A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » Is nobody an existentialist these days?
AngryHippie wrote: »
Cold War Kid wrote: » Of course there's a line without physical intimacy being a requirement. Not judging - sh-t happens, but it's not as rubbish as people are saying (it's rubbish all right if it's in reference to just friendship, even close friendship).
Candie wrote: » If you have a partner but fall in love with someone else and become intimate friends, share confidences, become very close and have an intense attraction, even if not acted upon. Intimacy without the athletics I suppose. It would hurt pretty bad if I had a partner who was emotionally interlocked with someone else, even if the rest of them wasn't interlocking.
strobe wrote: » So it's basically if you fall in love with someone else you would say Candie?
TheBeardedLady wrote: » How do people discover the extent of these emotional affairs? How would you discover something like that?
Deleted User wrote: » The same way real affairs are discovered. Look through phone.
TheBeardedLady wrote: » How could you distinguish and emotional affair from a good friendship via messages on a phone? What are the tell tale signs? I ask out of genuine curiosity and white wine in the system.
Deleted User wrote: » Are they distinguishable? An emotional affair kinda = a man being very good friends with a woman other than his wife, and confiding in her? Many women might consider this "emotional infidelity". Many men might shrug their shoulders and say there are either affairs, which involve sexual intimacy, or there are not affairs, and not this mumbo jumbo of emotional affairs.