Knex. wrote: » Had a quick glance at the access requests and spotted a few people who posted in here during the WC, which is good. Might have a few more contributors soon. Then I remembered Grayditch's request once more, and I laughed. Its a good day.
DaveSuarez wrote: » Why would Madrid do that when they could just match the 80m bid and offer the extra 10m to Suarez to insure he picks them? We were never gonna get more than his buyout clause.
Calvin Leong wrote: » If siing Richards means we stp off Bertrand, I approve. Richards is a decent defender who's ltst his touch, which I'm sure Brendan can re-kindle. I think he can also play CB, which is decent too.
Oranage2 wrote: » Another thing Liverpool have a great chance at attracting quality young players that could make a name for themselves, with the appeal of cl football but Rodgers seems to be going for players in a lower bracket.
Agent Coulson wrote: » Is he better than Flanagan, Johnson the players he would have to compete with for the RB slot? So we are buying Richards then as third choice RB maybe second? The same can be said for Bertrand is he better than what we already have? Is he better than Enrique, and a right footed Flanagan who made role is last season? So we are buying Bertrand to be third choice LB?
Utopia Parkway wrote: » Surely that describes Markovic almost exactly? Possibly even Can.
Oranage2 wrote: » Is there an evidence that Rodgers can rekindle careers? One thing I have noticed is that Rodgers is very quick to drop and isolate players he believes isn't doing a job for him: sahin, assaidi,Carroll, aspaz, Moses, Enrique etc Another thing Liverpool have a great chance at attracting quality young players that could make a name for themselves, with the appeal of cl football but Rodgers seems to be going for players in a lower bracket.
tritium wrote: » Its only my opinion but yes, if he could sort out his injury problems he's better than any that we have. Hes also extremely experienced for his age which will be vital next season. I'd welcome him ahead of a number if others we've been linked with (Yay they let me into the soccer forum)
K-9 wrote: » Rodgers did well with Henderson and Flanagan and excellent with Sterling. Moses and Aspas just weren't good enough really. Sahin probably the strange one!
Turtyturd wrote: » And Aspaz.
Turtyturd wrote: » You would wonder about a lot of things 'The Rodgers' does....Victory Moses being one. Agree about Flanagan though, both him and Henderson were overrated last year.
Oranage2 wrote: » QUOTE=Calvin Leong;91316164]Sturridge is the main man that comes to mind. Henderson and Coutinho as well, to a certain extent. Henderson looked certain to be on his way out and Coutinho wasn't even a starter at Inter (I think) I think themain reason Henderson looked out was because Rodgers tried to sell him for 2 million, coutinho was a very promising young player but he suffered a lot with injury and never really got started at inter. Sturidge had a lot of promise too but wasn't good enough for money bags Chelsea or city. Granted he did get them all playing very well and in Daniels case exceptional so there is some merit to the argument.
slingerz wrote: » Victory Moses was brought in to add depth to a painfully thin squad without relying on youth players. Henderson is much further along the lines in terms of development as a player than Flanagan and has much greater scope for improving to an elite level IMO. Liverpool need a squad of 22-24 players for the coming season. The likes of Richards/Bertrand make it a stronger 'squad' than what exists there already
Turtyturd wrote: » But he loaned out a better player than Moses to bring Moses in.Despite all that stuff Henderson was still overrated last year. Additions to the squad should be brought in to be starting in their position, or with the view to being long term replacements for who we currently have in those positions, while being able to contribute now if required. They should also be better than Bertrand and Richards.
Turtyturd wrote: » But he loaned out a better player than Moses to bring Moses in.Despite all that stuff Henderson was still overrated last year.
Nuri Sahin wrote: » I don't think he was at all, tbh. Towards the end of the season after he picked up that red card against Man City, the midfield was not the same.
Turtyturd wrote: » But he loaned out a better player than Moses to bring Moses in. Despite all that stuff Henderson was still overrated last year. Additions to the squad should be brought in to be starting in their position, or with the view to being long term replacements for who we currently have in those positions, while being able to contribute now if required. They should also be better than Bertrand and Richards.
hangballlouie wrote: » Source?
Agent Coulson wrote: » That's fair enough but that's just one player of the five Liverpool players who can play fullback. on the CB we already have 4 Internationls there and maybe 5 if Lovren joins.Is he better than Flanagan, Johnson the players he would have to compete with for the RB slot? So we are buying Richards then as third choice RB maybe second? The same can be said for Bertrand is he better than what we already have? Is he better than Enrique, and a right footed Flanagan who made role is last season? So we are buying Bertrand to be third choice LB?
slingerz wrote: » Who did he loan out that was better than Moses. If its Suso then he's become one of those players who is rated highly despite never playing. The snobbery factor here is ridic
Oranage2 wrote: » Well I can't confirm the exact details of the deal as I'm not his agent but he was offered to fulham as an exchange for Clint Dempsey, and Henderson even admitted that Fulham was an option.
