Bootros Bootros wrote: » Yeah. Our brains are neuro-plastic. Just like an athlete uses his muscles.
conorh91 wrote: » I don't know whether intelligence has a biological component, but it seems credible. If genetic material can be translated into proteins that code for height, skin, eye colour and bone density I don't see why they shouldn't necessarily code for proteins in the brain that determine one's analytical and reasoning skills, or ability to process and retain information. It's not 'bollox' just because it isn't popular.
conorh91 wrote: » It's not 'bollox' just because it isn't popular.
"Lynn performed an exhaustive literature search for all Jewish IQ studies in America, and presented the 32 examples he found, ranging in date from 1920 to the present day. He then noted the intriguing fact that Jewish IQs had substantially risen relative to white gentile scores during the course of the 20th century. Jewish IQ had averaged 101.5 in the first 14 studies from 1920-1937, then 107 in the nine studies from 1944-1960, and finally 111 in the last nine studies from 1970-2008. All these results had been separately normed against a fixed IQ of 100 for the average white population.A relative rise of 10 IQ points over just eighty-odd years in America seems unlikely to have any biological or genetic explanation, so it must be cultural or socio-economic in origin, hence an example of what I call the “Super-Flynn Effect.” Presumably, the underlying factors are somewhat similar to those which produced Ireland’s rise of 13 IQ points in the three decades after 1972, or the 15-20 point relative rise in the very low 1920s IQs of Greek, Italian, and Slav immigrants to America, or the recent rise in Mexican-American IQs."
Letree wrote: » I would guess countries that place a high value and spend a lot of time on mathematics based subjects would do quite well. Our kids waste a massive amount of time on a dead language and religion.
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » Did you intend to make a point?
Mr. Incognito wrote: » This IQ seems to equate to richer countries being top which frankly is just stupid. iQ tests themselves dont measure intelligence. They about as useful a guide to intelligence as hair colour.
764dak wrote: » Actually, language has a higher correlation with intelligence than mathematics.
Diego Simeone wrote: » How are you quantifying intelligence here?
steddyeddy wrote: » If you're the type of idiot who puts sway in IQ tests as reliable you shouldn't need to take them to get a good indication of your intelligence.
NotCominBack wrote: » Then how else do we separate ourselves from the dumb?
Tin Foil Hat wrote: » It quite obviously does. Otherwise, how could it possibly have evolved?
steddyeddy wrote: » Achievements, inventions and discoveries rather than sit around all day telling people you're in Mensa. The old fashioned way.
NotCominBack wrote: » You mean luck? You do know Christopher Columbus placed a boy at the head of his ship and said, "if you see the edge of this fecker then Holla"
steddyeddy wrote: » Was Newton lucky too?