nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Liverpool Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread 2014 mod warning linked in OP 26/07

dfx-

A new thread, it continues from the last one, here:

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2057203435

Thread Fantasy football code

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=91322653&postcount=7516

Who'll be first....

Mod warning 25/6: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=91001148&postcount=254

Mod Warning 25/6 #2: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=91001499&postcount=270

Mod Warning 21/7: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=91374012&postcount=8332

Mod Warning 26/7: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=91444846&postcount=9325

Find more posts tagged with

#rodriguez

ilori not llori/illori

katie cohen ftw

no premier leagues

we have 4 strikers

7th is the new 1st

oh no its bony!

liverhampton

Quick Links

Comments

jasonb

Francie Barrett wrote: »

Did the goalkeeper let that in on purpose? :pac:

I've seen a few keepers do that over the years, going for a shot / header and then seeming to give up on it and then end up on their knees. I've never known if they think (wrongly) that it's going wide, or realise they're not going to make it (without looking like they're really trying).

It reminded me a little of Dida's 'attempt' of a save for Gerrard's goal in Istanbul. Not saying it wasn't a good header, but I always felt like it looked like Dida gave up on it...

J.

Knex*

The Incredible Hulk wrote: »

Just skimming over the thread from last night, is Emre Can's surname really pronounced 'Chan'?

Yeah. And his middle name is, 'Jackie'.

Francie Barrett

The Incredible Hulk wrote: »

Just skimming over the thread from last night, is Emre Can's surname really pronounced 'Chan'?

Yep. His name is spelled Çan, the letter Ç is a different letter in the Turkish alphabet.

5live

The Incredible Hulk wrote: »

Just skimming over the thread from last night, is Emre Can's surname really pronounced 'Chan'?

Well, you chan if you want to...

DDC1990

http://www.rte.ie/sport/soccer/english-league/2014/0725/633059-vidal-appears-to-rule-out-man-utd-move/

Speaking on his return to Turin following a post-World Cup holiday, Gazzetta dello Sport reported Vidal as saying: "Can I say that I stay at Juve? I do not know. I will talk with [new Juve coach Massimiliano] Allegri then we'll see. I'm happy here.
"I have not yet spoken with Allegri and even with my friends, I do not go to Manchester."

Vidal to Liverpool is pretty certain now.

Agent Coulson

I highly doubt we will sign Vidal.

But I would love to see just to see all the back tracking in Manchester about not wanting him in the first place etc.

tibor

Luckycharms_74 wrote: »

The Count vs Roma

Can't wait to see him next season. He looks fresh and I can really seeing him stepping up to the plate and becoming the "Star" of this team
That pivot and turn @ 2:50 was class
[/YOUTUBE]

Looking very sharp already.

Here's hoping Brendan has him doing some shooting practice - his shot selection and technique can let him down at times. If he can add a few more goals to his game and impose a bigger threat around the box he looks ready to step up another level on CL stage.

Knex*

GotTheTshirt wrote: »

Olympiacos, Sunday night.

Highlights of the Roma game on by sports1 @ 4 today for anyone that missed it.

Who just beat Milan 3-0, while doing this:

x43r0

The Incredible Hulk wrote: »

Just skimming over the thread from last night, is Emre Can's surname really pronounced 'Chan'?

The commentator was pronouncing it 'Shan'

I am pie

Read that Atletico were going to gazump us on Origi.

I'd be happy enough to be honest. Don't think he'd add much beyond what we have.

Chip Whitley

Knex. wrote: »

Yeah. And his middle name is, 'Jackie'.

8-10

Agent Coulson wrote: »

I highly doubt we will sign Vidal.

But I would love to see just to see all the back tracking in Manchester about not wanting him in the first place etc.

I actually think he'll still go there

rob316

I am pie wrote: »

Read that Atletico were going to gazump us on Origi.

I'd be happy enough to be honest. Don't think he'd add much beyond what we have.

He's a player for the future so no I wouldn't be happy.
If Atletico are interested in any striker we should know by now by him fast or we will have to pay 30/40m in a few years.

ricero

I am pie wrote: »

Read that Atletico were going to gazump us on Origi.

I'd be happy enough to be honest. Don't think he'd add much beyond what we have.

Hes one for the future

Agent Coulson

I am pie wrote: »

Read that Atletico were going to gazump us on Origi.

I'd be happy enough to be honest. Don't think he'd add much beyond what we have.

With there record he will be worth £50/60m in a few years.

rob316

The Origi Atletico thing came from the daily mail so we can ignore that. Ben Smith, Bascombe and Pearce said he is in Boston having a medical.

Remy deal been held up by very complicated paperwork.

Cjs21

Origi is 19, well worth a punt for 10 million, nobody can deny that

zarquon

Agent Coulson wrote: »

I highly doubt we will sign Vidal.

But I would love to see just to see all the back tracking in Manchester about not wanting him in the first place etc.

You mean like what happened with Alexis Sanchez when he chose Arsenal over liverpool? :rolleyes:

Washington Irving

zarquon wrote: »

You mean like what happened with Alexis Sanchez? :rolleyes:

I don't think Utd were ever in for Sanchez though.

Ninja edit: What backtracking?

Agent Coulson

zarquon wrote: »

You mean like what happened with Alexis Sanchez? :rolleyes:

I'm not sure what you're point is with those :rolleyes: or post to be honest!

I didn't see one Liverpool fan backtrack on not wanting Sanchez at Liverpool.

We understood the reason he didn't join us wasn't down to footballing reasons it was down to wanting to live in London.

There is a difference but you choose not to see it! :rolleyes::rolleyes:

Edit; Washington Irving just backtracked shame on us all!

zarquon

Agent Coulson wrote: »

I'm not sure what you're point is with those :rolleyes: or post to be honest!

I didn't see one Liverpool fan backtrack on not wanting Sanchez at Liverpool.

We understood the reason he didn't join us wasn't down to footballing reasons it was down to wanting to live in London.

There is a difference but you choose not to see it! :rolleyes::rolleyes:

Edit; Washington Irving just backtracked shame on us all!

I'd be fairly certain it's a combination of both football reasons and location. Unless you have direct quotes from Sanchez to back up your theory which you present as "fact"

I don't have time to search the whole thread but i did read posts from people backtracking on Sanchez, here is one i found:

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=91138812&postcount=3831

Utopia Parkway

I can't remember a single person on here saying "well I didn't want Sanchez anyway" after he signed for Arsenal. Everyone would have gladly taken him. To suggest otherwise is just making nonsense up. There may be one but that is not a lot given how large the Liverpool fan base on here is.

Agent Coulson

zarquon wrote: »

I'd be fairly certain it's a combination of both football reasons and location. Unless you have direct quotes from Sanchez to back up your theory which you present as "fact"

I don't have time to search the whole thread but i did read posts from people backtracking on Sanchez, here is one i found:

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=91138812&postcount=3831

So you don't have time to search the whole thread yet you search the thread.

Now this is where you can use :rolleyes:.

If maybe you can find now where that poster said he would love Alexis Sanchez at Liverpool. Then you can use that post as a way to say he backtracked!

Knex*

Utopia Parkway wrote: »

I can't remember a single person on here saying "well I didn't want Sanchez anyway" after he signed for Arsenal. Everyone would have gladly taken him. To suggest otherwise is just making nonsense up. There may be one but that is not a lot given how large the Liverpool fan base on here is.

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=91221154&postcount=5421

jasonb

zarquon wrote: »

I'd be fairly certain it's a combination of both football reasons and location. Unless you have direct quotes from Sanchez to back up your theory which you present as "fact"

I don't have time to search the whole thread but i did read posts from people backtracking on Sanchez, here is one i found:

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=91138812&postcount=3831

I tend not to get involved in these conversations, but that's not backtracking. He said he's not the mad about Sanchez and wasn't too upset about him going to Arsenal. It would be backtracking if previous to that he said he'd loved Sanchez to sign for Liverpool. A quick glance through his posts show he never said that.

And Brendan Rodgers was quoted as saying that the Sanchez didn't want to live in Liverpool, he wanted London. It might not be a quote from Sanchez, but it's a quote from someone a lot more involved in these things than we are!

J.

Edit: Beaten to it by Agent Coulson!

zarquon

Utopia Parkway wrote: »

I can't remember a single person on here saying "well I didn't want Sanchez anyway" after he signed for Arsenal. Everyone would have gladly taken him. To suggest otherwise is just making nonsense up. There may be one but that is not a lot given how large the Liverpool fan base on here is.

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=91252391&postcount=6351

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=91250131&postcount=6314

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=91241084&postcount=6160

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=91221264&postcount=5424

Plenty of beauties here like "never liked sanchez" "prefer lallana anyway"

Anyway it's a moot point anyway. I don't think Van Gaal wants Vidal anyway. I'd be fairly confident that he wants to bring in strootman instead and vidal is just a smokescreen.

Mickeroo

zarquon wrote: »

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=91252391&postcount=6351

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=91250131&postcount=6314

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=91241084&postcount=6160

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=91221264&postcount=5424

Plenty of beauties here like "never liked sanchez" "prefer lallana anyway"

First guy is an Arsenal fan, last guy was joking.

Agent Coulson

zarquon wrote: »

I don't have time to search the whole thread

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=91138812&postcount=3831

zarquon wrote: »

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=91252391&postcount=6351

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=91250131&postcount=6314

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=91241084&postcount=6160

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=91221264&postcount=5424

Again this is where you can use :rolleyes:

zarquon

Mickeroo wrote: »

First guy is an Arsenal fan, last guy was joking.

Fair enough, only did a quick search so missing some context. Actually, the main backtracking i saw was on RAWK. That place was a hilarious parody of itself when Sanchez signed for Arsenal. At least the pool fans here are more down to earth

Soups123

zarquon wrote: »

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=91252391&postcount=6351

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=91250131&postcount=6314

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=91241084&postcount=6160

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=91221264&postcount=5424

Plenty of beauties here like "never liked sanchez" "prefer lallana anyway"

Anyway it's a moot point anyway. I don't think Van Gaal wants Vidal anyway. I'd be fairly confident that he wants to bring in strootman instead and vidal is just a smokescreen.

pretty much all of those were jokey