krudler wrote: » Indeed, I doubt one person on here who said they'd do that would do it in reality.
[Deleted User] wrote: » It's up there with putting the ring in a glass of champagne.
Czarcasm wrote: » they are my parents, in law, and so in effect for me at least, they are in authority over me.
ash23 wrote: » I'm not sure I'd dump him but honestly it would taint the proposal for me and annoy me beyond belief to the point where I would probably say no to the proposal. Himself would know exactly how I feel about my dad and if he asked his permission to ask me to marry him, well it would just totally undermine all the talks we've had about that very sore subject. So I do think it would cause problems in the relationship. Oh and my father wouldn't be walking me down the aisle. My mother would. And I wouldn't change my name as my daughter has my name unless she also wanted to change hers and then I'd consider it. No to diamonds too unless they're ethical. But I'm far from a traditionalist.
LexieOnRale wrote: » Traditional weddings always win out. My dads not alive anymore, so the original post doesn't matter. I don't think my oh would have asked my dads permission anyway. Would it be a big deal? No. I always said when I got married I didn't want an engagement ring, or a giant wedding. Ideally, it's an expensive pair of shoes, just me and him and two witnesses and then a really long honeymoon. No big church wedding because honestly I'd be so terrified of stage fright walking down an aisle, in front of hundred plus people. The big giant wedding full of people we barely know. Thousands on a dress ill never wear again. It seems such a waste. Neither of my parents are around to interfere in my 'perfect day', but the OHs mom is outrageous for it. Because its her oldest sons wedding, it's almost like its her day too and it's kind of like her way or no way. She didn't like my cheap wedding dress because it wasn't wedding dressy enough. She was horrified we weren't getting married in a church. Completely outraged there was no reception. What would she tell people?! And then when were planning the invitations its like people I have never even heard of are important enough to not be excluded. There's definitely the pressure there for the traditional wedding. So, were doing everything traditional now. I have an engagement ring even though I don't wear jewellery. My brother will be walking me down the aisle I never planned on walking. Well be getting married in a church. I'll be wearing a proper wedding dress. And there'll be about 150 sitting down at the reception. Yay for conformity!
krudler wrote: » Well if you've already made your feelings felt about it then that's totally different. Easy solution: bring it up in conversation at some point in the relationship, if she says she'd like the idea, go for it, if not, don't ask the dad first just tell the parents together. Simple, problem solved, everyone happy.
Philo Beddoe wrote: » You don't think the history of women is one of being treated as second-class citizens under threat of violence?
jill_valentine wrote: » It wouldn't be acceptable even without the threat of violence. You could reassure black people that don't worry, you're not really going to beat them up, this is just a tradition they have, to respect the white people on the bus, but I don't think that would go over terribly well either. This tradition is a deferential nod to a time when this gesture would not have been symbolic. Why is that something we'd want to honour? You're entering into a lifelong 50:50 partnership with this woman, and the foot you want to start on is asking her daddy if you can have her?
recylingbin wrote: » Depends on whether she has a dowry or not. No dowry, no permission sought.
Look good. What parent wants their beloved daughter marrying a total sleaze? Wash yourself that morning, do your hair, put on some nice clothes. Even clean jeans and a button-up shirt look great. Also, brush your teeth.
Hold the Cheez Whiz wrote: » I'm sorry - this is just a ridiculous comparison, and I can't even discuss it rationally because I think it is so stupid. Yes women were treated as second-class citizens until very recently, particularly in Ireland. But as with most wedding traditions, the original intent has lost its meaning over time, and the only relevance it has today is whether or not it is important or offensive to the bride, groom, and father-in-law - and that is a discussion that is between them. Making sweeping statements about patriarchy in relation to this silly but relatively innocuous practice is hyperbole at its worst.
Pawwed Rig wrote: » Very disrespectful to the girl imho. She is not the property of her father and shouldn't be treated as such. She will make her own decisions.
Tarzana wrote: » See, I would be LIVID if my father knew my BF was thinking of asking me before me.
psinno wrote: » Would you be more,the same or less livid if he talked to a friend about it before asking you?
jill_valentine wrote: » Why in the name of jaysus would you taint supposedly the happiest occasion of your life by doing something hurtful and belittling to your partner? How exactly is she supposed to approach this partnership of happy equals after watching you celebrate her father's historical role as custodian-owner?
jill_valentine wrote: » People in this thread are literally telling you that they would find it insulting. The people defending it by insisting it's harmless are effectively telling them they aren't insulted.
It's a dumbass practice harking back to an extremely crappy deal for women that we're all supposed to be long beyond. Why in the name of jaysus would you taint supposedly the happiest occasion of your life by doing something hurtful and belittling to your partner?
How exactly is she supposed to approach this partnership of happy equals after watching you celebrate her father's historical role as custodian-owner?
Just because you don't feel the harm in it doesn't mean it's harmless. Golliwogs were harmless tradition too.
Adalyn Scrawny Goalkeeper wrote: » You are of course completely ignoring the fact that a lot of women very much want this tradition carried out so how on earth can it be hurtful or belittling? I really can't get inside the heads of some people at all how they can come up with such nonsense about a harmless tradition that a lot of people like to do.
jill_valentine wrote: » People in this thread are literally telling you that they would find it insulting. The people defending it by insisting it's harmless are effectively telling them they aren't insulted. It's a dumbass practice harking back to an extremely crappy deal for women that we're all supposed to be long beyond. Why in the name of jaysus would you taint supposedly the happiest occasion of your life by doing something hurtful and belittling to your partner? How exactly is she supposed to approach this partnership of happy equals after watching you celebrate her father's historical role as custodian-owner? Just because you don't feel the harm in it doesn't mean it's harmless. Golliwogs were harmless tradition too.
Shenshen wrote: » Well, I've read all of this thread (and previous threads on the subject), and while I realise AH isn't exactly representative of general society, there are not very many women on here arguing in favour of asking the father first. In fact, the women on here seem to be the ones arguing against for the most part.
Shenshen wrote: » Well In real life, the only person I know who has asked the father is from Nigeria (as is his wife). The plural of anecdotes isn't data or fact, but I would question how prevalent it really is these days.
Adalyn Scrawny Goalkeeper wrote: » As you said though on many topics AH is a very poor representation of actual society and there are actually very few women arguing either way on this thread. In general the opinions expressed here are often the opposite if what I encounter in general and that's not just amount my group of friends but across work colleges, friends of friends etc etc.
Shenshen wrote: » Bluewolf, lazygal, dede12, tigger123, sunshine and flowers, Esterhase, nitrix, FactCheck, indigo twist, Tarzana, Dail Hard, ash24, Jill_valentine, Semele, alroley, and my good self. There might be more, but these are the posters who have made it clear that they are female. In fact, nearly all the female posters in this thread would find it offensive and disrespectful. Funnily enough, plenty of male posters keep telling us we're in the wrong to feel insulted. I've just read through much of it again, and I have to say the level of patronising is frankly astonishing. I don't know where you live and what your social circle is like, but anytime you post (in this thread as in others) I get the feeling there's a hole in the spacetime continuum and you're posting straight from 1952... at this point it's almost becoming surreal.