irishbucsfan wrote: » Noone is criticising his overall kicking statistics though. The problem is the kicks that he misses often come during big games and they are often from very kickable positions. I don't know why people are so hesitant to acknowledge that this is the case, it's a common occurrence at this stage. It's the only downside I can think of when I think of Sexton's game. He's giong to start for us regardless, and he's going to kick for us regardless. It's just something he's going to have to work out.
Tox56 wrote: » But is that really the case? He missed a pretty straightforward penalty against England halfway through the first half and missed another gettable one against Wales for his first kick. He seems to miss at least one or two every game, which is inevitable because he obviously isn't a 100% kicker. The logic seems to be where people are working backwards from this was a big kick, that was why he missed it. Is it not more accurate to say he very often misses kicks in every game, and they are often from kickable positions
Deleted User wrote: » Need more Henshaws
rrpc wrote: » Seriously, this is becoming a joke. Sexton missed four kicks this 6N. His percentage was 84%, he was 100% against France where every kick mattered. In contrast, George Ford who everyone seems to think was better at place kicking had 76%. He was struggling with a hamstring injury through the last two games where his percentage dropped from 80% against Wales to 77% against Scotland.
ScissorPaperRock wrote: » How's Paddy Jackson's return from injury coming along? I really hope he can build some form and come into contention for the World Cup. If he can build some consistency and confidence over the coming months he would probably be the closest thing to a like-for-like replacement for Sexton.
padser wrote: » The only big concern for me coming out of yesterday was Sextons place kicking. By chance, yesterday morning I ended up re watching a lot of the French game from last year, and I'd completely forgotten that Sextons kicking almost cost us that game. There is no getting away from the fact, in the highest pressure situations, Johnny is prone to repeated missing of what should be 90%+ kicks for him. The silver lining is that it doesn't negatively impact the rest of his game, but the fact remains, we will have some seriously high pressure kicks (hopefully) in the World Cup.
irishbucsfan wrote: » Henshaw may not be THE player of the tournament but he is my player of the tournament. He was our best back, he was one of the best backs in the competition. It's very easy to forget already that he's 21 years old. He is a very special player. The media should be going bonkers about this guy (maybe if he was scoring tries they would be).
padser wrote: » Yeah it's a fair point, I'd love to see someone do a analysis of it. Maybey perception is wrong and I just remember the critical ones he misses more than others (which would make sense). Even back in his Leinster days though, I always felt he was a little suspect on the big kicks, my heart was constantly in my mouth..,
.ak wrote: » I'd imagine we'll lose most of our warm up games as we'll be experimenting... OR, Schmidt might be looking at momentum, not experiment much, and we'll aim to win them all.
[Deleted User] wrote: » We're going to need to have one big performance before the WC just to blow the cobwebs off so we will see our "first choice" squad at least once. To be honest, I'll be watching through my fingers in case we have another David Wallace incident. But we need the games and it has to be done.
irishbucsfan wrote: » But it seems that the regular misses in front of the posts happen on big occasions more so than the easier ones. Like last weekend, like France last year, like New Zealand etc. Even if he misses easy kicks every week it's still a major flaw, he is more than capable of making those kicks so clearly something is going wrong on the occasions where he does miss them. It could be related to the intensity he brings in other aspects of the game, I have absolutely no idea and I don't really want to guess.
.ak wrote: » I'd imagine we'll lose most of our warm up games as we'll be experimenting...
marco_polo wrote: » Very pleased that Payne got his try as well, I really think he has had a much better tournament than he has got credit for. Edit: On another note I think it is pretty clear that Earls in next in line after Luke in Joels plans (perhaps only a fit Trimble would have any effect on this), there is no reason to think he won't be give a chance to stake his claim in the warm ups. Sometimes you'd swear it was a bad thing to be blessed with plenty of talented options in the back division going into the RWC.
rrpc wrote: » I'd need to see a map of his missed kicks before I could draw any conclusions. but having spoken to kickers about what kicks they have most trouble with, for right footers it's almost always two positions: In front of the posts from about 35-40m out and on the fifteen on the right hand side. I didn't get to talk to any left footers, but generally they are better kickers than right footers for some reason.
molloyjh wrote: » When you do look at it though what are the kicks that people say are the pressure ones that he missed? The NZ game is often referenced, but wasn't he injured and about to come off as a result anyway? It just so happened that the next break in play was a penalty and so he had to stay on for that. The France game is referenced as well when he missed a few in the first half. Yet people ignore the fact he slotted at least 2 in the second half. Were they not pressure kicks as well? He slotted more kicks than he missed in that game and surely they were all pressure kicks. Then against Scotland he missed 2 that would have put us ahead of Wales sure, but he also got the one that ultimately put us ahead of Wales after missing 2 on the trot. How was that kick not a pressure kick? In all of those games Sexton converted more than he missed, yet the ones he missed are labelled as pressure kicks and the ones he didn't conveniently ignored. What about the England game in Twickenham last year? Do people think there were no "pressure kicks" in that game where he converted 100% of his kicks? What actually is a "pressure kick" really? Sure he isn't a Leigh Halfpenney (guys like him aren't exactly the norm) and I'm sure he himself would want to improve his kicking percentages, but he's still a very good place kicker and given everything else he brings those few misses here and there are a reasonable trade off. But having some Irish "supporters" calling the guy a choker the day after we won a back to back 6 Nations title is just pathetic. He can continue to miss the odd one here and there as far as I'm concerned as long as the other elements of his game remain at the level they are at.
shuffol wrote: » He does have a tendency to miss straightforward kicks in crucial games for Ireland. The first miss against Scotland was one he'd bang over in his sleep, the second was a bit more difficult but he struck it horribly, ditto a couple of penalties against France last year. The NZ wasn't a sitter but the timing of his entire routine seemed to go to astray, he stood over the ball for an age. He's still a super goalkicker but in a pressure cooker game I'd honestly be nervous with him even for straightforward kicks. One thing though is that he seems to be able to put some bad misses behind him and recover. He's never really had any issues for Leinster though as far as I recall. I think his demeanour was a bit different when he was playing for Leinster though, like it was his team and he was the main man.
molloyjh wrote: » The point that I was making is that he isn't a top class goal kicker.
molloyjh wrote: » The point that I was making is that he isn't a top class goal kicker. There are very few of those actually around at the moment. He misses kicks from time to time. Some of those are in high pressure situations and some of them are not. It is a weakness in his game compared to the likes of Halfpenney, but it's not enough to be getting too worked up over given everything else he brings.