Soft Falling Rain wrote: » It irks me sometimes reading this thread tbh. Suso has a good showing as an impact sub in a league cup game, against non elite opposition, and all of a sudden the chap deserves a place on the bench at the expense of Markovic. Who is 20. Who we just signed. Who has barely got a look in. Who is coming here highly rated in Europe. I don't want to be harsh, but Suso has had plenty of opportunity already and is seemingly angling for a move to Milan on a free. While we've only just signed Markovic and is someone who very much needs time, nurturing and patience. So can some of you please relax on the knee jerk for once and look at the bigger picture; which is clearly the development of Markovic.
joe123 wrote: » On Mignolet, one of my biggest concerns is that he is glued to his line. Rarely you will see him come far off it and properly clear the ball out from danger.
I am pie wrote: » Rogers likes pace in front of his midfield, Suso isnt particularly quick. In Rogers set up, were would he play ideally? Not even sure. I can see him settling in to a slower transitioning Milan team. He's a very neat footballer with a good finish, but I dont think he carries the ball well enough or moves quickly enough over the ground for BR.
Soft Falling Rain wrote: » He played a role in Rodgers' 1st season and was then sent on loan to push on in his development. Going by Rodgers' business in the Summer, it seems Rodgers feels Suso didn't do that. And again, this is a play that seemingly wants out.
5starpool wrote: » Lots of the things you are defending Markovic over apply to Suso too. It's 18 months or so before last night that he last played competitively for us, he's only 20, he's highly rated, and more importantly contributed well on the pitch last night. I strongly disagree that he has had plenty of chances.
5live wrote: » Now, that stat is not to be sneezed at...
GavRedKing wrote: » I know who I'd have everyday of the week and twice on match days. :cool:
5starpool wrote: » I think my nose has run about 2000km in the last day or so.
Agent Coulson wrote: » Is that 2000km by road and sea or as the crow flies?
Boom_Bap wrote: » Mignolet in the past few games has made a few quality saves. This appears to be overlooked quite a bit. People also claim he is shakey on crosses. I've no stats, but I'd say on the majority of crosses, he cathes or gets a fist to it. One occassion last night, he made a fine save, but instead of pushing it wide, pushed it forward. Compare this to Cortoius, supposedly the greatest keeper ever, we've only conceeded one more goal in the league that Chelsea so far.
DVDM93 wrote: » Interesting statistic regarding Manquilo. There are 2,000km between where he was playing in Madrid to where he is now, Liverpool. Since he's started playing for Liverpool, Manquilo has covered ground of 2,000km on the pitch. In theory, that covers the price of his flight over for me. Amazing statistic imo. On and up from here for the young lad!
DVDM93 wrote: » Lads ye are missing one of the most important figures for calculating for this stat, think about it, it's obvious! We'll see who gets it first
Harry Palmr wrote: » Rumoured midfield for 2016 Jordan Rossiter Jordan Lussey Jordan Williams Jordan Henderson Jordon Ibe
Crash Bang Wall wrote: » Hes positioning and footwork is suspect. Third goal against Man City, first goal last night and the goal v west ham from the free kick. He was either in the wrong position, or didnt move his feet fast enough. He was rooted to his line last nite when the defensive line was around the penalty spot. He should have been further out for me to give him a chance of claiming the cross Most of the saves he has made you would expect a keeper to save, I cant think of any one outstanding top drawer save this season
tok9 wrote: » I feel like you are missing the important points on the post.
Blackhorse Slim wrote: » According to Marca, Sterling already has one foot in Madrid. As Manquillo ran past Sterling, he passed both Sterling's feet, therefore he ran to Madrid. Nope, can't make any sense of it.
DVDM93 wrote: » The game last night went to extra time, that's the only clue I'm giving.