrets Act or the Garda Code then management can quite rightly pursue me, and boards or any Irish run forum are legally obliged to provide them with my information (upon receipt of a sufficient warrant).

    So, yes, i can have an opinion, as long as it doesn't breach any of the above, which severely limits my public opinion, as only a fool would think that these forums and all social media of members are not being monitored. Members have already got into trouble over Facebook and Twitter comments which can be seen as "conduct unbecoming of a member of An Garda Síochána". We are never off duty, and as such always have to represent ourselves in the best interests of the Force. One of the reasons why i rarely socialise in public anymore, for fear of a flippant comment made coming back to haunt me.

    As for the phone being recorded, as source said, it's being happening for years, management were well aware, so i'd assume the Ministers for Defence were, but as long as it's not being used maliciously (which i insist they were not) then i can't see the issue. It's not feasible to inform every caller that the call is being recorded, as some people could be ringing with time sensitive information, or others could be put off ringing with information, even though we never pursue someone who wishes to give information confidentially.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 194 ✭✭D.Campbell


    source wrote: »
    AGS phones were not bugged or tapped, they were recorded as part of a large phone network. Same as Vodafone's, o2's, Airtricity, or any call centre for that matter.

    The issue is that members and the public were not made aware this system was in place. Management knew it was there, that is the issue.
    so now they knew what they were doing and knew that it was illegal, and now any member of the public who rang the Garda with in the past 30 years can sue hmm interesting


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,288 ✭✭✭source


    D.Campbell wrote: »
    so now they knew what they were doing and knew that it was illegal, and now any member of the public who rang the Garda with in the past 30 years can sue hmm interesting

    Have a read of Shatters statement, it's on the Irish times website. Yes management knew, yes there may be data protection implications, but the facts are that not all phones in all stations were recorded, only those which someone externally would call.

    Given that people would in general call AGS to give details of crimes, which they expect to be recorded electronically. I don't believe this will have as far reaching an implication as you're making out.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,009 ✭✭✭sopretty


    I can have an opinion, but it has to be aired through the proper channels when it concerns Data Sensitive information, or issues and/or concerns about procedures or actions. I cannot use names, stations or figures which are only known internally on a public forum, be it here on boards, Facebook or to the media. If i'm in breach of the Data Protection Act, the Official Secrets Act or the Garda Code then management can quite rightly pursue me, and boards or any Irish run forum are legally obliged to provide them with my information (upon receipt of a sufficient warrant).

    So, yes, i can have an opinion, as long as it doesn't breach any of the above, which severely limits my public opinion, as only a fool would think that these forums and all social media of members are not being monitored. Members have already got into trouble over Facebook and Twitter comments which can be seen as "conduct unbecoming of a member of An Garda Síochána". We are never off duty, and as such always have to represent ourselves in the best interests of the Force. One of the reasons why i rarely socialise in public anymore, for fear of a flippant comment made coming back to haunt me.

    As for the phone being recorded, as source said, it's being happening for years, management were well aware, so i'd assume the Ministers for Defence were, but as long as it's not being used maliciously (which i insist they were not) then i can't see the issue. It's not feasible to inform every caller that the call is being recorded, as some people could be ringing with time sensitive information, or others could be put off ringing with information, even though we never pursue someone who wishes to give information confidentially.

    How would you like to see AGS progressing in the future?
    I understand that autonomy is required, so that they can be seen to be independent. That poses problems with accountability.
    The secrecy required to carry out investigations etc. requires an enormous level of trust being put in serving members.
    Whistle-blowing is seen as disgusting.
    There seems to be a culture of loyalty above honesty.
    There is a sense of having to tow the line or else.
    I cannot see how any young guard, or indeed any principled long serving guard, could not end up either being moulded to conform to the current culture, or else end up burning out.
    While certainly GSOC is required for reports of wrongdoing on behalf of gardai, there also needs to be some sort of independent body and process for gardai to air their own grievances.
    Would you welcome an Independent Oversight Committee?
    Would you welcome reform in the culture?
    How would you propose such a thing could come about?

    It is in ALL of our best interests to regain trust in AGS and the system, both for gardai and the public.

    What would restore your morale? Certainly, pay-cuts must be a huge disincentive. I myself am not going to put my heart and soul into a job which pays a pittance.

    I'd love to see things overhauled. It is undeniable that there are some brilliant and dedicated gardai, equally, I have unfortunately seen first hand, the dishonesty and collusion and mentality of ass-covering involved.
    If we could have more of the former and less of the latter, we'd be sorted. :)


  • Posts: 18,749 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    there needs to be an independent Garda authority set up.
    they can oversee all the promotions and take them away from the political appointments they are currently.

    AGS needs to be independent, they should not be too close to a government.

    the Garda Authority ( or whatever you want to call it ) should also be there to recommend any improvements or changes to internal Garda policy.


    they should also be responsible for looking after the Gardai, get whatever is needed to allow them to do their job properly.
    equip the force correctly.

    they can bring all these issues to government on behalf of AGS.

    one problem (especially with Martin Callinan ) is that the commissioner is a government appointed position and as such, seems to side more with the minister for justice.


    this independent authority should also have the ability to investigate complaints by Gardai, which GSOC cannot.

    although, tbh, no matter what they do, or who is appointed anywhere, there will still believe that AGS is a corrupt organisation. they will still complain and find the slightest little thing that they dont agree with to put AGS down.

    instead of appreciating the good honest members of AGS.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,282 ✭✭✭✭Potential-Monke


    sopretty wrote: »
    How would you like to see AGS progressing in the future?
    I understand that autonomy is required, so that they can be seen to be independent. That poses problems with accountability.

    I would like, initially, to have more of a correspondence with the general public. A forum where the good work that gets carried out can be made available to the public. Maybe a section on the Garda website that outlines all the good work which otherwise goes unnoticed.
    sopretty wrote: »
    The secrecy required to carry out investigations etc. requires an enormous level of trust being put in serving members.
    Whistle-blowing is seen as disgusting.

    Yes, there is an enormous level of trust, and trust which, in my opinion, is rightly given. As i keep saying in many threads on this forum, we are not all corrupt. And as pointed out above, there is no forum for people to see the good work we do, only when high-profile cases make it to the media. How can someone trust AGS if they can't see the good work that's being done? I myself get praise (albeit very occasionally from management) for the manner in which i carry out my duties (i may be one of the most photographed Gardaí as i never have an issue posing for a photo - it's excellent PR work imo).
    sopretty wrote: »
    There seems to be a culture of loyalty above honesty.

    There is a culture of loyalty. We work shoulder to shoulder every day and rely on the colleagues beside, behind and in front of us. But within that loyalty, there is an understanding that in order to be loyal, we have to be honest and not put each other in a situation where we may have to decide between one or the other. I can state quite clearly that i have never been put in that position, and that if people think i am being loyal over honest, then they are wrong. My life is not worth a prisoner sentence over covering up for someones idiotic mistakes, or their need to asset themselves with violence. Everything my colleagues and I do is legal, and we can honestly stand behind our loyalty, because we don't have to lie for each other. This kind of behaviour, loyalty and honesty together, is far more common than what the public perceive.
    sopretty wrote: »
    There is a sense of having to tow the line or else.

    Every new member wants to fit in. You have to work with these people day in and day out, and are the only people you can genuinely rely on in violent situations. Some may seem to think you need to turn a blind eye to misdemeanors, but the truthful story is that in every situation i've been in, i've never had to tow the line, my colleagues don't put me in that situation, nor do they put any new members in that situation. And anyone that does, before anything severe happens (and what i mean is saying something in the wrong tone or in a manner likely to be taken out of context), is taken aside and spoken to. It doesn't happen again, and i've never been witness to anything which would promote gross misconduct, corruption, or anything else.
    sopretty wrote: »
    I cannot see how any young guard, or indeed any principled long serving guard, could not end up either being moulded to conform to the current culture, or else end up burning out.

    It is hard, but it's only with the support and understanding of your colleagues that it can work. See a trend starting to appear?
    sopretty wrote: »
    While certainly GSOC is required for reports of wrongdoing on behalf of gardai, there also needs to be some sort of independent body and process for gardai to air their own grievances.
    Would you welcome an Independent Oversight Committee?
    Would you welcome reform in the culture?
    How would you propose such a thing could come about?

    Yes, and independent oversight committee is needed. We need to remove politics from the force, and it is wide open to misconduct, corruption, etc. Politics have no place in the security of the nation, and an IOC would (hopefully) prevent that. While it would be necessary to have a Commissioner who has gone up through the ranks, it should also be assigned on merit over anything else. The culture is not what the media and public believe it to be. As i said above, there is a sense of loyalty, because in the end it is us against them (ie: Gardaí against the criminals) and they have more protection from the state than we do. And such a thing might come about very soon, and i will most definitely be voting for it.
    sopretty wrote: »
    It is in ALL of our best interests to regain trust in AGS and the system, both for gardai and the public.

    What would restore your morale? Certainly, pay-cuts must be a huge disincentive. I myself am not going to put my heart and soul into a job which pays a pittance.

    Restore morale? That will take a lot. Personally, i would require confidence from our management, increased numbers in a time when it is critically low, better personal protection equipment, better protection from civil cases against us for carrying out our duties legally, support from management, purpose built cars. Simple enough ideas that should be the norm. Money, well i wouldn't say no to getting back all that has been taken off me in the last few years. I don't even want more pay, but what i am entitled to before all these cuts. It's a well paid job, if you don't have loans/a mortgage, but very few don't. We are like everyone else, we are feeling the crunch and are constantly a target for more cuts. And many people can be heard say that they wouldn't do it for the money we get. I wouldn't blame them. I wanted to do my part for my country, and it was either the Army or the Gardaí (i'm not a "Tiocfaidh ár lá" guy, just wanted to do my bit). I picked the Gardaí as i believed it would afford me more freedom. I was wrong.
    sopretty wrote: »
    I'd love to see things overhauled. It is undeniable that there are some brilliant and dedicated gardai, equally, I have unfortunately seen first hand, the dishonesty and collusion and mentality of ass-covering involved.
    If we could have more of the former and less of the latter, we'd be sorted. :)

    Thank you for recognising that there are good Gardaí, and i appreciate that there are bad ones. But with the way accountability has gone, you are indeed going to get more of the former and less of the latter. But it will take time, and some new procedures.

    AGS is literally a very large family. You have your immediate family, ie: those you are stationed with (can be small or large, depending on your station). You would literally do anything for them, within the limit of the law, and they would do the same for you, as if they were your brothers and sisters. Then you have your extended family, or cousins if you will, and that would be the rest of the force. Some you could count as your immediate family, others are distant relatives. You would do more for your immediate family than you would your distant relatives. And then you've the likes of Callinan and Co. who are the uncles and aunts you never liked.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,883 ✭✭✭pa990




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,606 ✭✭✭pah


    And then you've the likes of Callinan and Co. who are the uncles and aunts you never liked.

    LOL I hear you, I think I'd like my aunty Noirín though.

    Potential-Monke for commissioner :D


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,126 ✭✭✭Santa Cruz


    pah wrote: »
    LOL I hear you, I think I'd like my aunty Noirín though.

    Potential-Monke for commissioner :D

    oooooh Matron


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,282 ✭✭✭✭Potential-Monke


    I'd run for it, but i'd probably end up punching Shatter...


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,463 ✭✭✭marienbad


    I'd run for it, but i'd probably end up punching Shatter...


    that is the attitude to all Justice Ministers from AGS since the dawn of time , a bit like the Education Minister and teachers


  • Advertisement
Advertisement