Lord TSC wrote: » Here is the official squad flying out... De Gea, Romero, Love, McNair, Smalling, Blind, Poole, Riley, Carrick, Herrera, Schneiderlin, Lingard, Pereira, Weir, Mata, Memphis, Martial, Keane. As per the official website. No CBJ either.
Mitch Connor wrote: » Man United, taking the EL seriously with one senior striker, of 20 years old.
Lord TSC wrote: » At his age, he would be on a one year rolling contract, I would imagine...
v3ttel wrote: » The one senior striker, of 20 years old, just happens to be our best attacking player by a country mile. We have two strikers and one of them is very likely to be injured or ill if he hasn't traveled.
bangkok wrote: » serious lack of talent in that squad, hard to imagine that van Gaal has spent 250m and that is our squad, minus a few
jayo26 wrote: » If our first team minus one or two players can't beat them well there is no hope.
bucketybuck wrote: » The defensive options are shocking really.
Lord TSC wrote: » Our front line is only missing Rooney and Januzaj
Rossi IRL wrote: » and Welbeck:pac:
DARK-KNIGHT wrote: » Hard to think van gaal has spent 250 odd million and the team looks absolutely ****e week in week out He has a lot to answer for
Mitch Connor wrote: » I'd prefer him to stay silent on it, after being sacked. The state of the United squad is inexcusable given the money he has spent and the authority he has had. Make no mistake, this is his United squad. This is the squad he wanted/created and his inability to get them playing football should have cost him his job 2 months ago. Woodward, at this stage, has as much to answer for. LVG is his problem to fix and he just sits on his hands (while City appoint the best manager in football).
DARK-KNIGHT wrote: agree with everything you said but im calling one thing here pep isnt the best in the world and he will be found out at city... i give him 18 months before he gets the sack there
beno619 wrote: » Its very difficult to find positive's the Van Gael reign. Besides the signing of Martial there really are very few tangible improvements. Young players have not developed better than Moyes and certainly nowhere near as well as Fergie. His "clear-out" has been a negative no matter what way people try to swing it. So after 18 months what has he achieved ?
Mitch Connor wrote: » Also - would have much prefered to see Fosu-Mensah or Williams in the squad instead of Poole - both far better players. Roole was ran around vs City U21s last game (though playing DM). He is hardly ready for U21 football, never mind senior football. Williams and Fosu-Mensah are already putting in dominating performances at U21. I think we are playing City at U18 level today and have U21 and U18 games on Saturday too - but if Poole can be taken out of those squads, why not Fosu-Mensah or Williams. Swapping Poole for either player would be better for United and for the players too, imo.
beno619 wrote: Its very difficult to find positive's the Van Gael reign.
beno619 wrote: » Its very difficult to find positive's in the Van Gael reign. Besides the signing of Martial there really are very few tangible improvements. Young players have not developed better than Moyes and certainly nowhere near as well as Fergie. His "clear-out" has been a negative no matter what way people try to swing it. So after 18 months what has he achieved ?
brinty wrote: » Daley has been a good signing Mo will be too Martial and Memphis young players who,'lol only improve That's not bad
Giggsy11 wrote: » I want him gone too but that's stretching it a bit. There are few positives from his reign. He did promote many young players, most recently CBJ who looked good enough to play at top level. For me his trust of young players is big positive in his reign and apart from that can't think of any.
Lucas Hood wrote: » You cant call it trusting in youths if they're the only players he has available to him.
