Inspector Coptoor wrote: » Ah yes. My peer reviewed, QED'd theory :rolleyes:
screamer wrote: » Let's turn it on its head would you be impressed if you were invited to a wedding and given no food? .
Sam Kade wrote: » Or even maths as we say in this part of the world.
steddyeddy wrote: » That's true. I often find those with less more generous. I think it's simple a matter of generosity though rather than a conscious effort to avoid looking poor. Your post seems indicative of a chip on one's shoulder.
steddyeddy wrote: » It's not arrogant as much as indicative of someone showing him/her up at a wedding with a more expensive gift.
Inspector Coptoor wrote: » How do I know? I don't, obviously.But sure if my uncle had breasts and a vagina, he'd be my uncle. Clutching at straws there.
screamer wrote: » Let's turn it on its head would you be impressed if you were invited to a wedding and given no food?
suicide_circus wrote: » Interesting, care to elaborate on this chip?
Inspector Coptoor wrote: » How do I know? I don't, obviously. But sure if my uncle had breasts and a vagina, he'd be my aunt Clutching at straws there. Giving a gift is a kind gesture. It's the the thing to do when going to a wedding. As it's the social norm, for the vast majority of people, it can therefore be expected, but it's not an entitlement. Ah yes. My peer reviewed, QED'd theory :rolleyes:
Zimmey wrote: » As already pointed out by a poster already though, unless a wedding is very local to you, even just attending costs a fair bit before even giving a gift. So nobody is going to be turning up looking for their free meal. There's nothing free about it! I would never not give a gift but people forget that it costs money to attend outside of that. It's different from just going to a friend's house or a dinner party or a local event.
steddyeddy wrote: » Inspector are you on the wine again?
Inspector Coptoor wrote: » No. Dry January. I made a mistake and have since rectified the post
steddyeddy wrote: » I'm doing dry January too. I thought you were making a political statement about transsexualism.
Inspector Coptoor wrote: » Sneaky pint before the church, betting on speeches, shots after speeches, Pant legs rolled up, tie on head and AC/DC blaring - what's not to love? Weddings are deadly Craic
Lia_lia wrote: » Not sure if sarcasm or...
Azalea wrote: » How do weddings suck? Surely it depends on the wedding.
Inspector Coptoor wrote: » We haven't been on a foreign holiday in almost three years as we are in "wedding season" the last couple of years (and this year) so we have made attending friend and family weddings our mini holidays as it is very expensive.
meeeeh wrote: » I have a partner and two kids, every so often we talk about getting married and never do anything. I would hate to organize the bloody thing. However I love going to weddings because it's ideal opportunity to see a lot of my friends in one place. I've been to a few weddings, some big, some small but none vulgar or crazily extravagant. I have no problem giving a gift. Firstly because I think it's a nice thing to do and secondly I certainly wouldn't want to do the leg work organising the event so the gift is appreciation of hard work and something for the future. There is a lot of talk about 50k weddings and bridezillas. I've never been to one and I have some very well off friends, neither I encountered any bridezillas. It could be type of friends and family some of you have that are causing you all this hardship. You can't pick your family but you can certainly pick your friends and if your friends are attention seeking couples who expect you to pay for their extravagant bash, then what does that say about you?
Lia_lia wrote: » LOL, anyone remember bridesmaidgate?
Zimmey wrote: » 300 is a large wedding. Most would be 200 or less. So for anyone with an average sized wedding secretly hoping for guests to cover their wedding, if they get a lot of declines, they could be in bother.