steveone wrote: » Is anyone else completely stumped with this water thing? .
policarp wrote: » It's just another stealth tax.
Cookie_Monster wrote: » I'm pro water rates and always have been. But, having seen how this has progressed from the initial outline to what's currently in place I have to agree. It's hard to see how it's anything other than a jobs for the boys club and an excessive, politicised tax grab.
Hotfail.com wrote: » Apparently (I haven't seen any definitive proof, I'd appreciate some if anyone has any though) water rates have always existed here just that they were raised through general taxation instead of a specific "charge".
Cookie_Monster wrote: » no, there used to be rates paid by households that covered them until FF abolished them to buy an election. since then they've been part paid by tax but mostly by borrowing.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_supply_and_sanitation_in_the_Republic_of_Ireland#The_first_abolition_of_domestic_water_charges
IrishWater are promoting these forms as if they are applications for the free allowances – but in reality the form is really a contract to agree to be a customer of Irish Water and to set up a customer account with them.
On the forms it states “ It is an offence under the Water Services Act, 2007 (as amended) to knowingly provide false or misleading information in this form and a person who does so is liable to a fine on summary conviction. By completing and returning this form, I declare that to the best of my knowledge all of the information provided is true and accurate. If I have confirmed that I am connected to the public water main and/or the public sewer then I declare that I am a customer of Irish Water, otherwise I am declaring that I am not a customer of Irish Water . Where I have declared I am a customer of Irish Water, I am confirming I have the authority to open an account at the premises and that I am liable for water charges at the premises . I confirm that I will advise Irish Water if there is any material change to the information provided in this form ”
Cookie_Monster wrote: » no, there used to be rates paid by households that covered them until FF abolished them to buy an election. The vat rate was increased to cover the rates. The car tax was also cut and fuel duty increased. Two good short term election winners.
Phoebas wrote: » ^^ Sounds like freeman bollixology tbh.
Tail Docker wrote: » err, no, sounds like a Private company wants people to sign a contract. What if people don't want to?
Tail Docker wrote: » What if people don't want to?
Phoebas wrote: » Isn't there already a bunch of threads on this topic?
MYOB wrote: » What private company?
Banjo String wrote: » Oh look, more negative attention.Get the debate shut down lads, quick. What bit? All I did was copy and paste an extract from the actual dubiously formed contract information pack. Then asked what could happen homes not metered if they refuse to sign, and therefore are not customers of Irish Water? How will they be disconnected, or as that's not permitted, reduced? How come if you question a government policy, or Irish Water gave charge around here, you're either a 'Shinnerbot' or spouting 'freeman nonsense'
Tail Docker wrote: » So it's not a private company? Cool. No need to sign a contract so. Thanks for that.
Banjo String wrote: » Irish Water. They're a for profit organisation aren't they?
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » Why would you sign anyway? Sure you had 2 wells sunk and a €13,000 state of the art pumphouse built for this
MYOB wrote: » That's not the definition of a private company. Irish Water are not a private company.
Tail Docker wrote: » FYP. I posted in a thread on Peugeots there yesterday and that doesn't affect me either. rebel that I am.
kneemos wrote: » They will be when it's sold .