Rubberchikken wrote: » it's pathetic for the 'educated worker' to pick on those who, at this time, have no coice but to claim social welfare. a major part of paying tax is to support those who are unfortunate enough to not be currently employed. how anyone can begrudge help to a fellow human being is beyond me. no matter how long someone is unemployed, it really isn't anyone else's business and these pointless rants towards others only shows an ignorance that is to be pitied.
therealme wrote: » I recently advertised 3 jobs. 2 are full time and 1 part time. In a county with VERY high unemployment, guess how many cv's I received????? TWO! I am aware of two other businesses who were also recruiting, 1 got two applicants and the other got NONE!!! Both businesses I know are well established and all jobs are standard 9-5. Until social welfare is cut after a certain point, this will not change. The thousands in this country with a sense of self entitlement and who contribute nothing really disgusts me.
Holsten wrote: » Person needs money to eat. Was using money from dole to eat and feed family. Dole is stopped, no money. Will person starve and let family starve? Nope. Person now commits a crime to get money, perhaps robs Better Call Saul or his family. Great idea, no?!?
whirlpool wrote: » Jobs don't just appear out of nowhere just because you've been on the dole for a few years. Please explain how a person who has no job and is unable to get a job is meant to survive with no income, or else STFU. Thanks.
sup_dude wrote: » What was the job, how was it advertised and what qualifications did you need? It's all well and good saying you had a job going and only got two applicants but if it's some specialised job that requires a degree and work experience, and you only advertised it in the local paper, you're not going to have many actually qualifed to do you job. The problem with most of the jobs available is they say "requires X amount of years work is sector". I've seen this is jobs for behind tils and waitering jobs too.
GarIT wrote: » I think the way to deal with the problem of people living off welfare with no intention to work would be to issue everyone on welfare with a welfare bank account and debit card that can't be used to pay for luxuries e.g. Subscription tv, alcohol, cigarettes, restaurants, fast food, anything outside of this country, clothes not from Tesco, dunnes or pennys. We should be giving people on welfare what they need to stay alive, nothing more.
Turtwig wrote: » This thread isn't extreme enough. People on the dole three years should be hung, drawn and quartered! That'll make them get jobs.
Sweet Rose wrote: » I believe in the welfare system but only when needs be. I'm sure there is a time in most people's lives when they might need it, to get them through a rough patch but it shouldn't be a lifestyle choice.
osarusan wrote: » I don't disagree with this, but what's the alternative? Just cutting the dole, or phasing it out after a certain amount of time, isn't going to solve things. I mean, where's the bottom line? After let's say 3 years (as per a suggestion earlier) the dole is completely phased out, and a family now have no money coming in at all, but still have bills to pay (rent, water, electricity) as well as costs for food and clothes. In that situation, what do we think should happen? Because the situation will arise. Not for everybody currently unemployed, but for some.
Kopparberg Strawberry and Lime wrote: » Hate to break it to you lads but all i have is a leaving cert behind me but ive had about 14 jobs in the last 4 years (I'm only 22) All permanent if i wanted them including my current one. so theres jobs here in ireland to be had, and i dont even mean the mcdonalds / lidls either that are also there for taking.
Sweet Rose wrote: » Like I said, why aren't some people made to account for what they spend the dole money on. I'm not talking about families here. I'm talking about people who live at home with their parents for example. From what I see its €188 for all adults but why aren't your personal circumstances taken into account. I know one woman and her outgoings is something like this for a week: €20 petrol €40 dress for a night out €10 cigarettes €80 socialising and booze €20 hobbies and gym The rest is probably spent on food and chewing gum! She doesn't contribute anything to her parents. Why should I have to pay for her to have a good time.
chuckyarelaw wrote: » I wouldn't employ you to lick a lampost - 14 jobs, one every few months?
agent graves wrote: » i was reading that for people now applying for BTEA they will hold an interview.. this is definitely a good idea because people under 24 get 100 per week on the dole and a lot of them in my area just apply for a one year course to get onto BTEA to up there payment to 188. and then just half arse their way through the course to make sure they dont get chucked off it and be put back down too 100...
GarIT wrote: » I think the way to deal with the problem of people living off welfare with no intention to work would be to issue everyone on welfare with a welfare bank account and debit card that can't be used to pay for luxuries e.g. Subscription tv, alcohol, cigarettes, restaurants, fast food, anything outside of this country, clothes not from Tesco, dunnes or pennys.