Mr.Prodston wrote: » I think if Dzeko or anyone else for that matter broke the goals scored record in a single match in the Champions League or Internationals it might be kind of relevant. The record is 5 in the Champions league so 6+ more goals would pique interest for me anyway and indicate decent form :pac:
Lemlin wrote: » I couldn't care if he broke the goals scored record in a single match in a CL or international game tbh. Those stats are not relevant to this game. That's clutching at straws of the highest order on your part.
roryc wrote: » It wasn't a fantastic start but he was scoring either side in International and cup/CL games. Probably why he was rested in GW4. GW1: Assist GW2: Goal GW3: subbed off at half-time GW4: Unused sub Champions League: Goal GW5: Played 74mins Carling Cup: Goal GW6: Goal 4 goals and 1 assist in 6.5 games isn't a bad return. I can't remember how long I had him though, possibly dumped in Wildcard after GW2. I think he's worth the risk at that price. His returns over the last few seasons are ridiculous despite never playing 2,000 minutes in a season.
Lemlin wrote: » Dzeko got an assist in the first game (not great considering City won 4-0), then a goal in the second. In the third he was hauled off at half time with one point and he didn't feature in either the fourth or fifth games. Pellegrini left him on the bench. Not sure when he got back into the team.
dahat wrote: » He did indeed,I was in the Dzeko camp early last season also but it wasn't as rosy as I expected from what I can remember. Alot will depend on Aguero as I think Jovetic will play Aguero type role rather than the No. 9 position. If Aguero is fit early I can see problems for Dzeko.
roryc wrote: » I think he's nailed on tbh. Had him at the start of last season too and that worked out alright, got a few goals and assists in his opening games. He finished last season strongly remember, with 5 goals in City's last 4 games.
dahat wrote: » Is Dzeko gametime a concern to you? The better Jovetic plays in pre season the more concerned I am, had him in originally but starting to doubt him now.
8-10 wrote: » Barnsley? Also, love the term yellow pack!
FHFC wrote: » For value the Sunderland Newcastle combo above is hard to beat. I'd probably go with Van Aarnholt (sp?) from Sunderland. Also keep and eye on Dummet(4m) at Newcastle as he could yet start at FB and if so may have some FKs. Stoke/Swansea is great for fixtures, but at 10m a bit pricey for defence scroogea like myself. A yellow pack option could also be Chester (Hull) and Barnsley (several options at 4.5 and possibly Duff at 4.0). It may work out to have Hull, Barnsley, Newcastle and Sunderland starters for 17m....but I'm a hopeless optimist!
Lemlin wrote: » Collocini at Newcastle and O'Shea at Sunderland for 9 million. Taylor at Swansea and Huth at Stoke (who rotate well) would be 9.5 million. Ward at Palace and Simpson at QPR (who rotate well) would be 9.5 also. Davies at Spurs and Enrique at Liverpool would be 10 million.
Rightlad91 wrote: » Will someone rate my team please?? Gk's : Green (qpr) and Schmiechal (leicester) : I plan on operating a rotation system. Defence: Shaw Caulker Ward Debuchy Bruce Mid: Mata Fabregas De Jong Barkley Ince Forward: Rooney Sturridge Ings Think i will swap shaw out for luis and possibly ideye or austin for ings.. other than that im pretty happy.. anybody wanna shed some light?
Dearg81 wrote: » We'll see. Id be surprised if he left Blackpool just to sit on the bench all season. I know he wont start the season in nets but I'd be surprised if he made 0 appearances this season.
T-b0n3 wrote: » I understand it's likely to be Pieters, Shawcross, Huth and Bardsley/Cameron.
roryc wrote: » Good post - what defenders are likely to play?
Iused2likebusts wrote: » I don't think Gilks has any chance of playing Heaton will be first choice.
wonski wrote: » Stoke has a very handy fixtures list. I will have 2 of their players to save some cash for future purchases. Fixtures: Aston Villa (H) Hull (A) City (A) Leicester (H) QPR (A) Newcastle (H) Sunderland (A) Swansea(H) Southampton (A) West Ham (H) Spurs (A) Burnley (H) They will go down after that - the worst schedule possible for them. I understand there are no easy games, especially for Stoke, but the start of the season couldn't be any easier.
Crash Bang Wall wrote: » Calculated gamble id say. Teams are likely to be after him, so he could go to a better side....id imagine LVG is after CBs so he could be a cheap Utd CB, used to playing 3 at the back
bicboy6666 wrote: » Vlaar is in 24.5% of teams.. Madness
FHFC wrote: » By the way. Any opinions on A or B above. We usually love A or B questions around here
T-b0n3 wrote: » My latest incarnation... Pretty happy with it at the moment. Terry, QPR/Palace and Stoke/Swans to start in def as my back 3, rotate very well as previously discussed. Will go with cheaper options if they are confirmed starters. Simpson/Jerome/Cameron etc. Siggy/Arnie/Austin rotate well for the first few weeks anyway, picking 2 out of the 3 each week. Alternatively could play 4 at the back if needed. Could swap Silva/Giroud for Dzeko/Ramsey. The former seems more nailed on to start though which is why I'm learning towards that. Having 2 QPR, 2 Swans and 2 Stoke a concern? Comments welcome.