Mod Post: A reminder to folks that trying to bait supporters by posting alternate names for a football club may lead to a yellow card. Folk are welcome to post in any superthread they wish to, but nobody is free to use superthreads or this forum in general as somewhere to try and bait/flame/troll other posters.
Eirebear wrote: » I read somewhere recently that they may have a link to the possibility of alzheimers being transmitted from person to person. Anyone who's aware of 'Big' Phil and his affect on a sizeable element of the celtic support would already understand this idea of brain destroying disease and erratic behaviour as being infectious.
TheCitizen wrote: » This latest story re the Allan transfer has surfaced because King has felt it necessary to elaborate on what happened. Nothing to do with Phil or anyone who supports Celtic. Naturally Hibs are saying King is talking shte. When King starts spinning are ye really going to buy it given his reputation in such matters. A glib and shameless liar as the judge described him.
Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: » Do you know I reckon 99.9 know exactly what a judge called him. Got to love how Celtic fans selectively decide what judge one to keep on quoting
weldoninhio wrote: » Was there oil found under Ibrox?? (Apart from the snake oil from the owners) Apparently King has come to the conclusion that there is enough money to see out the season without any more investment!! Don't you need 12 months operating funds in the bank before you got to the markets??
TheCitizen wrote: » Whit?
Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: » Simply put for you We know what the judge said We do not need to be told every time King is mentioned That ok
TheCitizen wrote: » Ah yes. Nothing to see here. sweep, sweep. That OK. I was responding to eirebear who started rambling about alzheimers, "Big" Phil and Celtic supporters. It was King that brought up the Allan transfer. For what? The transfer happened a month ago.
Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: » Sweep sweep whit you babbling about I made a point about Rangets fans knowing what a judge said and how it's strange the judge remains a bastion of truth while it suits them to ignore other rulings but hey hi whatever floats your boat mate
Jelle1880 wrote: » No idea where you got that from (although I can think of some sources ), he said that if necessary there will be further investment in the playing squad. Regarding finances of the club he mentioned during his press conference that the club is better off than expected and ahead of planning. Which means, and those are his words, that there may be less necessary investment than previously predicted.
Jelle1880 wrote: » The fantastic performances on the pitch must really annoy some people on here. Suck it up guys, I'm sure you've got plenty of riveting stuff to talk about in the Celtic thread :cool: Unless you're of course interested in joining the Warburton Express, in which case you're more than welcome :pac: Although Intifada will have to stay outside, sorry.
weldoninhio wrote: » I watched the Hearts game, you are far from fantastic.
weldoninhio wrote: » " Funds would no longer be required now because season ticket sales are beyond what we were budgeting on." Dave Kings answer to the very first question he was asked. What is the clubs cash position? He did say more money might be needed if Warburton wanted to buy players, but other than that he's claiming you are funded for the year, a laughable claim.
TheCitizen wrote: » Any thoughts on why King is talking about resurrecting oldco? Wasn't the line - which seemed to be bought by rangers fans - that it was just a company and the football club is not a new rangers? If they resurrect the oldco, wouldn't they have to pay oldco creditors the debts that were welched on? That would cost a lot of money wouldn't it. Or is King just lying?
Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: » He makes it clear one of the main reasons is to pay off the creditors the full amount if possible. And your last bit makes it the reason none of can be bothered in here because this is your stock saying well that and what s judge said
Jelle1880 wrote: » You watched a game last season ? How nice. Well, apart from the fact that that was not the first question he was asked, how can you know if it's a laughable claim ? Somewhere between 35.000 and 40.000 season tickets, several full houses with no sign of that changing any time soon, people with plenty of money behind the club,... I know you lot often claim to be in the know about the ins and outs of Rangers' finances, but you're making claims you can't back up.
weldoninhio wrote: » It's the first question that Keith Jackson has up in the DR Q&A. You had to get £8.5m in loans to see out last season. You make pennies from your retail operation. You still have the second highest wage bill in Scotland, you've a stadium that needs maintenance, you've a huge training complex that costs huge money to run. And you think £10m for season tickets is gonna pay for all of that?? Words fail me.
Jelle1880 wrote: » Just like Eirebear's updates on Waghorn's goals I'm sure we can come back to this come the end of the season to see who was right.
Intifada wrote: » Ah yes, if this thread is nothing it's a goldmine for vindication and told-ye-so's. Pity it's the sort that offends ye :pac:
Jelle1880 wrote: »
A Dub in Glasgo wrote: » "Hey Ref, where is our penalty?"
Intifada wrote: » Based on a true story
