georgiecasey wrote: » that's just plain incorrect as of now. I'd say it's nearly gone in the other direction, more Android apps. There was definitely more for iOS back in 2010. I'll say one thing, the standard of design is way better on iOS apps anyway.
NoMore MrNiceGuy wrote: » Nobody is under pressure. There are in fact far more older iphones out there than androids which explains their popularity. The 4S is still being used by many.
TheOtherBloke wrote: » Yes but I know a handful of people... only having the 5s for less than a few months selling them and buying the latest. They got rid of their perfectly working phones.. to spend more to get a new one. Simply to keep up with the latest
banquo wrote: » I literally couldn't agree more. The whole discourse is a shambles. A) But Samsung knew that people wanted a bigger screen! Truth: Samsung makes devices with screens in almost every single size, from tiny phones to 70" televisions. One of them was bound to stick. It's all down to advertising with Apple Nope, Samsung spent more than twice as much than Apple on advertising for the last two years running C) Samsung didn't really copy AppleOh yes. Oh yes they did. D) But Android has a higher market share! The only market share worth comparing is in the the €500+ range, as people buying cheaper phones didn't make their choice based on brand or OS, they based it on affordability. E) These phones are too expensive. Nope, most OEMs make a small loss or almost no money. Only Apple and HTC make any real dough, and Samsung saw their smartphone profits decline by 73% this year. Madness. There are plenty of actual differences that are largely ignored. For example, Apple's losing some of their "It just works" polish – iOS8 has like 21 screens to get through when you first get your phone. Some of the cloud services have basic fundamental flaws. But the market share / copying arguments are just painful to read.
banquo wrote: » Ha! Bring it! :pac:
Bam Bam Mickey wrote: » I disagree totally about pressure, you will find those that have the latest iPhone every year also get a new car every chance they can or always want the latest of everything in their lives. So the pressure is self created by their own lifestyle. If your friend has an iPhone 6 plus 128gb, and you want one just because it makes you feel bad that your phone is older then you have lots of social problems
TheOtherBloke wrote: » I am going to quote what my friend said... 'I look rich because ive got an iphone 6, you think people in the pub will notice it?' Abit of social perssure there wont you agree?
Bam Bam Mickey wrote: » And you blame Apple for that? 😂 Great logic! What you are suggesting is that you dislike your friends lifestyle or are jealous!
paltry few apps for droids compared to the amount available for the iPhone
I jailbroke my iPhone which makes it alright. Without that, the restrictions would be infuriating
TheOtherBloke wrote: » Not jealousy at all. I totally agree with the saying 'if you really want something, go get it'.. but spending 600+ euro on a mobile phone is beyond me.. especially if you already have a perfectly good working phone
Bam Bam Mickey wrote: » I would say your friend is a superficial "judge a book by its cover" type.
TheOtherBloke wrote: » He also purchased those expensive beats headphones and wears them around his neck at all times.. he admitted he did so to make him look like hes got money. Im not slagging him off. Hes a perfectly decent fella.. but I think hes under pressure to.. as he said ' look rich and up to date'
Bam Bam Mickey wrote: » I can see it is beyond you, but that doesn't mean anyone who can afford to do it, is like your mates, ie.trying to impress other people with being fashionable! Sometimes it's about the experience, who cares what other people think!
TheOtherBloke wrote: » Very good point. Yes im sure if we all could easily afford it most of us would blow all our money on all these up to date luxuries...I just could never see myself spending a massive amount of money on something such as a mobile phone. But youre right.. shouldnt care what people think.
Bam Bam Mickey wrote: » Any audiophile will laugh when they see beats headphones Boomy bass does not equal HQ. I bought a set of Sennheiser HD650 headphones, cost over 400 but well worth every penny when driven properly. I totally agree with Beats being overpriced fashionable items, as they all only do one thing, reproduce sound, unlike smartphones
banquo wrote: » Had a pair of their 290s years ago. Everything else just crap compared to Sennheiser. A worthy investment.
Bam Bam Mickey wrote: » I understand that, but as you can see your valid questions sometimes get spoiled by fanboys and their users, Apple would be still hated if they made a 200 euro iphone with the build quality to match
Bam Bam Mickey wrote: » The name is really prestige when it comes to audio, I'm sure those with 5mil MP3 files on their media device would call them overpriced too I'm lossless and amped all the way so can appreciate the premium price to match the build quality.
TheOtherBloke wrote: » The last thing I wanted was fanboys coming in and start comparing. Id say thats even worse than spending all that money.. but so many different answers and I thank the lot of yas for your opinions
need your email, phone number and so on
Digital Solitude wrote: » How do you play flac on an iPhone out of curiosity? Currently wearing a pair of Sennheisers too! Got to support local industry