S12b wrote: » Sexton cleared to play next week!!http://www.the42.ie/johnny-sexton-concussion-france-1924317-Feb2015/
phog wrote: » That's great news, I have to say I was very concerned about him as he seemed to be out longer than the "normal" concussion RTPP period. Now all we have to hope for is he doesn't suffer another one.
thomond2006 wrote: » This stand down period is exclusively an LNR/FFR thing. I'm not sure when it came into force but maybe it was a result of the Florian Fritz debacle last season. So I wouldn't have been concerned that the period was longer/different to what we have seen before. What nobody has mentioned/talked about is what happens if Sexton gets (*touchwood*) another concussion soon? Will there be another mandatory stand down period?
bilston wrote: » If it happens during the 6Ns would the LNR/FFR be able to impose a similar sanction. Actually how come their current sanction applies to the 6Ns? Obviously Sexton's health comes first but what has the LNR/FFR ruling got to do with Ireland? Edit - Also is there an actual medical reason for Sexton's rest period to be as long as it is? I'm just wondering if there is a good medical reason for this particular case for Sexton to be missing tomorrow?
total former wrote: » I presume not; look at Juan Figallo, banned from playing in France, just moved to Saracens. But given the current concern over concussions, no way were the IRFU going to ignore this and play him anyway, they'd have been slaughtered for it.
Clearlier wrote: » I would also think that the IRFU would be putting themselves in a dodgy legal position should Sexton have further concussion issues. Going against the views of a neurologist wouldn't have been seen in a positive light. For all the talk of the attritional and demanding nature of the Top 14 in this instance at least he has been very well treated.
S12b wrote: » Sexton cleared to play next week!! How long will it take him to be match / fit / ready? I can't see him playing the full game against France - he'd be knackered after 60 minutes?
andymx11 wrote: » Schmidt saying he is hopefully O'Brien will be fit for France. Must still be in his plans so.
vienne86 wrote: » I dunno. He said not starting him was precautionary. I'm not sure he'd be flung straight in against France.
andymx11 wrote: » That's just the impression I got but as ROG pointed out there are different rules for O'Brien.
Clareman wrote: » Just saw a bit of RoG at the end, he was trying to explain to the other the return to play rehab players go through and was trying to explain the way SoB will come back better cause he'll be doing 80m runs, down to 60m runs, to 40 and 20s, then tried to explain how every part of his shoulder would have been worked on and that pro players treat rehab differently to old school players, you could see him frustrated by the rest of them not getting it and just talking rubbish.
Quint2010 wrote: » There is no way SOB will be fit for next week. Massive ice pack strapped to his hamstring? Be lucky if he is fit to face England. Poor decision rushing him back.