orubiru wrote: » Isn't this just a really insincere and condescending simplification of a far more complex issue?
I'm feeling that this video is solely designed for people who just want to give themselves a smug pat on the back because they can explain consent in a "witty" way. I mean this is supposed to be "funny" right?
I find it VERY hard to believe that a victim of sexual assault would watch this and respond with "LOL, so true, my rapist was just a big dummy who didn't understand that unconscious people don't want tea. LOL". Yet, when I've seen this video doing the rounds a lot of women seem to think it's a really hilarious video. What gives?
Rapists are not a bunch of dumb dumbs who just don't understand consent. The are despicable, predatory, often violent, human beings and people need to wise up to that instead of perpetuating this "ah, sure just teach them not to do it" attitude that's doing the rounds.
If you pinch someones butt without their consent then, yeah, you are a total @$$hole. It's assault, maybe sexual assault depending on circumstances, and the law should clamp down hard on behavior like that.
Videos like the above though? Nah, sniggering away and praising yourself for understanding consent better than a rapist is no praise at all really.
"Look at me! I understand that you can't force yourself on an unconscious woman!" OK then, so you're just like 99.999% of society, why are you shouting it from the rooftops?
Oh wait, is this video really just saying "Men are pretty terrible people"? Ah, NOW I understand.
orubiru wrote: » Videos like the above though? Nah, sniggering away and praising yourself for understanding consent better than a rapist is no praise at all really.
Lollipops23 wrote: » I'd love for the lads laughing about this to spend just one night as a woman socializing in a city on a Friday night. Arse pinching is the least of our worries. And no- I don't think women should be allowed do it to men either.
bridgettedon wrote: » What do you mean it's the least of your worries? What exactly are you worried about?
LexieOnRale wrote: » Being assaulted by a taxi driver on your way home, being one personal experience.
bridgettedon wrote: » That's a terrible thing to happen. I thought the poster was making it sound like women are nearly entering a war zone when they go out. I don't go out thinking oh I might be assaulted by someone. I go out thinking I hope I have a good night.
LexieOnRale wrote: » First time, tell him to back off. Second time, tell him to back off. Third time, defend yourself.
LexieOnRale wrote: » They're generally back. There's one c u next Tuesday in the town I live in. Wouldn't say a word to you sober but anytime he'd see me out, he'd be up on top of me, grinding against me at the bar, groping me as I walked past him, feeling my arse at any given opportunity. I had told him many times to **** off, only for him to laugh. This one night I was in my dads local with him, walked down towards the bathroom and I nearly died, there he was sitting along side where I had to walk. He grabbed my wrist as I went by and I told him to get his hands off me. Of course he did the whole two hands up thing and laughed it off. Walking back from the toilet, he was standing up as I passed and he grabbed me as I tried to get past. Well, with every bit of strength I had, I upended him. That's 4 years ago now and he hasn't put his hand on me since
LexieOnRale wrote: » I do not need the validation of some rat faced little buffoon showing me his appreciation by groping me, slapping my arse or trying to shove his tongue in my mouth. I do not need that validation from strangers. I get enough compliments before I go out from my OH and my best friends so the opinions of strangers aren't warranted, or appreciated.
NachoBusiness wrote: » That's fair enough (with regards to the behavior you highlight as being out of order at least, as it undoubtedly is) but, by also adding "some rat faced little buffoon" you are suggesting (whether you mean to or not) that you wouldn't really have an issue with such behavior if the blokes were good looking and tall. Otherwise, why bother referencing the appearance of men you don't want groping you? Seems odd.
nelly17 wrote: » Jesus I'm quite shocked by some of the stuff on this thread - Drink has a lot to answer for though
LexieOnRale wrote: » Any guy I'd be into wouldn't feel the need to sexually assault a woman to get her attention. If a man can't start a civilised conversation to break the ice, NEXT
LexieOnRale wrote: » I do not need the validation of some rat faced little buffoon showing me his appreciation by groping me, slapping my arse or trying to shove his tongue in my mouth.
Strumms wrote: » It's a bit much, would you be made a sex offender and be on a register if you got done for it ?
StewartGriffin wrote: » Interesting point by Nacho above. Maybe less people complain when they find the person leering at them/pinching their ass, attractive.
smash wrote: » It's valid. If someone flashed you in public and you found them unattractive then you'd be disgusted or might feel violated. But if a hotte did it you'd probably be chuffed and want to see more.
Samaris wrote: » I wouldn't, I'd be annoyed no matter who it was.
rainbow kirby wrote: » Maybe they should think of the possible consequences BEFORE they put their hands on someone... :rolleyes: